Effect of a family and interdisciplinary intervention to prevent T2D: randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Lifestyle changes can reduce the risk of T2D; however, no study has evaluated the effect of a lifestyle intervention involving patients´ family. The aim of this study was to compare the impact of an interdisciplinary family (FI) Vs individual intervention (II) on glucose metabolism, insulin resistance (IR), pancreatic ß-cell function and cardiovascular risk markers in patients with prediabetes, as well as to measure the impact on their families' metabolic risk. METHODS: Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) to compare the impact of FI and II on IR and pancreatic ß-cell function in subjects with prediabetes. There were 122 subjects with prediabetes (and 101 family members) randomized to FI or II. Data were collected in 2015-2016 and analyzed in 2017-2018. FI group had the support of their family members, who also received personalized diet and exercise recommendations; patients and their family members attended monthly a lifestyle enhancement program. II group received personalized diet and exercise recommendations. The follow-up was for 12 months. Glucose, IR, pancreatic ß-cell function and secondary outcomes (body composition and lipid profile) were assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: FI group improved area under the glucose curve (AUC) (from 18,597 ± 2611 to 17,237 ± 2792, p = 0.004) and the Matsuda index (from 3.5 ± 2.3 to 4.7 ± 3.5, p = 0.05) at 12 months. II group improved Disposition Index (from 1.5 ± 0.4 to 1.9 ± 0.73, p < .0001) at 12 months. The improvements achieved in weight and lipids at 6 months, were lost in II group at 12 moths, whereas in FI persisted. Adherence up to 12 months was not different between the study groups (FI 56% Vs II 60%). CONCLUSIONS: FI intervention was more effective by improving glucose AUC, insulin sensitivity and lipid profile, besides that, metabolic risk in family members of the FI group was maintained, while the risk of II group was increased. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov on December 15, 2015 (NTC026365646).

The combination of linagliptin, metformin and lifestyle modification to prevent type 2 diabetes (PRELLIM). A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Prediabetes is a highly prevalent health problem with a high risk of complications and progression to type 2 diabetes (T2D). The goals of this study were to evaluate the effect of the combination of lingaliptin + metformin + lifestyle on glucose tolerance, pancreatic ß-cell function and T2D incidence in patients with prediabetes. METHODS: A single center parallel double-blind randomized clinical trial with 24 months of follow-up in patients with impaired glucose tolerance plus two T2D risk factors which were randomized to linagliptin 5 mg + metformin 1700 mg daily + lifestyle (LM group) or metformin 1700 mg daily + lifestyle (M group). Primary outcomes were regression to normoglycemia and T2D incidence; glucose levels and pancreatic ß-cell function were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Subjects were screened for eligibility by OGTT and 144 patients with prediabetes were randomized to LM group (n = 74) or M group (n = 70); 52 and 36 participants in the LM group and 52 and 27 participants in the M group, completed the 12 and 24 months of treatment, respectively; average follow-up was 17 ±â€¯6 and 18 ±â€¯7 months in M and LM group, respectively. Glucose levels during OGTT improved more in LM group. OGTT disposition index (DI) improved significantly better during the first months in LM group, increasing from 1·31 (95% CI: 1·14-1·49) to 2·41 (95% CI: 2.10-2.72) and to 2.07 (95% CI: 1.82-2.31) at 6 and 24 months in LM group vs from 1.21 (95% CI: 0.98-1.34) to 1.56 (95% CI: 1.17-1.95) and to 1.72 (95% CI: 1.45-1.98) at 6 and 24 months in M group (p < .05). T2D incidence was higher in M group in comparison to LM group (HR 4.0, 95% CI: 1.24-13.04, p = .020). The probability of achieving normoglycemia was higher in LM group (OR 3.26 CI 95% 1.55-6.84). No major side effects were observed during the study. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of linagliptin, metformin and lifestyle improved significantly glucose metabolism and pancreatic ß-cell function, and reduced T2D incidence in subjects with prediabetes as compared to metformin and lifestyle.

Pancreatic ß-cell dysfunction in normoglycemic patients and risk factors.

AIMS: To evaluate pancreatic ß-cell function (ßf) in patients with normoglycemia (NG) and normal glucose tolerance (NGT) and related risk factors. METHODS: An observational and comparative study in 527 patients with NG and NGT that were divided by quartiles of ßf according to the disposition index derived from OGTT. Anthropometrical, clinical, nutritional, and biochemical variables were measured and associated with ßf. RESULTS: Quartiles of ßf were Q1 = DI < 1.93 n = 131, Q2 = DI 1.93-2.45 n = 134, Q3 = DI 2.46-3.1 n = 133, and Q4 = DI > 3.1 n = 129. There was a progressive reduction in pancreatic ß-cell function and it is negatively correlated with age, weight, BMI, total body fat and visceral fat, waist circumference, total cholesterol, LDL, and triglycerides (p < 0.01). Glucose levels during OGTT had a negative correlation with ßf; the product of fasting glucose by 1-h glucose had the best correlation with ßf (r = 0.611, p < 0.001) and was the best predictor of ßdf (AUC 0.816, CI 95% 0.774-0.857), even better than 1-h glucose (r = 0.581, p < 0.001). Energy, fat, and carbohydrate intake were negatively correlated with ßf (p < 0.05). Glucose levels at 1-h OGTT > 110 mg/dl were positively associated with pancreatic ßdf (OR 6.85, CI 95% 3.86-12.4). In the multivariate analysis, glucose levels during OGTT, fasting insulin, and BMI were the main factors associated with ßf. CONCLUSIONS: A subgroup of patients with NG and NGT may have a loss of 40% of their ßf. Factors related to this ßdf were age, adiposity, glucose during OGTT, and the product of fasting and 1-h glucose, as well as food intake.