Outcomes of Intravenous Tocilizumab Treatment for Refractory Pars Planitis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate outcomes of intravenous (IV) tocilizumab (TCZ) in patients with pars planitis refractory to conventional immunomodulatory therapy and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha agents. METHODS: Medical records of eight patients diagnosed with pars planitis and treated with monthly 4 or 8 mg/kg IV TCZ were reviewed. The primary objective was to initiate and sustain remission continuously for three consecutive months. Secondary outcome measures were changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), degree of anterior chamber (AC) inflammation, vitreous cell, vitreous haze, presence of vitreous or pars plana exudates, peripheral vasculitis, fluorescein angiography (FA) score and central subfieldthickness (CST) on macular optical coherence tomography (OCT). RESULTS: Fourteen eyes of eight patients were treated with IV TCZ. Seven patients were women. The average age was 31.35 ± 16.42 years. In 6 (75%) out of 8 patients, IV TCZ, either as monotherapy or in combination with another conventional immunomodulatory agent, induced and sustained remission. The average FA score reduced from 11.15 ± 3.52 at the baseline visit to 6.50 ± 2.12 at the one-year follow-up visit (p-value < 0.05). None of the patients experienced any side effects of IV TCZ. CONCLUSION: IV Tocilizumab (TCZ) may represent an effective and safe treatment option for patients diagnosed with pars planitis resistant to conventional immunomodulatory therapy and anti-TNF alpha agents.

Effects of non-medical infliximab biosimilar switching in ocular inflammatory diseases: A case series from a tertiary care center.

PURPOSE: To describe the course of care and outcomes for 3 uveitis patients formerly on Remicade that were non-medically switched to Inflectra. DESIGN: Retrospective observational case series. METHODS: •Setting: Tertiary care clinical practice.•Patient population: 3 Uveitis patients, observing both eyes for inflammation as applicable. Patients included if they had been on Inflectra for ≥2 infusions and history of Remicade use. Patients described herein had at least 1 adverse reaction to Inflectra and were switched to Remicade for medical necessity. Patients excluded if they were lost to follow-up or not examined for over 6 months during therapy.•Observation procedures/Interventions: Patients observed for adverse changes in clinical course while on Inflectra. Patients developing these changes on Inflectra were started or restarted on Remicade. RESULTS: The 3 patients described herein developed adverse complications while on Inflectra that required switching to Remicade. They were originally on Remicade, and their clinical course worsened beyond what had been controlled with Remicade alone. Our findings are limited by our small sample size, and further investigation is necessary to explore the scope of effects of non-medical biosimilar switching. CONCLUSION: Non-medical biosimilar switching from Remicade to Inflectra may induce detrimental side-effects and significant worsening of inflammation in patients with uveitis. Non-medical biosimilar switching from Remicade to Inflectra should be discouraged, and physician input should be sought in establishing an effective and medically-necessary treatment plan for patients with uveitis.

Vision Outcomes of Long-Term Immunomodulatory and Steroid Therapy in Sympathetic Ophthalmia.

PURPOSE: To compare vision acuity outcomes of long-term steroid therapy compared with immunomodulatory therapy for treatment of sympathetic ophthalmia. DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective, comparative clinical study. METHODS: Patients with sympathetic ophthalmia treated from March 2005 to October 2022 with at least 1 year of follow-up were included. Visual acuity outcomes were compared by steroid and immunomodulatory treatment modality. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients with sympathetic ophthalmia were included in the study, with follow-up ranging from 1 to 17 years. Higher rates of vision loss correlated with longer periods of active uveitis and steroid treatment. Lower rates of vision loss correlated with longer periods of uveitis remission on immunomodulatory therapy alone and drug-free remission. Treatment with alkylating agents or combination therapy with an antimetabolite, a biologic-response modifier, and cyclosporine are more likely to result in sympathetic ophthalmia remission. CONCLUSION: Immunomodulatory therapy leads to superior vision outcomes in cases of steroid-resistant or recurrent sympathetic ophthalmia. Steroid therapy may be useful for acute or recalcitrant sympathetic uveitis but is insufficient for long-term inflammatory control. PRéCIS: This manuscript describes a retrospective analysis of vision outcomes in patients with sympathetic ophthalmia. Results indicate that long-term immunomodulatory therapy is associated with better vision outcomes than long-term steroid therapy for sympathetic ophthalmia treatment.

