High bone tumor burden to identify advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with survival benefit upon bone targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Bone-targeted agents (BTA), such as denosumab (DN) and zoledronic acid (ZA), have historically reduced the risk of skeletal related events in cancer patients with bone metastases (BM), with no improvement in survival outcomes. In the immunotherapy era, BM have been associated with poor prognosis upon immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Currently, the impact of bone tumor burden on survival upon BTAs in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients treated with ICI remains unknown. METHODS: Data from ICI-treated aNSCLC patients with BM (4/2013-5/2022) in one institution were retrospectively collected. BTA-ICI concurrent treatment was defined as BTA administration at any time before or within 90 days from ICI start. High bone tumor burden (HBTB) was defined as ≥ 3 sites of BM. Median OS (mOS) was estimated with Kaplan-Meier. Aikaike's information criterion (AIC) was used to select the best model for data analysis adjusted for clinical variables. RESULTS: Of 134 patients included, 51 (38 %) received BTA. At a mFU of 39.6 months (m), BTA-ICIs concurrent treatment did not significantly impact on mOS [8.3 m (95% CI 3.9-12.8) versus (vs) 6.8 m (95% CI 4.0-9.6) p = 0.36]; these results were confirmed after adjustment for clinical variables selected by AIC. A multivariate model showed a significant interaction between BTA use and HBTB or radiation therapy to BM. In subgroup analyses, only HBTB confirmed to be associated with significantly longer mOS [8.3 m (95% CI 2.4-14.2) vs 3.5 m (95% CI 2.9-4.1), p = 0.003] and mPFS [3.0 m (95% CI 1.6-4.4) vs 1.8 m (95% CI 1.6-2.0) p = 0.001] upon BTA-ICI concurrent treatment, with the most pronounced OS benefit observed for DN-ICI concurrent regimen [15.2 m (95% CI 0.1-30.7) vs 3.5 m (95% CI 2.9-4.1) p = 0.002]. CONCLUSIONS: In the immunotherapy era, HBTB can identify patients experiencing survival benefit with BTA, especially with DN-ICI combination. HBTB should be included as a stratification factor in the upcoming trials assessing BTA and ICI combinations in patients with aNSCLC and BM.

Comparing BamHI-W and CE-marked assays to detect circulating Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) DNA of nasopharyngeal cancer patients in a non-endemic area.

OBJECTIVES: Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)-DNA is a well-established prognostic biomarker in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Different methods for assessment include single-copy gene targeted, European Conformity (CE)-marked assays, which are mostly employed in non-endemic settings, vs multiple-copy gene targeted, in-house BamHI-W based assays, which currently represent the most widely used method for EBV-DNA quantification. To date, evidence concerning the commutability of these different assays is still limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From August 2016 to March 2018, 124 plasma and 124 whole blood (WB) samples from 93 NPC patients were collected at different time-points for each patient. EBV-DNA viral load was quantified in pre- (n = 12) and post-treatment (n = 9), follow-up (n = 53), and recurrent/metastatic (R/M) (n = 50) phase. For each sample, one in-house BamHI-W vs three different CE-marked plasma assays were compared; the performance of plasma vs WB matrix was also assessed. Quantitative agreement of EBV-DNA values was evaluated by linear correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: A statistically significant (p = 0.0001) agreement between all CE-marked and the BamHI-W assays was found using plasma matrix, regardless of clinical phase. The results obtained in copies/ml were comparable to those expressed in IU/ml. When using WB matrix, the number of positive detections increased in the post-treatment phase. CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective comparison supported an agreement between Plasma BamHI-W and CE-marked assays in measuring EBV-DNA for non-endemic NPC patients. There were no significant interferences from different measurement units (IU/ml vs copies/ml). Further evaluations are needed to better clarify the role of WB.

Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and EPSILoN score in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with first-line chemo-immunotherapy.

Background: Clinical and laboratory biomarkers in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) receiving chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) are still poorly explored. Materials & methods: All consecutive aNSCLC patients who received at least one cycle of first-line CIT were enrolled. The impact of several clinical and laboratory biomarkers on outcomes was evaluated through Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was shown to be an independent prognostic biomarker of both worse progression-free survival and worse overall survival. The EPSILoN score was able to divide patients into three different prognostic groups, with a median overall survival of 73.2, 45.6 and 8.6 months for the favorable, intermediate and poor groups, respectively. Conclusion: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and EPSILoN score were shown to have a prognostic value in aNSCLC patients treated with CIT.

