Utilization of coronary computed tomography angiography and computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve in a critical limb-threatening ischemia cohort.

Objective: Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) have a significant risk of myocardial infarction and death secondary to concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD). This is particularly true in patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) who exceed a 20% mortality rate at 6 months despite standard treatment with risk factor modification. Although systematic preoperative coronary testing is not recommended for patients with PAD without cardiac symptoms, the clinical manifestations of CAD are often muted in patients with CLTI due to poor mobility and activity intolerance. Thus, the true incidence and impact of "silent" CAD in a CLTI cohort is unknown. This study aims to determine the prevalence of ischemia-producing coronary artery stenosis in a CLTI cohort using coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) and computed tomography (CT)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT), a noninvasive imaging modality that has shown significant correlation to cardiac catheterization in the detection of clinically relevant coronary ischemia. Methods: Patients presenting with newly diagnosed CLTI at our institution from May 2020 to April 2021 were screened for underlying CAD. Included subjects had no known history of CAD, no cardiac symptoms, and no anginal equivalent complaints at presentation. Patients underwent cCTA and FFRCT evaluation and were classified by the anatomic location and severity of CAD. Significant coronary ischemia was defined as FFRCT ≤0.80 distal to a >30% coronary stenosis, and severe coronary ischemia was documented at FFRCT ≤0.75, consistent with established guidelines. Results: A total of 170 patients with CLTI were screened; 65 patients (38.2%) had no coronary symptoms and met all inclusion/exclusion criteria. Twenty-four patients (31.2%) completed cCTA and FFRCT evaluation. Forty-one patients have yet to complete testing secondary to socioeconomic factors (insurance denial, transportation inaccessibility, testing availability, etc). The mean age of included subjects was 65.4 ± 7.0 years, and 15 (62.5%) were male. Patients presented with ischemic rest pain (n = 7; 29.1%), minor tissue loss (n = 14; 58.3%) or major tissue loss (n = 3; 12.5%). Significant (≥50%) coronary artery stenosis was noted on cCTA in 19 of 24 patients (79%). Significant left main coronary artery stenosis was identified in two patients (10%). When analyzed with FFRCT, 17 patients (71%) had hemodynamically significant coronary ischemia (FFRCT ≤0.8), and 54% (n = 13) had lesion-specific severe coronary ischemia (FFRCT ≤0.75). The mean FFRCT in patients with coronary ischemia was 0.70 ± 0.07. Multi-vessel disease pattern was present in 53% (n = 9) of patients with significant coronary stenosis. Conclusions: The use of cCTA-derived fractional flow reserve demonstrates a significant percentage of patients with CLTI have silent (asymptomatic) coronary ischemia. More than one-half of these patients have lesion-specific severe ischemia, which may be associated with increased mortality when treated solely with risk factor modification. cCTA and FFRCT diagnosis of significant coronary ischemia has the potential to improve cardiac care, perioperative morbidity, and long-term survival curves of patients with CLTI. Systemic improvements in access to care will be needed to allow for broad application of these imaging assessments should they prove universally valuable. Additional study is required to determine the benefit of selective coronary revascularization in patients with CLTI.

Female and male patients have similar outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization in prospective trials.

