Comparison of Postoperative Complications and Outcomes in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Versus Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To compare the frequency of complications and outcomes between patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) of the cervical spine and those with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) who underwent anterior surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Anterior cervical spine surgery for OPLL is an effective surgical procedure; however, it is complex and technically demanding compared with the procedure for CSM. Few reports have compared postoperative complications and clinical outcomes after anterior surgeries between the 2 pathologies. METHODS: Among 1434 patients who underwent anterior cervical spine surgery at 3 spine centers within the same spine research group from January 2011 to March 2021, 333 patients with OPLL and 488 patients with CSM were retrospectively evaluated. Demographics, postoperative complications, and outcomes were reviewed by analyzing medical records. In-hospital and postdischarge postoperative complications were investigated. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated 1 year after the surgery using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score. RESULTS: Patients with OPLL had more comorbid diabetes mellitus preoperatively than patients with CSM ( P <0.001). Anterior cervical corpectomies were more often performed in patients with OPLL than in those with CSM (73.3% and 14.5%). In-hospital complications, such as reoperation, cerebrospinal fluid leak, C5 palsy, graft complications, hoarseness, and upper airway complications, occurred significantly more often in patients with OPLL. Complications after discharge, such as complications of the graft bone/cage and hoarseness, were significantly more common in patients with OPLL. The recovery rate of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score 1 year postoperatively was similar between patients with OPLL and those with CSM. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that complications, both in-hospital and after discharge following anterior spine surgery, occurred more frequently in patients with OPLL than in those with CSM.

The lower Osteotomy Level is Associated With Decreased Revision Surgery Due to Mechanical Complications After Three-Column Osteotomy in Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study.

STUDY DESIGN: A multi-institutional retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: To investigate risk factors of mechanical failure in three-column osteotomy (3COs) in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD), focusing on the osteotomy level. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 111 patients with ASD who underwent 3COs with at least 2 years of follow-up. Radiographic parameters, clinical data on early and late postoperative complications were collected. Surgical outcomes were compared between the low-level osteotomy group and the high-level osteotomy group: osteotomy level of L3 or lower group (LO group, n = 60) and osteotomy of L2 or higher group (HO group, n = 51). RESULTS: Of the 111 patients, 25 needed revision surgery for mechanical complication (mechanical failure). A lower t-score (odds ratio [OR] .39 P = .002) and being in the HO group (OR 4.54, P = .03) were independently associated with mechanical failure. In the analysis divided by the osteotomy level (LO and HO), no difference in early complications or neurological complications was found between the two groups. The rates of overall mechanical complications, rod failure, and mechanical failure were significantly higher in the HO group than in the LO group. After propensity score matching, mechanical complications and failures were still significantly more observed in the HO group than in the LO group (P = .01 and .029, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A lower t-score and osteotomy of L2 or higher were associated with increased risks of mechanical failure. Lower osteotomy was associated with better correction of sagittal balance and a lower rate of mechanical complications.

Augmented Reality Support for Anterior Decompression and Fusion Using Floating Method for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.

Anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) using the floating method for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is an ideal surgical technique, but it has a specific risk of insufficient decompression caused by the impingement of residual ossification. Augmented reality (AR) support is a novel technology that enables the superimposition of images onto the view of a surgical field. AR technology was applied to ADF for cervical OPLL to facilitate intraoperative anatomical orientation and OPLL identification. In total, 14 patients with cervical OPLL underwent ADF with microscopic AR support. The outline of the OPLL and the bilateral vertebral arteries was marked after intraoperative CT, and the reconstructed 3D image data were transferred and linked to the microscope. The AR microscopic view enabled us to visualize the ossification outline, which could not be seen directly in the surgical field, and allowed sufficient decompression of the ossification. Neurological disturbances were improved in all patients. No cases of serious complications, such as major intraoperative bleeding or reoperation due to the postoperative impingement of the floating OPLL, were registered. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the introduction of microscopic AR into ADF using the floating method for cervical OPLL with favorable clinical results.

Prospective Comparative Study of Dysphagia after Subaxial Cervical Spine Surgery: Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy and Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Ossification.

