Does sagittal position of the CTDR-related centre of rotation influence functional outcome? Prospective 2-year follow-up analysis.

PURPOSE: Recent studies describe significant rates of heterotopic ossification (HO) after cervical total disc replacement (CTDR). Little is known about the reasons, and one aspect that requires further in vivo investigation is the biomechanical alteration after CTDR and the role of the implant-related centre of rotation (CORi) in particular. The role of the sagittal position of the CORi on functional outcome in two versions of a semi-constrained disc prosthesis with sagittally different CORi is the topic of this study. METHODS: Patients were candidates for single-level CTDR between C3 and C7 who suffered from CDDD and received a standard or flat version of activ C™ (Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen). Clinical and radiographic assessments were determined preoperatively, intraoperatively, at discharge and again at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 and 2 years. Radiographic examinations were performed independently using specialized quantitative motion analysis software. RESULTS: Clinical outcome improved significantly regarding NDI as well as VAS on neck and arm pain with no differences in mean improvement by study group. Segmental angle measures show a significantly better lordotic alignment for both groups after surgery, but the degree of correction achieved is higher in the flat group. Correlation analysis proves that the more anterior the CORi is positioned, the higher the lordotic correction is achieved (Pearson rho -0.385). Segmental ROM decreased in the standard group but was maintained for flat implants. At present, our data do not demonstrate a correlation between CORi and ROM at 2 years. Two years after surgery, severe HO grade III-IV was present in 31.6 % standard and 13.1 % flat cases with significant differences. Grouping according to HO severity showed comparable sagittal positions of CORi for flat implants but a more posterior position in the severe HO group for standard implants. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the influence of CORi location on segmental alignment, kinematics and HO for a semi-constrained CTDR, but it also indicates a multifactorial process.

Plasminogen activation in neurofibromatosis 2-associated and sporadic schwannomas.

BACKGROUND: Schwannomas are usually benign tumours which occur sporadically or in association with neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2), an autosomal dominant disorder. Invasiveness and higher proliferative potential compared to sporadic tumours are features of NF2-associated schwannomas. METHOD: We studied urokinase (uPA), tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA), urokinase receptor (uPAR) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) expression by in situ hybridization and by immunohistochemistry in 14 NF2 and 15 sporadic patients with 34 schwannomas. uPAR and vitronectin immunohistochemistry were also studied. Three sural nerve specimens were included as Schwann cell controls. FINDINGS: Both schwannoma groups expressed prominent levels of uPA and tPA. Semiquantitative analysis of the in situ hybridization and immunoreactivity demonstrated that NF2 schwannomas expressed less PAI-1 at the mRNA level than sporadic schwannomas (score 1.63+/-0.41 vs. 2.05+/-0.75) and less total PAI-1 at the antigen level (score 1.55+/-0.66 vs. 2.07+/-0.56). PAI-1 was mostly in a free form in NF2 schwannomas compared to the sporadic counterparts (score 1.85+/-0.73 vs. 1.46+/-0.58), whereas there was less uPAR antigen in NF2 schwannomas than in the sporadic counterparts (score 1.18+/-0.49 vs. 1.68+/-0.56). Sural nerve Schwann cells did not express detectable level of PAI-1 and at the most a minor amount of tPA. CONCLUSIONS: Schwann cells of tumour cell origin, both in sporadic and NF2 schwannomas, expressed elevated levels of plasminogen activators and PAI-1 compared to normal suralic nerve Schwann cells. Furthermore, there seemed to be an imbalance in the PA-PAI-1 system in NF2-associated schwannomas. Although our methods are more descriptive than quantitative, we suggest that the somewhat more aggressive behavior of NF2-associated schwannomas compared to sporadic schwannomas may be based on the local proteolytic activity.

Genetic aberrations in sporadic and neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2)-associated schwannomas studied by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH).

BACKGROUND: Schwannomas occur sporadically or in association with neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2), an autosomal dominant disorder, which predisposes to multiple schwannomas, meningiomas and spinal ependymomas, with bilateral vestibular schwannomas as the classic hallmark. As NF2 and sporadic schwannomas differ in some respect in their clinical and biological behavior we evaluated whether there are any differences in the distribution of genetic aberrations between NF2 and sporadic schwannomas. Our interest was also to verify whether secondary genetic alterations besides the loss of 22q could be detected in schwannomas. METHODS: We investigated DNA copy number changes in 25 schwannomas (12 NF2 and 13 sporadic schwannomas) using the comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) technique. Some chromosomal regions were further studied by LOH or FISH analysis. FINDINGS: CGH detected genomic abnormalities in 15 of 25 schwannomas (60%). The most common alteration was loss on 22q, found in 32% (8/25) of schwannomas. No consistent changes were detected in other chromosomal regions. The overall number of genetic aberrations was similar in NF2 and in sporadic schwannomas. INTERPRETATION: Our results support the present view that loss of chromosome 22q harboring the NF2 gene plays a universal role in the pathogenesis of schwannomas without consistent involvement of other chromosomal regions.