Patients affected by inoperable lung cancer, due to great extension or to the presence of metastases, are currently treated with intravenous drugs that act on immune system activation alone or in combination with chemotherapy as first-line treatment. The characteristics of these patients (both their medical history and their blood exams) need to be studied to find out if some of them can help clinicians to predict if they will benefit from the combination of immunotherapy with chemotherapy. The authors collected the data of patients with advanced lung cancer treated in their hospital and found out that a value calculated from their blood exams, collected before the start of treatment and a combination of values named EPSILoN score (which considers patients' clinical condition, their history of tobacco smoking, the presence of metastases in the liver and two blood exam parameters, namely the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and LDH level) can predict how their disease will evolve during first-line treatment with chemotherapy in combination with immunotherapy.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with thymic epithelial tumours with and without active or pre-existing autoimmune disorders: Brief report of a TYME network safety analysis.

BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine for patients with cancer. A substantial risk of developing vaccine-related autoimmune toxicities could be hypothesised for patients with thymic epithelial tumours (TETs) due to their high risk of autoimmune disorders (ADs). Moreover, a cross-reaction between SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibodies and various tissue proteins has been shown, and antibodies against nucleoproteins showed overlaps in the autoimmune cross-reaction with antibodies to spike protein. Due to the rarity of TETs, no data addressing this hypothesis are available. METHODS: Patients with TETs who received SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, treated in 4 referral centres of the Italian Collaborative Group for ThYmic MalignanciEs (TYME) network between February 2021 and September 2021, were interviewed through a standardised 15-items questionnaire in order to describe the safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients affected by TETs. RESULTS: Data from 245 doses of vaccine administered to 126 patients (41 = thymic carcinoma, 85 = thymoma; 38 with AD, of which 26 with active AD) were collected. Nine patients had a previous COVID-19-positive swab. No cases of AD reactivation or worsening of a pre-existing AD were seen in the study population. A new diagnosis of myasthenia gravis likely unrelated to the vaccine was made in two patients after the vaccination. Sixty-four patients (51%) experienced a total of 103 adverse events, all G1/G2, most commonly fatigue, new or worsening muscle pain and chills. None AE required patients' hospitalisation. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines appear to be safe in patients with TET, even in case of active or pre-existing AD.

Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Uncommon Histology.

BACKGROUND: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved outcome of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients. However, their efficacy remains uncertain in uncommon histologies (UH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from ICI treated aNSCLC patients (April,2013-January,2021) in one Institution were retrospectively collected. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were estimated by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression model, respectively. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were assessed. RESULTS: Of 375 patients, 79 (21.1%) had UH: 19 (24.1%) sarcomatoid carcinoma, 15 (19.0%) mucinous adenocarcinoma, 10 (12.6%) enteric adenocarcinoma, 8 (10.1%) adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified, 7 (8.9%) large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, 6 (7.6%) mixed histology non-adenosquamous, 5 (6.3%) adenosquamous carcinoma, 9 (11.4%) other UH. In UH group, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) <1%, 1-49%, ≥50% and unknown expression were reported in 27.8%, 22.8%, 31.7% and 17.7% patients respectively and ICI was the second/further-line in the majority of patients. After a median follow-up of 35.64 months (m), median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 2.5 m in UH [95% CI 2.2-2.9 m] versus (vs.) 2.7 m in CH [95% CI 2.3-3.2 m, P-value = .584]; median overall survival (mOS) was 8.8 m [95% CI 4.9-12.6 m] vs. 9.7 m [95% CI 8.0-11.3 m, P-value = .653]. At multivariate analyses only ECOG PS was a confirmed prognostic factor in UH. ORR and DCR were 25.3% and 40.5% in UH vs. 21.6% and 49.5% in CH [P-value = .493 and .155 respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were detected between UH and CH groups. Prospective trials are needed to understand ICIs role in UH population.

The Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Receiving First-Line Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Since a non-negligible fraction of patients with metastatic melanoma does not experience long-term disease control, even with immunotherapy and targeted therapy, new biomarkers for patient stratification and treatment tailoring are needed in this setting. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the association of a novel immune-inflammatory blood-based biomarker, the Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV), with clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma receiving first-line therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included patients treated at the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori of Milan and having an available baseline complete blood cell count (CBC). PIV was calculated as: [neutrophil count (103/mm3) × platelet count (103/mm3) × monocyte count (103/mm3)]/lymphocyte count (103/mm3). RESULTS: A total of 228 patients were included: 119 (52%) had been treated with immunotherapy and 109 (48%) with targeted therapy. PIV was significantly higher in patients with ECOG PS ≥ 1, high disease burden, synchronous metastases, and elevated baseline LDH level. High baseline PIV was independently associated with poor overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.30-3.29; adjusted P = 0.002) and progression-free survival (adjusted HR 1.56; 95% CI 1.01-2.41; adjusted P = 0.044). High PIV was also associated with primary resistance to both immunotherapy (odds ratio [OR]: 3.98; 95% CI 1.45-12.32; P = 0.005) and targeted therapy (OR: 8.42; 95% CI 2.50-34.5; P < 0.001). PIV showed a promising discrimination ability in terms of AIC and c-index when compared with other CBC-based biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: PIV may guide the treatment decision process and the development of novel first-line treatment strategies in melanoma, but warrants further study and validation.

Management of loco-regionally advanced squamous laryngeal cancer in elderly patients.

PURPOSE: To describe the management and outcomes of loco-regionally advanced (stages III-IV) laryngeal cancer (LRALC) in elderly patients. METHODS: Clinical records of 88 LRALC patients treated at our Institution from 2002 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided in 2 subgroups: age > 65 years (elderly) and age ≤ 65 years (controls). Survivals were estimated with Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank test, multivariate analysis were performed with Cox proportional hazard methods. RESULTS: Eighty-eight LRALC patients were included: 45 elderly and 43 controls. Median follow-up was 55.3 months. Median age was 66 years (range 41-84) in the overall population, 72 years (range 66-84) in the elderly cohort. The majority (98%) of elderly patients had at least one comorbidity (ACE27 1-3), while ACE27 was 0 in 37% of controls (p = 0.0001). ECOG PS was 0 in 42% of elderly vs 79% of controls (p = 0.0029). Clinical stage (TNM eighth edition) was III in 67%, IVA in 22% and IVB in 11%. Treatment consisted in total laryngectomy (TL) in 55%, chemo-radiation in 29%, exclusive radiotherapy in 9%, and conservative surgery in 7%. In elderly patients 2-year disease-free and overall survivals were 58% and 74%, respectively. Multivariate analysis performed on the overall group of 88 patients showed that age (HR 1.07, p = 0.0006) and TNM (for both 7th and 8th Editions HR 0.27 for stage III vs IV, p = 0.0005) maintained an independent statistical significant association with OS. CONCLUSIONS: In this monocentric cohort, age and TNM confirmed their independent prognostic role in LRALC patients. Organ-preservation is still an unmet need in a significant portion of elderly patients.

Safety and activity of radium-223 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: the experience of Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori.

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic decision-making in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) represents an open challenge. Radium-223 is approved for patients with symptomatic bone metastases, no visceral involvement, progressing after at least 2 lines of systemic therapy, or ineligible for any other systemic treatment. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, observational study on patients with mCRPC treated with radium-223 at our institution outside of clinical trials, to assess the safety and activity in a real-world population. Data regarding baseline patient/disease characteristics and treatment outcomes (number of cycles, treatment-related adverse events [AEs], cause of discontinuation, and best response) were collected. RESULTS: Overall, 41 patients were treated from September 2015 to September 2018. Median age was 73 years; baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) was 0, 1, or 2 in 15%, 80%, and 5% of cases, respectively; and 3%, 41%, 44%, and 12% of patients had <6, 6-20, >20, and superscan bone lesions, respectively. A median number of 5 cycles (interquartile range 3-6) with median dose 19.52 MBq (interquartile range 12.87-24.83) was received. Treatment schedule was completed in 49% of cases; discontinuations due to AEs, disease-related death, or disease progression occurred in 24%, 33%, and 43% of patients, respectively. Any-grade AEs occurred in 73% and grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 29% of patients, mainly anemia, decreased platelet count, and fatigue. No skeletal-related events or treatment-related deaths were recorded. After treatment, 66%, 2%, and 32% of patients had a stable, improved, or deteriorated ECOG PS versus baseline, respectively, and 24%, 61%, and 15% reported a stable, improved, or worsened pain symptom control. Post-treatment versus baseline alkaline phosphatase was reduced or stable in 46% and increased in 54% of patients, whereas prostate-specific antigen was decreased or stable in 83% and increased in 17% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides clinically useful real-world data on radium-223, highlighting the importance of multidisciplinary patient management to guarantee the best continuum of care for patients with mCRPC.

