Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 31(2): 221-230.e3, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31711748

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To report final 2-year outcomes with the Sentry bioconvertible inferior vena cava (IVC) filter in patients requiring temporary protection against pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective multicenter trial, the Sentry filter was implanted in 129 patients with documented deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or PE (67.5%) or who were at temporary risk of developing DVT/PE (32.6%). Patients were monitored and bioconversion status ascertained by radiography, computed tomography (CT), and CT venography through 2 years. RESULTS: The composite primary 6-month endpoint of clinical success was achieved in 97.4% (111/114) of patients. The rate of new symptomatic PE was 0% (n = 126) through 1 year and 2.4% (n = 85) through the second year of follow-up, with 2 new nonfatal cases at 581 and 624 days that were adjudicated as not related to the procedure or device. Two patients (1.6%) developed symptomatic caval thrombosis during the first month and underwent successful interventions without recurrence. No other filter-related symptomatic complications occurred through 2 years. There was no filter tilting, migration, embolization, fracture, or caval perforation and no filter-related deaths through 2 years. Filter bioconversion was successful for 95.7% (110/115) of patients at 6 months, 96.4% (106/110) of patients at 12 months, and 96.5% (82/85) of patients at 24 months. Through 24 months of follow-up, there was no evidence of late-stage IVC obstruction or thrombosis after filter bioconversion or of thrombogenicity associated with retracted filter arms. CONCLUSIONS: The Sentry IVC filter provided safe and effective protection against PE, with a high rate of intended bioconversion and a low rate of device-related complications, through 2 years of follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis/instrumentación , Embolia Pulmonar/prevención & control , Filtros de Vena Cava , Vena Cava Inferior , Trombosis de la Vena/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bélgica , Chile , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Flebografía , Diseño de Prótesis , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Vena Cava Inferior/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto Joven
2.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 29(10): 1350-1361.e4, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30177423

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess the Sentry bioconvertible inferior vena cava (IVC) filter in patients requiring temporary protection against pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: At 23 sites, 129 patients with documented deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or PE, or at temporary risk of developing DVT or PE, unable to use anticoagulation were enrolled. The primary end point was clinical success, including successful filter deployment, freedom from new symptomatic PE through 60 days before filter bioconversion, and 6-month freedom from filter-related complications. Patients were monitored by means of radiography, computerized tomography (CT), and CT venography to assess filtering configuration through 60 days, filter bioconversion, and incidence of PE and filter-related complications through 12 months. RESULTS: Clinical success was achieved in 111 of 114 evaluable patients (97.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 92.5%-99.1%). The rate of freedom from new symptomatic PE through 60 days was 100% (n = 129, 95% CI 97.1%-100.0%), and there were no cases of PE through 12 months for either therapeutic or prophylactic indications. Two patients (1.6%) developed symptomatic caval thrombosis during the first month; neither experienced recurrence after successful interventions. There was no filter tilting, migration, embolization, fracture, or caval perforation by the filter, and no filter-related death through 12 months. Filter bioconversion was successful for 95.7% (110/115) at 6 months and for 96.4% (106/110) at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The Sentry IVC filter provided safe and effective protection against PE, with a high rate of intended bioconversion and a low rate of device-related complications, through 12 months of imaging-intense follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis/instrumentación , Embolia Pulmonar/prevención & control , Embolia Pulmonar/terapia , Filtros de Vena Cava , Trombosis de la Vena/prevención & control , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bélgica , Chile , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Flebografía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Diseño de Prótesis , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Embolia Pulmonar/etiología , Recurrencia , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Adulto Joven
3.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 17(9): 482-6, 2005 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16145238

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify a new angiographic parameter associated with poor short- and long-term outcomes with nitinol stenting in the larger infrainguinal arteries. BACKGROUND: Nitinol stents have proven to be useful and safe, but imperfect, tools for treating claudication and limb-threatening ischemia. Primary and secondary patency in superficial femoral artery (SFA) occlusions treated with nitinol stents are up to 80% at 1 year, but restenosis is between 40-50% at 2 years. The causes of SFA and popliteal restenosis remain unclear. Stent fracture has been implicated in some cases of restenosis, but this is clearly the minority. Chronic mechanical trauma to the arteries caused by native vessel-stent interaction, intensified by limb motion over time, appears to be a more plausible explanation. METHODS: Presented here are 2 cases of restenosis apparently caused by acute and chronic trauma to the native vessel from interaction of the artery with the ends of relatively rigid nitinol stent systems. RESULTS: The source of some future restenotic and occlusive events are not apparent using routine angiography techniques. CONCLUSION: The additional step of an on-table leg bend test at 80-90 degrees will allow the interventionalist to visualize many cases of negative interaction between the native artery and the stents that will occur during routine movement. This allows the operator to potentially avoid stent-induced arterial trauma.


Asunto(s)
Aleaciones , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Arteria Femoral , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/etiología , Arteria Poplítea , Stents , Anciano , Angiografía de Substracción Digital , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Femenino , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/diagnóstico , Humanos , Falla de Prótesis , Factores de Tiempo , Ultrasonografía Intervencional
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA