Restoration of intestinal continuity following emergency sigmoid colectomy for sigmoid volvulus: An American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis using coarsened exact matching.

BACKGROUND: There is limited data to guide decision-making between performing a primary anastomosis and fashioning an end colostomy following emergency sigmoid colectomy for patients with sigmoid volvulus. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of these two approaches. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database from 2006 to 2021 was retrospectively analyzed. Missing data were multiply imputed, and coarsened exact matching was performed to generate matched cohorts. Rates of major complications and other postoperative outcomes were evaluated among patients who had a primary anastomosis as compared with matched controls who had an end colostomy following emergency sigmoid colectomy. RESULTS: Overall, 4041 patients who had a primary anastomosis and 1240 who had an end colostomy met the inclusion criteria. After multiple imputation and coarsened exact matching, 895 patients who had a primary anastomosis had a matched control. The rate of major complications was lower in patients who had an end colostomy (33.2% vs. 36.7%), but this difference was not statistically significant (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.70-1.05). Results were similar in subgroup analyses of higher-risk patients. There were no significant differences in overall complication rate, mortality, length of hospital stay, or readmission rate. Patients with a colostomy were more likely to be discharged to a care facility (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.67). CONCLUSION: Differences in rates of major complications and many other outcomes after primary anastomosis as compared with end colostomy were not statistically significant following emergency sigmoid colectomy for sigmoid volvulus.

Factors affecting upper limb ergonomics in robotic colorectal surgery.

The aim of the study was to examine the factors which may influence suboptimal ergonomic surgeon hand positioning during robotic colorectal surgery (RCS). An observational study of 11 consecutive RCS cases from June 2022 to August 2022 was performed. Continuous video footage of RCS cases was analysed concurrently with video recordings of surgeon's hand positions at the console. The outcome studied was the frequency with which either hand remained in a suboptimal ergonomic position outside the predetermined double box outlines, as marked on the surgeon's video, for >1 min. Situations which resulted in poor upper limb ergonomics were dissection in the peripheral operating field location, left-hand use, use of the stapler, dissection of the main mesenteric blood vessels, and multi-quadrant surgery. Being aware of situations when suboptimal ergonomic positions occur can allow surgeons to consciously compensate by using the clutch or pausing to take a rest break. What does this paper add to the literature?: The study is important because it is the first to look at factors which may influence poor upper limb ergonomics during non-simulated RCS. By recognizing these factors and compensating for them, it may improve surgeon ergonomics with resultant better performance.

Impact of obesity on patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer in Australia and New Zealand.

PURPOSE: Patients with obesity undergoing rectal cancer surgery may have an increased risk of developing complications, though evidence is inconclusive. The aim of this study was to determine the direct impact of obesity on postoperative outcomes using data from a large clinical registry. METHOD: The Binational Colorectal Cancer Audit registry was used to identify patients who underwent rectal cancer surgery in Australia and New Zealand from 2007-2021. Primary outcomes were inpatient surgical and medical complications. Logistic regression models were developed to describe the association between body-mass index (BMI) and outcomes. RESULTS: Among 3,708 patients (median age 66 years [IQR 56.75-75], 65.0% male), 2.0% had a BMI < 18.5 kg/m2, 35.4% had a BMI of 18.5-24.9 kg/m2, 37.6% had a BMI of 25.0-29.9 kg/m2, 16.7% had a BMI of 30.0-34.9 kg/m2, and 8.2% had a BMI ≥ 35.0 kg/m2. Surgical complications occurred in 27.7% of patients with a BMI of 18.5-24.9 kg/m2, 26.6% of patients with a BMI of 25.0-29.9 kg/m2 (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.76-1.10), 28.5% with a BMI of 30.0-34.9 kg/m2 (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.76-1.21), and 33.2% with a BMI ≥ 35.0 kg/m2 (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.94-1.71). Modelling BMI as a continuous variable confirmed a J-shaped relationship. The association between BMI and medical complications was more linear. CONCLUSION: Risk of postoperative complications is increased in patients with obesity undergoing rectal cancer surgery.

Improving ergonomics for the bedside assistant in robotic colorectal surgery.

