Severity of inhalation injury and risk of nosocomial pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The impact of inhalation injury on risk of nosocomial pneumonia, an important complication in burn patients, is not well established. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is more severe inhalation injury associated with increased risk of nosocomial pneumonia? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with suspected inhalation injury admitted to a regional burn center from 2011 to 2022 who underwent diagnostic bronchoscopy within 48 hours of admission. We estimated the association of high-grade inhalation injury (abbreviated injury score [AIS] 3-4) versus low-grade inhalation injury (AIS 1-2) with nosocomial pneumonia (NP) adjusted for age, burn size, and comorbid obstructive lung disease. Death and hospital discharge were considered competing risks. RESULTS: Of the 245 patients analyzed, 51 (21%) had high-grade injury, 180 (73%) had low-grade injury, and 14 (6%) had no inhalation injury. Among the 236 patients hospitalized for >48 hours, NP occurred in 24/50 (48%) patients in the high-grade group, 54/172 (31%) in the low-grade group, and 2/14 (14%) in the no inhalation injury group. High-grade (vs low-grade) inhalation injury was associated with higher hazard of NP in both the proportional cause-specific hazard model (CSHR 2.04; 95% CI, 1.26-3.30; p=0.004) and Fine-Gray subdistribution hazards model (SHR for NP, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.38-3.64; p=0.001). INTERPRETATION: Among patients with inhalation injury, more severe injury was associated with higher hazard of NP in competing risk analysis. Additional research is needed to investigate mechanisms that may explain the relationship between inhalation injury and NP and to identify more effective prevention strategies.

Early Fluid Is Less Fluid: Comparing Early Versus Late ICU Resuscitation in Severely Injured Trauma Patients.

OBJECTIVES: The temporal trends of crystalloid resuscitation in severely injured trauma patients after ICU admission are not well characterized. We hypothesized early crystalloid resuscitation was associated with less volume and better outcomes than delaying crystalloid. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational. SETTING: High-volume level 1 academic trauma center. PATIENTS: Adult trauma patients admitted to the ICU with emergency department serum lactate greater than or equal to 4 mmol/dL, elevated lactate (≥ 2 mmol/L) at ICU admission, and normal lactate by 48 hours. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For the 333 subjects, we analyzed patient and injury characteristics and the first 48 hours of ICU course. Receipt of greater than or equal to 500 mL/hr of crystalloid in the first 6 hours of ICU admission was used to distinguish early vs. late resuscitation. Outcomes included ICU length of stay (LOS), ventilator days, and acute kidney injury (AKI). Unadjusted and multivariable regression methods were used to compare early resuscitation vs. late resuscitation. Compared with the early resuscitation group, the late resuscitation group received more volume by 48 hours (5.5 vs. 4.1 L; p ≤ 0.001), had longer ICU LOS (9 vs. 5 d; p ≤ 0.001), more ventilator days (5 vs. 2 d; p ≤ 0.001), and higher occurrence rate of AKI (38% vs. 11%; p ≤ 0.001). On multivariable regression, late resuscitation remained associated with longer ICU LOS and ventilator days and higher odds of AKI. CONCLUSIONS: Delaying resuscitation is associated with both higher volumes of crystalloid by 48 hours and worse outcomes compared with early resuscitation. Judicious crystalloid given early in ICU admission could improve outcomes in the severely injured.

Improving Post-Injury Follow-up Survey Response: Incorporating Automated Modalities.