Response to "Similarities in clinical course and outcome between juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)-associated and ANA-positive idiopathic anterior uveitis: data from a population-based nationwide study in Germany".

We have read the article entitled "Similarities in clinical course and outcome between juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)-associated and ANA-positive idiopathic anterior uveitis: data from a population-based nationwide study in Germany" by Heiligenhaus et al. While we appreciate the work conducted by the authors, we have several comments we would like to address. First, the follow-up interval of 2 years is too short to conclude that the clinical course between two chronic pathologies is not significantly different. Second, remission status was determined by uveitis inactivity during the 2-year follow-up visit without any mention of flare frequency or length of remission, which is not a reliable measure of uveitis control. Third, ANA-positive idiopathic anterior uveitis is not a classification with a distinct clinical phenotype, and additional reports of serologic investigations would have been helpful.

Implantation of XEN gel stent in a patient with ocular cicatricial pemphigoid.

Purpose: Herein, we report a case of XEN gel stent implantation in a patient with ocular cicatricial pemphigoid that successfully reduced glaucoma topical medication at one year. Observations: A 76-year-old male patient presented with severe ocular cicatricial pemphigoid and advanced glaucoma who required several topical medications to control intraocular pressure. Despite successful reduction of ocular inflammation with immunomodulatory therapy, his topical medication regimen prevented total remission of ocular inflammation. One year after XEN gel stent implantation, his intraocular pressures were controlled without any topical medication, and he had no ocular inflammation off any immunomodulatory therapy. Conclusions and Importance: The XEN gel stent represents a useful intervention for glaucoma treatment even in the setting of severe ocular surface disease and can improve outcomes for concurrent inflammatory and glaucomatous pathology.

Late recurrence in birdshot chorioretinopathy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the demographic, clinical, ancillary testing, and multimodal imaging characteristics of birdshot chorioretinopathy (BSCR) patients with late recurrence and birdshot patients with durable remission. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective observational case series. The above-mentioned parameters were studied in BSCR patients with late recurrence (group 1) and BSCR patients with durable remission (group 2). RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were included in this study. The average age of patients was 62.1 ± 11.1 years (range, 35-88 years). Groups 1 and 2 included 20 (36.4%) and 35 (63.6%) patients, respectively. In group 1, the average age of patients was 60.5 ± 10.39 years (range, 35-79 years). The female-to-male ratio was 16:4. In group 2, the average age of patients was 63.1 ± 11.6 years (range, 37-88 years). The female-to-male ratio was 22:13. None of the demographic, clinical, ancillary testing, and multimodal imaging parameters were statistically significantly different between the two groups. Using a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve, we found that the ideal duration of successful therapy to induce durable remission was 30 months with 70% sensitivity and 40% specificity (ideal point on the curve). A Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated that late recurrence was seen within 30 months after stopping successful treatment of patients with BSCR. CONCLUSION: There are no demographic, clinical, ancillary testing, or multimodal imaging characteristics that can predict late recurrence in BSCR patients. However, we found that 30 months of successful treatment may be ideal and recommended.

Effects of Subcutaneous Repository Corticotropin Gel Injection on Regulatory T Cell Population in Noninfectious Retinal Vasculitis.

AIM: To evaluate the effect of repository corticotropin injection (RCI) on regulatory T cell population in patients with noninfectious retinal vasculitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with active noninfectious retinal vasculitis were included in a prospective nonrandomized open-label study. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (33 eyes) were included in the study. Eleven (61.1%) patients [20 (60.6%) eyes] and 7 (38.9%) patients [13 (33.3%) eyes] were in the responsive and non-responsive groups, respectively. We did not find any statistically significant difference within the PPP-R group, within the PPP-NR group, or between these two groups in regard to regulatory T cell population. No significant systemic or ocular complications were found. CONCLUSION: RCI may be a complementary treatment in patients with non-infectious retinal vasculitis with or without uveitis. This study did not demonstrate an increase in regulatory T cell population in patients with noninfectious retinal vasculitis.

Birdshot Chorioretinopathy: Resistant versus Responsive.

