Community level youth-led interventions to improve maternal-neonatal outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of randomised trials.

Background: Evidence on the effectiveness of youth-led interventions for improving maternal-neonatal health and well-being of women and gender diverse childbearing people in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) is incomplete. We aimed to summarise the evidence on whether community level youth-led interventions can improve maternal and neonatal outcomes in LMICs. Methods: We included experimental studies of youth-led interventions versus no intervention, standard care, or another intervention. Participants were women and gender diverse childbearing people during antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum periods. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Global Health, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, and grey literature were searched to January 2023. All interventions addressing and targeting maternal-neonatal health and well-being that were youth-led and community level were included. Primary outcomes of interest were maternal death and neonatal death. We excluded based on population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) and design. Two reviewers independently extracted key information from each included study and assessed risk of bias. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed where there were sufficient data. The certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). A narrative synthesis was done for results that could not be pooled. Results: Of the 8054 records retrieved, four trials (21 813 enrolled participants) met the inclusion criteria. The Cooperative for Assistance and Relieve Everywhere, Inc. (CARE) Community Score Card intervention compared to standard reproductive health services control did not significantly improve Antenatal Care coverage (difference-in-differences estimate ß = 0.04; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.11, 0.18, P = 0.610; one study, low certainty of evidence). The multi-component social mobilisation interventions compared to standard of care had no effect on adolescent/youth pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio estimate = 1.08; 95% CI = 0.87, 1.33; three studies; low certainty of evidence). Conclusions: Youth-led interventions in LMICs did not show a significant improvement in maternal outcomes. More studies are required to make more precise conclusions. Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42021288798.

Community Level Youth-Led Interventions to Improve Maternal-Neonatal Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Protocol for a Systematic Review.

Introduction: On a global scale, women and childbearing people and neonates continue to die from preventable causes related to pregnancy or childbirth. Sustained and accelerated efforts are critical to improve maternal and neonatal health and well-being. Globally, youth are a growing population and have strength in their numbers. Youth are critical, key drivers of change in their communities. Young people hold the potential to affect positive change, and their meaningful engagement is important to improving maternal health and well-being in low- and middle-income countries. Objectives: To assess the effects of community level youth-led interventions for improving maternal-neonatal health and well-being compared with no interventions or another intervention. Methods: We will undertake a literature search that is comprehensive, complete, and exhaustive. This will include databases such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, as well as a grey literature search. In our systematic review, we will include experimental studies evaluating maternal-neonatal health and well-being associated with or because of the implementation of community level youth-led interventions. Participants will include women and childbearing people (of any age) during antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum periods (up to 42 days postpartum). We will examine all interventions addressing and targeting maternal-neonatal health and well-being that are youth-led and community-based and aimed at the members of the community. Our comparators will be no intervention or another intervention. Our primary outcomes are maternal deaths and neonatal deaths. Our review will include only studies in low- and middle-income countries conducted in urban or rural areas. Ethics and Dissemination. Ethics approval is not required as we will use secondary data that is publicly available. There are no active participants in our study. We will involve key stakeholders and experts in maternal-neonatal health regarding dissemination and knowledge mobilization strategies. Our findings will be disseminated as an open access publication, be presented publicly, and defended as part of a doctoral thesis. This trial is registered with CRD42021288798.

Modifiable Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease in Korea and Japan.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death and a major contributor to disability worldwide. Since the majority of cardiovascular events are preventable, identification of modifiable CVD risk factors and implementation of primordial prevention strategies should be a public health priority. In this aspect, the American Heart Association declared a strategic goal to reduce total CVD mortality in the US by 20% within 10 years via eliminating 7 major CVD risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, cigarette smoking, physical inactivity, obesity, and poor-quality diet) in 2010, and their strategy has been achieving. However, the applicability of similar metrics to prevent CVD among East Asians requires an in-depth investigation of the modifiable CVD risk factors based on national and regional evidence-based findings. Herein, this review article aims to discuss several modifiable risk factors for CVDs, using epidemiological evidence from cohort studies and nationally representative data of 2 East Asian countries: Korea and Japan.

Stressful life events and serum triglyceride levels: the Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases Etiology Research Center cohort in Korea.

OBJECTIVES: Elevated serum triglyceride levels are a risk factor for developing cardiovascular disease. A number of studies have demonstrated a positive association between psychological stress and serum triglyceride levels. However, there is limited evidence regarding the impact of stressful life events (SLEs) on serum triglyceride levels in the healthy population. Therefore, we evaluated the independent association between SLEs and serum triglyceride levels in a middle-aged Korean population. METHODS: We analyzed a sample of 2,963 people (aged 30-64 years; 36% men) using baseline data from the Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases Etiology Research Center (CMERC) cohort study. The Korean version of the Life Experience Survey questionnaire was used to measure the presence and positive/negative impact of SLEs. Hypertriglyceridemia was defined as a fasting serum triglyceride level of ≥ 150 mg/dL. RESULTS: Of the 2,963 participants, 33.1% reported at least 1 SLE over the past 6 months and 24.8% had hypertriglyceridemia. Even after adjusting for potential confounders, the serum triglyceride level was significantly associated with the total number of SLEs in men (3.333 mg/dL per event; p= 0.001), but not in women (0.451 mg/dL per event, p= 0.338). Hypertriglyceridemia was also associated with having 4 or more SLEs with positive effects (odds ratio [OR], 2.57; 95% CI, 1.02 to 6.46) and 4 or more SLEs with negative effects (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.16 to 3.41) in men. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that SLEs may increase the risk of hypertriglyceridemia in middle-aged men.