Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 29(6): 325-337, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38549280

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with COVID-19 is associated with poor prognosis. This study assessed the hitherto uninvestigated impact of COVID-19 on the progression and clinical outcomes of patients with AKI. METHODS: Data from 576 patients with AKI admitted between 13/3/20 and 13/5/20 were studied. Increasingly complex analyses, from logistic regressions to competing-risk and multi-state models, have revealed insights into AKI progression dynamics associated with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 acquisition and death. Meta-analyses of case fatality ratios among patients with AKI were also conducted. RESULTS: The overall case-fatality ratio was 0.33 [95% CI (0.20-0.36)]; higher in COVID-19 positive (COVID+) patients 0.52 [95% CI (0.46-0.58)] than in their negative (COVID-) counterparts 0.16 [95% CI (0.12-0.20)]. In AKI Stage-3 patients, that was 0.71 [95% CI (0.64-0.79)] among COVID+ patients with 45% dead within 14 days and 0.35 [95% CI (0.25-0.44)] in the COVID- group and 28% died within 14 days. Among patients diagnosed with AKI Stage-1 within 24 h, the probability of progression to AKI Stage-3 on day 7 post admission was 0.22 [95% CI (0.17-0.27)] among COVID+ patients, and 0.06 [95% CI (0.03, 0.09)] among those who tested negative. The probability of discharge by day 7 was 0.71 [95% CI (0.66, 0.75)] in COVID- patients, and 0.27 [95% CI (0.21, 0.32)] in COVID+ patients. By day 14, in AKI Stage-3 COVID+ patients, that was 0.35 [95% CI (0.25, 0.44)] with little change by day 10, that is, 0.38 [95% CI (0.29, 0.47)]. CONCLUSION: These results are consistent with either a rapid progression in severity, prolonged hospital care, or high case fatality ratio among AKI Stage-3 patients, significantly exacerbated by COVID-19 infection.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , COVID-19 , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Lesión Renal Aguda/mortalidad , Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , SARS-CoV-2 , Factores de Riesgo , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Clin Kidney J ; 17(3): sfae034, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38476400

RESUMEN

The purpose of this retrospective review is to question the validity of the condition 'loin pain haematuria syndrome' (LPHS). We highlight the possibility that most patients regarded as having LPHS have a psychiatric/psychological basis for their symptoms, particularly loin pain. Because of this, and because it recurs despite treatment, the review also questions the use of treatments that are invasive, expensive, and carry considerable morbidity.

3.
Med Sci Educ ; 33(5): 1073-1079, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37886281

RESUMEN

Background: Recording large-group lectures is commonplace in higher education, allowing students to access content asynchronously and remotely. With the move towards online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, recording of small-group teaching sessions has also become increasingly common; however, the educational value of this practice is unknown. Methods: All medical students rotating through the Acute Medicine Department of a large teaching hospital were invited to enrol in the study. Consenting students were recorded for the second half of an online case-based learning (CBL) session. The recording was available for 6 months; viewing patterns were analysed. Students were sent a questionnaire after the session, asking them to reflect on the recorded and unrecorded halves of the session. Findings: Thirty-three students underwent recording in 12 separate groups; 31 students (94%) completed the questionnaire. All 31 respondents (100%) described the session as "useful" or "very useful". Twenty-four respondents (77%) recommended continuing to record small-group sessions and 17 (55%) reported being "likely" or "very likely" to watch the recording. Six respondents (19%) reported a negative impact of being recorded. During 6 months of follow-up, no students returned to view the recording for more than 1 minute. Conclusion: Despite positive feedback for the session and high student demand for ongoing recording, no students viewed the recording for any significant duration. One-fifth of students reported a negative impact of being recorded. The findings from this study do not support routine recording of small-group CBL sessions, even where demand for this may exist. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-023-01837-5.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...