Background: Incorporating post-discharge data into trauma registries would allow for better research on patient outcomes, including disparities in outcomes. This pilot study tested a follow-up data collection process to be incorporated into existing trauma care systems, prioritizing low-cost automated response modalities. Methods: This investigation was part of a larger study that consisted of two protocols with two distinct cohorts of participants who experienced traumatic injury. Participants in both protocols were asked to provide phone, email, text, and mail contact information to complete follow-up surveys assessing patient-reported outcomes six months after injury. To increase follow-up response rates between protocol 1 and protocol 2, the study team modified the contact procedures for the protocol 2 cohort. Frequency distributions were utilized to report the frequency of follow-up response modalities and overall response rates in both protocols. Results: A total of 178 individuals responded to the 6-month follow-up survey: 88 in protocol 1 and 90 in protocol 2. After implementing new follow-up contact procedures in protocol 2 that relied more heavily on the use of automated modalities (e.g., email and text messages), the response rate increased by 17.9 percentage points. The primary response modality shifted from phone (72.7%) in protocol 1 to the combination of email (47.8%) and text (14.4%) in protocol 2. Conclusions: Results from this investigation suggest that follow-up data can feasibly be collected from trauma patients. Use of automated follow-up methods holds promise to expand longitudinal data in the national trauma registry and broaden the understanding of disparities in patient experiences.

Identifying Common Data Elements to Achieve Injury-related Health Equity Across the Lifespan: A Consensus-Driven Approach.

Background: Limited availability and poor quality of data in medical records and trauma registries impede progress to achieve injury-related health equity across the lifespan. Methods: We used a Nominal Group Technique (NGT) in-person workgroup and a national web-based Delphi process to identify common data elements (CDE) that should be collected. Results: The 12 participants in the NGT workgroup and 23 participants in the national Delphi process identified 10 equity-related CDE and guiding lessons for research on collection of these data. Conclusions: These high-priority CDE define a detailed, equity-oriented approach to guide research to achieve injury-related health equity across the lifespan.

Implementation of a geriatric care bundle for older adults with acute burns.

BACKGROUND: Frailty and comorbidities are important outcome determinants in older patients (age ≥65) with burns. A Geriatric Burn Bundle (Geri-B) was implemented in 2019 at a regional burn center to standardize care for older adults. Components included frailty screening and protocolized geriatric co-management, malnutrition screening with nutritional support, and geriatric-centered pain regimens. METHODS: This study aimed to qualitatively evaluate the implementation of Geri-B using the Proctor Framework. From June-August 2022, older burn-injured patients, burn nurses, and medical staff providers (attending physicians and advanced practice providers) were surveyed and interviewed. Transcribed interviews were coded and thematically analyzed. From May 2022 to August 2023, the number of inpatient visits aged 65 + with a documented frailty screening was monitored. RESULTS: The study included 23 participants (10 providers, 13 patients). Participants highly rated Geri-B in all implementation domains. Most providers rated geriatric care effectiveness as 'good' or 'excellent' after Geri-B implementation. Providers viewed it as a reminder to tailor geriatric care and a safeguard against substandard geriatric care. Staffing shortages, insufficient protocol training, and learning resources were reported as implementation barriers. Many providers advocated for better bundle integration into the hospital electronic health record (EHR) (e.g., frailty screening tool, automatic admission order sets). Most patients felt comfortable being asked about their functional status with strong patient support for therapy services. The average frailty screening completion rate from May 2022 to August 2023 was 86%. CONCLUSIONS: Geri-B was perceived as valuable for the care of older burn patients and may serve as a framework for other burn centers.

Implementation evaluation of tiered tele-triage pathways for burn center consultations and transfers.

BACKGROUND: Early transfer to specialized centers improves trauma and burn outcomes; however, overtriage can result in unnecessary burdens to patients, providers, and health systems. Our institution developed novel burn triage pathways in 2016 to improve resource allocation. We evaluated the implementation of these pathways, analyzing trends in adoption, resource optimization, and pathway reliability after implementation. METHODS: Triage pathways consist of transfer nurses (RNs) triaging calls based on review of burn images and clinical history: green pathway for direct outpatient referral, blue pathway for discussion with the on-call provider, red pathway for confirmation of transfer as requested by referring provider, and black pathway for the rapid transfer of severe burns. We used the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework to evaluate implementation. These pathways affected all acute burn referrals to our center from January 2017 to December 2019 (reach). Outcomes of interest were pathway assignment over time (adoption), changes to burn provider call volume (effectiveness), and the concordance of pathway assignment with final disposition (implementation reliability). RESULTS: Transfer RNs triaged 5,272 burn referrals between 2017 and 2019. By January 2018, >98% of referrals were assigned a pathway. In 2018-2019, green pathway calls triaged by RNs reduced calls to burn providers by a mean of 40 (SD, 11) per month. Patients in green/blue pathways were less likely to be transferred, with >85% receiving only outpatient follow-up ( p < 0.001). Use of the lower acuity pathways increased over time, with a concordant decrease in use of the higher acuity pathways. Younger adults, patients referred from Level III to Level V trauma centers and nontrauma hospitals, and patients referred by APPs were less likely to be triaged to higher acuity pathways. CONCLUSION: Implementation of highly adopted, reliable triage pathways can optimize existing clinical resources by task-shifting triage of lower acuity burns to nursing teams. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

Early Fluid is Less Fluid: Comparing Early Versus Late Resuscitation in Severely Injured Trauma Patients.

Background: We aimed to characterize the temporal trends of crystalloid resuscitation in severely injured trauma patients after intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Using 500 mL/hr of crystalloid in the first 6 hours of ICU admission to distinguish early versus late resuscitation, we hypothesized early resuscitation was associated with less volume by 48 hours and better outcomes compared with late resuscitation. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of the trauma registry of a high-volume level 1 academic trauma center to examine adult trauma patients admitted to the ICU (2016-2019) with: with initial serum lactate ≥ 4 mmol/dL, elevated lactate (≥ 2 mmol/L) at ICU admission, and lactate normalization within 48 hours. We analyzed patient and injury characteristics, and the first 48 hours of ICU course. The primary outcome was ICU length of stay (LOS); secondary outcomes included ventilator days, acute kidney injury (AKI), and in-hospital death. We compared subjects who received early resuscitation to those received late resuscitation using unadjusted methods and multivariable regression models. Results: We analyzed 333 subjects. The late resuscitation group received less volume over the first 24 hours, but surpassed the early group by 48 hours (5.5 vs 4.1L, p ≤ 0.001). The late group had longer ICU LOS (9 vs 5 days, p ≤ 0.001) and ventilator days (5 vs 2 days, p ≤ 0.001), and higher incidence of AKI (38% vs 11%, p ≤ 0.001). On multivariable regression, late resuscitation remained associated with longer ICU LOS and ventilator days, and higher odds of AKI after adjusting for important confounders. Conclusions: After hemostasis, crystalloid can play an important role in restoration of organ perfusion. Delaying resuscitation is associated with both receipt of higher volumes of crystalloid by 48 hours and worse outcomes compared to early resuscitation. Judicious crystalloid given early in ICU admission could improve outcomes in the severely injured.

Disparities in Misclassification of Race and Ethnicity in Electronic Medical Records Among Patients with Traumatic Injury.

Systems-level barriers to self-reporting of race and ethnicity reduce the integrity of data entered into the medical record and trauma registry among patients with injuries, limiting research assessing the burden of racial disparities. We sought to characterize misclassification of self-identified versus hospital-recorded racial and ethnic identity data among 10,513 patients with traumatic injuries. American Indian/Alaska Native patients (59.9%) and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander patients (52.4%) were most likely to be misclassified. Most Hispanic/Latin(x) patients preferred to only be identified as Hispanic/Latin(x) (73.2%) rather than a separate race category (e.g., White). Incorrect identification of race/ethnicity also has substantial implications for the perceived demographics of patient population; according to the medical record, 82.3% of the population were White, although only 70.6% were self-identified as White. The frequency of misclassification of race and ethnicity for persons of color limits research validity on racial and ethnic injury disparities.

Impact of Tele-Triage Pathways on Short-Stay Admission after Transfer to a Regional Burn Center for Acute Burn Injury.

BACKGROUND: Regionalized care for burn-injured patients requires accurate triage. In 2016, we implemented a tele-triage system for acute burn consultations. We evaluated resource utilization following implementation, hypothesizing that this system would reduce short-stay admissions and prioritize inpatient care for those with higher burn severity. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective study of all transferred patients with acute burn injuries from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2015, and January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019. We evaluated the proportions of short-stay admissions (discharges less than 24 hours without operative intervention, ICU admission, or concern for nonaccidental trauma) among patients transferred before (2010 to 2015) and after (2017 to 2019) triage system implementation. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to evaluate factors associated with short-stay admissions. Interrupted time series analysis was used to evaluate the effect of the triage system. RESULTS: There were 4,688 burn transfers (3,244 preimplementation and 1,444 postimplementation) in the study periods. Mean age was higher postimplementation (32 vs 29 years, p < 0.001). Median hospital length of stay (LOS) and ICU LOS were both 1 day higher, more patients underwent operative intervention (19% vs 16%), and median time to first operation was 1 day lower postimplementation. Short-stay admissions decreased from 50% (n = 1,624) to 39% (n = 561), and patients were 17% less likely to have a short-stay admission after implementation (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.8 to 0.9). Pediatric patients younger than 15 years old composed 43% of all short-stay admissions and were much more likely than adult patients to have a short-stay admission independent of transfer timing (aRR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.84 to 3.03). CONCLUSIONS: Tele-triage burn transfer center protocols reduced short-stay admissions and prioritized inpatient care for patients with more severe injuries. Pediatric patients remain more likely to have short-stay admission after transfer.

Association of Discontinuing Preinjury Beta-Adrenergic Blockade Medications With Mortality in Severe Blunt Traumatic Brian Injury.

Background: Beta-adrenergic receptor blocker (BB) administration has been shown to improve survival after traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, studies to date that observe a benefit did not distinguish between continuation of preinjury BB versus de novo initiation of BB. Objectives: To determine the effect of continuation of preinjury BB and de novo initiation of BB on risk-adjusted mortality and complications for patients with TBI. Methods: Trauma quality collaborative data (2016-2021) were analyzed. Patients were excluded with hospitalization <48 hours, direct admission, or penetrating injury. Severe TBI was identified as a head abbreviated injury scale (AIS) value of 3 to 5. Patients were placed into 4 groups based on the preinjury BB use and administration of BB during hospitalization. Propensity score matching was used to create 1:1 matched cohorts of patients for comparisons. Odd ratios of mortality accounting for hospital clustering were calculated. A sensitivity analysis was performed excluding patients with AIS >2 injuries in all other body regions to create a cohort of isolated TBI patients. Results: A total of 15,153 patients treated at 35 trauma centers were available for analysis. Patients were divided into 4 cohort groupings related to preinjury BB use and postinjury receipt of BB. The odds of mortality was significantly reduced for patients with a TBI on a preinjury BB who had the medication continued in the acute setting (as compared with patients on preinjury BB who did not) (odds ratio [OR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.98; P = 0.04). Patients with a TBI who were not on preinjury BB did not benefit from de novo initiation of BB with regard to mortality (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.64-1.08; P = 0.2). In the sensitivity analysis, excluding polytrauma patients, patients on preinjury BB who had BB continued had a reduction in mortality when compared with patients in which BB was stopped following a TBI (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47-0.91; P = 0.01). Conclusions: Continuing BB is associated with reduced odds of mortality in patients with a TBI on preinjury BB. We were unable to demonstrate benefit from instituting beta blockade in patients who are not on a BB preinjury.

THE COMPENSATORY RESERVE INDEX FOR PREDICTING HEMORRHAGIC SHOCK IN PREHOSPITAL TRAUMA.

