Sideroflexin-1 promotes progression and sensitivity to lapatinib in triple-negative breast cancer by inhibiting TOLLIP-mediated autophagic degradation of CIP2A.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer and it lacks specific therapeutic targets and effective treatment protocols. By analyzing a proteomic TNBC dataset, we found significant upregulation of sideroflexin 1 (SFXN1) in tumor tissues. However, the precise function of SFXN1 in TNBC remains unclear. Immunoblotting was performed to determine SFXN1 expression levels. Label-free quantitative proteomics and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry were used to identify the downstream targets of SFXN1. Mechanistic studies of SFXN1 and cellular inhibitor of PP2A (CIP2A) were performed using immunoblotting, immunofluorescence staining, and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Functional experiments were used to investigate the role of SFXN1 in TNBC cells. SFXN1 was significantly overexpressed in TNBC tumor tissues and was associated with unfavorable outcomes in patients with TNBC. Functional experiments demonstrated that SFXN1 promoted TNBC growth and metastasis in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistic studies revealed that SFXN1 promoted TNBC progression by inhibiting the autophagy receptor TOLLIP (toll interacting protein)-mediated autophagic degradation of CIP2A. The pro-tumorigenic effect of SFXN1 overexpression was partially prevented by lapatinib-mediated inhibition of the CIP2A/PP2A/p-AKT pathway. These findings may provide a new targeted therapy for patients with TNBC.

The DRAP1/DR1 Repressor Complex Increases mTOR Activity to Promote Progression and Confer Everolimus Sensitivity in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer. Transcriptional dysregulation is a hallmark of cancer, and several transcriptional regulators have been demonstrated to contribute to cancer progression. Here, we identified upregulation of the transcriptional corepressor DRAP1 in TNBC, which was closely associated with poor recurrence-free survival in TNBC patients. DRAP1 promoted TNBC proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro and tumor growth and metastasis in vivo. Mechanistically, the DR1/DRAP1 heterodimer complex inhibited expression of the arginine sensor CASTOR1 and thereby increased activation of mTOR, which sensitized TNBC to treatment with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus. DRAP1 and DR1 also formed a positive feedback loop. DRAP1 enhanced the stability of DR1, recruiting the deubiquitinase USP7 to inhibit its proteasomal degradation; in turn, DR1 directly promoted DRAP1 transcription. Collectively, this study uncovered a DRAP1-DR1 bidirectional regulatory pathway that promotes TNBC progression, suggesting that targeting the DRAP1/DR1 complex might be a potential therapeutic strategy to treat TNBC.

SF3A2 promotes progression and cisplatin resistance in triple-negative breast cancer via alternative splicing of MKRN1.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the deadliest subtype of breast cancer owing to the lack of effective therapeutic targets. Splicing factor 3a subunit 2 (SF3A2), a poorly defined splicing factor, was notably elevated in TNBC tissues and promoted TNBC progression, as confirmed by cell proliferation, colony formation, transwell migration, and invasion assays. Mechanistic investigations revealed that E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase UBR5 promoted the ubiquitination-dependent degradation of SF3A2, which in turn regulated UBR5, thus forming a feedback loop to balance these two oncoproteins. Moreover, SF3A2 accelerated TNBC progression by, at least in part, specifically regulating the alternative splicing of makorin ring finger protein 1 (MKRN1) and promoting the expression of the dominant and oncogenic isoform, MKRN1-T1. Furthermore, SF3A2 participated in the regulation of both extrinsic and intrinsic apoptosis, leading to cisplatin resistance in TNBC cells. Collectively, these findings reveal a previously unknown role of SF3A2 in TNBC progression and cisplatin resistance, highlighting SF3A2 as a potential therapeutic target for patients with TNBC.

