Endoscopic management of pancreatic collections. Endoscopic Ultrasound Group from the Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy (GSEED-USE) Clinical Guidelines.

Acute pancreatitis is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. It can develop complications such as fluid collections and necrosis. Infection of necrosis occurs in about 20-40% of patients with severe acute pancreatitis, and is associated with organ failure and worse prognosis. In the past years, the treatment of pancreatic collections has shifted from open surgery to minimally invasive techniques, such as endoscopic ultrasound guided drainage. These guidelines from a selection of experts among the Endoscopic Ultrasound Group from the Spanish Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (GSEED-USE) have the purpose to provide advice on the management of pancreatic collections based on a thorough review of the available scientific evidence. It also reflects the experience and clinical practice of the authors, who are advanced endoscopists or clinical pancreatologists with extensive experience in managing patients with acute pancreatitis.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage with long-term lumen-apposing metal stent indwell: 1-year results from a prospective nationwide observational study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: This study aimed to determine safety and risk factors for adverse events (AEs) of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) with long-term indwell of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS). METHODS: This study is a multicenter prospective observational study on consecutive high surgical-risk patients requiring gallbladder drainage who underwent EUS-GBD with LAMS over 12 months. Centralized telephone follow-up interviews were conducted every 3 months for 1 year. Patients were censored at LAMS removal, cholecystectomy, or death. AE-free survival was determined using log-rank tests. Cumulative risks were estimated using life-table analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were included (53.7% male, median [interquartile range] age of 84.6 [76.5-89.8] years, and 85.4% with acute cholecystitis). Technical success was achieved in 79 (96.3%), and clinical success in 73 (89%). No patient was lost to follow-up; 45 patients (54.9%) completed 1-year follow-up with in situ LAMS. Median (interquartile range) LAMS indwell time was 364 (47-367) days. Overall, 12 (14.6%) patients presented 14 AEs, including 5 (6.1%) recurrent biliary events (3 acute cholangitis, 1 mild acute pancreatitis, and 1 acute cholecystitis). Patients with pancreatobiliary malignancy had an increased risk of recurrent biliary events (33% vs 1.5%, P = 0.001). The overall 1-year cumulative risk of recurrent biliary events was 9.7% (4.1-21.8%). The 1-year risk of AEs and of severe AEs was 18.8% (11-31.2%) and 7.9% (3.3-18.2%), respectively. Pancreatobiliary malignancy was the single risk factor for recurrent biliary events; LAMS misdeployment was the strongest risk factor for AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term LAMS indwell does not increase the risk of delayed AEs following EUS-GBD.

Endoscopic removal of lumen-apposing metal stents - risk factors for stent embedment, complex removals, and adverse events: analysis from a multicenter prospective case series.

BACKGROUND: Removing lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) may be difficult and even harmful, but these features have seldom been analyzed. We aimed to generate a comprehensive assessment of the feasibility and safety of LAMS retrieval procedures. METHODS: A prospective multicenter case series including all technically successfully deployed LAMSs between January 2019 and January 2020 that underwent endoscopic stent removal. All retrieval-related data were prospectively recorded using standardized telephone questionnaires as part of centralized follow-up that ended after stent removal had been performed. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the potential risk factors for complex removal. RESULTS: For the 407 LAMSs included, removal was attempted in 158 (38.8 %) after an indwell time of 46.5 days (interquartile range [IQR] 31-70). The median (IQR) removal time was 2 (1-4) minutes. Removal was labelled as complex in 13 procedures (8.2 %), although advanced endoscopic maneuvers were required in only two (1.3 %). Complex removal risk factors were stent embedment (relative risk [RR] 5.84, 95 %CI 2.14-15.89; P = 0.001), over-the-wire deployment (RR 4.66, 95 %CI 1.60-13.56; P = 0.01), and longer indwell times (RR 1.14, 95 %CI 1.03-1.27; P = 0.01). Partial and complete embedment were observed in 14 (8.9 %) and five cases (3.2 %), respectively. The embedment rate during the first 6 weeks was 3.1 % (2/65), reaching 15.9 % (10/63) during the following 6 weeks (P = 0.02). The adverse event rate was 5.1 %, including seven gastrointestinal bleeds (5 mild, 2 moderate). CONCLUSIONS: LAMS removal is a safe procedure, mostly requiring basic endoscopic techniques attainable in conventional endoscopy rooms. Referral to advanced endoscopy units should be considered for stents with known embedment or long indwell times, which may require more technically demanding procedures.

SEED Consensus Document on SpyGlass-DS. / Documento de consenso de la Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva sobre SpyGlass-DS.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the technique of choice for the treatment of biliopancreatic pathology. However, fluoroscopic imaging does not always allow an adequate diagnosis. On the other hand, some large stones cannot be removed by the usual methods. In these situations, cholangioscopy has proven to be an essential tool for the diagnosis of biliary strictures and the treatment of large stones. Its role in pancreatic pathology is also increasing. The development of a single-operator, disposable cholangioscope has made it possible to expand the technique to a large number of hospitals that perform ERCP. For this reason, the Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy has developed this consensus document on the use of the Spyglass-DS cholangioscope. The document has been prepared by a group of endoscopists with expertise in cholangioscopy, reviewing the scientific evidence on the main current indications for cholangiopancreatoscopy.

Safety of endoscopist-administered deep sedation with propofol in ASA III patients

Introduction: deep sedation controlled by the endoscopist is safe in patients with low anesthetic risk (ASA I-II). However, scarce evidence is available in patients with intermediate risk (ASA III).Objective: to evaluate the safety of deep sedation with propofol controlled by the usual endoscopy staff (endoscopist, nurse, assistant) in outpatients classified as ASA III and the risk factors for the occurrence of complications during deep sedation.Patients and methods: this observational and single-center cross-sectional study included consecutive patients undergoing non-complex procedures in which deep sedation was administered by the endoscopy staff. Patients were divided into group I (ASA = III) and group II (ASA < III).Results: a total of 562 patients were included and 80 (14.2 %) were in group I. Complications related to deep sedation were more frequent in group I (23.8 % vs 14.5 %; p = 0.036), mainly mild desaturations (13.8 % vs 7.5 %; p = 0.058). Emergency intervention or death were not registered. The adjusted analysis identified age as the only independent baseline risk factor for developing global adverse events.Conclusion: ASA III patients developed more sedation-related complications than ASA I-II patients. However, these complications were mild and did not prevent the correct performance of the procedure. (AU)

Safety of endoscopist-administered deep sedation with propofol in ASA III patients.

INTRODUCTION: deep sedation controlled by the endoscopist is safe in patients with low anesthetic risk (ASA I-II). However, scarce evidence is available in patients with intermediate risk (ASA III). OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the safety of deep sedation with propofol controlled by the usual endoscopy staff (endoscopist, nurse, assistant) in outpatients classified as ASA III and the risk factors for the occurrence of complications during deep sedation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: this observational and single-center cross-sectional study included consecutive patients undergoing non-complex procedures in which deep sedation was administered by the endoscopy staff. Patients were divided into group I (ASA = III) and group II (ASA < III). RESULTS: a total of 562 patients were included and 80 (14.2 %) were in group I. Complications related to deep sedation were more frequent in group I (23.8 % vs 14.5 %; p = 0.036), mainly mild desaturations (13.8 % vs 7.5 %; p = 0.058). Emergency intervention or death were not registered. The adjusted analysis identified age as the only independent baseline risk factor for developing global adverse events. CONCLUSION: ASA III patients developed more sedation-related complications than ASA I-II patients. However, these complications were mild and did not prevent the correct performance of the procedure.