We prospectively investigated the postoperative dysphagia in cervical posterior longitudinal ligament ossification (C-OPLL) and cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) to identify the risk factors of each disease and the incidence. A series of 55 cases with C-OPLL: 13 anterior decompression with fusion (ADF), 16 posterior decompression with fusion (PDF), and 26 laminoplasty (LAMP), and a series of 123 cases with CSM: 61 ADF, 5 PDF, and 57 LAMP, were included. Vertebral level, number of segments, approach, and with or without fusion, and pre and postoperative values of Bazaz dysphagia score, C2-7 lordotic angle (∠C2-7), cervical range of motion, O-C2 lordotic angle, cervical Japanese Orthopedic Association score, and visual analog scale for neck pain were investigated. New dysphagia was defined as an increase in the Bazaz dysphagia score by one grade or more than one year after surgery. New dysphagia occurred in 12 cases with C-OPLL; 6 with ADF (46.2%), 4 with PDF (25%), 2 with LAMP (7.7%), and in 19 cases with CSM; 15 with ADF (24.6%), 1 with PDF (20%), and 3 with LAMP (1.8%). There was no significant difference in the incidence between the two diseases. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that increased ∠C2-7 was a risk factor for both diseases.

K-Line Tilt is a Predictor of Postoperative Kyphotic Deformity After Laminoplasty for Cervical Myelopathy Caused by Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective single-center study. OBJECTIVES: K-line is a decision-making tool to determine the appropriate surgical procedures for patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (C-OPLL). Laminoplasty (LAMP) is one of the standard surgical procedures indicated on the basis of K-line measurements (+: OPLL does not cross the K-line). We investigated the impact of K-line tilt, a radiographic parameter of cervical sagittal balance measured using the K-line, on surgical outcomes after LAMP. METHODS: The study included 62 consecutive patients with K-line (+) C-OPLL who underwent LAMP. The following preoperative and postoperative radiographic measurements were evaluated: (1) the K-line, (2) K-line tilt (an angle between the K-line and vertical line), (3) center of gravity of the head -C7 sagittal vertical axis, (4) C2-C7 lordotic angle, (5) C7 slope, and (6) C2-C7 range of motion. Clinical results were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association scoring system for cervical myelopathy (C-JOA score). RESULTS: All the patients had non-kyphotic cervical alignment (CL ≥ 0°) preoperatively; however, kyphotic deformity (CL < 0°) was observed in 6 patients (9.7%) postoperatively. The recovery rate of the C-JOA scores was poor in the kyphotic deformity (+) group (7.8%) than in the kyphotic deformity (-) group (47.5%). The K-line tilt was identified to be a preoperative risk factor in the multivariate analysis, and the cutoff K-line tilt for predicting the postoperative kyphotic deformity was 20°. CONCLUSIONS: LAMP is not suitable for K-line (+) C-OPLL patients with K-line tilts >20°.

Effectiveness of Lumbosacral Orthosis After Discectomy for Lumbar Disk Herniation: A Prospective Comparative Study.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective comparative study. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the benefits of postoperative application of lumbosacral orthosis after single-level discectomy for lumbar disk herniation (LDH). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although many surgeons use postoperative lumbosacral orthosis for patients with LDH, there is no clear evidence to support or deny its effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-nine consecutive patients who underwent the microscopic discectomy were included. They were divided into two groups: orthosis group and nonorthosis group, before surgery. The recurrence rate and reoperation rate were compared between the two groups at four-week, six-month, and one-year follow-up. Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score for lumbar spine (L-JOA score) at two-week and one-year follow-up, lower extremities and low back pain's visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at six-month and one-year follow-up were compared. RESULTS: Forty-two patients in the orthosis group and 39 patients in the nonorthosis group were followed up for at least one-year after surgery. Recurrence occurred in three patients (7.1%) in the orthosis group and six (15.4%) in the nonorthosis group within one-year. Two patients (4.8%) in the orthosis group and two patients (5.1%) in the nonorthosis group underwent reoperation. There were no significant intergroup differences in the recurrence rate and in the reoperation rate. No significant difference was also observed between the two groups in L-JOA score, ODI, VAS of low back pain, and leg pain at one-year after surgery. Furthermore, at any other follow-up period, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in recurrence rate, reoperation rate, L-JOA score, VAS of low back/leg pain, or ODI. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a postoperative orthosis did not reduce recurrence or reoperation rates, nor did it improve postoperative clinical symptoms. The routine use of an orthosis may not be necessary after single-level lumbar discectomy.

Early Experiences of One-Level Total Disc Replacement (Prestige LP) in Japan: A Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes with Anterior Cervical Discectomy with Fusion.

Introduction: In Japan, cervical total disc replacement (TDR) was approved in 2017. However, because of its short history, no comparative study between cervical TDR and anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) has been conducted in the country. Therefore, we examined and compared the surgical outcomes of TDR and ACDF for one-level cervical degenerative diseases. Methods: In total, 50 patients who had received anterior surgeries for one-level cervical degenerative diseases were investigated. Among them, 25 underwent TDR (Prestige LP; Medtronic), whereas the other 25 patients underwent ACDF. ACDF samples were selected from cases conducted before the approval of TDR (-2017.9) and were retrospectively judged to be indicated for TDR. Before and at 1 year after surgery, clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated. Results: No significant differences in terms of patient demographics between the two groups were observed. A longer operative time was observed in the TDR group than in the ACDF group. Postoperatively, no differences in the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score for cervical myelopathy (C-JOA) score, neck pain visual analog scale, C2-7 angle, and C2-7 range of motion (ROM) were determined. TDR tended to show better neck disability index (NDI) scores postoperatively when compared with ACDF. The local angle at operative level was larger in ACDF. In TDR, the local ROMs were maintained postoperatively; however, in ACDF, the local ROM at the operative level was decreased, and the local ROMs at adjacent levels were increased postoperatively. In the TDR group, although heterotopic ossification was observed in 11 patients (44.0%), and anterior bone loss was identified in 14 patients (56.0%), these issues did not affect surgical outcomes. Conclusions: Conclusively, no differences in terms of C-JOA score and neck pain between patients treated through TDR and ACDF were observed. However, a trend of better NDI scores was identified with TDR. While TDR maintained postoperative ROMs, ACDF showed an increase in the local ROMs at adjacent levels.

A comparative study of surgical outcomes between anterior cervical discectomy with fusion and selective laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have directly compared anterior and posterior surgical approaches in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients with short-segment disease. We aimed to examine and compare surgical outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) and selective laminoplasty (S-LAMP) in CSM patients with 1- or 2-level disease. METHODS: Forty-six patients, who received surgeries for CSM, were prospectively investigated; 24 underwent ACDF and 22 underwent S-LAMP. Average follow-up was 3.5 years. The following pre- and postoperative radiographic measurements were recorded: (1) C2-7 angle, (2) local angle (lordotic Cobb angle at operative level), (3) cervical sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (center of gravity of the head-C7 SVA), and (4) C7 slope. Outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association scoring system for cervical myelopathy (C-JOA score), neck pain visual analog scale, and neck disability index (NDI). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in patient demographics between the two groups. Postoperatively, C2-7 angle, local angle, cervical SVA, C7 slope, C-JOA score, and neck pain and NDI scores were not significantly different between the two groups; however, the recovery rate of the C-JOA score was superior in the ACDF group (57.5%) compared to the S-LAMP group (42.1%). The recovery rate of the C-JOA score in the local lordosis subgroup (local angle ≥ 0°) showed no significant difference between the two surgical groups. However, in the local kyphosis subgroup (local angle < 0°), C-JOA score recovery rate was worse after S-LAMP (20.4%) than ACDF (57.9%); local angle also worsened postoperatively after S-LAMP. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with local lordosis at the segments of cervical spondylosis and spinal cord compression, S-LAMP showed equivalent surgical outcomes (neurological recovery, neck pain and NDI scores, and cervical alignment) to ACDF. However, in patients with local kyphosis, S-LAMP worsened the kyphosis and resulted in worse neurological recovery.

Impact of preoperative cervical sagittal alignment for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament on surgical treatment.

BACKGROUND: Surgical procedures for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) are often chosen based on OPLL size and cervical spine alignment. Recently, cervical sagittal alignment based on sagittal vertical axis (SVA) has received increased attention as an important determinant of radiological and clinical outcomes after surgery. This study aimed to investigate the impact of SVA-based cervical sagittal alignment on surgical treatment for cervical OPLL by reviewing a previous retrospective cohort in which its concept was not taken into account in the surgical procedure choices. METHODS: We reviewed a total of 96 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for cervical myelopathy caused by OPLL from 2008 to 2014. We performed anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) or posterior decompression with fusion (PDF) on patients with massive OPLL or kyphotic alignment, and we performed laminoplasty (LAMP) on patients without massive OPLL or kyphotic alignment. CSVA (center of gravity of the head - C7 SVA), CL (C2-7 lordotic angle) and C7 slope were measured in cervical X-ray at standing position. Clinical results were evaluated using C-JOA score. We divided patients into two subgroups based on the preoperative CSVA: the Low-CSVA (CSVA <40 mm) and High-CSVA (CSVA ≥40 mm) subgroups. RESULTS: In the Low-CSVA subgroup, none of the three operations had an effect on the CL. In contrast, in the High-CSVA subgroup, while ADF and PDF had no effect on the CL, LAMP worsened the CL postoperatively. The recovery rates of the C-JOA scores in the Low-CSVA subgroup showed no significant differences among the three operations; however in the High-CSVA subgroup, LAMP resulted in worse recovery rate of the C-JOA score than ADF or PDF. CONCLUSIONS: LAMP is not suitable for patients with cervical myelopathy caused by OPLL who have high CSVA alignment, even in cases without massive OPLL or kyphotic alignment.

Impact of body mass index on surgical outcomes and complications in adult spinal deformity.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported that overweightness and obesity are associated with higher complication rates in lumbar spine surgery. However, little is known about the effect of obesity on postoperative complications in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, especially in the elderly. This study aimed to examine the effect of body mass index (BMI) on surgical outcomes and postoperative complications in elderly ASD patients undergoing surgical correction in Japan. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, observational study of 234 consecutive patients diagnosed with ASD who underwent corrective surgery. Patients were divided into two groups according to BMI, BMI <25 (153 patients, mean age 71.9 years) and BMI ≥ 25 (overweight/obese, 81 patients, mean age 73.3 years). Radiographic results and perioperative complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Surgical complications occurred in approximately 20% of patients in each group; complications did not significantly differ between the two groups. A greater proportion of patients in the BMI ≥ 25 group experienced mechanical failure and DJK, although the difference was not significant. Preoperative mean lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI) minus LL, sacral slope (SS) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were similar in the BMI < 25 and BMI ≥ 25 groups. However, the BMI ≥25 group had lower mean LL (p = 0.015) and higher PI minus LL (p = 0.09) postoperatively. The BMI ≥25 groups also had significantly smaller LL (p = 0.026), smaller SS (p = 0.049) and higher SVA (p = 0.041) at the final follow-up, compared to the BMI < 25 group. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, no difference in medical or surgical complications after ASD surgery was found between overweight/obese patients (BMI ≥ 25) and those with BMI < 25. However, correction of LL and SVA was smaller in patients with overweight/obese patients.

Formulation of Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) clinical practice guideline for the management of low back pain- the revised 2019 edition.

BACKGROUND: The latest clinical guidelines are mandatory for physicians to follow when practicing evidence-based medicine in the treatment of low back pain. Those guidelines should target not only Japanese board-certified orthopaedic surgeons, but also primary physicians, and they should be prepared based entirely on evidence-based medicine. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Low Back Pain guideline committee decided to update the guideline and launched the formulation committee. The purpose of this study was to describe the formulation we implemented for the revision of the guideline with the latest data of evidence-based medicine. METHODS: The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Low Back Pain guideline formulation committee revised the previous guideline based on a method for preparing clinical guidelines in Japan proposed by Medical Information Network Distribution Service Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development 2014. Two key phrases, "body of evidence" and "benefit and harm balance" were focused on in the revised version. Background and clinical questions were determined, followed by literature search related to each question. Appropriate articles were selected from all the searched literature. Structured abstracts were prepared, and then meta-analyses were performed. The strength of both the body of evidence and the recommendation was decided by the committee members. RESULTS: Nine background and nine clinical qvuestions were determined. For each clinical question, outcomes from the literature were collected and meta-analysis was performed. Answers and explanations were described for each clinical question, and the strength of the recommendation was decided. For background questions, the recommendations were described based on previous literature. CONCLUSIONS: The 2019 clinical practice guideline for the management of low back pain was completed according to the latest evidence-based medicine. We strongly hope that this guideline serves as a benchmark for all physicians, as well as patients, in the management of low back pain.

Anterior Cervical Corpectomy with Fusion versus Anterior Hybrid Fusion Surgery for Patients with Severe Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Involving Three or More Levels: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Various studies have found a high incidence of early graft dislodgement after multilevel corpectomy. Although a hybrid fusion technique was developed to resolve implant failure, the hybrid and conventional techniques have not been clearly compared in terms of perioperative complications in patients with severe ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) involving three or more levels. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiologic outcomes between anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion (ACCF) and anterior hybrid fusion for the treatment of multilevel cervical OPLL. We therefore retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiologic data of 53 consecutive patients who underwent anterior fusion to treat cervical OPLL: 30 underwent ACCF and 23 underwent anterior hybrid fusion. All patients completed 2 years of follow-ups. Implant migration was defined as subsidence > 3 mm. There were no significant differences in demographics or clinical characteristics between the ACCF and hybrid groups. Early implant failure occurred significantly more frequently in the ACCF group (5 cases, 16.7%) compared with the hybrid group (0 cases, 0%). The fusion rate was 80% in the ACCF group and 100% in the hybrid group. Although both procedures can achieve satisfactory neurologic outcomes for multilevel OPLL patients, hybrid fusion likely provides better biomechanical stability than the conventional ACCF technique.

Comparison of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion as Corrective Surgery for Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity-A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is increasingly performed as corrective surgery for patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). This paper compares the surgical results of LLIF and conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF)/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in ASD using a propensity score matching analysis. We retrospectively reviewed patients with ASD who received LLIF and PLIF/TLIF, and investigated patients' backgrounds, radiographic parameters, and complications. The propensity scores were calculated from patients' characteristics, including radiographic parameters and preoperative comorbidities, and one-to-one matching was performed. Propensity score matching produced 21 matched pairs of patients who underwent LLIF and PLIF/TLIF. All radiographic parameters significantly improved in both groups at the final follow-up compared with those of the preoperative period. The comparison between both groups demonstrated no significant difference in terms of postoperative pelvic tilt, lumbar lordosis (LL), or pelvic incidence-LL at the final follow-up. However, the sagittal vertical axis tended to be smaller in the LLIF at the final follow-up. Overall, perioperative and late complications were comparable in both procedures. However, LLIF procedures demonstrated significantly less intraoperative blood loss and a smaller incidence of postoperative epidural hematoma compared with PLIF/TLIF procedures in patients with ASD.

Sagittal alignment changes and postoperative complications following surgery for adult spinal deformity in patients with Parkinson's disease: a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) has been found to increase the risk of postoperative complications in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). However, few studies have investigated this by directly comparing patients with PD and those without PD. METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, we reviewed all surgically treated ASD patients with at least 2 years of follow-up. Among them, 27 had PD (PD+ group). Clinical data were collected on early and late postoperative complications as well as any revision surgery. Radiographic parameters were evaluated before and immediately after surgery and at final follow-up, including sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, and pelvic tilt. We compared the surgical outcomes and radiographic parameters of PD patients with those of non-PD patients. RESULTS: For early complications, the PD+ group demonstrated a higher rate of delirium than the PD- group. In terms of late complications, the rate of non-union was significantly higher in the PD+ group. Rates of rod failure and revision surgery due to mechanical complications also tended to be higher, but not significantly, in the PD+ group (p = 0.17, p = 0.13, respectively). SVA at final follow-up and loss of correction in SVA were significantly higher in the PD+ group. CONCLUSION: Extra attention should be paid to perioperative complications, especially delirium, in PD patients undergoing surgery for ASD. Furthermore, loss of correction and rate of non-union were greater in these patients.

Laminar Closure in Double-door Laminoplasty for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy with Nonkyphotic Alignment.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and clinical features of laminar closure in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) based on prospectively collected data. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Laminar closure after single open-door laminoplasty (LAMP) has been reported to result in poor clinical outcomes. However, no studies to date have examined the underlying mechanisms and frequency of laminar closure after double-door LAMP. METHODS: This study prospectively enrolled 128 consecutive patients with CSM scheduled for double-door LAMP without a laminar spacer at our hospital between 2008 and 2013. Sagittal parameters including C2-7 angle, T1 slope, and cervical sagittal vertical axis (C-SVA), which is defined as the distance between the anterior margin of the external auditory canal plumb line and the posterior-cranial corner of the C7 vertebral body on x-ray, were calculated before and after the operation. Laminar angle was also measured on magnetic resonance images preoperatively and at 1 week and 1 year postoperatively. Laminar closure was defined as > 20% decrease in laminar angle at 1 year compared with that at 1 week postoperatively. The Japanese Orthopedic Association score for cervical myelopathy and the recovery rate determined from the preoperative and postoperative scores were evaluated as clinical outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 110 patients were completely followed up for at least 1 year (follow-up rate: 85.9%). Laminar closure was observed in six cases (5.5%) at the 1-year follow-up. The recovery rate in these six cases was significantly lower than in cases without laminar closure (16.6% vs. 45.1%, respectively). Logistic regression analysis revealed age and C-SVA as significant risk factors for postoperative laminar closure. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to investigate the incidence of laminar closure after double-door LAMP without a laminar spacer. Laminar closure occurred exclusively in elderly patients with kyphotic deformity after LAMP.Level of Evidence: 4.

Surgical outcomes of the thoracic ossification of ligamentum flavum: a retrospective analysis of 61 cases.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic ossification of ligamentum flavum (T-OLF), as one of the causes of thoracic myelopathy, is often combined with other spinal disorders. Concurrent lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LCS) is often obscured by symptoms due to T-OLF, leading to difficulty in identifying the origin of these neurological findings. It is common to be misdiagnosed or delayed diagnosis due to the complicated nature. We evaluated the prevalence, distribution, and clinical characteristics of OLF, especially in patients with LCS. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of the outcomes of 61 patients who underwent thoracic surgeries performed for symptomatic T-OLF. In all the patients, whole spine lesions were evaluated preoperatively. We examined the factors related to poor outcomes (the recovery rate of the Japanese Orthopedic Association score for thoracic myelopathy is less than 40%) following OLF surgeries. We compared the clinical outcomes according to whether there was concurrent LCS, and determined the optimal surgical approach. RESULTS: The occurrence of T-OLF increased with age. Forty-six cases (75.4%) were considered to be tandem T-OLF and LCS (LCS group). An advanced age, and concurrent LCS were associated with a poor outcome after the surgery. The LCS group significantly included a greater number of elderly, and more light-weighted patients with Modic change in thoracic spine and a greater sagittal vertical axis, resulting in the lower neurological recovery. Additional lumbar surgery (13cases) effectively improved both the T-JOA and L-JOA scores (from 6.5 ± 2.0 points to 8.0 ± 1.8 points, p = 0.0406, and from 14.5 ± 4.7 points to 20.7 ± 2.6 points, p = 0.001, respectively) in OLF patients with LCS. CONCLUSIONS: T-OLF was highly associated with other spinal disorders. Poor outcomes in T-OLF surgery could be associated with age and concurrent LCS, and an additional surgery for another lumbar lesion significantly improved neurological findings in T-OLF patients.

Prognostic factors for neurological outcome after anterior decompression and fusion for proximal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy - A retrospective analysis of 77 cases.

BACKGROUND: Decompression through an anterior approach is theoretically effective for the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic amyotrophy (CSA), because the pathology usually locates at the anterior side. However, most previous studies investigated posterior surgery or a mix of anterior surgery and posterior surgery in their investigation. Only a few small case series have investigated the surgical outcomes of anterior decompression and fusion (ADF). Therefore, we conducted a multicenter retrospective study that included patients who underwent ADF for proximal-type CSA. METHODS: We analyzed the outcomes of 77 consecutive spinal surgeries performed on proximal-type CSA patients who underwent ADF. Preoperative and postoperative manual muscle tests (MMT) and the patients' backgrounds, radiological findings, and complications were reviewed. We divided the cases into two groups, good-outcome group (MMT improvement â‰§ 2 or improved to MMT 5) and poor-outcome group (others) and evaluated the prognostic factors for outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 77 patients, 48 (62%) showed good neurological outcome. Multiple compressive lesions at anterior horn (AH) and/or ventral nerve roots (VNRs) were detected in 66 patients (85.7%) on the magnetic resonance images. The patients with a single compressive lesion at VNR or AH tended to show good neurological recovery when compare to those with multiple lesions. Age and duration of symptoms were related to the poor outcome in univariate analysis. Duration of symptoms was an independent factor associated with postoperative neurological outcome. The cut-off value for poor outcome was 7.0 months for the symptom duration (sensitivity: 79%, specificity: 54%, area under the curve: 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with proximal-CSA were more likely to have multiple compressive lesions at an AH and/or a VNR. The prognostic factor for poor neurological outcome was duration of symptoms of ≥7 months.

