Sacrohysteropexy: A Way to Spare the Uterus.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To show the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy for treating uterine prolapse. DESIGN: An educational video to explain the laparoscopic steps of this procedure by focusing on the main anatomic landmarks and on tips and tricks to avoid complications. SETTING: A tertiary care university hospital. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic sacropexy with uterus preservation for grade 3 apical defect. CONCLUSION: This video shows a stepwise approach to laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy demonstrating its feasibility and safety. There is a wide choice of surgical procedures and approaches focused on pelvic organ prolapse repair. Since many years, uterine prolapse has been an indication for hysterectomy, regardless of the occurrence of uterine disease and patients' desires. With the introduction of minimally invasive surgery, the uterine-sparing procedures are being increasingly taken into account, especially in young women [1]. Sacrohysteropexy is a uterus-sparing procedure that allows for a reduction in operating time, intraoperative blood loss, mesh-related complications, and surgical costs [2]. Furthermore, this technique has a high success rate with an objective cure rate of 100% for the apical compartment and 80% for all compartments and does not seem to increase the pelvic organ prolapse recurrence rate [3]. Sacropexy is not a life-threatening procedure, but its main objective is to restore functional anatomy with the primary goal of improvement in patient's quality of life. Moreove, no difference has been found with or without uterus preservation in term of postoperative recurrence rate or ent's quality of life [4]. However, high patient satisfaction has been recently reported; therefore, uterine preservation should be considered during patient's counseling.

Effect of Anterior Compartment Endometriosis Excision on Infertility.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic surgical excision of bladder nodules has been demonstrated to be effective in relieving associated painful symptoms; the data are lacking concerning the impact of anterior compartment endometriosis on infertility. We conducted this study to evaluate whether or not the surgical excision of deep endometriosis affecting the anterior compartment plays a role in restoring fertility. METHODS: This multicentre, retrospective study included a group of 55 patients presenting with otherwise-unexplained infertility who had undergone laparoscopic excision of anterior compartment endometriosis with histological confirmation. Patient medical records and operative reports were reviewed. Telephone interviews were conducted for long-term followup of fertility outcomes. RESULTS: The pregnancy rate following surgical excision of endometriotic lesions was 44% (n = 11) among those with anterior compartment involvement alone and 50% (n = 15) in case of posterior lesions association without any significant difference. The symptoms related to bladder endometriosis resolved in the 84.2% of the cases with a recurrence rate of 1.8% at the 2-year followup not requiring further surgery. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic excision of anterior compartment endometriosis is effective in restoring fertility in patients with otherwise-unexplained infertility and in treating endometriosis-related symptoms.

Impact of Laparoscopic Surgical Management of Deep Endometriosis on Pregnancy Rate.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of laparoscopic excision of lesions on deep endometriosis-related infertility. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Endometriosis tertiary referral center (Canadian Task Force II-2). PATIENTS: A group of 115 patients who had undergone laparoscopic surgery for infertility with histologic confirmation of deep endometriosis. INTERVENTIONS: Patient medical records and operative reports were reviewed. Telephone interviews were conducted for long-term follow-up of fertility outcomes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Evaluation of fertility outcome after laparoscopic treatment of deep endometriosis by spontaneous conception and by assisted reproductive technology (ART) correlated with lesion number, size, and location (anterior, posterolateral, pouch of Douglas, and multiple locations). After a mean follow-up of 22 months the overall pregnancy rate was 54.78% (n = 63) with a live-birth rate of 42.6% (n = 49). Among those patients given the chance to conceive spontaneously (n = 70), the overall pregnancy rate was 60% (n = 42): 38.5% (n = 27) spontaneously and 21.4% (n = 15) by ART. The removal of multiple lesions was associated with a higher pregnancy rate after surgery. When comparing isolated lesion size and disease location, there was no difference in pregnancy rate. Furthermore, those patients who underwent surgical eradication of the disease for the first time had a higher pregnancy rate (odds ratio, 4.18). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that laparoscopic excision of deep endometriosis enhances pregnancy rate, by both spontaneous conception and ART. First surgical treatment of multiple lesions was associated with higher pregnancy rates, whereas isolated lesions influenced the pregnancy rate irrespective of their location and size.

Nonsurgical Alternatives for Uterine Fibroids.

Uterine leiomyomata are the direct cause of a significant health-care burden for women, their families, and society as a whole. Because of the long experience with the mode of treatment, surgical myomectomy remains the gold standard for treating reproductive-age women; however, in the recent years, the wide evolution of less invasive approaches led to a change in the options used by the clinician to treat symptomatic fibroids. Minimally invasive procedures such as uterine artery embolization (UAE) are increasingly used to treat symptomatic fibroids. Other alternative treatments are becoming more diffuse, such as magnetic resonance-guided high-frequency focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS), cryomyolysis, vaginal occlusion, and laparoscopic closure of the uterine arteries. Both advantages and limitations of these techniques under development must be taken into account, but this wider range of choices is being increasingly considered for a tailored treatment. This article aims to enable health-care providers with the tools to provide the latest evidence-based care in the minimally invasive or noninvasive management of this common problem.