RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To analyze the rapid Assistive Technology Assessment (rATA) data and identify challenges and opportunities for improving access to assistive technology products (AP) in Indonesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design consisting of a quantitative survey and a qualitative interview study was used. The rATA survey was administered to households in two randomly sampled provinces to collect data on AP met and unmet need. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze the survey data. Qualitative data were collected from unstructured videorecorded interviews with rATA policymakers. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: On average, data from rATA respondents (n = 11,300) revealed 60% of AP unmet need. A high proportion of funding sources came from the private sector, and contributions from the government remained low. Affordability and funding were the main barriers to access. From the policymaker interviews (n = 5), four essential themes emerged, i.e., "resources and workforce", "funding", "laws and policies", and "guidelines and standards". From each theme, key challenges and opportunities were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Affordability remained a major challenge, in part because government-sponsored funding was still inadequate, forcing people with low financial status to self-produce AP. One potential opportunity would be to localize AP production and improve local workforce training. Integrated national funding schemes and intersectoral coordination could accelerate improvement in meeting AP unmet need. This study may provide evidence of current challenges and opportunities to help improve the field of rehabilitation through enhanced access to AP services in Indonesia.
IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONA high assistive technology product (AP) unmet need due to low affordability and limited funding may prevent people with disabilities from receiving appropriate rehabilitation with the goal of improved quality of life.Evidence shows key barriers to AP service provision, and such evidence can be viewed as an opportunity for stakeholders to develop actionable strategies to improve access nationwide.Potential strategies such as local workforce capacity building, integrated national funding schemes, and improved government coordination may help enhance equitable access to AP for all.
RESUMEN
AIM: The purpose of this study was to develop, validate and conduct a feasibility study of three remote basic skills assessment modalities for wheelchair service providers (WSP) including an online case study quiz (m1), an in-person skills assessment (m2) and a video conference skills assessment (m3). METHODS: We conducted a literature review; developed and validated 3 basic skills assessments; and conducted a feasibility study of each modality. RESULTS: The literature review revealed that a validated remote basic skills assessment for WSP that reflects all World Health Organization (WHO) 8 wheelchair service provision steps did not exist. We recruited a total of 12 participants for the feasibility study. Two participants dropped out of the study prior to completing a second testing modality. Related to test performance, the results show that our first hypothesis was rejected because only m1 mean score was comparable to the International Society of Wheelchair Professionals (ISWP) Basic Knowledge Test (SD = 0.44). This is in contrast with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test results that show a statistically significant difference between these two modalities. We are therefore not confident that the knowledge test was an appropriate comparison to m1 skills assessment. Hypothesis two was not rejected. The feasibility results reveal 86% success. CONCLUSION: M1, 2 and 3 have the potential to serve as remote basic skills assessments. However, according to both test performance and feasibility criteria, we believe that m2 has the highest potential to be included in certification processes for basic wheelchair service providers, like the one offered by ISWP.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONA universal remote basic skills assessment that can be accessed across the globe, especially in remote locations where a skilled and experienced provider is not available, is needed.Such test can be an asset to training or professional organisations like ISWP as a way to test WSP competency or to warrant certification.WSP clinical knowledge and skills are essential for the prescription of an appropriate wheelchair to avoid physical harm, abandonment of the device and unnecessary expenses.Properly prescribed wheelchairs allow people with impaired mobility to gain increased ability to perform ADLs, participate in communities, and reduce secondary medical complications such as upper limb repetitive strain injuries, pain, and/or pressure sores.