ABSTRACT: Background: The compensatory reserve index (CRI) is a noninvasive, continuous measure designed to detect intravascular volume loss. CRI is derived from the pulse oximetry waveform and reflects the proportion of physiologic reserve remaining before clinical hemodynamic decompensation. Methods: In this prospective, observational, prehospital cohort study, we measured CRI in injured patients transported by emergency medical services (EMS) to a single Level I trauma center. We determined whether the rolling average of CRI values over 60 s (CRI trend [CRI-T]) predicts in-hospital diagnosis of hemorrhagic shock, defined as blood product administration in the prehospital setting or within 4 h of hospital arrival. We hypothesized that lower CRI-T values would be associated with an increased likelihood of hemorrhagic shock and better predict hemorrhagic shock than prehospital vital signs. Results: Prehospital CRI was collected on 696 adult trauma patients, 21% of whom met our definition of hemorrhagic shock. The minimum CRI-T was 0.14 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.08-0.31) in those with hemorrhagic shock and 0.31 (IQR 0.15-0.50) in those without ( P = <0.0001). The positive likelihood ratio of a CRI-T value <0.2 predicting hemorrhagic shock was 1.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55-2.22). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the minimum CRI-T predicting hemorrhagic shock was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.60-0.70), which outperformed initial prehospital HR (0.56; 95% CI, 0.50-0.62) but underperformed EMS systolic blood pressure and shock index (0.74; 95% CI, 0.70-0.79 and 0.72; 95% CI, 0.67-0.77, respectively). Conclusions: Low prehospital CRI-T predicts blood product transfusion by EMS or within 4 hours of hospital arrival but is less prognostic than EMS blood pressure or shock index. The evaluated version of CRI may be useful in an austere setting at identifying injured patients that require the most significant medical resources. CRI may be improved with noise filtering to attenuate the effects of vibration and patient movement.

Centering patient perspectives to achieve injury-related health equity in trauma care systems: Improving trauma registry data.

BACKGROUND: Limitations in current data collection systems for patients who experience traumatic injury limit researchers' ability to identify and address disparities in injury and outcomes. We sought to develop and test a patient-centered data-collection system for equity-related data indicators that was acceptable to racially and ethnically diverse patients being treated for traumatic injuries. METHODS: Health equity indicators included in this study were race and ethnicity, language, education, employment, housing, and injury address. We conducted interviews with 245 racially and ethnically diverse trauma patients who were treated at a level-1 trauma center in the US in 2019-2020. We first interviewed 136 patients to develop a culturally resonant process and options for the health equity indicators to be added to a revised data collection system for the electronic medical record. English and Spanish interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim; qualitative analysis was used to assess patient preferences. We then pilot tested the revised data collection system with an additional 109 trauma patients to assess acceptability. Acceptability was defined as having more than 95% of participants self-identify with one of the proposed options for race/ethnicity, language, education, employment, and housing. Injury address (to identify geographic disparities) was pre-defined as acceptable if at least 85% of participants could identify exact address, cross streets, a landmark or business, or zip code of injury. RESULTS: A revised data collection system, including culturally resonant indicators and a process to be used by patient registrars to collect health equity data, was pilot tested, refined, and considered acceptable. Culturally resonant question phrasing/answer options for race/ethnicity, language, education, employment, housing status, and injury address were identified as acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a patient-centered data collection system for health equity measures with racially and ethnically diverse patients who have experienced traumatic injury. This system has the potential to increase data quality and accuracy, which is critical to quality improvement efforts and for researchers seeking to identify groups most impacted by racism and other structural barriers to equitable health outcomes and effective intervention points.

Lessons from the implementation of a trauma center-based program to support primary care providers in managing opioids and pain after trauma hospitalization.