Is There an Interplay between Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, Thromboprophylactic Treatments and Thromboembolic Events? Mechanisms and Impact in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

PD-1 pathway blockade has been shown to promote proatherogenic T-cell responses and destabilization of atherosclerotic plaques. Moreover, preclinical evidence suggests a potential synergy of antiplatelet drugs with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We conducted an analysis within a prospective observational protocol (APOLLO study) to investigate the rates, predictors, and prognostic significance of thromboembolic events (TE) and thromboprophylaxis in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs. Among 217 patients treated between April 2014 and September 2018, 13.8% developed TE events. Current smoking status (HR 3.61 (95% CI 1.52-8.60), p = 0.004) and high (>50%) PD-L1 (HR 2.55 (95% CI 1.05-6.19), p = 0.038) resulted in being independent TE predictors. An increased risk of death following a diagnosis of TE (HR 2.93; 95% CI 1.59-5.42; p = 0.0006) was observed. Patients receiving antiplatelet treatment experienced longer progression-free survival (PFS) (6.4 vs. 3.4 months, HR 0.67 (95% CI 0.48-0.92), p = 0.015) and a trend toward better OS (11.2 vs. 9.6 months, HR 0.78 (95% CI 0.55-1.09), p = 0.14), which were not confirmed in a multivariate model. No impact of anticoagulant treatment on patients' outcomes was observed. NSCLC patients treated with ICIs bear a consistent risk for thrombotic complications, with a detrimental effect on survival. The impact of antiplatelet drugs on ICIs efficacy deserves further investigation in prospective trials.

Sorafenib Versus Observation Following Radical Metastasectomy for Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results from the Phase 2 Randomized Open-label RESORT Study.

BACKGROUND: In selected metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients, radical metastasectomy followed by observation is a potential strategy. It is still to be defined whether systemic therapy should be administered following metastasectomy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential benefit of postoperative treatment with sorafenib compared with observation alone after radical metastasectomy in mRCC patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The RESORT trial was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 study conducted between November 2012 and November 2017 in Italy. Patients with clear-cell mRCC pretreated with nephrectomy and undergoing radical metastasectomy (three or fewer lesions) were eligible for the study. Patients were randomized (1:1) within 12 wk from metastasectomy to sorafenib (standard dose 400 mg twice daily) or observation for a maximum of 52 wk. Stratification factors were interval from nephrectomy, site, and number of lesions. Overall, 76 patients were screened and 69 were randomized: 33 were assigned to sorafenib and 36 to observation. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival and the safety profile. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: RFS curves were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to statistically compare the curves. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: At a median follow-up of 38 mo, median RFS was 37 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 20-not available [NA]) in the observation arm versus 21 mo (95% CI 11-NA) in the sorafenib arm (log-rank test p = 0.404), with 12-, 24-, and 36-mo RFS probability of 74% versus 63%, 59% versus 49%, and 50% versus 41%, respectively, in the observation versus the sorafenib arm. Any-grade adverse event (AE) rates were 84% in the sorafenib arm and 31% in the observation arm; grade ≥3 AE rates were 22% and 3% in the sorafenib and the observation arm, respectively, with a rate of treatment discontinuation for AEs of 19% in the sorafenib arm. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study showed that systemic treatment with sorafenib did not increase RFS as compared with observation in mRCC patients following radical metastasectomy. PATIENT SUMMARY: This article reports the clinical outcome of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sorafenib or managed with an observation-alone strategy after the radical surgery of metastases. We found that sorafenib did not improve the patient outcome in terms of relapse-free survival in this selected population.

Collecting ducts carcinoma: An orphan disease. Literature overview and future perspectives.

Collecting ducts carcinoma (CDC) is a rare and aggressive histological subtype of renal cancer accounting for only 1% of renal tumors. Usually patients present in bad clinical conditions due to a symptomatic disease with synchronous metastasis. Due to the rarity of CDC, data from prospective trials evaluating the best treatment for these patients are limited. The prognosis is poor with a median overall survival of around 11 months for patients with metastatic disease. The best treatment option today is considered a doublet chemotherapy with platinum salt plus gemcitabine as a result from a prospective phase II trial, but survival outcomes remain unsatisfactory. The interest in the in-depth understanding the biology of this orphan disease is growing, leading to find potential new biological-driven treatment approaches. Here we review the up-to-date literature evidences to address the best management of this rare and unfavorable clinical condition.