Population-based analysis of sporadic and type 2 neurofibromatosis-associated meningiomas and schwannomas.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence of meningiomatosis and schwannomatosis, and their familial occurrences and relation to type 2 neurofibromatosis (NF2) in a well-defined population. METHODS: Patients with histologically verified intracranial, spinal, or peripheral schwannomas or meningiomas, who were residents of the Helsinki University Hospital catchment area (population, 1,713,000) from January 1, 1985, to December 31, 1995, were included in the study. The Population Register Center was used to identify relatives of all the patients, and their data were linked further to the Finnish Cancer Registry to find NF2-related tumors. Detailed pedigrees were constructed for the patients with NF2, schwannomatosis, meningiomatosis, patients with relatives with histologically verified schwannomas or meningiomas, and patients younger than 25 years of age at the time of diagnosis. RESULTS: Approximately 3% (12 of 455) of the schwannoma patients had multiple schwannomas in association with NF2, and 2% (11 of 455) had schwannomatosis without NF2. Two of the patients with schwannomatosis (2 of 11) had familial schwannomatosis. Approximately 1% (7 of 823) of the patients with meningioma had multiple meningiomas in association with NF2, and 4% (29 of 823) had meningiomatosis without NF2. No families with meningiomatosis were found among the 823 patients with meningioma studied. The birth occurrence of NF2 was 1 in 87,410. CONCLUSIONS: The current diagnostic criteria of type 2 neurofibromatosis (NF2) seem valid because NF2 patients were differentiated rather easily from patients with sporadic schwannomatosis and meningiomatosis. Familial meningiomatosis, if it truly exists, is very rare, and familial schwannomatosis is uncommon.

Proliferation potential and histological features in neurofibromatosis 2-associated and sporadic meningiomas.

The authors compared the histological appearance and proliferation potential of 35 meningiomas in patients with neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) and 30 sporadic meningiomas in age- and gender-matched patients without NF2. The NF2 meningiomas showed more mitotic figures (p < 0.001) and nuclear pleomorphism (p = 0.003) than the sporadic meningiomas; however, the incidence of meningothelial, fibroblastic, and transitional subtypes occurred equally in both groups. The proliferation potential was significantly higher in the 35 meningiomas removed from 23 patients with NF2 than in the 30 sporadic meningiomas removed in the 30 patients without NF2 (mean MIB-1 labeling indices: 2.5 vs. 1.75, p = 0.0147). The higher proliferation potential of the NF2 meningiomas may reflect differences in molecular biology between sporadic and NF2 meningiomas and may be related to an earlier onset, multiplicity, and more aggressive behavior of NF2 tumors.

Proliferative potential of sporadic and neurofibromatosis 2-associated schwannomas as studied by MIB-1 (Ki-67) and PCNA labeling.

Neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2), a dominantly inherited disorder, is typically manifested as bilateral vestibular Schwannomas and predisposes to other nervous system tumors. Vestibular Schwannomas also occur sporadically but the onset is usually at an older age. Surgical and histological studies have shown that vestibular Schwannomas of NF2 patients are more invasive than sporadic Schwannomas and that the two groups also have morphological differences. We compared the proliferation activity of 26 vestibular Schwannomas (19 NF2 patients) to that of 27 sporadic cases using the Ki-67 (MIB-1) and PCNA (19A2) monoclonal antibodies. In addition, proliferation was assessed in 20 spinal benign Schwannomas, 4 spinal cellular Schwannomas and 3 spinal malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST). We found a significant difference in the proliferation potential between NF2 and sporadic vestibular Schwannomas (MIB-1-LI: 1.72 +/- 0.93 vs 0.95 +/- 0.57, p = 0.001; and PCNA-LI: 1.40 +/- 0.75 vs 0.81 +/- 0.52, p = 0.001). Age does not explain the detected difference in proliferation, since NF2 vestibular Schwannomas also had higher MIB-1 indices than 34 age-matched sporadic tumors. In spinal tumors, MPNST had higher MIB-1 indices than cellular Schwannomas, and therefore MIB-1 staining may be useful in distinguishing between them. Although the defective NF2 gene is important in the tumorigenesis of both NF2 and sporadic Schwannomas, our results suggest that there are differences in the molecular biology of these tumors.