PURPOSE: To search findings that can explain the heterogeneity between Resistant and Responsive patients with birdshot chorioretinopathy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective observational case series on "Responsive" versus "Resistant" birdshot chorioretinopathy. RESULTS: One-hundred-eighty and Ninety-nine patients were included in the Responsive and Resistant groups respectively. Multivariate analysis of paraclinical variables at the first visit demonstrated that mean deviation (p = .04), pattern standard deviation (p < .001), optic nerve head leakage (p = .012), large vessel leakage and staining (p = .01), and macular small vessel leakage (p = .03) were statistically significantly different between the two groups; however, at the visit preceding successful therapy, only macular small vessel leakage (p = .01) was statistically significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: .Small vessel leakage in the macular area and/or optic nerve head leakage at the earliest visit might be risk factors for resistant birdshot chorioretinopathy.

Ocular Inflammatory Complications of Treatment for Metastatic Melanoma.

PURPOSE: To characterize various ocular inflammatory complications arising from metastatic cutaneous melanoma therapies and their management. METHODS: Retrospective case series of patients who were referred to a tertiary uveitis practice for ophthalmic exam All patients received targeted metastatic cutaneous melanoma treatment, including BRAF/MEK inhibitors and various immunotherapies. RESULTS: 109 patients were identified, with 43 (39.4%) having 65 definitive instances of OIAE. Sixteen different OIAE were identified. Ipilimumab monotherapy and ipilimumab/nivolumab combination therapy were most commonly associated. Anterior uveitis was the most common OIAE (18/65, 27.7%). Thirty patients (69.8%) were managed with observation or topical steroid therapy. Only 4 patients required further therapies for OIAE, with one patient not attaining resolution. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: While a broad range of OIAE was identified, most were not vision-threatening and did not require discontinuation of the associated therapy.

QUESTION: What is the scope of ocular inflammatory complications from metastatic melanoma therapies? FINDINGS: In this retrospective chart review, 43 patients with definitive ocular inflammatory adverse effects(OIAE) were identified from 109 total patients on therapy for metastatic melanoma. Sixteen different OIAE were identified.Meaning: Ophthalmologists managing ocular complications from melanoma treatments should be aware of the broad, but usually mild, scope of possible complications.

Ocular Mucus Membrane Pemphigoid: A Primary Versus Secondary Entity.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this review was to investigate the idea that inflammatory events of the conjunctiva and ocular surface may act as triggering events for the onset of ocular mucus membrane pemphigoid (oMMP). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients with biopsy-proven oMMP and no systemic pemphigoid disease. The presence, or absence, of the following inflammatory conditions at the time of OMMP diagnosis was noted: significant eyelid disease, significant atopic eye disease, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, graft-versus-host disease, viral keratitis, sarcoidosis with ocular involvement, chemical burns, medicamentosa, Sjogren syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus with ocular involvement, and epidemic keratoconjunctivitis. Response to immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) was also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 779 patient records were identified. Conjunctival biopsy was present in 724 patients, with 646 (89.2%) being positive. One hundred thirty-nine patients (21.5%) with positive biopsies had extraocular pemphigoid disease and were excluded from further analysis. Of the 507 included patients, 154 (30.4%) had at least one of the specified inflammatory conditions present at the time of OMMP diagnosis. One hundred eighteen patients (23.3%) had only 1 such condition, 35 (6.9%) had 2, and 1 patient had 3. In patients with at least one of these conditions present, response to IMT was seen in 84.9% of patients with sufficient follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that oMMP may arise as a secondary pathology to acute inflammatory events or chronic inflammatory states of the conjunctiva and ocular surface.

Lirentelimab for severe and chronic forms of allergic conjunctivitis.