C9orf142 transcriptionally activates MTBP to drive progression and resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitor in triple-negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) presents the most challenging subtype of all breast cancers because of its aggressive clinical phenotypes and absence of viable therapy targets. In order to identify effective molecular targets for treating patients with TNBC, we conducted an integration analysis of our recently published TNBC dataset of quantitative proteomics and RNA-Sequencing, and found the abnormal upregulation of chromosome 9 open reading frame 142 (C9orf142) in TNBC. However, the functional roles of C9orf142 in TNBC are unclear. METHODS: In vitro and in vivo functional experiments were performed to assess potential roles of C9orf142 in TNBC. Immunoblotting, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), and immunofluorescent staining were used to investigate the expression levels of C9orf142 and its downstream molecules. The molecular mechanisms underlying C9orf142-regulated mouse double minute 2 (MDM2)-binding protein (MTBP) were determined by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and dual-luciferase reporter assays. RESULTS: In TNBC tissues and metastatic lymph nodes, we observed that C9orf142 exhibited abnormal up-regulation, and its elevated expression was indicative of unfavorable prognosis for TNBC patients. Both in vitro and in vivo functional experiments demonstrated that C9orf142 accelerated TNBC growth and metastasis. Further mechanism exploration revealed that C9orf142 transcriptionally activated MTBP, thereby regulating its downstream MDM2/p53/p21 signaling axis and the transition of cell cycle from G1 to S phase. Functional rescue experiment demonstrated that knockdown of MTBP attenuated C9orf142-mediated tumour growth and metastasis. Furthermore, depletion of C9orf142 remarkably increased the responsiveness of TNBC cells to CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these findings unveil a previously unrecognized effect of C9orf142 in TNBC progression and responsiveness to CDK4/6 inhibitor, and emphasize C9orf142 as a promising intervention target for TNBC treatment.

ETHE1 Accelerates Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Metastasis by Activating GCN2/eIF2α/ATF4 Signaling.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most fatal subtype of breast cancer; however, effective treatment strategies for TNBC are lacking. Therefore, it is important to explore the mechanism of TNBC metastasis and identify its therapeutic targets. Dysregulation of ETHE1 leads to ethylmalonic encephalopathy in humans; however, the role of ETHE1 in TNBC remains elusive. Stable cell lines with ETHE1 overexpression or knockdown were constructed to explore the biological functions of ETHE1 during TNBC progression in vitro and in vivo. Mass spectrometry was used to analyze the molecular mechanism through which ETHE1 functions in TNBC progression. ETHE1 had no impact on TNBC cell proliferation and xenograft tumor growth but promoted TNBC cell migration and invasion in vitro and lung metastasis in vivo. The effect of ETHE1 on TNBC cell migratory potential was independent of its enzymatic activity. Mechanistic investigations revealed that ETHE1 interacted with eIF2α and enhanced its phosphorylation by promoting the interaction between eIF2α and GCN2. Phosphorylated eIF2α in turn upregulated the expression of ATF4, a transcriptional activator of genes involved in cell migration and tumor metastasis. Notably, inhibition of eIF2α phosphorylation through ISRIB or ATF4 knockdown partially abolished the tumor-promoting effect of ETHE1 overexpression. ETHE1 has a functional and mechanistic role in TNBC metastasis and offers a new therapeutic strategy for targeting ETHE1-propelled TNBC using ISRIB.

Destabilization of microrchidia family CW-type zinc finger 2 via the cyclin-dependent kinase 1-chaperone-mediated autophagy pathway promotes mitotic arrest and enhances cancer cellular sensitivity to microtubule-targeting agents.

BACKGROUND: Microtubule-targeing agents (MTAs), such as paclitaxel (PTX) and vincristine (VCR), kill cancer cells through activtion of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) and induction of mitotic arrest, but the development of resistance poses significant clinical challenges. METHODS: Immunoblotting and RT-qPCR were used to investigate potential function and related mechanism of MORC2. Flow cytometry analyses were carried out to determine cell cycle distribution and apoptosis. The effect of MORC2 on cellular sensitivity to PTX and VCR was determined by immunoblotting, flow cytometry, and colony formation assays. Immunoprecipitation assays and immunofluorescent staining were utilized to investigate protein-protein interaction and protein co-localization. RESULTS: Here, we identified microrchidia family CW-type zinc finger 2 (MORC2), a poorly characterized oncoprotein, as a novel regulator of SAC activation, mitotic progression, and resistance of cancer cells to PTX and VCR. Mechanically, PTX and VCR activate cyclin-dependent kinase 1, which in turn induces MORC2 phosphorylation at threonine 717 (T717) and T733. Phosphorylated MORC2 enhances its interation with HSPA8 and LAMP2A, two essential components of the chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) mechinery, resulting in its autophagic degradation. Degradation of MORC2 during mitosis leads to SAC activation through stabilizing anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome activator protein Cdc20 and facilitating mitotic checkpoint complex assembly, thus contributing to mitotic arrest induced by PTX and VCR. Notably, knockdown of MORC2 promotes mitotic arrest induced by PTX and VCR and enhances the sensitivity of cancer cells to PTX and VCR. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, these findings unveil a previously unrecognized function and regulatory mechanism of MORC2 in mitotic progression and resistance of cancer cells to MTAs. These results also provide a new clue for developing combined treatmentstrategy by targeting MORC2 in combination with MTAs against human cancer.