OBJECTIVE: Sex disparities in outcomes after carotid revascularization have long been a concern, with several studies demonstrating increased postoperative death and stroke for female patients after either carotid endarterectomy or transfemoral stenting. Adverse events after transfemoral stenting are higher in female patients, particularly in symptomatic cases. Our objective was to investigate outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) stratified by patient sex hypothesizing that the results would be similar between males and females. METHODS: We analyzed prospectively collected data from the Safety and Efficacy Study for Reverse Flow Used During Carotid Artery Stenting Procedure (ROADSTER)1 (pivotal), ROADSTER2 (US Food and Drug Administration indicated postmarket), and ROADSTER Extended Access TCAR trials. All patients had verified carotid stenosis meeting criteria for intervention (≥80% for asymptomatic patients and ≥50% in patient with symptomatic disease), and were included based on anatomical or clinical high-risk criteria for carotid stenting. Neurological assessments (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Modified Rankin Scale) were obtained before and within 24 hours from procedure end by an independent neurologist or National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale-certified nurse. Patients were stratified by sex (male vs female). Baseline demographics were compared using χ2 and Fisher's exact tests where appropriate; primary outcomes were combination stroke/death (S/D) and S/D/myocardial infarction (S/D/M) at 30 days, and secondary outcomes were the individual components of S/D/M. Univariate logistic regression was conducted. RESULTS: We included 910 patients for analysis (306 female [33.6%], 604 male [66.4%]). Female patients were more often <65 years old (20.6% vs 15%) or ≥80 years old (22.6% vs 20.2%) compared with males, and were more often of Black/African American ethnicity (7.5% vs 4.3%). There were no differences by sex in term of comorbidities, current or prior smoking status, prior stroke, symptomatic status, or prevalence of anatomical and/or clinical high-risk criteria. General anesthetic use, stent brands used, and procedure times did not differ by sex, although flow reversal times were longer in female patients (10.9 minutes male vs 12.4 minutes female; P = .01), as was more contrast used in procedures for female patients (43 mL male vs 48.9 mL female; P = .049). The 30-day S/D and S/D/M rates were similar between male and female patients (S/D, 2.7% male vs 1.6% female [P = .34]; S/D/M, 3.6% male vs 2.6% female [P = .41]), which did not differ when stratified by symptom status. Secondary outcomes did not differ by sex, including stroke rates at 30 days (2.2% male vs 1.6% female; P = .80), nor were differences seen with stratification by symptom status. Univariate analysis demonstrated that history of a prior ipsilateral stroke was associated with increased odds of S/D (odds ratio [OR], 4.19; P = .001) and S/D/M (OR, 2.78; P = .01), as was symptomatic presentation with increased odds for S/D (OR, 2.78; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Prospective TCAR trial data demonstrate exceptionally low rates of S/D/MI, which do not differ by patient sex.

Disparities in Outcomes Between Sexes in Type B Aortic Dissection Patients Treated with TEVAR.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate differences in presentation and outcomes between sexes in patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection (TBAD). METHODS: Between January 1, 2012 and January 1, 2017 186 patients underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair for TBAD at a single institution. Men (n = 112) and women (n = 74) were compared based on presenting demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications. Primary outcomes were survival and need for reintervention. RESULTS: Women were older (P = 0.04) and had a lower body mass index (P = 0.03). More women (F) presented with continued pain or refractory hypertension (51.0% F, 30.0% M), while more men (M) presented with acute complicated dissections (19.0% F, 39.0% M) (P = 0.008). At presentation, women had statistically higher relative rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = 0.05), hyperlipidemia (P = 0.03), and smoking (P = 0.03). Significantly more women were on Medicare without Medicaid (55.0% F, 34.0% M), while men had private insurance (35.0% F, 13.0% M) (P = 0.005). There was no significant difference in blood pressure control at presentation, discharge, or at 30 days. When normalized by body surface area, women had larger ascending aortic diameters (19.2(3.10)F, 17.5(2.40)M, P = 0.0002), as well as proportionally larger true lumens at the left subclavian artery (14.9(2.90)F, 13.4(2.50)M, P = 0.0002), carina (12.6(5.80)F, 9.90(4.80)M, P = 0.0009), and celiac (10.5(4.50)F, 8.50(4.10)M, P = 0.006) levels, and at the largest point of dissection (11.6(6.50)F, 9.60(4.80)M, P = 0.04), as well as proportionately smaller false lumens at the carina (5.90(5.60)F, 9.30(6.10)M, P = 0.003). Despite not being statistically significant, women had lower rates of stroke (6.80% F, 8.00% M, P = 0.7) and acute kidney injury (5.40% F, 11.6% M, P = 0.2), as well fewer days in the intensive care unit (ICU) (3.20(4.30)F, 4.60(6.60)M, P = 0.2) and an overall shorter length of stay (6.80(6.70)F, 8.00(8.20)M, P = 0.5). Kaplan-Meier estimates for survival for women versus men were 96.0% vs. 92.0%, 90.0% vs. 79.0%, and 70.0% vs. 69.0% at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years, respectively (P = 0.042). Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from reintervention for women versus men were 89.0% vs. 90.0%, 58.0% vs. 72.0%, and 48.0% vs. 58.0% at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years, respectively (P = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Women present with TBAD at an older age, have more comorbidities, lower socioeconomic status, and have larger ascending aortic diameters for their size. Despite having less severe dissections as evidenced by smaller false lumens and wider true lumens, it does not appear that this correlates with improved outcomes for women when compared to men. It appears that this is one of the few, if not only, aortic pathologies that result in comparable outcomes between sexes.