BACKGROUND: Allergic conjunctivitis (AC) is an ocular inflammatory disease with symptoms driven by eosinophils and mast cells. Allergic comorbidities are common. Current treatments are often ineffective in severe AC and limited by potential side effects. Lirentelimab is an anti-sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin-8 mAb that depletes eosinophils and inhibits mast cells. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine safety and preliminary efficacy of lirentelimab in an open-label, phase 1b study. METHODS: Patients with chronic, severely symptomatic atopic keratoconjunctivitis, vernal keratoconjunctivitis, and perennial AC, and who had history of topical or systemic corticosteroid use, were enrolled to receive up to 6 monthly lirentelimab infusions (dose 1: 0.3 mg/kg, dose 2: 1 mg/kg, subsequent doses: 1 or 3 mg/kg). Changes from baseline in peripheral blood eosinophils, changes in patient-reported symptoms (measured by daily Allergic Conjunctivitis Symptom Questionnaire, including atopic comorbidities), changes in investigator-reported ocular signs and symptoms (Ocular Symptom Scores), changes in quality of life, and changes in tear cytokine and chemokine levels were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled (atopic keratoconjunctivitis n = 13, vernal keratoconjunctivitis n = 1, perennial AC n = 16), 87% of whom had atopic comorbidities. After lirentelimab treatment, mean improvement was observed in Allergic Conjunctivitis Symptom Questionnaire score (-61%; 95% CI, -75% to -48%) and Ocular Symptom Scores (-53%; 95% CI, -76% to -31%), consistent across atopic keratoconjunctivitis, vernal keratoconjunctivitis, and perennial AC groups. There was substantial improvement in atopic comorbidities, with -55% (95% CI, -78% to -31%), -50% (95% CI, -82% to -19%), and -63% (95% CI, -87% and -38%) reduction in symptoms of atopic dermatitis, asthma, and rhinitis, respectively. Levels of key mediators of inflammation were reduced in patient tears after lirentelimab treatment. The most common adverse effects were mild to moderate infusion-related reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Lirentelimab was well tolerated, improved severe AC and concomitant atopic symptoms, and reduced inflammatory mediators in patient tears.

Widefield Fundus Fluorescein Angiography Features of Uveitis Associated with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the wide-field fundus fluorescein angiography (WFA) characteristics of uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA-uveitis). METHODS: Retrospective review of records. WFA with Spectralis (Heidelberg) of JIA-uveitis patients were analyzed using the scoring system by Angiography Scoring for Uveitis Nomenclature. RESULTS: Thirty-seven eyes of 20 patients were studied. A total score of at least 1 was noted in 27 eyes (72.97%). WFA features included optic disc hyperfluorescence (51.35%), macular leakage (27.03%), retinal vascular staining/leakage at posterior pole (27.03%) and peripheral retina (64.86%), capillary leakage at the posterior pole (37.84%), and peripheral retina (59.46%). A decision to change the management plan was made in 8 of 9 patients with bilateral quiet anterior chambers after WFA results. CONCLUSION: More than 70% of JIA-uveitis eyes showed some WFA-evidence of posterior segment inflammation, which changed the course of therapy for a major proportion of patients with no clinically active anterior chamber inflammation.

Fixed-Luminance and Multi-Luminance Flicker Electroretinography Parameters in Patients with Early Active Birdshot Chorioretinopathy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the parameters of the Fixed-Luminance and Multi-Luminance flicker electroretinography protocol among patients with early active birdshot chorioretinopathy. METHODS: Fixed-Luminance magnitude, Fixed-Luminance phase, Multi-Luminance magnitude area under the curve, and Multi-Luminance phase area under the curve parameters were compared between early active birdshot chorioretinopathy patients and an age-matched control group. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the Fixed-Luminance flicker magnitude (P = .6), the Fixed-Luminance flicker phase (P = .9), and the Multi-Luminance flicker phase area under the curve (P = .55) when each was compared to the normal population; however, the difference between the mean Multi-Luminance flicker magnitude area under the curve in our patients and the healthy control group was statistically significant. (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Multi-Luminance flicker magnitude area under the curve has been shown to be significantly different from the normal population in the early active course of the disease. ABBREVIATIONS: BSCR: birdshot chorioretinopathy; cd: Cadmium; ERG: Electroretinography; FA: Fluorescein angiography; FL-: Fixed-luminance; HVF: Humphrey visual field; Hz: Hertz; ICG: Indocyanine green; m2: Square meter; ML-: Multi-luminance; ms: millisecond; SITA: Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm; SWAP: Short wave-length automated perimetry.