Dynamic SUMOylation of MORC2 orchestrates chromatin remodelling and DNA repair in response to DNA damage and drives chemoresistance in breast cancer.

Rationale: SUMOylation regulates a plethora of biological processes, and its inhibitors are currently under investigation in clinical trials as anticancer agents. Thus, identifying new targets with site-specific SUMOylation and defining their biological functions will not only provide new mechanistic insights into the SUMOylation signaling but also open an avenue for developing new strategy for cancer therapy. MORC family CW-type zinc finger 2 (MORC2) is a newly identified chromatin-remodeling enzyme with an emerging role in the DNA damage response (DDR), but its regulatory mechanism remains enigmatic. Methods: In vivo and in vitro SUMOylation assays were used to determine the SUMOylation levels of MORC2. Overexpression and knockdown of SUMO-associated enzymes were used to detect their effects on MORC2 SUMOylation. The effect of dynamic MORC2 SUMOylation on the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to chemotherapeutic drugs was examined through in vitro and in vivo functional assays. Immunoprecipitation, GST pull-down, MNase, and chromatin segregation assays were used to explore the underlying mechanisms. Results: Here, we report that MORC2 is modified by small ubiquitin-like modifier 1 (SUMO1) and SUMO2/3 at lysine 767 (K767) in a SUMO-interacting motif dependent manner. MORC2 SUMOylation is induced by SUMO E3 ligase tripartite motif containing 28 (TRIM28) and reversed by deSUMOylase sentrin-specific protease 1 (SENP1). Intriguingly, SUMOylation of MORC2 is decreased at the early stage of DNA damage induced by chemotherapeutic drugs that attenuate the interaction of MORC2 with TRIM28. MORC2 deSUMOylation induces transient chromatin relaxation to enable efficient DNA repair. At the relatively late stage of DNA damage, MORC2 SUMOylation is restored, and SUMOylated MORC2 interacts with protein kinase CSK21 (casein kinase II subunit alpha), which in turn phosphorylates DNA-PKcs (DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit), thus promoting DNA repair. Notably, expression of a SUMOylation-deficient mutant MORC2 or administration of SUMO inhibitor enhances the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to DNA-damaging chemotherapeutic drugs. Conclusions: Collectively, these findings uncover a novel regulatory mechanism of MORC2 by SUMOylation and reveal the intricate dynamics of MORC2 SUMOylation important for proper DDR. We also propose a promising strategy to sensitize MORC2-driven breast tumors to chemotherapeutic drugs by inhibition of the SUMO pathway.

