RESUMEN
Objective Status epilepticus (SE) presents a critical neurological emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality rates worldwide. However, the determinants influencing outcomes in SE within specific regional contexts remain less explored, especially within North India. Understanding the factors influencing the prognosis of SE in this region is crucial for tailored therapeutic approaches and improved patient outcomes. Materials and methods This observational study was conducted at Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh, India, from December 1, 2020, to November 31, 2022. Patients who presented with convulsive SE lasting more than five minutes or repetitive and discrete seizures with impaired consciousness between the interictal period for at least 30 minutes were included in the study. Their clinical and biochemical variables at presentation were assessed and correlated with the outcome. Results Out of the 110 patients included in the study, males represented 59.1% (n=65), outnumbering females, who comprised 40.9% (n=45). Favourable outcome was observed in 66.36% (n=73) of patients, and unfavourable outcome was observed in 33.63% (n=37). The mean time interval between seizure onset to the patient's arrival at the hospital was 5.30 ± 4.96 hours, and the mean time interval between seizure onset to the point of seizure control was 7.10 ± 6.38 hours. On analysing the factors associated with unfavourable outcome, the type of seizure at onset (p=0.021), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of <=12 at presentation (p<0.001), presence of refractory seizure (p<0.001), presence of abnormal epileptiform discharges on electroencephalography (p=0.001), Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS) of >2 (p<0.001), serum lactate levels (p<0.001), duration of hospital stay (p=0.004), time interval between seizure onset to hospital arrival (p<0.001) and time interval between seizure onset to the point of seizure control (p<0.001) showed significant association. However, on analysing the independent risk factors of unfavourable outcome using multivariate logistic regression, only duration of hospital stay (p<0.001, odds ratio (OR): 1.205, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.046-1.389), and GCS of less than or equal to 12 at presentation (p<0.001, OR: 12.354, 95% CI: 2.974-51.319) showed significant association. Conclusions Our study highlighted key clinical and time-related parameters influencing the outcome of convulsive SE. Understanding these factors is crucial for better treatment and improved patient outcomes. Further research is essential for refining interventions in this complex condition.
RESUMEN
Chronic diarrhea poses a diagnostic challenge due to its diverse etiology, encompassing various gastrointestinal disorders. This case report emphasizes the clinical significance of considering common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) as a potential underlying cause in a patient presenting with chronic diarrhea. In this case study, we describe a 36-year-old female with a 9-year history of chronic diarrhea, recurrent sinopulmonary infections, and weight loss for 3 years, where previous evaluations failed to yield a diagnosis. This case underscores the diagnostic hurdles faced by healthcare professionals, often causing a delay in identifying fewer common conditions like immunodeficiency syndromes. Early recognition of CVID is crucial, enabling timely intervention with immunoglobulin replacement therapy, markedly enhancing patients' quality of life and averting complications. This report highlights the necessity for a comprehensive evaluation of non-responsive chronic diarrhea cases and raises awareness about CVID as an essential consideration, facilitating precise diagnoses and tailored treatments.