Clinical features, visual outcome, and poor prognostic factors in occlusive retinal vasculitis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical features, treatment, and visual outcome of occlusive retinal vasculitis (ORV), with a focal analysis on prognostic factors associated with poor visual outcome. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in patients diagnosed with ORV with at least 6 months of follow-up. Demographic data, ocular features, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fluorescein angiography, therapy regimens, and outcomes were collected from the Massachusetts Eye Research and Surgery Institution database from 2006 to 2017. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to analyze the factors independently predicting poor visual outcome. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (69 eyes) were enrolled, 42 with noninfectious cause, 9 with infectious cause, and 1 with masquerade uveitis. Systemic inflammatory diseases, including necrotizing vasculitis, sarcoidosis, multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and Behçet's disease comprised the causes of ORV. Forty of the 42 patients with noninfectious ORV received immunomodulatory therapy (IMT), and 35 patients (87.5%) were able to achieve steroid-free remission. Compared with the BCVA at the initial visit (0.66 [±0.11] logMAR), there was significant improvement at the most recent visit (0.37 [±0.07] logMAR, p = 0.001). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that optic nerve atrophy, macular ischemia, and poor BCVA at initial presentation were independently correlated with poor visual outcome. CONCLUSIONS: ORV could be caused by a wide spectrum of systemic inflammatory diseases. Aggressive IMT is preferred to achieve a steroid-free durable remission for noninfectious ORV. Optic nerve atrophy, macular ischemia, and poor BCVA at the initial visit predict a poor visual outcome.

Pediatric uveitis: A comprehensive review.

Pediatric uveitis accounts for 5-10% of all uveitis. Uveitis in children differs from adult uveitis in that it is commonly asymptomatic and can become chronic and cause damage to ocular structures. The diagnosis might be delayed for multiple reasons, including the preverbal age and difficulties in examining young children. Pediatric uveitis may be infectious or noninfectious in etiology. The etiology of noninfectious uveitis is presumed to be autoimmune or autoinflammatory. The most common causes of uveitis in this age group are idiopathic and juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis. The stepladder approach for the treatment of pediatric uveitis is based on expert opinion and algorithms proposed by multidisciplinary panels. Uveitis morbidities in pediatric patients include cataract, glaucoma, and amblyopia. Pediatric patients with uveitis should be frequently examined until remission is achieved. Once in remission, the interval between follow-up visits can be extended; however, it is recommended that even after remission the child should be seen every 8-12 weeks depending on the history of uveitis and the medications used. Close follow up is also necessary as uveitis can flare up during immunomodulatory therapy. It is crucial to measure the impact of uveitis, its treatment, and its complications on the child and the child's family. Visual acuity can be considered as an acceptable criterion for assessing visual function. Additionally, the number of cells in the anterior chamber can be a measure of disease activity. We review different aspects of pediatric uveitis. We discuss the mechanisms of noninfectious uveitis, including autoimmune and autoinflammatory etiologies, and the risks of developing uveitis in children with systemic rheumatologic diseases. We address the risk factors for developing morbidities, the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) criteria for timing and anatomical classifications, and describe a stepladder approach in the treatment of pediatric uveitis based on expert opinion and algorithms proposed by multi-disciplinary panels. In this review article, We describe the most common entities for each type of anatomical classification and complications of uveitis for the pediatric population. Additionally, we address monitoring of children with uveitis and evaluation of Quality of Life.

Repository Corticotropin Injection as an Alternative Treatment for Refractory Ocular Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report the clinical course and outcome of patients with refractory ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) treated by repository corticotropin injection (RCI). METHODS: Patients with biopsy-proven ocular MMP treated with RCI from 3 tertiary medical centers were evaluated. Medical records between January 2013 and January 2021 were reviewed and deidentified to retrieve relevant disease-related data. Primary outcome measures included conjunctival inflammatory activity, change in Foster clinical conjunctival scarring staging after RCI treatment, and the development of ocular and systemic complications. RESULTS: Included were 15 patients (10 women and 5 men; 36-95 yrs of age) with a mean follow-up of 4.5 years. Most of the patients (80%) had Foster stage 3 at presentation, and all patients had active MMP. Each patient had failed to respond to at least 1 immunomodulatory drug during the follow-up, and 9 (60%) patients had treatment failure of at least 2 other agents before the use of RCI. The mean duration of RCI treatment was 21 months (range, 3-54 mo). Foster stage did not change in any of the 15 patients at the last follow-up. Nine patients continued RCI therapy at the last follow-up, and in all of them, the disease activity of MMP was well controlled. No serious adverse events because of RCI were documented during the follow-up in any treated patient. CONCLUSIONS: RCI may serve as an alternative or an adjunctive treatment in patients with severe and refractory ocular MMP. Treatment with RCI seems to be safe and well-tolerated.

