Early administration of hydrocortisone replacement after the advent of septic shock: impact on survival and immune response*.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of early initiation of hydrocortisone therapy on the clinical course of septic shock and on cytokine release. DESIGN: Prospective study in patients with septic shock treated with low doses of hydrocortisone. SETTING: ICUs and general wards. PATIENTS: Over a 2-year period, 170 patients with septic shock treated with low doses of hydrocortisone were enrolled. Blood was sampled from 34 patients for isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and cytokine stimulation before and 24 hours after the start of hydrocortisone. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After quartile analysis, patients were divided into those with early initiation of hydrocortisone (< 9 hr after vasopressors, n = 46) and those with late initiation of hydrocortisone (> 9 hr after vasopressors, n = 124). After adjusting for disease severity and type of infection, a protective effect of early hydrocortisone administration against unfavorable outcome was found (hazard ratio, 0.20; p = 0.012). Time of discontinuation of vasopressors was earlier among patients with initiation of hydrocortisone within 9 hours. Production of tumor necrosis factor-α was lower among patients who had had hydrocortisone early. CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving hydrocortisone for septic shock, early initiation of treatment was associated with improved survival. This treatment was also associated with attenuated stimulation of tumor necrosis factor-α.

Kinetics of circulating immunoglobulin M in sepsis: relationship with final outcome.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate the kinetics of immunoglobulin M (IgM) during the different stages of sepsis. METHODS: In this prospective multicenter study, blood sampling for IgM measurement was done within the first 24 hours from diagnosis in 332 critically ill patients; in 83 patients this was repeated upon progression to more severe stages. Among these 83 patients, 30 patients with severe sepsis progressed into shock and IgM was monitored daily for seven consecutive days. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from 55 patients and stimulated for IgM production. RESULTS: Serum IgM was decreased in septic shock compared to patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and patients with severe sepsis. Paired comparisons at distinct time points of the sepsis course showed that IgM was decreased only when patients deteriorated from severe sepsis to septic shock. Serial measurements in these patients, beginning from the early start of vasopressors, showed that the distribution of IgM over time was significantly greater for survivors than for non-survivors. Production of IgM by PBMCs was significantly lower at all stages of sepsis compared with healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: Specific changes of circulating IgM occur when patients with severe sepsis progress into septic shock. The distribution of IgM is lower among non-survivors.

Polymicrobial bloodstream infections: Epidemiology and impact on mortality.

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of polymicrobial bloodstream infections (pBSIs) on the outcome of sepsis in an area where antimicrobial resistance is of concern. This was a retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively from patients developing BSI outside of an intensive care unit (non-ICU patients) or after ICU admission. Demographics and clinical characteristics were compared for patients with pBSI versus monomicrobial BSI (mBSI) and following stratification by ICU or non-ICU and severity of sepsis status. Possible risk factors for adverse outcome were explored by multivariate analysis, and outcomes were measured by Cox regression analysis. Among 412 patients with BSI, 47 patients (11.4%) with pBSI were recorded; compared with patients with mBSI, they had significantly higher APACHE II scores and presented more frequently with severe sepsis/septic shock. The all-cause 28-day mortality was significantly higher for pBSI versus mBSI (38.3% vs. 24.7%; P=0.033), whereas appropriateness of treatment was comparable (78.7% vs. 86.6%). Primary bacteraemia by combinations of Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii was predominant among pBSIs; in mBSIs, urinary tract infections by Escherichia coli, K. pneumoniae or Pseudomonas aeruginosa predominated. Multivariate analysis demonstrated pBSI as a significant contributor to 28-day mortality (HR=1.86; P=0.039), along with presence of two or more co-morbidities (HR=2.35; P=0.004). In conclusion, pBSIs differed epidemiologically from mBSIs, with the emergence of enterococcal species, and portended an almost two-fold increased risk of 28-day mortality. Prospective studies are warranted to elucidate possibly modifiable factors.

Risk assessment in sepsis: a new prognostication rule by APACHE II score and serum soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor.

INTRODUCTION: Early risk assessment is the mainstay of management of patients with sepsis. APACHE II is the gold standard prognostic stratification system. A prediction rule that aimed to improve prognostication by APACHE II with the application of serum suPAR (soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor) is developed. METHODS: A prospective study cohort enrolled 1914 patients with sepsis including 62.2% with sepsis and 37.8% with severe sepsis/septic shock. Serum suPAR was measured in samples drawn after diagnosis by an enzyme-immunoabsorbent assay; in 367 patients sequential measurements were performed. After ROC analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis a prediction rule for risk was developed. The rule was validated in a double-blind fashion by an independent confirmation cohort of 196 sepsis patients, predominantly severe sepsis/septic shock patients, from Sweden. RESULTS: Serum suPAR remained stable within survivors and non-survivors for 10 days. Regression analysis showed that APACHE II ≥ 17 and suPAR ≥ 12 ng/ml were independently associated with unfavorable outcome. Four strata of risk were identified: i) APACHE II <17 and suPAR <12 ng/ml with mortality 5.5%; ii) APACHE II < 17 and suPAR ≥ 12 ng/ml with mortality 17.4%; iii) APACHE II ≥ 17 and suPAR <12 ng/ml with mortality 37.4%; and iv) APACHE II ≥ 17 and suPAR ≥ 12 ng/ml with mortality 51.7%. This prediction rule was confirmed by the Swedish cohort. CONCLUSIONS: A novel prediction rule with four levels of risk in sepsis based on APACHE II score and serum suPAR is proposed. Prognostication by this rule is confirmed by an independent cohort.

Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) for assessment of disease severity in ventilator-associated pneumonia and sepsis.

Urokinase plasminogen activator (uPAR) is a receptor mainly expressed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells and neutrophils. The role of its soluble form, namely suPAR, as a predictor of sepsis outcome in a homogenous cohort of 180 septic patients, was investigated. Blood from 180 patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and sepsis was collected for seven consecutive days. suPAR and PCT were measured in serum by an enzyme immunoassay and an immuno-time-resolved amplified cryptate assay respectively. Neutrophils and monocytes were isolated on day 1 and incubated. suPAR levels greater than 10.5 ng/ml had 80% specificity and 77.6% positive predictive value to discriminate between severe sepsis and sepsis. suPAR levels greater than 12.9 ng/ml had 80% specificity and 76.1% positive predictive value for prognosis of unfavorable outcome. suPAR levels were significantly lower among survivors than among non-survivors over follow-up. Step-wise Cox regression analysis found suPAR as an independent factor related with unfavorable outcome (p: 0.026). Concentrations of suPAR in supernatants of neutrophils of patients with sepsis were greater compared to controls. It is concluded that suPAR is a reliable marker of sepsis severity and a strong independent predictor of unfavorable outcome in VAP and sepsis. Neutrophils are involved in release.

Early changes of procalcitonin may advise about prognosis and appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy in sepsis.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to define if early changes of procalcitonin (PCT) may inform about prognosis and appropriateness of administered therapy in sepsis. METHODS: A prospective multicenter observational study was conducted in 289 patients. Blood samples were drawn on day 1, that is, within less than 24 hours from advent of signs of sepsis, and on days 3, 7, and 10. Procalcitonin was estimated in serum by the ultrasensitive Kryptor assay (BRAHMS GmbH, Hennigsdorf, Germany). Patients were divided into the following 2 groups according to the type of change of PCT: group 1, where PCT on day 3 was decreased by more than 30% or was below 0.25 ng/mL, and group 2, where PCT on day 3 was either increased above 0.25 ng/mL or decreased less than 30%. RESULTS: Death occurred in 12.3% of patients of group 1 and in 29.9% of those of group 2 (P < .0001). Odds ratio for death of patients of group 1 was 0.328. Odds ratio for the administration of inappropriate antimicrobials of patients of group 2 was 2.519 (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Changes of serum PCT within the first 48 hours reflect the benefit or not of the administered antimicrobial therapy. Serial PCT measurements should be used in clinical practice to guide administration of appropriate antimicrobials.