Blue-light filtering alters angiogenic signaling in human retinal pigmented epithelial cells culture model.

BACKGROUND: Light exposure and more specifically the spectrum of blue light contribute to the oxidative stress in Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The purpose of the study was to establish whether blue light filtering could modify proangiogenic signaling produced by retinal pigmented epithelial (RPE) cells under different conditions simulating risk factors for AMD. METHODS: Three experiments were carried out in order to expose ARPE-19 cells to white light for 48 h with and without blue light-blocking filters (BLF) in different conditions. In each experiment one group was exposed to light with no BLF protection, a second group was exposed to light with BLF protection, and a control group was not exposed to light. The ARPE-19 cells used in each experiment prior to light exposure were cultured for 24 h as follows: Experiment 1) Normoxia, Experiment 2) Hypoxia, and Experiment 3) Lutein supplemented media in normoxia. The media of all groups was harvested after light exposure for sandwich ELISA-based assays to quantify 10 pro-angiogenic cytokines. RESULTS: A significant decrease in angiogenin secretion levels and a significant increase in bFGF were observed following light exposure, compared to dark conditions, in both normoxia and hypoxia conditions. With the addition of a blue light-blocking filter in normoxia, a significant increase in angiogenin levels was observed. Although statistical significance was not achieved, blue light filters reduce light-induced secretion of bFGF and VEGF to near normal levels. This trend is also observed when ARPE-19 cells are grown under hypoxic conditions and when pre-treated with lutein prior to exposure to experimental conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Following light exposure, there is a decrease in angiogenin secretion by ARPE-19 cells, which was abrogated with a blue light - blocking filter. Our findings support the position that blue light filtering affects the secretion of angiogenic factors by retinal pigmented epithelial cells under normoxic, hypoxic, and lutein-pretreated conditions in a similar manner.

Endoresection versus iodine-125 plaque brachytherapy for the treatment of choroidal melanoma.

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of pars plana vitrectomy endoresection with iodine-125 brachytherapy in the treatment of choroidal melanoma. DESIGN: A nested case-control study (1:2) from a surgical cohort. METHODS: The study comprised 81 choroidal melanoma patients treated with either endoresection or iodine-125 brachytherapy. Twenty-seven patients who had undergone endoresection were matched according to tumor height and postequatorial tumor location with 54 cases treated with iodine-125 brachytherapy. Metastatic disease, overall survival, local tumor recurrence, visual acuity, and secondary enucleation rates were analyzed and compared between groups. RESULTS: Metastatic spread was observed in 11 patients in the iodine-125 brachytherapy group vs only 1 patient in the endoresection group (20.4% and 3.7%, respectively, P = .053). Fourteen patients died during follow-up: 11 in the brachytherapy arm vs 3 in the endoresection arm (20.4% and 11.1%, respectively, P = .238). For the iodine-125 brachytherapy and endoresection groups, respectively, the 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates were as follows: overall survival, 81.5% vs 89.2% (log-rank test, P = .429;); relapse-free survival, 96.6% vs 92.4% (P = .2); visual acuity retention equal or superior to 20/200, 66.4% vs 59.9% (P = .083), and eye retention, 85.7% vs 87.8% (P = .942). CONCLUSIONS: Endoresection for choroidal melanoma is an effective treatment modality in selected cases of posterior choroidal melanomas, with outcomes similar to those obtained with iodine-125 brachytherapy.

Topical azithromycin or ofloxacin for endophthalmitis prophylaxis after intravitreal injection.

BACKGROUND: The number of patients who have undergone intravitreal injections has increased enormously in recent years, but a consensus is still lacking on prophylaxis for endophthalmitis. The aim of this prospective, observational study was to evaluate the prophylactic effect of azithromycin eye drops versus ofloxacin eye drops. METHODS: The study was conducted in five hospitals in Spain and included all patients undergoing intravitreal injections of triamcinolone, bevacizumab, ranibizumab, or pegaptanib over one year. Patients received azithromycin 15 mg/g eye drops (twice daily on the day prior to injection and for another 2 days) or ofloxacin 3 mg/g eye drops (every 6 hours on the day prior to injection and for another 7 days). RESULTS: In the azithromycin group, there were 4045 injections in 972 eyes of 701 patients. In the ofloxacin group, there were 4151 injections in 944 eyes of 682 patients. There were two cases of endophthalmitis (0.049%) in the azithromycin group and five (0.12%) in the ofloxacin group. The odds ratio of presenting with endophthalmitis in the ofloxacin group compared with the azithromycin group was 2.37 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32-3.72, P < 0.001). There were two cases of noninfectious uveitis after triamcinolone injection in the azithromycin group (0.049%) and two (0.048%) in the ofloxacin group; no significant differences were observed (odds ratio 0.902, 95% CI 0.622-1.407, P = 0.407). Conjunctival hyperemia was observed in 12 cases in the azithromycin group and none in the ofloxacin group. CONCLUSION: The risk of endophthalmitis was significantly greater with ofloxacin than with azithromycin. These findings provide a valuable addition to the ever-increasing pool of information on endophthalmitis prophylaxis after intravitreal injection, although further large-scale studies are required to provide definitive conclusions.

As-needed treatment with ranibizumab 0.5 mg in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: To describe the results obtained in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with ranibizumab 0.5 mg on an as-needed basis from the start after 1 year of follow-up. METHODS: Retrospective, consecutive interventional case series of patients with all angiographic types of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (mean baseline size, 3.4 disk areas) in a tertiary retinal center (Institut de la Màcula i la Retina; Barcelona, Spain). Main outcome was mean vision change; secondary outcomes were center retinal thickness change, number of injections, adverse events, and independent covariates associated with a good response. RESULTS: Mean visual acuity change was an increase of 1.3 letters (95% confidence interval -2.7 to +5.3), and difference between angiographic patterns did not reach statistical significance (p=0.30). A decrease in retinal thickness of 44.6 µm was identified (p<0.001), with a median of 3 injections. Absence of baseline arterial hypertension, lower visual acuity, and lesions located outside the fovea were associated with a better response to therapy. CONCLUSIONS: As-needed treatment from the start achieved stabilization of visual acuity and a moderate decrease of retinal thickness with a low number of injections, but did not achieve the same efficacy as regular monthly injections.