RESUMEN
Purpose: A study among Filipinos revealed that only 15% of patients with diabetes achieved glycemic control, and poor response to metformin could be one of the possible reasons. Recent studies demonstrate how genetic variations influence response to metformin. Hence, the present study aimed to determine genetic variants associated with poor response to metformin. Methods: Using a candidate variant approach, 195 adult Filipino participants with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were enrolled in a case-control study. Genomic DNA from blood samples were collected. Allelic and genotypic associations of variants with poor response to metformin were determined using exact statistical methods. Results: Several polymorphisms were nominally associated with poor response to metformin (P uncorrâ <â 0.05). The most notable is the association of multiple variants in the SLC2A10 gene-rs2425911, rs3092412, and rs2425904-with common additive genetic mode of inheritance. Other variants that have possible associations with poor drug response include rs340874 (PROX-AS1), rs815815 (CALM2), rs1333049 (CDKN2B-AS1), rs2010963 (VEGFA), rs1535435 and rs9494266 (AHI1), rs11128347 (PDZRN3), rs1805081 (NPC1), and rs13266634 (SLC30A8). Conclusion: In Filipinos, a trend for the association for several variants was noted, with further observation that several mechanisms may be involved. The results may serve as pilot data for further validation of candidate variants for T2DM pharmacotherapy.
RESUMEN
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a known risk factor for morbidity and mortality among patients with COVID-19 based on recent studies. While there are many local and international guidelines on inpatient management of diabetes, the complicated pathology of the virus, the use of glucose-elevating drugs such as glucocorticoids, antivirals and even inotropes, and various other unique problems has made the management of in-hospital hyperglycemia among patients with COVID-19 much more difficult than in other infections. The objective of this guidance is to collate and integrate the best available evidence that has been published regarding in-patient management of diabetes among patients with COVID-19. A comprehensive review of literature was done and recommendations have been made through a consensus of expert endocrinologists from the University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital (UP-PGH) Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. These recommendations are evolving as we continue to understand the pathology of the disease and how persons with diabetes are affected by this virus.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of heparinoid supplementation on all-cause mortality and disease progression in diabetic kidney disease (DKD). METHODOLOGY: Trials evaluating heparinoid supplementation in DKD were included. Two authors performed a literature search with eligible studies undergoing validity screen, data extraction, and statistical analysis. Results were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio for dichotomous variables and the inverse variance method for continuous variables, and pooled using a random or fixed effects model depending on heterogeneity. RESULTS: Twelve trials were included in the analysis. Eight involved sulodexide while two each involved low molecular weight heparin and danaparoid. We found no statistically significant difference between the heparinoid and placebo groups for all-cause mortality (95% CI, HR 0.79 [0.41, 1.53], p=0.49), number of patients reaching therapeutic success (95% CI, OR 0.97 [0.71, 1.33], p=0.87), serum creatinine (95% CI, MD 2.55 umol/L [-0.54, 5.65], p=0.11), and creatinine clearance (95% CI, MD -8.55 mg/min [-18.28, 1.18], p=0.09). We also found no statistically significant difference in urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER) between Type 2 heparinoid-treated DKD patients compared to placebo (95% CI, log transformed MD 0.13 mg/24h [-0.42, 0.68], p=0.65); however, a statistically significant UAER reduction was seen in Type 1 heparinoid-treated DKD patients compared to placebo (95% CI, log-transformed MD -1.5 mg/24h [-2.79, -0.21], p=0.02). This subgroup analysis was performed due to initial heterogeneity (I2=57%). CONCLUSION: Heparinoid supplementation was not associated with statistically significant changes in Type 2 DM patients. However, it may be associated with a statistically significant UAER reduction of approximately 31.62 mg/24 h as compared to placebo in Type 1 DM patients. Due to sparse data on hard clinical outcomes, larger studies are recommended.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Hazards of hypoglycemia include accidents, cardiovascular events, neurologic damage, and impaired hypoglycemia awareness (IHA) which presents as inability to perceive and respond to hypoglycemic warning symptoms. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop the first questionnaire evaluating IHA adapted from Clarke Hypoglycemia Index (CHI) and validated among adult Filipino patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). METHODOLOGY: A questionnaire development study was conducted involving CHI linguistic translation, its modification through literature review and focus group discussions, panel synthesis, and content validity. A cross-sectional analytic study followed by administration of the questionnaire to 117 adult Filipinos with T2DM, advanced age, long-standing T2DM, insulin or sulfonylurea, polypharmacy, comorbidities and/or prior hypoglycemia. There were 9 participants in pilot testing, 69 in criterion validity against continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and 108 in construct validity. RESULTS: IHA domains in the concept map included Elusive Euglycemia Model, Developmental Model, and Cognitive Model. The Filipino-CHI formulated had 8 questions with content validity scores ranging from 87.5-93.75%. Owing to brevity, its internal consistency Cronbach's alpha was 0.45. Criterion validity against CGM yielded 21 patients with biochemical hypoglycemic events, of which 2 had clinical hypoglycemic events and 19 were positive monitor-identified IHA. A questionnaire IHA cutoff score of ≥4 had sensitivity of 89.47%, and area under the curve of 0.55. CONCLUSION: An 8-item questionnaire evaluating IHA among adult Filipino T2DM patients was developed and validated.
RESUMEN
Objective. Previous studies have demonstrated the role of genetic susceptibility in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy. The study aimed to determine the frequencies of angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) gene insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism in a pilot population of Filipino type 2 diabetic patients and normal controls. Methods. An analysis of the ACE gene polymorphism was performed in 42 diabetic patients with and without nephropathy, and 24 normal controls. The analysis was done using polymerase chain reaction, restriction enzyme digestion, and gel electrophoresis techniques to determine the polymorphism (II, DD or ID). Independent T-tests and chi-square tests were used to compare clinical characteristics, and logistic regression analysis was done to determine odds ratio for development of nephropathy. Results. The ID polymorphism of the ACE gene was more frequent (52.4%) in patients with diabetic nephropathy (n=21). In those without nephropathy (n=21), II was more common (61.9%). ID was the more frequent genotype in the normal controls (n=24) (58.3%). The odds of developing diabetic nephropathy were increased by 4.8 times in those with ID polymorphism, and 2.9 times in those with DD. Conclusion. The D allele was more common in patients with diabetic nephropathy, similar to the observation in South Indian patients. Since the study involved only a small pilot group, studies on a larger population is needed to establish the hypothesized role of the D allele in susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy in Filipinos.