Protein Phosphatase 1 Subunit PPP1R14B Stabilizes STMN1 to Promote Progression and Paclitaxel Resistance in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents the most lethal subtype of breast cancer due to its aggressive clinical features and the lack of effective therapeutic targets. To identify novel approaches for targeting TNBC, we examined the role of protein phosphatases in TNBC progression and chemoresistance. Protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 14B (PPP1R14B), a poorly defined member of the protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunits, was aberrantly upregulated in TNBC tissues and predicted poor prognosis. PPP1R14B was degraded mainly through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. RPS27A recruited deubiquitinase USP9X to deubiquitinate and stabilize PPP1R14B, resulting in overexpression of PPP1R14B in TNBC tissues. Gain- and loss-of-function assays demonstrated that PPP1R14B promoted TNBC cell proliferation, colony formation, migration, invasion, and resistance to paclitaxel in vitro. PPP1R14B also induced xenograft tumor growth, lung metastasis, and paclitaxel resistance in vivo. Mechanistic investigations revealed that PPP1R14B maintained phosphorylation and stability of oncoprotein stathmin 1 (STMN1), a microtubule-destabilizing phosphoprotein critically involved in cancer progression and paclitaxel resistance, which was dependent on PP1 catalytic subunits α and γ. Importantly, the tumor-suppressive effects of PPP1R14B deficiency could be partially rescued by ectopic expression of wild-type but not phosphorylation-deficient STMN1. Moreover, PPP1R14B decreased STMN1-mediated α-tubulin acetylation, microtubule stability, and promoted cell-cycle progression, leading to resistance of TNBC cells to paclitaxel. Collectively, these findings uncover a functional and mechanistic role of PPP1R14B in TNBC progression and paclitaxel resistance, indicating PPP1R14B is a potential therapeutic target for TNBC. SIGNIFICANCE: PPP1R14B upregulation induced by RPS27A/USP9X in TNBC increases STMN1 activity, leading to cancer progression and paclitaxel resistance.

Combined Estrogen Receptor and Progesterone Receptor Level Can Predict Survival Outcome in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-positive Early Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: In human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer, emerging evidence imply that clinical behaviors differ according to hormone receptor (HR) status. However, there is no conclusion about the relevance between estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) expression and clinical outcome of HER2+ breast cancer. Our study aimed to determine the influence of different ER/PR levels on survival outcome of HER2+ early breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine hundred and nineteen early HER2+ breast cancer patients treated between 2009 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed and HR+/HER2+ patients were further divided based on ER level (Low/L: 1%-9%; Median/M: 10%-79%; High/H: 80%-100%) and PR level (Low/L: 0%-19%; High/H: 20%-100%) according to restricted cubic spline (RCS) smoothing curve. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test. RESULTS: Four hundred and forty two HR+/HER2+ and 477 HR-/HER2+ breast cancer patients were included in our study and 73.2% received target therapy (HR+ 69.7%, HR- 76.5%). While HR+/HER2+ breast cancer showed better survival than HR-/HER2+ subtype in 5-year disease free survival (DFS, 93.0% vs. 86.8%, P < .001), no significant difference was observed between DFS in ER+/PR+ and ER+/PR- subgroup (94.4% vs. 90.4%, P = .22). However, a potential correlation was found between ER/PR levels and DFS in HR+/HER2+ (P = .074) tumors. In HR+/HER2+ breast cancer, all subgroups showed DFS improvement trend versus M-ER/L-PR. In all HER2+ patients, hazard ratio of H-ER/H-PR compared with HR- subtype was 0.10 (95%CI 0.01-0.74, P = .024) in all patients and 0.14 (95%CI, 0.02-1.02, P = .053) in patients receiving anti-HER2 therapy. CONCLUSION: ER/PR expression may become a predictor of survival benefit in HER2+ early breast cancer and a higher ER/PR level might be associated with better DFS.

Breast Subtypes and Prognosis of Breast Cancer Patients With Initial Bone Metastasis: A Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a highly heterogeneous disease and bone is one of the most common metastatic sites. This retrospective study was conducted to investigate the clinical features, prognostic factors and benefits of surgery of breast cancer patients with initial bone metastases. METHODS: From 2010 to 2015, 6,860 breast cancer patients diagnosed with initial bone metastasis were analyzed from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and Multivariable analysis were used to identify prognostic factors. A nomogram was performed based on the factors selected from cox regression result. Survival curves were plotted according to different subtypes, metastatic burdens and risk groups differentiated by nomogram. RESULTS: Hormone receptor (HR) positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive patients showed the best outcome compared to other subtypes. Patients of younger age (<60 years old), white race, lower grade, lower T stage (<=T2), not combining visceral metastasis tended to have better outcome. About 37% (2,249) patients received surgery of primary tumor. Patients of all subtypes could benefit from surgery. Patients of bone-only metastases (BOM), bone and liver metastases, bone and lung metastases also showed superior survival time if surgery was performed. However, patients of bone and brain metastasis could not benefit from surgery (p = 0.05). The C-index of nomogram was 0.66. Cutoff values of nomogram point were identified as 87 and 157 points, which divided all patients into low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups. Patients of all groups showed better overall survival when receiving surgery. CONCLUSION: Our study has provided population-based prognostic analysis in patients with initial bone metastatic breast cancer and constructed a predicting nomogram with good accuracy. The finding of potential benefit of surgery to overall survival will cast some lights on the treatment tactics of this group of patients.