The role of metastasectomy in advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Introduction: So far, clinical experiences have proved metastasectomy as the only approach in the setting of metastatic renal cell carcinoma that may achieve the 'no evidence of disease' status, with an associated improvement in survival. Areas covered: This review aims to summarize the body of knowledge on therapeutic approaches to mRCC, with a specific insight on the role of metastasectomy and on which underlying factors could be good predictors to select patients who may benefit from surgery. In detail, we managed to identify as potential selection criteria: the number of lesions and their site, the DFI, patients' performance status and, most of all, the completeness of resection. Expert opinion: The definition of the optimal treatment strategy of mRCC patients is still an unmet clinical need. The decision-making process about treatment strategy should consider specific tumor's and patient's characteristics, as well as the integration of the available therapeutic approaches with the aim to reach the best clinical outcome. We consider multidisciplinary management mandatory in order to tailor the treatment approach according to the patient and disease features. The experience of clinicians may be considered crucial in order to select the best candidates for a multimodal approach.

Androgen and Estrogen Receptor Imaging in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients as a Surrogate for Tissue Biopsies.

In addition to the well-known estrogen receptor (ER) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, the androgen receptor (AR) is also a potential drug target in breast cancer treatment. Whole-body imaging can provide information across lesions within a patient. ER expression in tumor lesions can be visualized by 18F-fluoroestradiol (18F-FES) PET, and AR expression has been visualized in prostate cancer patients with 18F-fluorodihydrotestosterone (18F-FDHT) PET. Our aim was to assess the concordance between 18F-FDHT and 18F-FES PET and tumor AR and ER expression measured immunohistochemically in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Methods: Patients with ER-positive metastatic breast cancer were eligible for the study, irrespective of tumor AR status. The concordance of 18F-FDHT and 18F-FES uptake on PET with immunohistochemical expression of AR and ER in biopsies of corresponding metastases was analyzed. Patients underwent 18F-FDHT PET and 18F-FES PET. A metastasis was biopsied within 8 wk of the PET procedures. Tumor samples with more than 10% and 1% nuclear tumor cell staining were considered, respectively, AR- and ER-positive. Correlations between PET uptake and semiquantitative immunohistochemical scoring (percentage positive cells × intensity) were calculated. The optimum threshold of SUV to discriminate positive and negative lesions for both AR and ER was determined by receiver-operating-characteristic analysis. Results: In the 13 evaluable patients, correlation (R2 ) between semiquantitative AR expression and 18F-FDHT uptake was 0.47 (P = 0.01) and between semiquantitative ER expression and 18F-FES uptake 0.78 (P = 0.01). The optimal cutoff for AR-positive lesions was an SUVmax of 1.94 for 18F-FDHT PET, yielding a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 100%; the optimal cutoff was an SUVmax of 1.54 for 18F-FES PET, resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 100% for ER. Conclusion:18F-FDHT and 18F-FES uptake correlate well with AR and ER expression levels in representative biopsies. These results show the potential use of whole-body imaging for receptor status assessment, particularly in view of biopsy-associated sampling errors and heterogeneous receptor expression in breast cancer metastases.

Recommendations and Technical Aspects of 16α-[18F]Fluoro-17ß-Estradiol PET to Image the Estrogen Receptor In Vivo: The Groningen Experience.

The estrogen derivative 16α-F-fluoro-17ß-estradiol (FES) is a PET tracer that has been used in a variety of preclinical and clinical studies to detect estrogen receptor (ER) expression, mainly in breast cancer, but also for other oncological indications. As a result of the success of these studies and the potential applications of the tracer, FES starts to be implemented in routine clinical practice. However, the number of centers using this tracer is still limited and many nuclear medicine physicians and medical oncologists are still unaware of the possibilities FES PET imaging offers. The aim of this article is therefore to give an overview of the main indications of FES PET in oncology and to provide recommendations on correct use of this imaging technique. This includes precautions that have to be taken for patient preparation, procedures for the acquisition of the scans, the physiological distribution of the tracer, factors that might influence tracer uptake and guidance for image analysis, quantification of tracer uptake, and reporting of the scans.