Análisis retrospectivo multicéntrico de las incidencias asociadas a las prótesis de aposición luminal tipo Axios(TM) / A retrospective, multicenter analysis of incidents associated with Axios(TM) lumen-apposing stents

Introducción: existe controversia respecto a los riesgos asociados a las prótesis de aposición luminal (PAL), con importantes variaciones entre los trabajos disponibles. Objetivos: describir el tipo y la proporción de complicaciones durante la permanencia y retirada de PAL tipo Axios(TM). Describir la relación entre tiempo de permeabilidad, diana terapéutica y presencia de complicaciones. Métodos: serie de casos retrospectiva y multicéntrica que incluyó todos los pacientes consecutivos a los que se les colocó una PAL para acceder a estructuras extraluminales durante el año 2017. Se registraron únicamente aquellos casos que alcanzaron éxito técnico. Resultados: se incluyeron 179 pacientes de siete centros (rango 4-68 casos/centro) con edad media de 64,3 años (DE: 15,8, rango 24,6-98,8 años), 122 (68,2%) de ellos varones. Las indicaciones más frecuentes fueron las necrosis encapsuladas (58, 32,4%), seguidas de pseudoquistes (31, 17,3%) y drenajes vesiculares (26, 14,5%). Durante la permanencia de la PAL se documentaron complicaciones en 19 pacientes (10,9%), siendo las más frecuentes las obstrucciones de la luz protésica o del marco gastroduodenal en ocho (4,5%) casos y las hemorragias en siete (3,9%) pacientes. Las PAL no se retiraron en 86 pacientes (48%) por los siguientes motivos: intención permanente de la PAL en 46 (53,5%), pérdida del seguimiento en 18 (20,9%), fallecimiento del paciente en 16 (18,6%) y migración en seis (7%). Durante la retirada se observaron cinco complicaciones (5,4%), tres casos de hemorragia y dos perforaciones. No observamos una asociación entre el tiempo de permanencia y las complicaciones (p = 0,67). Conclusión: la aparición de complicaciones secundarias a la inserción de PAL es poco frecuente, aunque pueden ser graves. En este estudio no se ha observado una asociación entre la aparición de complicaciones y el tiempo de permanencia de la prótesis

Introduction: there is controversy with regard to the risks associated with lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs), with significant variations between available reports. Objectives: to describe the types and proportions of complications that arise during the permanence time and removal of Axios(TM) LAMS. Furthermore, the relationship between patency time, therapeutic target and the presence of complications was also described. Methods: a retrospective, multicenter case series study was performed of all patients with an implanted LAMS to access extra-luminal structures during 2017. Only technically successful cases were recorded. Results: a total of 179 patients from seven sites (range, 4-68 cases/site) were included in the study, with a mean age of 64.3 years (SD: 15.8; range: 24.6-98.8 years) and 122 (68.2%) were male. Most common indications included encapsulated necrosis (58, 32.4%), pseudocysts (31, 17.3%) and gallbladder drains (26, 14.5%). Complications during LAMS stay were reported in 19 patients (10.9%); stent lumen or gastroduodenal obstruction (8, 4.5%) and bleeding (7, 3.9%) were the most common. LAMS were not removed in 86 (48%) patients due to the following reasons: a permanent stent was used (46, 53.5%), loss to follow-up (18, 20.9%), patient demise (16, 18.6%) and stent migration (6, 7%). Five (5.4%) complications were reported during stent removal, which were three bleeds and two perforations. No association was found between stent duration and complications (p = 0.67). Conclusion: complications secondary to LAMS insertion are uncommon but may be serious. This study found no association between complications and stent duration

A retrospective, multicenter analysis of incidents associated with Axios™ lumen-apposing stents.

INTRODUCTION: there is controversy with regard to the risks associated with lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs), with significant variations between available reports. OBJECTIVES: to describe the types and proportions of complications that arise during the permanence time and removal of Axios™ LAMS. Furthermore, the relationship between patency time, therapeutic target and the presence of complications was also described. METHODS: a retrospective, multicenter case series study was performed of all patients with an implanted LAMS to access extra-luminal structures during 2017. Only technically successful cases were recorded. RESULTS: a total of 179 patients from seven sites (range, 4-68 cases/site) were included in the study, with a mean age of 64.3 years (SD: 15.8; range: 24.6-98.8 years) and 122 (68.2%) were male. Most common indications included encapsulated necrosis (58, 32.4%), pseudocysts (31, 17.3%) and gallbladder drains (26, 14.5%). Complications during LAMS stay were reported in 19 patients (10.9%); stent lumen or gastroduodenal obstruction (8, 4.5%) and bleeding (7, 3.9%) were the most common. LAMS were not removed in 86 (48%) patients due to the following reasons: a permanent stent was used (46, 53.5%), loss to follow-up (18, 20.9%), patient demise (16, 18.6%) and stent migration (6, 7%). Five (5.4%) complications were reported during stent removal, which were three bleeds and two perforations. No association was found between stent duration and complications (p = 0.67). CONCLUSION: complications secondary to LAMS insertion are uncommon but may be serious. This study found no association between complications and stent duration.

Cepillado de la pared del quiste. Explorando los límites de la citología / Cyst wall brushing. Exploring the limits of cytology

No disponible

Cyst wall brushing. Exploring the limits of cytology.

With the increasingly widespread use of imaging techniques pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are now commonly identified. Their prevalence among the symptom-free population ranges from 2.4% to 13.5%. However, a recent study by our group revealed PCLs in up to 21.5% of patients undergoing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for non-pancreas conditions, an incidence that increases with age. Identifying PCLs in an otherwise asymptomatic population has become a significant clinical issue.

Mature cystic teratoma of the pancreas diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. A case report

Introduction. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) guided by ecoendoscopy (EE) or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become a useful diagnostic tool for cystic lesions of the pancreas. We present a case of mature cystic teratoma in the body of the pancreas which was diagnosed preoperatively and successfully treated with distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. The characteristics, preoperative diagnosis and the differential diagnosis of this rare entity are discussed. Case History. A 39 year old woman presented with epigastric pain. A computed tomography (CT) scan showed an 8.5cm multicystic pancreatic mass. FNA guided by ecoendoscopy provided tissue for cytological examination which showed distinct types of epithelium (mucous, ciliary and squamous), leading to a preoperative diagnosis of mature cystic teratoma. Discussion. Mature cystic teratoma of the pancreas is extremely rare and has a wide range of differential diagnoses which include cystic and pseudocystic tumours. FNA guided by ecoendoscopy is a useful tool for the preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic lesions but an in situ evaluation of the cytopathologist necessary to obtain good sampling(AU)

Introducción. La punción aspiración con aguja fina (PAAF) guiada con ecoendoscopio (EE) o por ultrasonografía endoscópica (USE) se ha convertido en un método útil para el diagnóstico de lesiones quísticas pancreáticas. Presentamos un caso de teratoma quístico maduro en el cuerpo del páncreas diagnosticado preoperatoriamente y tratado exitosamente con pancreatectomía distal con espenectomía. Características, detección preoperatoria y diagnóstico diferencial de esta rara entidad son discutidos. Caso. Este artículo documenta los hallazgos de una mujer de 39 años que presenta dolor epigástrico. La tomografía computarizada (TC) muestra una masa multiquística pancreática de 8.5cm. Los extendidos citológicos de la PAAF guiada por ecoendoscopio demuestran distintos tipos de epitelio (mucoso, ciliado y escamoso) y ofrecen el diagnóstico preoperatorio de teratoma quístico maduro. Discusión. El teratoma quístico maduro de páncreas es extremadamente raro y el espectro de diagnóstico diferencial es amplio e incluye tumores quísticos y pseudoquistes. La PAAF guiada por ecoendoscopio es un método útil para el diagnóstico preoperatorio de lesiones pancreáticas y una valoración in situ del citopatólogo es necesaria para obtener un buen muestreo de la lesión(AU)

Desarrollo y validación de indicadores y estándares de calidad en colonoscopia / Development and validation of quality standards for colonoscopy

