Effects of Laurus nobilis Leaf Extract (LAURESH®) on Oral and Gut Microbiota Diversity in Mice.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The leaves of Laurus nobilis have been used for culinary purposes for many years and have recently been shown to have beneficial effects on human health by altering microbiota composition. However, the effects of L. nobilis on the diversity of microbiomes in the oral cavity and gut remain unknown. Therefore, in this study, we examined the effects of an extract of L. nobilis on the diversity of microbiomes in the oral cavity and gut in mice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: C57BL/6J mice were randomly divided into two groups and fed a standard diet (SD) and a standard diet containing 5% LAURESH®, a laurel extract (SDL). After 10 weeks, oral swabs and fecal samples were collected. The bacterial DNA extracted from the oral swabs and feces was used for microbiota analysis using 16S rRNA sequencing. The sequencing data were analyzed using the Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology 2 in the DADA2 pipeline and 16S rRNA database. RESULTS: The α-diversity of the oral microbiome was significantly greater in the SDL group than in the SD group. The ß-diversity of the oral microbiome was also significantly different between the groups. Moreover, the taxonomic abundance analysis showed that five bacteria in the gut were significantly different among the groups. Furthermore, the SDL diet increased the abundance of beneficial gut bacteria, such as Akkermansia sp. CONCLUSION: Increased diversity of the oral microbiome and proportion of Akkermansia sp. in the gut microbiome induced by L. nobilis consumption may benefit oral and gut health.

Transcriptomic analysis of the submandibular gland under psychological stress condition.

BACKGROUND: Psychological stress is associated with changes in salivary flow and composition. However, studies to show the effect of psychological stress on the transcriptome of the salivary gland are limited. This study aims to perform a transcriptomic analysis of the submandibular gland under psychological stress using a chronic restraint stress model of rats. METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into stress groups and control groups. Psychological stress was induced in the stress group rats by enclosing them in a plastic tube for 4 h daily over 6 weeks. RNA sequencing was performed on RNA extracted from the submandibular gland. The differentially expressed genes were identified, and the genes of interest were further validated using qRT-PCR, immunofluorescence, and western blot. RESULTS: A comparison between control and stress groups showed 45 differentially expressed genes. The top five altered genes in RNA sequencing data showed similar gene expression in qRT-PCR validation. The most downregulated gene in the stress group, FosB, was a gene of interest and was further validated for its protein-level expression using immunofluorescence and western blot. The genesets for gene ontology cellular component, molecular function, and KEGG showed that pathways related to ribosome biosynthesis and function were downregulated in the stress group compared to the control. CONCLUSION: Psychological stress showed transcriptomic alteration in the submandibular gland. The findings may be important in understanding stress-related oral diseases.

Induction of Periodontal Ligament-like Cells by Coculture of Dental Pulp Cells, Dedifferentiated Cells Generated from Epithelial Cell Rests of Malassez, and Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells.

INTRODUCTION: Apart from the epithelial cell rests of Malassez (ERMs), dental pulp (DP) contains the same types of mesenchymal cells as the periodontal ligament (PDL). ERMs may affect the characteristics of the mesenchymal cells in the PDL. The aim of this study was to examine whether DP cells cultured with ERMs and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) could transform into PDL-like cells. METHODS: Progenitor-dedifferentiated into stem-like cells (Pro-DSLCs) were produced by the induction of ERMs with 5-Azacytidine and valproic acid. DP cells were cultured in mesenchymal stem cell medium for 1 week under the following conditions: DP cells alone (controls); PDL cells alone; coculture of DP cells and ERMs (DP + ERM) or Pro-DSLCs (DP + Pro-DSLC); and coculture of DP cells, HUVECs, and ERMs (DP + ERM + HUVEC) or Pro-DSLCs (DP + Pro-DSLC + HUVEC). Quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction, and flow cytometry were performed. RESULTS: The expression levels of PDL-related markers Msx1, Msx2, Ncam1, Postn, and S100a4 and mesenchymal stem cell-positive markers Cd29, Cd90, and Cd105 were significantly higher in the PDL cells and DP + Pro-DSLC + HUVEC cultures than in the controls (P < .05). The DNA methylation levels of Msx1 and Cd29 in the PDL cells and the DP + Pro-DSLC + HUVEC culture were significantly lower than in the controls (P < .01). We found a significant increase in the number of cells stained with MSX1 (P < .05) and CD29 (P < .01) in the DP + Pro-DSLC + HUVEC culture than in the controls. CONCLUSIONS: Coculture of DP cells with Pro-DSLCs and HUVECs induced their transformation into PDL-like cells. This method may prove to be useful for periodontal regeneration via tissue engineering.

Effect of Systemic Administration of Amitriptyline on Oral Microbes in Rats.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Amitriptyline is a major tricyclic antidepressant that is also used to relieve chronic orofacial pain. Recently, alterations in gut flora due to various antidepressants have been demonstrated. However, it remains unknown how antidepressants affect the oral environment, including microbiota and innate immunity. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of amitriptyline on oral microflora and antimicrobial peptides. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats were intraperitoneally injected with amitriptyline for 2 weeks. The DNA extracted from the oral swabs were used to perform 16SrRNA sequencing to evaluate the oral microbiome. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed to evaluate the mRNA levels of antimicrobial peptides in the buccal tissues. RESULTS: No significant differences in salivary flow rates were observed between the amitriptyline and control groups. Taxonomic analysis showed significant alterations in bacteria such as Corynebacterium, Rothia, and Porphyromonas due to amitriptyline administration. The beta diversity showed significant differences between the amitriptyline and control groups. Additionally, the predicted metagenome functions were significantly different between the two groups. The mRNA expression levels of antimicrobial peptides in the amitriptyline group were significantly higher as compared to controls. CONCLUSION: Systemic administration of amitriptyline may affect the oral environment, including oral microbes and innate immunity in the oral mucosa.