Fast-tracking the end of HIV in the Asia Pacific region: domestic funding of key population-led and civil society organisations.

Ending AIDS in Asia Pacific by 2030 requires countries to give higher priority to financing community-based and key population-led service delivery. Mechanisms must be developed for civil society organisations to deliver health and HIV/AIDS services for key populations, especially men who have sex with men, and transgender people, within national health policy frameworks. Current investments in the HIV response in the Asia Pacific region reflect inadequate HIV financing for key populations, particularly for civil society and key population-led organisations that are optimally positioned to advance HIV epidemic control. These organisations are typically supported by international agencies whose investments are starting to decline. Domestic investments in key population-led organisations are often hampered by punitive laws against their communities, pervasive stigma and discrimination by policy makers, an insufficient understanding of the most effective HIV epidemic control strategies, and financing systems that limit access to funding for these organisations from the national budget. Countries in the Asia Pacific region are evolving their community-based and key population policies and programmes. We need accessible, disaggregated financial data and in-depth case studies that showcase effective key population-led programmes, to enable countries to learn from each other.

Compulsory treatment of drug use in Southeast Asian countries.

BACKGROUND: Several Southeast Asian countries have implemented compulsory drug detention centres in which people who use or are suspected of using drugs, mainly amphetamine-type stimulants, are confined without their consent and in most cases without due process and clinical evaluation of their substance use disorder. Given these facilities' lack of access to evidence-based drug dependence treatment, and the human rights implications of peoples' arbitrary detention under the pretext of "treatment", international organizations have called for their closure. The aim of this study was to estimate recent numbers of compulsory drug treatment centres and of people in these centres in the region. METHODS: We conducted an analysis of cross-sectional governmental data collected from seven countries in the region with compulsory drug detention centres, namely Cambodia, China, Lao PDR, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand and Viet Nam. We computed descriptive data provided by government representatives for the period between 2012 and 2014. RESULTS: The total number of people in compulsory detention centres overall decreased by only 4% between 2012 and 2014. In 2014, over 450,000 people were detained in 948 facilities in the seven countries. While only two countries decreased the number of compulsory detention centres, most countries increased the number of people detained. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of international calls for the closure of compulsory detention centres, the number of facilities and detained people remained high in the seven countries included in the analysis. These officially reported figures are concerning regarding access to effective drug dependence treatment and given the potential for additional human rights abuses within compulsory detention centers. Further concerted policy and advocacy efforts should support transition of treatment for people with drug dependence towards human rights-based and evidence-based drug dependence treatment. Expansion of existing drug and HIV services in the community rather than compulsory treatment modalities will effectively address the region's drug and HIV burden.