Safety and efficacy of mechanical aspiration thrombectomy for patients with acute lower extremity ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is associated with high rates of amputation and consequent morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study is to report on the safety and efficacy of aspiration thrombectomy using the Indigo Aspiration System in patients with lower extremity (LE) ALI. METHODS: The STRIDE study was an international, multicenter, prospective, study that enrolled 119 participants presenting with LE-ALI. Patients were treated firstline with mechanical thrombectomy using the Indigo Aspiration System, before stenting or angioplasty, or other therapies as determined by treating physician. The primary end point was target limb salvage at 30 days after the procedure. Secondary end points within 30 days included technical success, defined as core laboratory-adjudicated Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 2/3 flow rate immediately after the procedure, changes in modified Society for Vascular Surgery runoff score, improvement of Rutherford classification compared with before the procedure, patency, rate of device-related serious adverse events, and major periprocedural bleeding. Secondary end points that will be evaluated at 12 months include target limb salvage and mortality. RESULTS: Of the 119 participants enrolled at 16 sites, the mean age was 66.3 years (46.2% female). At baseline (n = 119), ischemic severity was classified as Rutherford I in 10.9%, Rutherford IIa in 54.6%, and Rutherford IIb in 34.5%. The mean target thrombus length was 125.7 ± 124.7 mm. Before the procedure, 93.0% (of patients 107/115) had no flow (TIMI 0) through the target lesion. The target limb salvage rate at 30 days was 98.2% (109/111). The rate of periprocedural major bleed was 4.2% (5/119) and device-related serious adverse events was 0.8% (1/119). Restoration of flow (TIMI 2/3) was achieved in 96.3% of patients (105/109) immediately after the procedure. The median improvement in the modified Society for Vascular Surgery runoff score (before vs after the procedure) was 6.0 (interquartile range, 0.0-11.0). Rutherford classifications also improved after discharge in 86.5% of patients (83/96), as compared with preprocedural scores. Patency at 30 days was achieved in 89.4% of patients (101/113). CONCLUSIONS: In the STRIDE (A Study of Patients with Lower Extremity Acute Limb Ischemia to Remove Thrombus with the Indigo Aspiration System) study, aspiration thrombectomy with the Indigo System provided a safe and effective endovascular treatment for patients with LE-ALI, resulting in a high rate (98.2%) of successful limb salvage at 30 days, with few periprocedural complications.

Five-year outcomes of endosuture aneurysm repair in patients with short neck abdominal aortic aneurysm from the ANCHOR registry.

OBJECTIVE: Hostile aortic neck anatomies such as proximal short necks are known to put patients at an increased risk for type IA endoleaks, migration, and need for reinterventions. The Heli-FX EndoAnchor System was designed to improve seal of aortic stent grafts. Endosuture aneurysm repair (ESAR) using EndoAnchors with the Endurant stent graft has been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of patients with short necks through one year. This study reports the 5-year patient outcomes of the Aneurysm Treatment using the Heli-FX EndoAnchor System Global Registry (ANCHOR) short neck regulatory cohort. METHODS: The 70 patients from the ANCHOR Registry were cohort submitted to regulators for approval of the Endurant short neck indication. Patients had an infrarenal neck length of ≥ 4 mm and <10 mm. At 5 years, this short neck cohort had clinical and imaging follow-up compliance rates of 85% (28/33) and 70% (23/33), respectively. RESULTS: The short neck cohort had a mean age of 71.3±8.1 years and was 27.1% (19/70) female. Kaplan Meier freedom from all-cause mortality was 68.5 ± 6.2%, freedom from aneurysm-related mortality was 90.1 ± 4.5%, freedom from any endovascular or surgical secondary procedure was 76.9 ± 7.2%, and freedom from rupture was 95.6 ± 3.2%. Eight patients had a total of nine type IA endoleaks detected through 5 years, of which three resolved spontaneously by the next follow-up visit. There were two patients with renal complications who did not undergo reintervention and there were no device migrations reported through 5 years. After 5 years, 68.2% of patients (15/22) had sac regression, 13.6% (3/22) had stable sacs, and 18.2% (4/22) had increased sac diameter as compared with their 1-month measurements. CONCLUSIONS: After ESAR treatment using Heli-FX EndoAnchors with Endurant, the 5-year outcomes of the short neck cohort from the ANCHOR registry had encouraging results with regards to proximal neck-related complications, secondary procedures, and sac regression. This review of ESAR in patients with short proximal necks showed positive outcomes through 5 years although follow-up of a larger cohort is necessary.

Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Secondary to Vascular Insufficiency from Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Clavicle: A Case Report.

CASE: An 18-year-old woman with a history of congenital pseudarthrosis of the clavicle (CPC) presented with episodes of right upper extremity ischemia. Vascular studies demonstrated an extensive thrombus with complete occlusion of the brachial artery. She underwent urgent thrombectomy. Subsequently, she underwent first rib resection and scalenectomy as well as pseudarthrosis takedown and fixation. Postoperatively, she returned to Division I collegiate soccer with complete symptomatic resolution. CONCLUSION: We report a case of arterial thoracic outlet syndrome secondary to CPC.

