Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
World Allergy Organ J ; 17(8): 100936, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39211425

RESUMEN

Background: Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR) are a group of delayed presumed T-cell mediated hypersensitivities associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite their shared global healthcare burden and impact, the clinical phenotypes, genomic predisposition, drug causality, and treatment outcomes may vary. We describe the establishment and results from the first Australasian registry for SCAR (AUS-SCAR), that via a collaborative network advances strategies for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of SCAR. Methods: Prospective multi-center registry of SCAR in Australian adult and adolescents, with planned regional expansion. The registry collects externally verified phenotypic data drug causality, therapeutics and long-term patient outcomes. In addition, biorepository specimens and DNA are collected at participating sites. Results: we report on the first 100 patients enrolled in the AUS-SCAR database. DRESS (50%) is the most predominant phenotype followed by SJS/TEN (39%) and AGEP (10%), with median age of 52 years old (IQR 37.5, 66) with 1:1 male-to-female ratio. The median latency for all implicated drugs is highly variable but similar for DRESS (median 15 days IQR 5,25) and SJS/TEN (median 21 days, IQR 7,27), while lowest for AGEP (median 2.5 days, IQR 1,8). Antibiotics (54.5%) are more commonly listed as primary implicated drug compare with non-antibiotics agent (45.5%). Mortality rate at 90 days was highest in SJS/TEN at 23.1%, followed by DRESS (4%) and AGEP (0%). Conclusion: In the first prospective national phenotypic and biorepository of SCAR in the southern hemisphere we demonstrate notable differences to other reported registries; including DRESS-predominant phenotype, varied antibiotic causality and low overall mortality rate. This study also highlights the lack of standardised preventative pharmacogenomic measures and in vitro/in vivo diagnostic strategies to ascertain drug causality. Trial registration: ANZCTR ACTRN12619000241134. Registered 19 February 2019.

4.
BMJ Case Rep ; 20162016 Jan 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26823364

RESUMEN

A man in his 60s was brought to the emergency department, with airway compromise and dysarthria due to a grossly enlarged tongue. As he was on a current course of antibiotics, he was treated for a likely antibiotic-associated allergic reaction. However, as he failed to improve with intramuscular and nebulised epinephrine, another cause of his symptoms was sought. Further discussion revealed a history of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), which had recently relapsed. Investigations were ordered to confirm that the symptoms were due to acquired angioedema, and the patient was managed for this diagnosis based on the presence of an undetectable C4 level. This diagnosis was later confirmed when the results of specialist tests became available. The patient was treated for his relapsed CLL with good effect, and has had no further episodes of angioedema and an improvement in the level of his C1 esterase protein level and function.


Asunto(s)
Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas/tratamiento farmacológico , Angioedema/tratamiento farmacológico , Epinefrina/uso terapéutico , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/complicaciones , Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas/etiología , Proteínas Inactivadoras del Complemento 1/deficiencia , Humanos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA