Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 49
Filtrar
5.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(1): 79-83, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37840237

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous overrepresentations of contact allergies and photocontact allergies are common in individuals with photocontact allergy to ketoprofen. AIMS: To investigate whether contact allergy to oxidised (ox.) geraniol, geraniol, geranial, neral and citral is overrepresented in individuals with photocontact allergy to ketoprofen. METHODS: The contact allergy rates to ox. geraniol, geraniol, geranial, neral and citral in routinely patch tested dermatitis patients were compared with the corresponding rates in individuals with photocontact allergy to ketoprofen. RESULTS: Allergic patch test reactions were noted to ox. geraniol 11% (n = 39, 5.8%), ox. geraniol 6% (n = 12, 1.8%), geraniol 6% (n = 2, 0.3%), geranial (n = 18, 2.7%), neral (n = 7, 1.0%) and citral (n = 15, 2.2%). In those four patients who were diagnosed with photocontact allergy to ketoprofen during the test period, a significant overrepresentation (p = 0.020) of simultaneous contact allergy to ox. geraniol 11% was demonstrated. Overrepresentation of simultaneous contact allergy to various combinations of ox. geraniol, ox. limonene and ox. linalool was also noted in ketoprofen-photoallergic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Contact allergy to ox. geraniol, geranial and citral is common in routinely tested dermatitis patients. There is an overrepresentation of simultaneous contact allergy to ox. geraniol, ox. limonene and ox. linalool in patients with photocontact allergy to ketoprofen.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Fotoalérgica , Cetoprofeno , Humanos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Cetoprofeno/efectos adversos , Limoneno , Dermatitis Fotoalérgica/epidemiología , Dermatitis Fotoalérgica/etiología , Pruebas del Parche
6.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(1): 74-78, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37915267

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Contact allergy to the mint-tasting flavour carvone has been observed in patients with oral lichenoid lesions (OLL). Mint-flavoured products such as toothpaste frequently contain carvone. Snuff is a smokeless tobacco product that is chewed or placed in the mouth rather than smoked. In Sweden, the use of snuff and its flavoured versions is extremely common. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether the consumption of mint-flavoured snuff is associated with contact allergy to carvone and subsequently plays a role in the aetiology of OLL. METHODS: Regarding the two patients, patch testing with snuff pouches was performed. High-performance liquid chromatography and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis were used for identification of carvone in different snuff samples. RESULTS: Two patients with OLL were contacted allergic to carvone when patch tested. Both were using mint-flavoured snuffs several hours a day for many years. One patient was contacted allergic to the snuff pouch tested as is. Carvone was detected in the snuff samples of both patients. CONCLUSIONS: The patients were recommended to avoid the use of mint-flavoured snuffs, toothpaste and foodstuffs. At follow-up 3 months later, the patients had a dramatic clinical improvement of the OLL and oral symptoms. Exposure to mint-flavoured snuffs can be overlooked as a possible aggravating/provoking factor in OLL.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Tabaco sin Humo , Humanos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Tabaco sin Humo/efectos adversos , Pastas de Dientes , Monoterpenos Ciclohexánicos
7.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 103: adv22336, 2023 Dec 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38078690

RESUMEN

Fibromyalgia is a common chronic pain condition. Rates of contact allergy in individuals with fibromyalgia have not been widely studied. Systemic contact allergy can present with muscle and joint pain and general malaise. The aim of this study is to investigate contact allergy rates in individuals with fibromyalgia to the sensitizers in an extended dental series and compare with control groups. Contact allergy to gold was significantly more common in the fibromyalgia group than the dermatitis control group. When corrected for patch test system, contact allergy to gold was significantly more common in the fibromyalgia group than the dental control group. Contact allergy to hydroxyethyl methacrylate and grouped acrylates and methacrylates was significantly more common in the fibromyalgia group than the dental control group. In conclusion, individuals with fibromyalgia may have a propensity to sensitization to gold, either via an increased exposure or an alteration in the oral environment. Gold is also implicated in systemic contact dermatitis and may be a factor in elicitation of symptoms in individuals with fibromyalgia. Acrylate allergy is also common in the fibromyalgia population and may be a consequence of occupational exposure or dental treatment.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Fibromialgia , Humanos , Dermatitis Profesional/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Alérgenos , Pruebas del Parche , Oro/efectos adversos , Fibromialgia/diagnóstico , Fibromialgia/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Acrilatos/efectos adversos , Metacrilatos/efectos adversos
9.
Contact Dermatitis ; 89(2): 103-106, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37194199

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antioxidants in medical devices, added to protect polymers or adhesives, may also cause contact dermatitis in some individuals. OBJECTIVES: To present data on sensitization to 4,4'-thiobis(2-tert-butyl-5-methylphenol), an antioxidant detected in some types of medical devices, for six patients that experienced eczematous reactions to different medical devices. METHODS: Patch testing with 4,4'-thiobis(2-tert-butyl-5-methylphenol), 1% pet was performed. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used for identification of 4,4'-thiobis(2-tert-butyl-5-methylphenol) in different medical device products. RESULTS: Six patients with contact allergy to 4,4'-thiobis(2-tert-butyl-5-methylphenol) also had relevant contact allergic reactions to medical devices containing the antioxidant. The presence of the antioxidant in products was detected using GC-MS analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The antioxidant 4,4'-thiobis(2-tert-butyl-5-methylphenol) may cause allergic contact dermatitis after exposure to different medical devices.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Humanos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Antioxidantes/efectos adversos , Cresoles , Pruebas del Parche/efectos adversos
12.
Contact Dermatitis ; 88(1): 54-59, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36112512

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The textile dye mix (TDM) 6.6% in petrolatum contains Disperse Blue (DB) 35, Disperse Yellow 3, Disperse Orange (DO) 1 and 3, Disperse Red 1 and 17, and DB 106 and 124. The most frequent allergen in TDM-positive patients is DO 3. Around 85% of para-phenylenediamine (PPD)-allergic dermatitis patients have been positive to DO 3. There has been a discussion to exclude DO 3 from TDM 6.6% because of strong simultaneous reactions to TDM and PPD. OBJECTIVES: To study if DO 3 can be excluded from TDM 6.6%. METHODS: Patch tests were performed on 1481 dermatitis patients with TDM 6.6%, TDM 7.0% (without DO 3 but the other disperse dyes at 1.0% each), DO 3 1.0%, and PPD 1.0% pet. RESULTS: Contact allergy to TDM 6.6% was 3.6% and to TDM 7.0% was 3.0%. All 26 DO 3-positive patients were positive to PPD. The 44 patients positive to TDM 7.0% plus the 13 positive to PPD and TDM 6.6% but negative to TDM 7.0% were 57, outnumbering the 53 positive to TDM 6.6%. CONCLUSION: TDM 7.0% can replace TDM 6.6% in the Swedish baseline series, since TDM 7.0% together with PPD 1.0% will detect patients with textile dye allergy.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Humanos , Pruebas del Parche/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Suecia , Textiles/efectos adversos , Colorantes/efectos adversos
13.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 37(1): 104-113, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36018078

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Contact allergy can manifest in a variety of ways clinically. Systemic contact allergy may occasionally present with pain in muscles and joints. Fibromyalgia is a chronic rheumatic disease characterized by pain and with virtually unknown aetiology. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the contact allergy rates to the sensitizers in a baseline series and compare with corresponding rates in dermatitis patients and the general population. METHODS: Patch testing with the Swedish baseline series was performed in 120 individuals with fibromyalgia. Fisher's exact test was used for pair-wise comparisons of contact allergy rates between the fibromyalgia group and two control groups, dermatitis patients and individuals in the general population. RESULTS: Contact allergy was significantly more common in the fibromyalgia group compared to the general population concerning nickel and the fragrance markers Myroxolon pereirae and fragrance mix I. There were fewer allergic reactions to preservatives in the fibromyalgia group compared with the dermatitis group. CONCLUSIONS: Myroxolon pereirae and fragrance mix I represent besides fragrance allergy also allergy to flavouring substances which indicate that oral exposure to flavouring substances and hygiene products might be important for sensitization and possibly elicitation of systemic contact allergy symptoms in fibromyalgia individuals.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Fibromialgia , Enfermedades del Sistema Inmune , Perfumes , Humanos , Pruebas del Parche/efectos adversos , Odorantes , Suecia/epidemiología , Fibromialgia/complicaciones , Fibromialgia/epidemiología , Perfumes/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dolor , Alérgenos
14.
Contact Dermatitis ; 87(4): 325-330, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35818106

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Disperse dyes (DDs) are the most prevalent causes of textile-related allergic contact dermatitis and are used for colouring synthetic textile materials based on fibres such as polyester, acrylic, acetate and polyamide. Eight DDs are included in a textile dye mix (TDM) 6.6% petrolatum (pet.) in the European baseline patch test series. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to patch test TDM 6.6% pet. positive individuals with the extracts of synthetic fibre clothes that do not contain any of the pure DDs present in the TDM 6.6% to study the reactivity pattern. METHODS: Seventy-three TDM-positive former patients tested between 2012 and 2017 at the Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology in Malmö, Sweden were invited to join the study, 10 participated. Twenty-four textile items (collected in nine countries in Europe, Asia and North America in 2012) were extracted in dichloromethane. The TDM 6.6% was patch tested simultaneously with the 24 textile item preparations in petrolatum made from the extracts. Prior to patch testing the participants filled the 7-question questionnaire regarding possible symptoms from textile exposure. RESULTS: Ten individuals, agreed to join the study. Eight of them reacted to TDM 6.6%. Nine participants reacted to 20 of 24 extracts. One reacted to 19 extracts, another to 14, 3 to 5 extracts, 1 to 4, 1 to 3 extracts and 2 to 2 extracts. One was negative to all tested preparations including TDM 6.6%. The participants mainly reacted to six textile extracts. All controls tested negatively to tested extracts. Four individuals of the 10 TDM-allergic individuals previously had had problems after wearing clothes. Four out of the 10 participants had had atopic eczema in childhood. All women had dyed their hair with permanent hair dyes but none of the males. CONCLUSION: TDM-positive patients react to textile extracts made from synthetic garments, even if they do not contain any of the pure DDs present in TDM 6.6%. More studies are needed to pin-point the culprit haptens in these extracts.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Tinturas para el Cabello , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Vestuario , Colorantes/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas del Parche/métodos , Vaselina , Textiles/efectos adversos
15.
Contact Dermatitis ; 86(6): 514-523, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35152428

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Regularly updating the prevalence of fragrance contact allergy (CA) is important. Patch testing with fragrance markers in the baseline series and the ingredients of fragrance mixes (FMs) is still debated. OBJECTIVES: To update the prevalence and clinical characteristics of patients with fragrance CA. To establish the results of patch testing with individual allergens of FMs. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 3539 patients with dermatitis who were patch tested with the baseline series and FMs ingredients during 2016 to 2020 was performed. RESULTS: The prevalence of fragrance CA was 13%. About 10% of these patients with fragrance CA would be missed if the individual ingredients were not tested. Unlike hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde, there was no decreasing trend of CA to Evernia prunastri (oakmoss) extract after the EU regulation came into force. Patients with CA from only one ingredient of the mixes or having a weak positive reaction to the ingredients were significantly missed when tested with only the fragrance markers in the baseline series. CONCLUSIONS: Patch testing with individual fragrance allergens is crucial for experts to expand knowledge in the fragrance CA field. The concentrations of the allergens in FMs may need to be adjusted to detect patients with fragrance CA, since some were significantly overlooked.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Perfumes , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Biomarcadores , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Humanos , Odorantes , Pruebas del Parche/métodos , Perfumes/efectos adversos , Vehículos Farmacéuticos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Suecia/epidemiología
16.
Dermatitis ; 33(1): 31-35, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34570735

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recently, aluminum chloride hexahydrate (ACH) 10.0% petrolatum (pet) was recommended for patch testing to detect aluminum contact allergy. Aluminum lactate (AL) may be as reliable a test substance as ACH. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the frequencies of aluminum allergy when ACH and AL were used in patch testing consecutive patients. METHODS: Petrolatum preparations of ACH 10.0% and AL 12.0% were added to the baseline series in 2010-2017. Aluminum chloride hexahydrate 10.0% pet was added to the children baseline series from July 1, 2012, to December 31, 2017. RESULTS: A total of 5448 patients were patch tested with the extended baseline series and 196 children with the extended children baseline series. Forty-eight of the 5448 adults (0.9%) and 10 of the 196 children (5.1%) were diagnosed with aluminum contact allergy. A significant difference was found between the aluminum allergy frequencies in children and adults patch tested with ACH in 2013-2017 (P < 0.001). The difference between the frequencies of contact allergies for the 2 aluminum salts is not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Patch testing with ACH and AL demonstrated similar contact allergy frequencies. To detect aluminum allergy, patch testing with ACH 10.0% pet is recommended. Aluminum chloride hexahydrate 10.0% pet should be considered for inclusion in baseline series for patch testing adults and children.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Cloruro de Aluminio/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Pruebas del Parche/métodos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Alérgenos/administración & dosificación , Cloruro de Aluminio/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Aluminio/efectos adversos , Niño , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Pruebas Intradérmicas/métodos , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo
17.
Contact Dermatitis ; 86(1): 15-24, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34561893

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Contact allergy to oxidized (ox.) linalool and ox. limonene has been reported to have a high prevalence, raising the question of inclusion into the baseline series. However, several important issues should be clarified and further investigated before inclusion can be warranted. OBJECTIVES: To report the trends of ox. terpenes allergy in patients with dermatitis, features of the patch test reactions, and clinical characteristics of the patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 5773 patients was performed. All patients were patch tested with baseline series, individual ingredients of fragrance mix I and II, ox. linalool, and ox. limonene from 2013 to 2020. RESULTS: The prevalence rates of contact allergy to ox. linalool and ox. limonene were 7.0% and 5.1%, respectively. Significantly increasing trends of contact allergy were observed. More than 95% of contact allergy cases were identified on Day 3/4. Patients with contact allergy to ox. linalool and ox. limonene were significantly younger than those with contact allergy to other fragrances and were predominantly female. Strong reactions were associated with older age and multiple fragrance allergies. CONCLUSIONS: Contact allergy to ox. linalool and ox. limonene is becoming increasingly important, and findings show intriguing features. More studies concerning the clinical relevance before recommending these substances for screening are required.


