Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Inappropriate Use of the Emergency Department.

Background: Inappropriate use of the emergency department (IEDU)-consisting of the unnecessary use of the resource by patients with no clinical need-is one of the leading causes of the loss of efficiency of the health system. Specific contexts modify routine clinical practice and usage patterns. This study aims to analyse the influence of COVID-19 on the IEDU and its causes. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional study conducted in the emergency department of a high-complexity hospital. The Hospital Emergency Suitability Protocol (HESP) was used to measure the prevalence of IEDU and its causes, comparing three pairs of periods: (1) March 2019 and 2020; (2) June 2019 and 2020; and (3) September 2019 and 2020. A bivariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression models, adjusted for confounding variables, were utilized. Results: In total, 822 emergency visits were included (137 per period). A total prevalence of IEDU of 14.1% was found. There was a significant decrease in IEDU in March 2020 (OR: 0.03), with a prevalence of 0.8%. No differences were found in the other periods. A mistrust in primary care was the leading cause of IEDU (65.1%). Conclusions: The impact of COVID-19 reduced the frequency of IEDU during the period of more significant population restrictions, with IEDU returning to previous levels in subsequent months. Targeted actions in the field of population education and an improvement in primary care are positioned as strategies that could mitigate its impact.

Factors associated with in-hospital mortality and readmission in a cohort of patients treated with noninvasive ventilation during emergency department or out-of-hospital emergency care: the VentilaMadrid study. / Factores asociados a la mortalidad intrahospitalaria y reingreso en una cohorte tratada con ventilación no invasiva en urgencias extrahospitalarias y hospitalarias: estudio VentilaMadrid.

OBJECTIVES: To describe clinical, outcome, and risk factors in a cohort of patients treated with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in a hospital emergency department (ED) or by out-of-hospital emergency medical services (OHEMSs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multicenter, prospective cohort study enrolling consecutive patients with acute pulmonary edema and/or exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who were treated with NIV between November 2018 and November 2020 in a hospital ED or OHEMS setting in Madrid. We recorded baseline data, variables related to the acute episode, and outcome variables, including in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission. RESULTS: A total of 317 patients were included; 132 (41.6%) were treated in an OHEMS setting and 185 (58.4%) in a hospital ED. Forty-seven (16.3%) in-hospital deaths occurred, and 78 patients (28.8%) were readmitted within 30 days. Mortality in the hospital ED and OHEMS subsamples did not differ, but the patients who received NIV in an OHEMS setting had a lower 30-day readmission rate. On multivariate analysis, in-hospital mortality was associated with prior dependence in activities of daily living in the multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR], 2.4; 95% CI, 1.11-5.27) and a low-moderate score on the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) versus a high-very high one (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.26-5.77). Mortality after OHEMS ventilation was associated with discontinuance of NIV during transfer (OR, 8.57; 95% CI, 2.19-33.60). Readmission within 30 days was associated with group (in-hospital ED application of NIV) (OR, 3.24; 95% CI, 2.62-6.45) and prior dependence (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.02-4.22). CONCLUSION: Patients treated in the hospital ED and OHEMS setting have similar baseline characteristics, although acute episodes were more serious in the OHEMS group. No significant differences were found related to in-hospital mortality. Higher mortality was associated with dependence, a SAPS II score greater than 52, and discontinuance of NIV. Readmission was associated with dependence and NIV treatment in the hospital ED setting.

OBJETIVO: Describir las características clínicas, evolutivas y los factores pronóstico de una cohorte de pacientes tratados con ventilación no invasiva (VNI) en servicios de urgencias extrahospitalarios (SUEH) y hospitalarios (SUH). METODO: Estudio de cohortes multicéntrico, prospectivo con inclusión consecutiva de pacientes con edema agudo de pulmón o agudización de enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica tratados con VNI entre noviembre 2018 y noviembre de 2020 en SUEH y SUH de la Comunidad de Madrid. Se recogieron características basales, del episodio agudo, así como variables de resultado incluyendo la mortalidad hospitalaria y el reingreso a 30 días. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 317 pacientes, 132 (41,6%) en SUEH y 185 (58,4%) en SUH. Hubo 47 muertes intrahospitalarias (16,3%) y 78 reingresos a los 30 días (28,8%). No hubo diferencias en la mortalidad, pero el grupo VNI-SUEH tuvo menor reingreso a 30 días. En el análisis multivariado la mortalidad intrahospitalaria se asoció con la dependencia previa (OR = 2,4; IC 95%: 1,11-5,27) y el SAPS-II bajo-moderado frente al alto-muy alto (OR = 2,69; IC 95%: 1,26-5,77). En la cohorte extrahospitalaria, la mortalidad intrahospitalaria se asoció con la retirada de la VNI en la transferencia del paciente (OR = 8,57; IC 95%: 2,19-33,60). Los reingresos a los 30 días se asociaron con inicio de VNI en el hospital (OR = 3,24; IC 95%: 2,62-6,45) y dependencia previa (OR = 2,08; IC 95%: 1,02-4,22). CONCLUSIONES: Los pacientes de ambos grupos, SUH y SUEH, tienen un perfil clínico basal similar, aunque con mayor gravedad del episodio en el grupo SUEH. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la mortalidad intrahospitalaria. Se asociaron a una mayor mortalidad la dependencia, la escala SAPS-II > 52 y la retirada de la VNI. El reingreso se asoció con la dependencia y pertenecer al grupo SUH.

Artritis infecciosa esternoclavicular: serie de 5 casos y revisión de la literatura / Sternoclavicular septic arthritis: a series of 5 cases and review of the literature

La artritis infecciosa es una urgencia médica de cuyo rápido diagnóstico depende el pronóstico a corto y medio plazo del estado general del paciente y de la funcionalidad final de la articulación. La articulación esternoclavicular es una región de baja prevalencia de este tipo de artritis, aunque su frecuencia se suele concentrar en pacientes inmunosuprimidos, usuarios de drogas parenterales o tras procedimientos traumáticos. Presentamos una serie de 5 casos microbiológicamente documentados de artritis infecciosa esternoclavicular, 3 de los cuales se presentaron en pacientes inmunocompetentes, y una revisión de esta peculiar enfermedad (AU)

Infectious arthritis is a medical emergency whose prognosis, in terms of general morbidity and the final functionality of the joint, depends on rapid diagnosis and treatment. The sternoclavicular joint is an area of low prevalence of this type of arthritis, although its frequency is often concentrated in immunosuppressed patients, users of parenteral drugs or after traumatic events. We present a series of 5 microbiologically documented cases of sternoclavicular septic arthritis, 3 of which occurred in immunocompetent patients, and a short review of this pathology (AU)

Sternoclavicular septic arthritis: a series of 5 cases and review of the literature.

Infectious arthritis is a medical emergency whose prognosis, in terms of general morbidity and the final functionality of the joint, depends on rapid diagnosis and treatment. The sternoclavicular joint is an area of low prevalence of this type of arthritis, although its frequency is often concentrated in immunosuppressed patients, users of parenteral drugs or after traumatic events. We present a series of 5 microbiologically documented cases of sternoclavicular septic arthritis, 3 of which occurred in immunocompetent patients, and a short review of this pathology.