Predictors of myocardial recovery in arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy: A multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC) is characterized by improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) following arrhythmia treatment. Predictors of recovery in LVEF are not well understood. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated predictors of AIC recovery in a large multicenter cohort. METHODS: In total, 243 patients (age 65 ± 11, 73% male) with AIC caused by atrial fibrillation (49%), atrial tachycardia (20%), and premature ventricular contractions (PVCs; 31%) were treated and included. LVEF was assessed before and after treatment. Patients were stratified by arrhythmia duration (known [KN, n = 132] vs. unknown [UKN, n = 111]), arrhythmia type, LVEF, and presence of structural heart disease (SHD). RESULTS: Arrhythmia treatment was rhythm control in 95%. Median arrhythmia duration in the KN group was 47 months (25-75th percentile, 24-80 months). Post treatment LVEF was higher in KN group (55.9 ± 7 vs. 46.2 ± 12%; p < .0001) but the degree of LVEF improvement was similar (21.2 ± 9 vs. 19.4 ± 11; p = .16). Comparing highest quartile (longest arrhythmia duration) versus the rest of the KN group, the extent of LVEF improvement was similar (21.5 ± 8 vs. 21 ± 9%; p = .1). Patients in lowest index LVEF quartile (n = 74) had more PVC-induced AIC, greater EF improvement after treatment (24 ± 17 vs. 19 ± 7%; p < .0001) but lower post treatment EF (45 ± 14 vs. 54 ± 8%; p < .0001) versus other patients. Patients with SHD had lower index EF (28 ± 8 vs. 34 ± 8%; p < .0001) and lower final EF (47 ± 12 vs. 56 ± 7; p ≪ .0001). In multivariate regression, low index LVEF predicted myocardial recovery (odds ratio, 11.4; p < .005). CONCLUSIONS: In this AIC cohort, LVEF improved regardless of arrhythmia duration or type but those with PVCs had lower index LVEF and had less recovery. Low index LVEF predicted LVEF recovery following arrhythmia treatment.

Perioperative predictors of permanent pacing and long-term dependence following tricuspid valve surgery: a multicentre analysis.

AIMS: Permanent pacemaker placement (PPM) is often required after valvular surgery and is especially common following tricuspid valve surgery [tricuspid valve repair or replacement (TVR)]. Literature suggests that surgical intervention for isolated tricuspid valve disease is becoming more prevalent. Predictors of PPM dependency following TVR are currently unknown and would be clinically useful from a prognostication standpoint. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a multicentre, retrospective study to assess perioperative factors of TVR that predispose to PPM placement and long-term PPM dependency from 2008 to 2014. Regression analysis was used to determine independent predictors of PPM implantation. A total of 237 patients (age 66 ± 15 years, 29% male) were studied, and the incidence of PPM placement following TVR was 27% (65/237). No significant differences were observed between those who received PPM and those who did not in age (P = 0.092), gender (P = 0.359), and co-morbidities. Regression analysis identified cross-clamp time >60 min (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.3-12.9, P = 0.015) and concomitant mitral valve surgery (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.2-12.2, P = 0.026) as independent risk factors for PPM following TVR. Long-term PPM dependency data were only available in 28 patients who received PPM with 14 of these patients developing long-term dependence. The only statistically significant difference noted was an increased frequency of coronary artery disease in the long-term dependent group vs. the non-dependent group (64% vs. 14%, P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Cross-clamp time >60 min and concomitant mitral valve surgery were independent predictors of PPM implantation following TVR. Long-term PPM dependency is more prevalent after TVR than other types of valvular surgery.