Validation of the Prognostic Stage of American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Staging Manual in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Compared to Invasive Ductal Carcinoma and Proposal of a Novel Score System.

Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pathological prognostic stage among patients with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and to propose a modified score system if necessary. Methods: Women diagnosed with IDC and ILC during 2010-2015 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were retrospectively identified. Disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Predictive performances of different staging systems were evaluated based on Harrell concordance index (C-index) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Multivariate Cox models were conducted to build preferable score systems. Results: A total of 184,541 female patients were included in the final analyses, with a median follow-up of 30.0 months. In IDC cohort, the pathological prognostic stage (C-index, 0.8281; AIC, 110274.5) was superior to the anatomic stage (C-index, 0.8125; AIC, 112537.0; P < 0.001 for C-index) in risk stratification with respect to DSS. In ILC cohort, the prognostic stage (C-index, 0.8281; AIC, 7124.423) didn't outperform the anatomic stage (C-index, 0.8324; AIC, 7144.818; P = 0.748 for C-index) with respect to DSS. Similar results were observed with respect to OS. The score system defined by anatomic stage plus grade plus estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor (AS+GEP) allows for better staging (C-index, 0.8085; AIC, 7178.448) for ILC patients. Conclusion: Compared with anatomic stage, the pathological prognostic stage provided more accurate stratification for patients with IDC, but not for patients with ILC. The AS+GEP score system may fit ILC tumors better.

Comparison of the Distribution Pattern of 21-Gene Recurrence Score between Mucinous Breast Cancer and Infiltrating Ductal Carcinoma in Chinese Population: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

PURPOSE: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the distribution pattern and prognostic value of 21-gene recurrence score (RS) in Chinese patients with mucinous breast cancer (MC) and compared with infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with MC or IDC from January 2010 to January 2017 were retrospectively recruited. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay of 21 genes was conducted to calculate the RS. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the association between RS and clinicopathological factors. Survival outcomes including disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. RESULTS: The MC cohort included 128 patients and the IDC cohort included 707 patients. The proportions of patients with a low (RS < 18), intermediate (18-30), or high risk (RS > 30) were 32.0%, 48.4%, and 19.5% in MC cohort, and 26.9%, 46.8% and 26.3% in IDC cohort. The distribution of RS varied significantly according to different Ki-67 index and molecular subtype in both cohorts. Moreover, the receipt of chemotherapy was associated with RS in both cohorts. Among patients with MC, tumor stage was related to the DFS (p=0.040). No significant differences in DFS and OS were found among MC patients in different RS risk groups (OS, p=0.695; DFS, p=0.926). CONCLUSION: RS was significantly related to Ki-67 index and molecular subtypes in MC patients, which is similar in IDC patients. However, RS was not able to predict DFS and OS in patients with MC.

Impact of Prior Cancer History on the Clinical Outcomes in Advanced Breast Cancer: A Propensity Score-Adjusted, Population-Based Study.

PURPOSE: Despite the rapid growing of cancer survivors, prior cancer history is a commonly adopted exclusion criterion. Whether prior cancer will impact the survival of patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) remains uncertain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with ABC diagnosed between 2004 and 2010 were identified using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Timing, stage, and type were used to characterize prior cancer. Multivariable analyses using propensity score-adjusted Cox regression and competing risk regression were conducted to evaluate the prognostic effect of prior cancer on overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). RESULTS: A total of 14,176 ABC patients were identified, of whom 10.5% carried a prior cancer history. The most common type of prior cancer was female genital cancer (32.4%); more than half (51.7%) were diagnosed at localized stage; most were diagnosed more than 5 years (42.9%) or less than 1 year (28.3%) prior to the index cancer. In multivariate analyses, patients with prior cancer presented a slightly worse OS (hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07 to 1.30; p=0.001) but a better BCSS (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.74; p < 0.001). In subset analyses, no survival detriment was observed in patients with prior malignancy from head and neck or endocrine system, at in situ or localized stage, or diagnosed more than 4 years. CONCLUSION: Prior cancer provides an inferior OS but a superior BCSS for patients with ABC. It does not affect the survival adversely in some subgroups and these patients should not be excluded from clinical trials.