The aim of the study was to document when significant bedside assistant (BA) and robotic arm collisions occurred during robotic colorectal surgery (RCS). An observational study of 10 consecutive RCS cases, from May 2022 to September 2022, was performed. Situations when there was significant collision between BA arm and robotic arm (to cause inadvertent movement of the assistant instrument) were documented. The assistant port was randomly placed to the right or the left side of the camera port. Situations which led to detrimental BA ergonomics include dissection at the most peripheral working field, proximity of the target (mesenteric vessels), small bowel retraction, placement of the assistant port in the medial position (on the left side of the camera port), during intra-corporeal suturing and robotic stapler use. The robotic console surgeon can predictably identify and avoid situations when injury to the BA may occur.

The learning curve to attain surgical competency in robotic colorectal surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to assess the robotic colorectal surgery (RCS) learning curve of an experienced surgeon. METHODS: A retrospective review of 117 consecutive patients who underwent total RCS at a single institution between October 2018 and July 2021 was performed. Patient demographics, surgery indications, operation type, intraoperative data, histopathology, morbidity and mortality, and length of stay were analysed. Cumulative summation technique (CUSUM) was used to construct a learning curve of surgeon console and total operation times (SCT and TOT). RESULTS: There was no open conversion, positive resection margin and mortality in the study population. There were four Clavien-DIndo grade III complications and one local recurrence. The range for SCT was 18-855 min (mean 214, median 211) and TOT was 68-937 min (mean 302, median 291). The SCT CUSUM graph identified change in slope at cases 44 and 88, which divided the learning curve into three distinct phases. Patient demographics were similar through the three phases. There was proportionally more cancer cases performed in the first phase (P = 0.001). The mean SCT was significantly higher in Phase 2 when compared with Phases 1 and 3 (P = 0.03). The failure rate was similar through the three phases. There was a non-significant steady decline in LOS over the three phases, from 6.9 to 6.1 days. CONCLUSION: Experienced colorectal surgeons can perform robotic surgery safely, even on patients with high complexity early in the learning curve. Audit of patient outcome should be an important component of learning curve assessment.

Robotic colorectal surgery and ergonomics.

Improved ergonomics for the operating surgeon may be an advantage of robotic colorectal surgery. Perceived robotic ergonomic advantages in visualisation include better exposure, three-dimensional vision, surgeon camera control, and line of sight screen location. Postural advantages include seated position and freedom from the constraints of the sterile operating field. Manipulation benefits include articulated instruments with seven degrees of freedom movement, elimination of fulcrum effect, tremor filtration, and scaling of movement. Potential ergonomic detriments of robotic surgery include lack of haptic feedback, visual, and mental strain from increased operating time and interruptions to workflow from crowding.

Ergonomic port placement in robotic colorectal surgery.

AIM: The aim of the study was to determine how spacing between ports and alignment of ports (oblique or vertical) influences manipulation angles in robotic colorectal surgery. METHOD: Abdominal CT scans of 10 consecutive robotic right hemicolectomy and 10 consecutive robotic high anterior resection patients were analysed. The manipulation angles were calculated using fixed points on the preoperative abdominal coronal CT scan. Port placements were marked on the CT scan. The fixed points used to measure the manipulation angles were from the most lateral part of the caecum, hepatic flexure, splenic flexure, the descending colon/sigmoid colon junction and the sigmoid colon/rectum junction. RESULTS: For right hemicolectomy and high anterior resection surgery, a port spacing of 8 cm compared with 6 cm resulted in greater manipulation angles. With 6-cm port spacing, wider manipulation angles were not achieved with vertical port alignment compared with oblique alignment except for dissection at the splenic flexure. CONCLUSIONS: The greatest manipulation angles were achieved with the oblique 8-cm port spacing, which should be used in most cases.

Accuracy of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging in local staging for rectal cancer: a single local health district, real world experience.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plays a key role in reducing local recurrence rates for locally advanced rectal cancer. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (pMRI) is the gold standard for local clinical staging which allows clinicians to decide the treatment patients receive. A more advanced tumour or the presence of high-risk features on pMRI mean that neoadjuvant therapy will be offered to these patients. Understanding the accuracy of pMRI in local staging for rectal cancer is therefore crucial. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of the accuracy of pMRI staging in a subgroup of patients who had primary rectal cancer surgery without neoadjuvant therapy was performed. Specificity and sensitivity for T-staging, N-staging and presence of high-risk features (threatened circumferential resection margin and extramural venous invasion) were calculated. Patients who had previous pelvic surgery, previous pelvic radiotherapy and previous surgery for continence were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients were included in the analysis. MRI accurately predicts T-stage in 56.6% and N-stage in 55.8%. Prediction of extramural disease was accurate in 51%. A negative circumferential resection margin was accurately predicted in 98.6% of patients. Overall adherence to reporting proforma was 15.8%. CONCLUSION: Overall, this study provided valuable information about the clinical staging of patients with rectal cancer who are at an early stage within a large regional catchment area in Australia with pMRI. These results allow us to assess the accuracy of our local staging with ramifications to the clinical decisions being made in the context of the more recent trials which questioned the need for neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy in all node positive patients.