Rituximab Monotherapy versus Rituximab and Bortezomib Combination Therapy for Treatment of Non-paraneoplastic Autoimmune Retinopathy.

Purpose: To study whether rituximab and bortezomib combination therapy is more effective than rituximab monotherapy in the treatment of non-paraneoplastic autoimmune retinopathy (npAIR). Methods: Retrospective case series involving six patients with npAIR, taking either rituximab and bortezomib combination therapy (three cases) or rituximab monotherapy (one case and two historical patients). Results: Patients on both treatment regimens showed stability in most of the visual function parameters during the one year of follow-up. Combination therapy resulted in improvement of scotopic combined rod and cone a-wave and b-wave amplitudes in all eyes where they were available (four eyes); however, rituximab monotherapy resulted in only two eyes with stable scotopic combined rod and cone a-wave and b-wave amplitudes, while four eyes showed a decrease in both a- and b-wave amplitudes. The average improvement in b-wave amplitude (50.7% ± 29.4% [range, 25-90%]) was higher than the average improvement in a-wave amplitude (35.7% ± 9.74 [range, 25-63%]). No severe adverse effects were reported. Conclusion: Rituximab and bortezomib combination therapy may not be more effective than rituximab monotherapy in npAIR patients for most of the visual function parameters; however, this combination therapy may be more effective in improving scotopic combined rod and cone a- and b-wave amplitudes. This may indicate the higher efficacy of combination therapy when there is involvement of the inner retina.

Treatment of Noninfectious Retinal Vasculitis Using Subcutaneous Repository Corticotropin Injection.

PURPOSE: To show whether subcutaneous repository corticotropin injection (RCI, Acthar® Gel, a repository corticotropin injection, can be an effective potential therapeutic agent for noninfectious retinal vasculitis. METHODS: Patients with active retinal vasculitis were followed with serial ultra-wide-field fluorescein angiograms and treated with 80 units of subcutaneous repository corticotropin injection twice weekly. RESULTS: Primary outcome of ≥ 50% improvement in response level (RL) for retinal vasculitis and percent improvement in retinal vasculitis severity scoring (RVSS) by more than one quartile ( ≥ 25%) at week 12 was met in 15 and 16 of the 30 total eyes, respectively, including 1 eye with severe retinal vasculitis in each group. Complete resolution of retinal vasculitis was seen in seven eyes with a mean time of 17.1 weeks. Intraocular pressure elevation requiring therapy and cataract progression were noted in two and three eyes, respectively. One patient stopped medication due to side effects (injection site reaction). CONCLUSION: Repository corticotropin injection was well-tolerated overall. Repository corticotropin injection may be an effective therapeutic agent in the treatment of noninfectious retinal vasculitis.

Management of repository corticotropin injection therapy for non-infectious uveitis: a Delphi study.

PURPOSE: Diagnosis and management of non-infectious uveitis (NIU), a major cause of blindness worldwide, are challenging. Corticosteroids, the cornerstone of therapy, are not appropriate for long-term use, and while non-biologic and biologic immunomodulators may be used for some patients, data on their efficacy and safety in this population are limited. Repository corticotropin injection (RCI), believed to affect uveitis by multiple mechanisms, has received regulatory approval for treatment of ophthalmic diseases including posterior uveitis, but is not widely used or discussed in guidelines for the management of uveitis and ocular inflammatory diseases. METHODS: The index study employed a modified Delphi process with a panel of 14 US-based ophthalmologists. Consensus recommendations were developed through a series of three questionnaires. Panellists rated statements on a Likert scale from -5 (strongly disagree) to +5 (strongly agree). RESULTS: The Delphi panel provided consensus recommendations on examinations and testing needed for diagnosis, treatment goals, and the use of corticosteroids, as well as the use of non-biologic and biologic immunomodulators. The panel reached consensus that RCI may be considered for posterior and pan-uveitis, and dosing should be individualized for each patient. Dose reduction/discontinuation should be considered for excessive RCI-related toxicity, hyperglycaemia and/or diabetic complications, excessive costs, or remission ≥ 2 years. Patients should be weaned from RCI if uveitis is stable and well controlled. Adverse events during RCI therapy can be managed by appropriate interventions, with dose reduction/discontinuation considered if events are severe or recurrent. CONCLUSIONS: Expert consensus suggests RCI may be an appropriate treatment option for some patients with uveitis when other therapies are ineffective or intolerable.