Subdivision of M1 Stage for De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer to Better Predict Prognosis and Response to Primary Tumor Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer (MBC) constitute a heterogeneous group with different clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes. Despite controversy regarding its prognostic value, primary tumor surgery may improve survival for selected patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with de novo MBC were identified using the SEER database and were then divided randomly into training and validation sets. A Fine-Gray competing risks model was developed to identify the variables associated with increased cancer-specific mortality in the training set. The M1 subdivision system was established based on the independent prognostic factors. Cumulative incidence curves were estimated and compared using Gray's test. RESULTS: Involvement of brain or liver and number of metastatic sites were identified as independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. The M1 category was subdivided into 3 subcategories: M1a, single site involvement except brain and liver; M1b, liver involvement only, or multiple site involvement except brain and liver; and M1c, brain involvement regardless of number of metastatic sites, or liver and other sites involvement except brain (M1b vs M1a: subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 1.48; 95% CI, 1.29-1.68; M1c vs M1a: SHR, 2.45; 95% CI, 2.18-2.75). Patients with the M1a subtype benefited most from primary tumor surgery in the adjusted competing risks model (M1a: SHR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.48-0.67, M1b: SHR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47-0.83, and M1c: SHR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44-0.80), whereas benefits conferred by treatment with chemotherapy alone increased with the upstaging of metastatic disease (M1a: SHR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.62-0.83, M1b: SHR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.44-0.68, and M1c: SHR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.45-0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Subdivision of M1 stage facilitates prognosis prediction and treatment planning for patients with de novo MBC. Treatment offered should be decided in a coordinated multidisciplinary setting. Primary tumor surgery may play an important role in the management of selected patients.

Evaluation of the Incorporation of Recurrence Score into the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Staging System in Patients with T1-2N0M0, Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Receptor 2-Negative Invasive Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The current study aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition staging system in patients with invasive breast cancer based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with T1-2N0M0, estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer from 2010 to 2014 were retrospectively recruited in this analysis. Patients were reassigned to different stages according to the anatomic staging system (AS), prognostic staging system (PS), and prognostic and genomic staging criteria downstaging patients with recurrence score (RS) lower than 11 (PGS_RS11). Cox models were conducted for multivariate analyses, and likelihood ratio (LR) χ2, Akaike information criterion (AIC), and Harrell's concordance index (C-index) were calculated for the comparison of different staging systems. Additionally, adjustments were made to generate prognostic and genomic staging criteria downstaging patients with RS lower than 18 (PGS_RS18) and RS lower than 25 (PGS_RS25). RESULTS: PGS_RS11 was an independent predictor for breast cancer-specific survival, as were PS and AS. Adjusted for age and ethnicity, PGS_RS11 (AIC = 2,322.763, C-index = 0.7482, LR χ2 = 113.17) showed superiority in predicting survival outcomes and discriminating patients compared with AS (AIC = 2,369.132, C-index = 0.6986, LR χ2 = 60.80) but didn't outperform PS (AIC = 2,320.992, C-index = 0.7487, LR χ2 = 114.94). The predictive and discriminative ability of PGS_RS18 was the best (AIC = 2297.434, C-index = 0.7828, LR χ2 = 138.50) when compared with PS and PGS_RS11. CONCLUSION: PGS_RS11 was superior to AS but comparable with PS in predicting prognosis. Further validations and refinements are needed for the better incorporation of RS into staging systems. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Staging systems are of critical importance in informing prognosis and guiding treatment. This study's objective was to evaluate the newly proposed staging system in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition staging manual, which combined biological and genomic information with the traditional TNM classification for the first time to determine tumor stages of breast cancer. The superiority of the prognostic and genomic staging system was validated in our cohort and possibly could encourage the utility of genomic assays in clinical practice for staging assessment and prognosis prediction.