Asunto(s)
Monoterpenos Acíclicos/efectos adversos , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Pruebas del Parche/métodos , Adulto , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxidación-Reducción , Estudios Retrospectivos , Terpenos/efectos adversos
18.
Dermatitis ; 33(4): 287-292, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34115662

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since the spring of 2020, we have seen several patients experiencing severe allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) from the Dexcom G6 glucose sensor after the composition of the sensor's adhesive patch had been changed. We have previously reported the finding of a new sensitizer, 2,2'-methylenebis(6- tert -butyl-4-methylphenol) monoacrylate, in the Dexcom G6 adhesive patch. Three patients with ACD from Dexcom G6 tested positive to this sensitizer. They were also allergic to isobornyl acrylate, a sensitizer present both in Dexcom G6 and in other medical devices previously used by these patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to report the first 4 cases sensitized to 2,2'-methylenebis(6- tert -butyl-4-methylphenol) monoacrylate without a simultaneous allergy to isobornyl acrylate. METHODS: The cases were patch tested their own materials, a medical device series, and 2,2'-methylenebis(6- tert -butyl-4-methylphenol) monoacrylate in several concentrations. RESULTS: All 4 cases tested positive to 2,2'-methylenebis(6- tert -butyl-4-methylphenol) monoacrylate at either 1.0% or 1.5% in petrolatum, whereas 20 controls tested negative to both concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The cases reported here provide further evidence of 2,2'-methylenebis(6- tert -butyl-4-methylphenol) monoacrylate as a relevant culprit sensitizer in patients with ACD from Dexcom G6. However, the initially used patch test concentration (0.3%) did not suffice to elicit positive reactions in these cases, which is why patch testing at 1.5% is recommended.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Acrilatos/efectos adversos , Adhesivos , Alérgenos , Cresoles , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Glucosa , Humanos , Sistemas de Infusión de Insulina/efectos adversos , Pruebas del Parche/efectos adversos , Fenoles/efectos adversos
19.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 101(5): adv00454, 2021 May 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33846762

RESUMEN

Simultaneous contact allergies are common in individuals with photocontact allergy to ketoprofen. The rate of contact allergy to the fragrance substances oxidized linalool and oxidized limonene in ketoprofen-photo-allergic individuals were investigated in comparison with the corresponding rates in individuals without photo-contact allergy to ketoprofen, using Fisher's exact test. A total of 4,021 patients were routinely tested with oxidized linalool; of whom 190 (4.7%) tested positively. For oxidized limonene the numbers were 3,797 patients and 111 positive reactions (2.9%). A total of 19 contact allergic reactions to oxidized linalool were noted in 29 patients (65.5%) who also had photocontact allergy to ketoprofen (p < 0.0001). The corresponding figures for oxidized limonene were 10 positive reactions in 24 ketoprofen-photoallergic individuals (41.7%) (p < 0.0001). Contact allergy to oxidized linalool and/or oxidized limonene is common in routinely tested patients with dermatitis and, particularly, in those patients who are photoallergic to ketoprofen.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Fotoalérgica , Cetoprofeno , Monoterpenos Acíclicos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Fotoalérgica/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Fotoalérgica/epidemiología , Dermatitis Fotoalérgica/etiología , Humanos , Cetoprofeno/efectos adversos , Limoneno , Pruebas del Parche
20.
Contact Dermatitis ; 84(5): 326-331, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33098110

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Polyaminopropyl biguanide (INCI name) and polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) are polymeric biguanides. PHMB is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial substance used as a preservative in many products. Due to our limited knowledge on PHMB contact allergy frequency and the fact that cases of allergic contact dermatitis to PHMB might be missed, we have included PHMB as a screening allergen since 2016. OBJECTIVE: To report the prevalence of positive patch test reactions to PHMB as a screening allergen in patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 1760 patch tested patients from July 2016 to December 2018 was performed. Polyaminopropyl biguanide 2.0% aqua was included in the extended Malmö baseline series during the study period. RESULTS: Of all patients, 1204 (68.4%) were female. Positive patch test reactions were reported in 19 patients (1.1%). The most common sites of lesions were face, head, and neck (52.6%). There was a significant correlation between concomitant reactions to PHMB and other cosmetic-related allergens. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of positive reactions to PHMB was higher than that previously reported. Patch testing with PHMB should be performed in patients with dermatitis who have lesions on the face, head, and neck.


Asunto(s)
Biguanidas/efectos adversos , Cosméticos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Conservadores Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Biguanidas/química , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estructura Molecular , Pruebas del Parche , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Suecia/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...