Fundamento y objetivos: Antes de iniciar programas de cribado de cáncer colorrectal es necesario evaluar la calidad de la colonoscopia. Nos propusimos desarrollar un grupo de indicadores de calidad en colonoscopia fácilmente aplicables y determinar la variabilidad de su cumplimiento. Pacientes y método: A partir de la bibliografía se elaboraron 21 indicadores potenciales de calidad que se sometieron a un proceso de selección en el que se determinó su validez facial, de contenido, fiabilidad y viabilidad de su medición. Se estimó la variabilidad del cumplimiento de los indicadores mediante el coeficiente de variación (CV) y del cumplimiento de estándares mediante la ji al cuadrado. Resultados: Seis indicadores superaron el proceso de selección: consentimiento informado, medicación administrada, colonoscopia completa, complicaciones, pólipos extirpados y recuperados y detección de adenomas de colon en mayores de 50 años. Se incluyeron un total de 1.928 colonoscopias procedentes de 8 centros hospitalarios. Cada centro incluyó el mismo número de colonoscopias seleccionadas mediante muestreo aleatorizado simple con sustitución. Existía una importante variabilidad en el cumplimiento de algunos indicadores y estándares: medicación administrada (CV del 43%; p<0,01), registro de complicaciones (CV del 37%; p<0,01), todos los pólipos extirpados y recuperados (CV del 12%; p<0,01) y detección de adenomas en pacientes de más de 50 años (CV del 2%; p<0,01).Conclusiones: Hemos validado 6 indicadores de calidad en colonoscopia fácilmente medibles. Existe una importante variabilidad en el cumplimiento de algunos indicadores y estándares, lo que aconseja el desarrollo de programas de mejora de la calidad en colonoscopia antes de la implantación del cribado de cáncer colorrectal (AU)

Background and objectives: Before starting programs for colorectal cancer screening it is necessary to evaluate the quality of colonoscopy. Our objectives were to develop a group of quality indicators of colonoscopy easily applicable and to determine the variability of their achievement. Patients and methods: After reviewing the bibliography we prepared 21 potential indicators of quality that were submitted to a process of selection in which we measured their facial validity, content validity, reliability and viability of their measurement. We estimated the variability of their achievement by means of the coefficient of variability (CV) and the variability of the achievement of the standards by means of ÷2. Results: Six indicators overcome the selection process: informed consent, medication administered, completed colonoscopy, complications, every polyp removed and recovered, and adenoma detection rate in patients older than 50 years. 1928 colonoscopies were included from eight endoscopy units. Every unit included the same number of colonoscopies selected by means of simple random sampling with substitution. There was an important variability in the achievement of some indicators and standards: medication administered (CV 43%, p<0.01), complications registered (CV 37%, p<0.01), every polyp removed and recovered (CV 12%, p<0.01) and adenoma detection rate in older than fifty years (CV 2%, p<0.01). Conclusions: We have validated six quality indicators for colonoscopy which are easily measurable. An important variability exists in the achievement of some indicators and standards. Our data highlight the importance of the development of continuous quality improvement programmes for colonoscopy before starting colorectal cancer screening (AU)

[Development and validation of quality standards for colonoscopy]. / Desarrollo y validación de indicadores y estándares de calidad en colonoscopia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Before starting programs for colorectal cancer screening it is necessary to evaluate the quality of colonoscopy. Our objectives were to develop a group of quality indicators of colonoscopy easily applicable and to determine the variability of their achievement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After reviewing the bibliography we prepared 21 potential indicators of quality that were submitted to a process of selection in which we measured their facial validity, content validity, reliability and viability of their measurement. We estimated the variability of their achievement by means of the coefficient of variability (CV) and the variability of the achievement of the standards by means of chi(2). RESULTS: Six indicators overcome the selection process: informed consent, medication administered, completed colonoscopy, complications, every polyp removed and recovered, and adenoma detection rate in patients older than 50 years. 1928 colonoscopies were included from eight endoscopy units. Every unit included the same number of colonoscopies selected by means of simple random sampling with substitution. There was an important variability in the achievement of some indicators and standards: medication administered (CV 43%, p<0.01), complications registered (CV 37%, p<0.01), every polyp removed and recovered (CV 12%, p<0.01) and adenoma detection rate in older than fifty years (CV 2%, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We have validated six quality indicators for colonoscopy which are easily measurable. An important variability exists in the achievement of some indicators and standards. Our data highlight the importance of the development of continuous quality improvement programmes for colonoscopy before starting colorectal cancer screening.