Population pharmacokinetics of anidulafungin in ICU patients assessing inter- and intrasubject variability.

AIMS: The population pharmacokinetics (PK) of anidulafungin in critically ill patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs) was explored with the intention of evaluating and optimizing dosing regimens. METHODS: A PK study was conducted in a cohort of 13 patients treated with anidulafungin using intensive sampling during multiple periods per patient and the high-performance liquid chromatography method for drug quantification. A population PK model was developed to describe the concentration-time course of anidulafungin and the inter-individual (IIV) and interoccasion variability (IOV) of the PK parameters. Model-based PK simulations have been performed to estimate the probability of target attainment (PTA), given the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target of free 24-hour area under the free drug concentration-time curve over minimum inhibitory concentration for several dosing regimens. RESULTS: A two-compartment PK model, with first-order elimination, best described the data with population clearance (CL) and central/peripheral volume of distribution (V1/V2) of 0.778 L/h and 10.2/21.1 L, respectively, and a mean ± s.d. AUC0-24 of 119.97 ± 46.23 mg·h/L. Pronounced IIV and IOV variability was found for CL (38% and 31%) and V1 (47% and 30%), respectively. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Body Mass Index (BMI) were found to be covariates on CL and V1, respectively. Low PTA values were calculated for borderline Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)-susceptible Candida strains. CONCLUSIONS: Although anidulafungin exposure was found comparable to that in healthy volunteers, elevated interindividual and significant interoccasion variability was found in critically ill ICU patients, which resulted in reduced PTA values in these patients.

Population pharmacokinetics of micafungin over repeated doses in critically ill patients: a need for a loading dose?

OBJECTIVES: To study the population pharmacokinetics of micafungin in critically ill patients, evaluate and optimize dosage regimens. METHODS: An HPLC-fluorescence bioassay for micafungin was developed, fully validated and applied to a pharmacokinetic study conducted in 14 ICU patients. Dense blood sampling was performed from days 1 to 7. A population pharmacokinetic model accounting for interindividual (IIV) and interoccasion variability (IOV) of the PK parameters was developed. Simulations were performed to estimate the probability of target attainment (PTA) for several dosing regimens. KEY FINDINGS: A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model best described the data, with population clearance CL = 1.31 L/h and central volume V1 = 14.2 L. The relatively high IOV observed (45% for CL, 27% for V1) sets limits for the dose individualization in this population. The low PTA on the first day of treatment suggests the need of a loading dose. PTA and CFR estimates show that the current micafungin dosage may be insufficient for the treatment of borderline susceptible Candida strains. CONCLUSIONS: A loading dose of up to 300 mg of micafungin is needed for the treatment of invasive candidiasis in ICU patients while a maintenance dose of up to 200 mg can be considered in empirical antifungal treatment.