Clinical trial outcomes and thoracic aortic morphometry after one year with the Valiant Navion stent graft system.

AUTHORS' NOTE: On February 17, 2021, Medtronic Incorporated issued a global voluntary recall of the Valiant Navion Thoracic Stent Graft System (the device under study in the Valiant Evo Global Clinical Program that is the subject of this publication), and instructed physicians to immediately cease use of the Valiant Navion system and return any unused product. Medtronic initiated the recall in response to three clinical trial subjects recently observed with stent fractures, two of whom have confirmed type IIIb endoleaks. The data collection, analysis, and manuscript submission occurred before the notice of this recall, and, specifically, the 100 procedures reviewed for this series were free of events at 1 year related to the reason for this device recall. The authors of this article and the manufacturer were unaware of the recently detected adverse events at the time of the preparation of the manuscript, and the 1-year trial results, and imaging-based analyses described are unchanged. Management of thoracic aortic aneurysms continues to be a challenging problem and outcomes are dependent on patient anatomy. The present publication focuses on the importance of achieving proximal and distal seals and the consideration of the temporal changes of the aortic morphology as a part of the TEVAR planning process. The authors believe there is still scientific merit in disclosing this information, despite the current nonavailability of the Valiant Navion system. OBJECTIVE: The Valiant Navion stent graft system (Medtronic Inc, Santa Rosa, Calif) is a third-generation device with improved conformability. We have reported the 1-year clinical trial outcomes, with a focus on an imaging-based analysis of the aortic morphology. We assessed the effects of graft implantation on the native anatomy and the effects of the 1-year changes in thoracic aorta morphology on the original seal zones of the stent graft. METHODS: A total of 100 subjects were enrolled in a prospective single-arm clinical trial investigating the Valiant Navion stent graft system. An independent core laboratory (Syntactx, New York, NY) assessed the anatomic characteristics and performance outcomes. RESULTS: Through 1 year of follow-up, the freedom from all-cause mortality, aneurysm-related mortality, and secondary procedures was 89.8%, 97.0%, and 94.8% respectively. Of the 100 patients, 5 had undergone a total of six secondary procedures, and 9 patients had developed an endoleak (type Ia and Ib in 1, type Ia in 1, type Ib in 3, and type II in 4 patients) within the first year. After 1 year, 2 of 76 patients (2.6%) had had an increase in their maximum aneurysm diameter of ≥5 mm, 62 (81.6%) had had stable sacs, and 12 (15.8%) had experienced sac shrinkage. Although no deployment failures had occurred, 36 of the 100 proximal (36%) and 31 of the 100 distal (31%) attachment zones were considered short according to our definitions. The stent graft had conformed to the native anatomy at implantation, because the preprocedural thoracic aorta tortuosity (1.45 ± 0.02) had not significantly changed at 1 month after implantation (1.46 ± 0.02). Despite a natural increase in thoracic tortuosity after 1 year (1.49 ± 0.02), wall apposition had been maintained over time, as evidenced by the low endoleak rates. Aortic elongation and dilation had occurred at the proximal end of the graft by an average of 1.2 mm and 1.6 mm, respectively. Aortic remodeling was more pronounced at the distal end, with an average increase of 4.2 mm in length and 2.8 mm in diameter. CONCLUSIONS: The included patients had had positive 1-year outcomes with high freedom from mortality, endoleak development, and secondary procedures. Aortic elongation and dilation were more prevalent at the distal end, emphasizing the importance of distal attachment zone consideration as part of preoperative planning. Because aortic remodeling can be expected to continue over time, additional follow-up and imaging analysis in the trial will be necessary to assess the aortic morphology and its effects on stent graft performance.

Endovascular aortic repair in an asymptomatic COVID-19-positive patient with a symptomatic inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm.

In this report, we present the case of a COVID-19-positive patient whose symptomatic inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm was successfully treated with endovascular aortic repair at our institution. We discuss the reasoning behind the type of therapy used and the various lessons learned. Based on our experience with this patient, we recommend an endovascular approach for similar COVID-19 patients and suggest a prophylactic dose of enoxaparin (Lovenox; 40 mg daily) postoperatively for 14 days.