Background: Decreasing exposure to prescription opioids is critical to lowering risk of opioid misuse, overdose and opioid use disorder. This study reports a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial implementing an opioid taper support program directed to primary care providers (PCPs) of patients discharged from a level I trauma center to their homes distant from the center, and shares lessons for trauma centers in supporting these patients. Methods: This longitudinal descriptive mixed-methods study uses quantitative/qualitative data from trial intervention arm patients to examine implementation challenges and outcomes: adoption, acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity. In the intervention, a physician assistant (PA) contacted patients after discharge to review their discharge instructions and pain management plan, confirm their PCP's identity and encourage PCP follow-up. The PA reached out to the PCP to review the discharge instructions and offer ongoing opioid taper and pain management support. Results: The PA reached 32 of 37 patients randomized to the program. Of these 32, 81% discussed topics not targeted by the intervention (eg, social/financial). The PA identified and reached a PCP's office for only 51% of patients. Of these, all PCP offices (100% adoption) received one to four consults (mean 1.9) per patient (fidelity). Few consults were with PCPs (22%); most were with medical assistants (56%) or nurses (22%). The PA reported that it was not routinely clear to patients or PCPs who was responsible for post-trauma care and opioid taper, and what the taper instructions were. Conclusions: This level I trauma center successfully implemented a telephonic opioid taper support program during COVID-19 but adapted the program to allow nurses and medical assistants to receive it. This study demonstrates a critical need to improve care transition from hospitalization to home for patients discharged after trauma. Level of evidence: Level IV.

Long-term health-related quality of life and independence among older survivors of serious injury.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the recovery experiences of older trauma intensive care unit (TICU) survivors and the relationship between geriatric trauma care and long-term functional ability and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 218 patients (age, ≥65 years) admitted to a Level 1 regional trauma center TICU before versus after implementation of a geriatric care bundle with protocolized geriatrics consultations (Geri-T). Survivors or their proxies were interviewed approximately 1 year after hospitalization. Outcomes included the Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs), and EQ-5D-5L HRQOL survey. Two investigator-developed questions regarding recovery experiences were included. Differences in outcomes among survivors admitted before versus after Geri-T were analyzed using multivariable linear regression. Responses to questions about recovery experiences were qualitatively assessed using content analysis. RESULTS: We reached 67% (146/218) of hospital survivors or their proxies across both groups; 126 patients were still alive and completed the survey. Mean age was 76 (SD, 8), 36% were female, and 90% were independent with ADLs preinjury. At follow-up, independence with ADLs was 76% and IADLs was 63%. The mean EQ-5D-5L index score was 0.78 (SD, 0.18). Most patients (65%) reported having not returned to preinjury functional status. Neither functional ability or HRQOL differed significantly among patients admitted before versus after Geri-T. Content analysis of open-ended questions revealed themes of activity limitations, persistent pain, and cognitive dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Nearly one-fifth of TICU survivors experienced loss of ADL function 1 year after injury, and most reported having not returned to preinjury functional status. Nonetheless, patient-reported HRQOL was comparable to age-adjusted norms. Geri-T was not associated with differences in HRQOL or functional ability. Survivors reported persistent difficulty with activities beyond those of daily living, pain, and cognition. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiologic, Level III.

Long-Term Prescription Opioid Use After Injury in Washington State 2015-2018.

BACKGROUND: Patients with injury may be at high risk of long-term opioid use due to the specific features of injury (e.g., injury severity), as well as patient, treatment, and provider characteristics that may influence their injury-related pain management. OBJECTIVES: Inform prescribing practices and identify high-risk populations through studying chronic prescription opioid use in the trauma population. METHODS: Using the Washington State All-Payer Claims Database (WA-APCD) data, we included adults aged 18-65 years with an incident injury from October 1, 2015-December 31, 2017. We compared patient, injury, treatment, and provider characteristics by whether or not the patients had long-term (≥ 90 days continuous prescription opioid use), or no opioid use after injury. RESULTS: We identified 191,130 patients who met eligibility criteria and were included in our cohort; 5822 met criteria for long-term use. Most had minor injuries, with a median Injury Severity Score = 1, with no difference between groups. Almost all patients with long-term opioid use had filled an opioid prescription in the year prior to their injury (95.3%), vs. 31.3% in the no-use group (p < 0.001). Comorbidities associated with chronic pain, mental health, and substance use conditions were more common in the long-term than the no-use group. CONCLUSION: Across this large cohort of multiple, mostly minor, injury types, long-term opioid use was relatively uncommon, but almost all patients with chronic use post injury had preinjury opioid use. Long-term opioid use after injury may be more closely tied to preinjury chronic pain and pain management than acute care pain management.

