Initiative to deprescribe high-risk drugs for older adults presenting to the emergency department after falls.

BACKGROUND: Over 35 million falls occur in older adults annually and are associated with increased emergency department (ED) revisits and 1-year mortality. Despite associations between medications and falls, the prevalence of fall risk-increasing drugs remains high. Our objective was to implement an ED-based medication reconciliation for patients presenting after falls and determine whether an intervention targeting high-risk medications was related to decreased future falls. METHODS: This was an observational prospective cohort study at a single site in the United States. Adults 65 years and older presenting to the ED after falls had a pharmacist review their medicines. Pharmacists made recommendations to taper, stop, or discuss medications with the primary clinician. At 3, 6, and 12 months, we recorded the number of fall-related return ED visits and determined if recommended medication changes had been implemented. We compared the rate of return visits of patients who had followed the medication change recommendations and those who received recommendations but had no change in their medications using chi-square tests. RESULTS: A total of 577 patients (mean age 81 years, 63.6% female) were enrolled of 1509 potentially eligible patients. High-risk medications were identified in 310 patients (53.7%) who received medication recommendations. High-risk medications were associated with repeat fall-related visits at 12 months (risk difference 8.1% [95% confidence interval 0.97-15.0]). A total of 134 (43%) patients on high-risk medications had evidence of medication modification. At 12 months, there was no statistically significant difference in return fall visits between patients who had modifications to medications compared with those who had not implemented changes (p = 0.551). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings identified opportunities for medication optimization in over half of emergency visits for falls and demonstrated that medication counseling in the ED is feasible. However, evaluation of the effect on future falls was limited.

Safety of fixed-dose heparin titration boluses in underweight patients.

INTRODUCTION: At UNC, venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients are treated with a heparin nomogram including fixed-dose titration boluses to correct subtherapeutic heparin correlation values (HCVs). The bolus dose often exceeds the recommended loading dose in underweight patients, therefore raising concern for an increased bleeding risk. This evaluation aims to assess the safety of these titration boluses for underweight patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients receiving intravenous heparin for VTE treatment and requiring at least one titration bolus were included. The underweight patients had a body mass index (BMI) <18.5 kg/m2 while the patients in the control group had a BMI of 18.5-29.9 kg/m2. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with a supratherapeutic HCV after the first titration bolus. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of patients with a supratherapeutic HCV requiring holding of the infusion, time to stable HCV, and clinically significant bleeding. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-eight patients met inclusion criteria, with similar baseline characteristics between groups. There were 13.9 % of patients in both groups who had a supratherapeutic HCV after the first titration bolus. More underweight patients required holding of heparin. All patients took over 48 h to reach a stable HCV. There was no difference in clinically significant bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Despite finding no significant difference, there remains clinical concern for increased bleeding risk in underweight patients as this population required heparin to be held due to supratherapeutic HCVs more often. More evidence is needed to evaluate the safety of fixed-dose heparin titration boluses in underweight patients due to the limited scope of this study.

Descriptive evaluation of patients receiving one-time intravenous vancomycin doses at a large academic medical center emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous (IV) vancomycin is commonly used to treat a variety of infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The practice of administering a single dose of IV vancomycin prior to emergency department (ED) discharge may be clinically ineffective and foster antimicrobial resistance. Furthermore, this practice introduces an unnecessary infection risk along with preventable adverse effects while potentially increasing ED length of stay (LOS). There is a paucity of literature identifying patient characteristics and objective findings in this patient population, which may foster future antimicrobial stewardship initiatives in the ED. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective, descriptive analysis of adult patients seen in the ED between January 2020 and January 2023 who received a single dose of IV vancomycin and were subsequently discharged from the ED without hospital admission. Information was collected on patient demographics and select comorbidities, vancomycin indication and dosing, ED LOS, initial vitals and labs, concomitant antibiotics administered, culture results, 30-day return ED visits and admissions, and antibiotics prescribed at ED discharge. RESULTS: A total of 295 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 32.1% of patients met SIRS criteria. The most commonly selected order indication for IV vancomycin was "skin and skin structure infection" (41%). A total of 86.1% of patients received concomitant antibiotics in the ED and only 54.6% of patients were prescribed oral antibiotics at ED discharge. A total of 80% of patients had at least one culture obtained during the ED visit. In those who had at least one culture obtained, 78.4% of patients had negative cultures and 4.2% of patients had MRSA positive cultures, with MRSA skin cultures being the most common (3.1%). Return ED visits and admissions within 30 days were not statistically significantly different between patients who did and did not receive oral antibiotics at ED discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a lack of clinical efficacy reported in prior literature and the potential risks, administration of a one-time dose of IV vancomycin prior to ED discharge is commonly encountered in clinical practice. There are opportunities for enhanced antimicrobial stewardship related to IV vancomycin use in the ED. Areas of future focus include the utilization of oral antimicrobials when clinically appropriate, particularly for skin and soft tissue infections, and clarification of antibiotic allergies.

Evaluation of the impact of a pharmacist-run antimicrobial report in reducing delays in subsequent antibiotic administration in patients in the emergency department.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the implementation of a pharmacist-run, real-time electronic health record (EHR) antimicrobial report reduces the frequency of delays in subsequent antibiotic medication administration timing in patients in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: A single-center, retrospective, pre-and-post quasi-experimental study was conducted between July and December 2021 following the implementation of an antimicrobial EHR report of adult patients presenting to the ED who were continued on antibiotic therapy after receiving a one-time dose of an antibiotic in the ED. The primary objective was to determine the impact of the pharmacist-run, real-time EHR antibiotic dosing report in the ED on reducing the number of major delays in subsequent antibiotic administration times. A subanalysis of the primary outcome was performed to evaluate differences in major delays based on specific dosing intervals of 6, 8, and 12 hours. RESULTS: A total of 521 subsequent antibiotic dosing orders from 273 patient encounters were analyzed, with major delays in subsequent antibiotic dosing administration times identified in 20% of the intervention group compared to 27% of the control group (P = 0.047). Major delays were also significantly decreased in the intervention group compared to the control group for antibiotics dosed at 8-hour intervals (18% vs 32%; P = 0.026). No significant difference in delays was observed between the groups for antibiotics dosed at 6-hour intervals (18% vs 27%) or 12-hour intervals (29% vs 21%). CONCLUSION: Implementing a real-time EHR antimicrobial report run by pharmacists in the ED was associated with significantly fewer major delays in subsequent antibiotic dosing following a first dose.