The Lipoprotein Profile Evaluated by 1H-NMR Improves the Performance of Genetic Testing in Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: The familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) diagnosis is based on clinical and genetic criteria. A relevant proportion of FH patients fulfilling the criteria for definite FH have negative genetic testing. Increasing the identification of true genetic-based FH is a clinical challenge. Deepening the analysis of lipoprotein alterations could help increase the yield of genetic testing. We evaluated whether the number, size, and composition of lipoproteins assessed by 1H-NMR could increase the identification of FH patients with pathogenic gene variants. METHODS: We studied 294 clinically definite FH patients, 222 (75.5%) with positive genetic testing, as the discovery cohort. As an external validation cohort, we studied 88 children with FH, 72 (81%) with positive genetic testing. The advanced lipoprotein test based on 1H-NMR (Liposcale®) was performed at baseline after a lipid-lowering drug wash-out of at least 6 weeks. The association of variables with genetic variants was evaluated by random forest and logistic regression. Areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated. A predictive formula was developed and applied to the validation cohort. RESULTS: A formula derived from NMR lipoprotein analyses improved the identification of genetically positive FH patients beyond LDL-C levels (AUC=0.87). The parameters contributing the most to the identification formula were LDL particle number, HDL size and remnant cholesterol. The formula also increases the classification of FH children with a pathogenic genetic variation. CONCLUSIONS: NMR lipoprotein profile analysis identifies differences beyond standard lipid parameters that help identify FH with a positive pathogenic gene variant, increasing the yield of genetic testing in FH patients.

Association between Nordic and Mediterranean diets with lipoprotein phenotype assessed by 1HNMR in children with familial hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Both Nordic and Mediterranean diets are considered healthy despite notable regional differences. Although these dietary patterns may lower cardiovascular risk, it is unclear if they improve the lipoprotein phenotype in children with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). The aim is to determine the impact of Nordic and Mediterranean diets on the advanced lipoprotein profile in children with heterozygous FH (HeFH). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study performed in children with FH recruited from the Lipid Clinics at Sant Joan University Hospital in Reus (Spain) and Oslo University Hospital (Norway). Two-hundred fifty-six children (mean age 10 y/o; 48% girls): 85 Spanish and 29 Norwegian FH children, and 142 non-FH healthy controls (119 from Spain and 23 from Norway) were included in the study. A pathogenic FH-associated genetic variant was present in 81% of Spanish children with FH and all Norwegian children with FH. An 1H NMR based advanced lipoprotein test (Nightingale®) providing information on the particle number, size and lipid composition of 14 lipoprotein subclasses was performed and correlated to the dietary components. RESULTS: Levels of LDL-C, HDL-C and triglycerides were not significantly different between the Nordic and Mediterranean FH groups. Spanish children with FH had more LDL particles, mainly of the large and medium LDL subclasses, than Norwegian FH children. Spanish FH children also had more HDL particles, mainly medium and small, than Norwegian FH children. The mean LDL size of Spanish FH children was larger, while the HDL size was smaller than that of the Norwegian FH children. The HDL particle number and size were the main determinants of differences between the two groups. In Norwegian children with FH, dietary total fat and MUFAs showed a significant correlation with all apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins and LDL size, whereas there was no correlation to SFA. A weaker association pattern was observed in the Spanish children. CONCLUSIONS: The lipoprotein profiles of Spanish and Norwegian children showed differences when studied by 1H NMR. These differences were in part associated with differences in dietary patterns.

Lipid lowering combination therapy: From prevention to atherosclerosis plaque treatment.

Statins have contributed to the prevention of numerous atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) events and cardiovascular deaths in the past three decades. The benefit of statins is mainly mediated by the lowering of LDLc. According to scientific evidence, the current international guidelines recommend very low LDLc goals in patients at high/very high cardiovascular risk because they are associated with fewer CV events and improvements in atherosclerotic plaques. However, these goals often cannot be obtained with statins alone. Recent RCTs have demonstrated that these CV benefits can also be obtained with nonstatin LDLc-lowering drugs such as PCSK9 inhibitors (alirocumab and evolocumab), ezetimibe and bempedoic acid, while evidence with inclisiran is upcoming. Icosapent ethyl, a lipid metabolism modifier, has also shown an effect on event reduction. Physicians should take advantage of the currently available lipid-lowering therapies, choosing the drug or combination of drugs that is most appropriate for each patient according to his or her CV risk and baseline LDLc concentration. Strategies implementing combination therapies from early stages or even from the outset may increase the number of patients attaining LDLc goals, thereby preventing new CV episodes and improving existing atherosclerotic lesions.

Glycoprotein Serum Concentrations Assessed By 1H-NMR are Increased in Patients With High Blood Pressure.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hypertension present a permanent state of low-grade inflammation, as the disease activates several pro-inflammatory cells and inflammatory pathways. Glycoproteins A, B, and F, determined by proton nuclear magnetic resonance, provide a highly sensitive method for determining a group of liver-derived pro-inflammatory proteins, and their role has not yet been explored in patients with hypertension. In this study, we evaluated the impact of plasma concentrations of these glycoproteins in patients with hypertension. METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved 340 patients attending our vascular and metabolism medicine unit. Of them, 129 were normotensive and 211 were hypertensive. Standard biochemistry and carotid ultrasound measures were performed. Serum concentrations of glycoproteins A, B, and F were determined by proton nuclear magnetic resonance. RESULTS: Hypertensive patients presented a higher prevalence of obesity, metabolic syndrome, and diabetes and higher glycoprotein A, B, and F concentrations. Glycoproteins A, B, and F were positively correlated with systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Multivariate logistic models showed that glycoproteins A, B, and F were associated with higher odds of being hypertensive. Machine learning methods corroborated the relationship between glycoproteins and high blood pressure. The higher prevalence of carotid plaques in patients with high blood pressure was partially mediated by glycoproteins A and F. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with hypertension present systemic, subclinical inflammation as assessed by liver-derived glycoprotein A, B, and F serum levels. These results support the effect of hypertension on the mechanisms of systemic inflammation. Hypertension-associated systemic inflammation plays a role in hypertension-associated vascular injury and probably in hypertension-induced damage to other organs.

First and second waves of coronavirus disease-19: A comparative study in hospitalized patients in Reus, Spain.

Many countries have seen a two-wave pattern in reported cases of coronavirus disease-19 during the 2020 pandemic, with a first wave during spring followed by the current second wave in late summer and autumn. Empirical data show that the characteristics of the effects of the virus do vary between the two periods. Differences in age range and severity of the disease have been reported, although the comparative characteristics of the two waves still remain largely unknown. Those characteristics are compared in this study using data from two equal periods of 3 and a half months. The first period, between 15th March and 30th June, corresponding to the entire first wave, and the second, between 1st July and 15th October, corresponding to part of the second wave, still present at the time of writing this article. Two hundred and four patients were hospitalized during the first period, and 264 during the second period. Patients in the second wave were younger and the duration of hospitalization and case fatality rate were lower than those in the first wave. In the second wave, there were more children, and pregnant and post-partum women. The most frequent signs and symptoms in both waves were fever, dyspnea, pneumonia, and cough, and the most relevant comorbidities were cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and chronic neurological diseases. Patients from the second wave more frequently presented renal and gastrointestinal symptoms, were more often treated with non-invasive mechanical ventilation and corticoids, and less often with invasive mechanical ventilation, conventional oxygen therapy and anticoagulants. Several differences in mortality risk factors were also observed. These results might help to understand the characteristics of the second wave and the behaviour and danger of SARS-CoV-2 in the Mediterranean area and in Western Europe. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.