How we built a hospital-based community whole blood program.

BACKGROUND: Whole blood (WB) is an attractive product for prehospital treatment of hemorrhagic shock and for initial in-hospital resuscitation of patients likely to require massive transfusion. Neither our regional blood provider nor our hospital blood bank had recent experience collecting or using WB, so we developed a stepwise process to gather experience with WB in clinical practice. METHODS: When our Transfusion Committee suggested a WB program, we worked with our regional blood provider to collect cold-stored, leukoreduced, low-titer anti-A, and anti-B group O RhD positive WB (low-titer group O WB [LTOWB]) and worked with our city Fire Department to integrate it into prehospital care. This work required planning, development of protocols, writing software for blood bank and electronic medical records, changes in paramedic scope of practice, public information, training of clinicians, and close clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Between June 2019 and December 2021, we received 2269 units of LTOWB and transfused 2220 units; 24 (1%) were wasted, two were withdrawn, and 23 were in stock at the end of that time. Most (89%) were transfused to trauma patients. Usage has grown from 48 to 120 units/month, covers all 5 Fire Districts in the county, and represents about » of all hospital trauma blood product use. CONCLUSIONS: Developing a WB program is complex but can be started slowly, including both pre-hospital and hospital elements, and expanded as resources and training progress. The investments of time, effort, and funding involved can potentially improve care, save blood bank and nursing effort, and reduce patient charges.

Blood product availability in the Washington state trauma system.

BACKGROUND: Early transfusion can prolong life in injured patients awaiting definitive hemorrhage control. We conducted a community resources assessment of blood product availability at hospitals within the Washington State (WA) Regional Trauma System, with the expectation that a minority of Level IV and V centers would have blood products routinely available for use in resuscitation. METHODS: We designed a questionnaire soliciting information on routinely available unit quantities of red blood cells (RBC), plasma, platelets, cryoprecipitate, and/or whole blood and submitted this questionnaire electronically to the 82 WA designated trauma centers (Levels I-V). Non-responders were contacted directly by telephone. The study was conducted in September and October 2021. US 2020 census data were used to correlate results with local population densities. RESULTS: First-round contact netted responses from 57 (70%) centers; the remaining centers provided information via telephone, for a 100% final response. Packed RBC were available in 79 of the 82 centers (96%; range 6-220 units); plasma, 62 centers (76%, range 1-100 units); platelets, 40 centers (49%, range 1-8 units); cryoprecipitate, 45 centers (55%, range 1-20 units). Whole blood was only available at the Level I center. Three Level V centers, located in 2 of the 8 WA state trauma regions, reported no routine blood availability. The two trauma regions affected represent 12% of the state's population and more than a third of its geographic area. CONCLUSIONS: Within the WA regional trauma system, blood products are wide, if unevenly, available. Large urban/rural disparities in availability exist that should be explored.

Nonoperative Management in Blunt Splenic Trauma: Can Shock Index Predict Failure?

INTRODUCTION: Predicting failure of nonoperative management (NOM) in splenic trauma remains elusive. Shock index (SI) is an indicator of physiologic burden in an injury but is not used as a prediction tool. The purpose of this study was to determine if elevated SI would be predictive of failure of NOM in patients with a blunt splenic injury. METHODS: Adult patients admitted to a level-1 trauma center from January 2011 to April 2017 for NOM of splenic injury were reviewed. Patients were excluded if they underwent a procedure (angiography or surgery) prior to admission. The primary outcome was requiring intervention after an initial trial of noninterventional management (NIM). An SI > 0.9 at admission was considered a high risk. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify predicators of the failure of NOM. Findings were subsequently verified on a validation cohort of patients. RESULTS: Five hundred and eighty-five patients met inclusion criteria; 7.4% failed NIM. On an univariate analysis, findings of pseudoaneurysm or extra-arterial contrast on computed tomography did not differentiate successful NIM versus failure (8.1% versus 14.0%, P = 0.18). Age, the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma injury grade, and elevated SI were included in multivariate modeling. Grade of injury (OR 3.49, P = 0.001), age (OR 1.02, P = 0.009), and high SI (OR 3.49, P = 0.001) were each independently significant for NIM failure. The risk-adjusted odds of failure were significantly higher in patients with a high risk SI (OR 2.35, P < 0.001). Validation of these findings was confirmed for high SI on a subsequent 406 patients with a c-statistic of 0.71 (95% CI 0.62-0.80). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated SI is an independent risk factor for failure of NIM in those with splenic injury. SI along with age and computed tomography findings may aid in predicting the failure of NIM. Trauma providers should incorporate SI into decision-making tools for splenic injury management.

Improving Data Collection and Abstraction to Assess Health Equity in Trauma Care.

Current trauma registries suffer from inconsistent collection of data needed to assess health equity. To identify barriers/facilitators to collecting accurate equity-related data elements, we assessed perspectives of national stakeholders, Emergency Department (ED) registration, and Trauma Registry staff. We conducted a Delphi process with experts in trauma care systems and key informant interviews and focus groups with ED patient registration and trauma registry staff at a regional Level I trauma center. Topics included data collection process, barriers/facilitators for equity-related data collection, electronic health record (EHR) entry, trauma registry abstraction, and strategies to overcome technology limitations. Responses were qualitatively analyzed and triangulated with observations of ED and trauma registry staff workflow. Expert-identified barriers to consistent data collection included lack of staff investment in changes and lack of national standardization of data elements; facilitators were simplicity, quality improvement checks, and stakeholder investment in modifying existing technology to collect equity elements. ED staff reported experiences with patients reacting suspiciously to queries regarding race and ethnicity. Cultural resonance training, a script to explain equity data collection, and allowing patients to self-report sensitive items using technology were identified as potential facilitators. Trauma registry staff reported lack of discrete fields, and a preference for auto-populated and designated EHR fields. Identified barriers and facilitators of collection and abstraction of equity-related data elements from multiple stakeholders provides a framework for improving data collection. Successful implementation will require standardized definitions, staff training, use of existing technology for patient self-report, and discrete fields for added elements.

Blood component use and injury characteristics of acute trauma patients arriving from the scene of injury or as transfers to a large, mature US Level 1 trauma center serving a large, geographically diverse region.

BACKGROUND: Advanced trauma care demands the timely availability of hemostatic blood products, posing special challenges for regional systems in geographically diverse areas. We describe acute trauma blood use by transfer status and injury characteristics at a large regional Level 1 trauma center. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We reviewed Harborview Medical Center (HMC) Trauma Registry, Transfusion Service, and electronic medical records on acute trauma patients for demographics, injury patterns, blood use, and in-hospital mortality, 2011-2019. RESULTS: Among 47,471 patients (mean age 45.2 ± 23.0 years; 68.3% male; Injury Severity Score 12.6 ± 11.1), 4.7% died and 8547 (18%) received at least one blood component through HMC. Firearms injuries were the most often transfused (690/2596, 26.6%) and the most urgently (39.9% ≥3 units in <1 h; 40.6% ≥5 units in <4 h), and had the highest mortality (case-fatality, 12.2%) (all p < .001). From-scene patients were younger than transfers (42.9 ± 21.0 vs. 47.2 ± 24.4), predominated among firearms injuries (68.2% from-scene vs. 31.8% transfers), were more likely to receive blood (18.5% vs. 17.6%) more urgently (≥3 units first hour, 24.4% vs. 7.7%; ≥5 units first 4 h: 25.6% vs. 8.2%), were more likely to die of hemorrhage (15.5% vs. 4.3%) and from firearms injuries (310/1360, 22.8%) (all p < .001). DISCUSSION: Early blood use, firearms injuries, and mortality were all greater among from-scene patients, and firearms injuries had worse outcomes despite greater and more urgent blood use, but the role of survivor bias for transfer patients must be clarified. Future research must identify strategies for providing local hemostatic transfusion support, particularly for firearms injuries.