A Prospective Cohort Study of Dysphagia After Subaxial Cervical Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively examine dysphagia after subaxial cervical spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery is common and well-studied, it has rarely been examined in posterior subaxial cervical spine surgery. METHODS: This study analyzed 191 consecutive patients (132 male, 59 female; mean age, 64.9 yrs) who underwent subaxial cervical spine surgery for degenerative disease and completed 1 year of follow-up. Anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) was performed in 87 patients, posterior decompression with fusion (PDF) in 21, and laminoplasty (LAMP) in 83. Dysphagia was evaluated by a self-administered questionnaire using the Bazaz dysphagia scale before, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. Diagnosis, levels and number of operative segments, C2-7 lordotic angle (CL), O-C2 angle (OC2A), C2-7 range of motion (ROM), Japanese Orthopedic Association for cervical myelopathy (C-JOA) score, and neck pain visual analog scale (VAS) were examined. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (16.8%) reported dysphagia before surgery. New dysphagia after surgery, defined as more than or equal to 1 grade worsening of the Bazaz score after surgery compared with the preoperative status, was observed in 38 patients (19.9%) at 6 months and 32 patients (16.8%) at 1 year. The incidence of new dysphagia at 1 year was 25.3% in the ADF group, 23.8% in the PDF group, and 6.0% in the LAMP group. Fusion surgery (ACDF or PDF) and increased CL after surgery were found as risk factors at 1 year in multivariate analysis; receiver operating characteristic analysis determined a postsurgical change in CL cutoff of 5°. CONCLUSION: Fusion surgery and increased CL after surgery were risk factors for development of dysphagia after subaxial cervical spine surgery. Cervical alignment change due to anterior and posterior fusion surgery can cause postoperative dysphagia.Level of Evidence: 3.

Increased Height of Fused Segments Contributes to Early-Phase Strut Subsidence after Anterior Cervical Corpectomy with Fusion for Multilevel Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior decompression and fusion have shown favorable neurologic outcomes in patients with cervical myelopathy. However, implant migration sometimes occurs immediately after multilevel anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion (ACCF). Risk factors associated with early bone graft migration have not been precisely documented. The study aimed to investigate how frequently bone graft subsidence occurs after ACCF and to determine the factors affecting implant migration. METHODS: Forty-seven consecutive patients who underwent ACCF for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament at our hospital between 2007 and 2015 and were able to complete 1 year of follow-up were enrolled. Patients treated with hybrid fixation were excluded. Data on demographics and radiographic findings, namely, fused segment angle and fused segment height (FSH), were collected. Implant migration was defined as subsidence of >3 mm. The patients were divided into 2-segment (2F), 3-segment (3F), and ≥4-segment (4F) groups. Results were compared between the groups using one-way analysis of variance, the Mann-Whitney U test, and the chi-square test. RESULTS: Mean age was 61.6 years in the 2F group (n = 17), 62.1 years in the 3F group (n = 21), and 69 years in the 4F group (n = 9). There were no significant between-group differences in demographics or clinical characteristics. Implant subsidence occurred in 3 cases (17.6%) in the 2F group, 4 (19%) in the 3F group, and 3 (33.3%) in the 4F group. Revision surgery was required in 2 cases (1 patient each in the 3F and 4F groups). Logistic regression analysis showed a significant association of increased FSH and increased risk of postoperative implant subsidence. CONCLUSIONS: A postoperative increase in FSH may affect graft stability and lead to early implant migration.