Should cardiac surgery be delayed in patients with uncorrected hypothyroidism?

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: 'should cardiac surgery be delayed in patients with uncorrected hypothyroidism?' A total of 1412 papers were found using the reported search, of which 7 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. There was limited high-quality evidence with the majority of the studies being retrospective. One propensity-matched analysis and 6 cohort studies provided the evidence that there was no significant difference in the rate of major adverse cardiac events including mortality based on thyroid status. However, hypothyroidism and subclinical hypothyroidism were associated with higher rates of postoperative atrial fibrillation. Based on the available evidence, we conclude that cardiac surgery should not be delayed to allow achievement of euthyroid status.

Comparison of novel oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for post-operative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting.

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was 'Does the use of Novel Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) result in more complications than Warfarin for treatment of post-operative atrial fibrillation (AF) following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)?' Altogether more than 93 papers were found using the reported search with 4 studies representing the best evidence to answer the clinical question, including 1 randomised trial and 3 retrospective case-control studies. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers were tabulated. Timing for initiation of anticoagulation was similar across the studies, with both demonstrating longer hospital stays and greater time to reach therapeutic anticoagulation in the warfarin cohort. Three studies reported similar safety between the two groups. One study revealed significantly more invasive interventions for pleural or pericardial effusions in the NOAC group, whilst in contrast another study demonstrated a higher rate of major bleeding in the warfarin cohort. Cost-analysis revealed that NOACs were overall more cost-effective compared to warfarin despite the higher cost for the medication itself. In conclusion, the use of NOACs after CABG for post-operative AF can be used as an alternative to warfarin, however, one should remain vigilant for possible pericardial or pleural effusions which may require reintervention. Further dedicated research and larger appropriately powered randomised control trials are needed to confirm the safety of NOACs in post-cardiac surgery patients.

In patients undergoing dialysis who require a valve replacement is a bioprosthetic valve superior to a mechanical prosthesis in terms of long-term survival and morbidity?

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was 'In [dialysis patients undergoing a valve replacement] is [a bioprosthetic valve superior to a mechanical prosthesis] for [long-term survival and morbidity]'. Altogether more than 501 papers were found using the reported search, of which five represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. There was limited high-quality evidence with all studies being retrospective. One meta-analysis and four cohort studies provided the evidence that there was no significant difference in long-term survival based on prosthesis type. However, the majority of studies demonstrated a significantly higher rate of valve-related complications including bleeding and thromboembolism, and readmission to hospital in the mechanical valve prosthesis group, likely related to the requirement for long-term anticoagulation. We conclude that overall long-term survival in dialysis-dependent patients is poor. While prosthesis type does not play a significant contributing role to long-term survival, bioprosthetic valves were associated with significantly fewer valve-related complications. Based on the available evidence, a bioprosthetic valve may be more suitable in this high-risk group of patients as it may avoid the complications associated with long-term anticoagulation without any reduction in long-term survival.

How to do a handsewn reversal of ileostomy: a systematic technique for new surgical trainees.

A straightforward, systematic and reproducible framework for junior registrars to adopt when learning the handsewn ileostomy closure technique.

General Surgeons Australia's 12-point plan for emergency general surgery.

In the last decade, emergency general surgery (EGS) in Australia and New Zealand has seen a transition from the traditional on-call system to the acute surgical unit (ASU) model. The importance and growing demand for EGS has resulted in the implementation of the General Surgeons Australia's 12-point plan for emergency surgery. Since its release, the 12-point plan has been used as a benchmark of a well-functioning ASU, both locally and abroad. This study aims to provide a descriptive review on the relevance of the 12-point plan to the ASU model and review the current evidence to support this framework. The review concludes that the establishment of the ASU model has met the aims set out by the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons for EGS. The 12-point plan is relevant and has good evidence to support its framework.