Early Outcomes in the ROADSTER 2 Study of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization in Patients With Significant Carotid Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) is comprised of carotid artery stent placement with cerebral protection via proximal carotid artery clamping and reversal of cerebral arterial flow. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TCAR performed by a broad group of physicians with variable TCAR experience. METHODS: The ROADSTER 2 study is a prospective, open label, single arm, multicenter, postapproval registry for patients undergoing TCAR. Patients considered at high risk for complications from carotid endarterectomy with symptomatic stenosis ≥50% or asymptomatic stenosis ≥80% were included. The primary end point was procedural success, which encompassed technical success plus the absence of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death within the 30-day postoperative period. Secondary end points included technical success and individual/composite rates of stroke, death, and myocardial infarction (MI). All patients underwent independent neurological assessments before the procedure, within 24 hours, and at 30 days after TCAR. An independent clinical events committee adjudicated all major adverse events. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2019, 692 patients (Intent to Treat Population) were enrolled at 43 sites. Sixty cases had major protocol violations, leaving 632 patients adhering to the Food and Drug Administration-approved protocol (per-protocol population). The majority (81.2%) of operators were TCAR naïve before study initiation. Patients underwent TCAR for neurological symptoms in 26% of cases, and all patients had high-risk factors for carotid endarterectomy (anatomic-related 44%; physiological 32%; both 24%). Technical success occurred in 99.7% of all cases. The primary end point of procedural success rate in the Intent to Treat population was 96.5% (per-protocol 97.9%). The early postoperative outcomes in the Intent to Treat population included stroke in 13 patients (1.9%), death in 3 patients (0.4%), and MI in 6 patients (0.9%). The composite 30-day stroke/death rate was 2.3%, and stroke/death/MI rate was 3.2%. In the per-protocol population, there were strokes in 4 patients (0.6%), death in one patient (0.2%), and MI in 6 patients (0.9%) leading to a composite 30-day stroke/death rate of 0.8% and stroke/death/MI rate of 1.7%. CONCLUSIONS: TCAR results in excellent early outcomes with high technical success combined with low rates of postprocedure stroke and death. These results were achieved by a majority of operators new to this technology at the start of the trial. Adherence to the study protocol and peri-procedural antiplatelet therapy optimizes outcomes. Longer-term follow-up data are needed to confirm these early outcomes. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02536378.

Pivotal results for the Valiant Navion stent graft system in the Valiant EVO global clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The Valiant Navion stent graft system (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, Calif) is a new iteration of a thoracic endograft for the treatment of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. Herein, the 30-day primary safety and efficacy outcomes and secondary end points are presented. METHODS: The Valiant EVO global clinical trial is a prospective, nonrandomized, single-arm trial. Patient enrollment occurred from April 2016 to October 2017. The primary end point was defined as access and/or deployment failure and/or a major device effect (MDE), including device-related secondary procedures, device-related mortality, conversion to open surgery, or thoracic aortic aneurysm rupture within 30 days of the index procedure. Other measures of stent graft performance including procedural data, rates of secondary procedures, and frequency of endoleaks are also reported. RESULTS: Of the 87 consecutive patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair who were enrolled, 33 (37.9%) were female with 61 (70.9%) presenting with severe access artery tortuosity and 66 (85.7%) with high thoracic aortic tortuosity per core laboratory evaluation. The mean procedure duration was 88.7 ± 53.4 minutes and geographical differences existed such as percutaneous access (37/52 [71.2%]) in the United States and surgical cut down in the outside of the U.S. sites (28/35 [80.0%]). There were no access or deployment failures and only 2.3% of the patients (2/87; P < .0001; performance goal of 16%) experienced a MDE within 30 days of the index procedure. Two secondary procedures (n = 1 retrograde type A dissection; n = 1 aortic arch rupture) were required, and in the first 30 days, two patients died leading to a freedom from all-cause mortality of 97.7%. Endoleaks at 1 month were reported in 2.5% of patients (n = 1 type Ia; n = 1 type II). CONCLUSIONS: Access/deployment failures, MDEs, and endoleaks were rare in the first 30 days of the Valiant Evo clinical trial. The Valiant Navion thoracic stent graft system has shown encouraging 30-day results in this challenging cohort and trial patients will continue to be followed through 5 years.

Endosuture aneurysm repair in patients treated with Endurant II/IIs in conjunction with Heli-FX EndoAnchor implants for short-neck abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) remains a challenging clinical scenario when there is a short or nonexistent segment of healthy infrarenal aorta. This study sought to determine the safety and effectiveness of endosuture aneurysm repair (ESAR) using the Endurant II/IIs endograft (Medtronic Vascular, Santa Rosa, Calif) in conjunction with Heli-FX EndoAnchors (Medtronic Vascular) in the treatment of short-neck AAA. METHODS: In this subgroup analysis, 70 patients were identified from the Aneurysm Treatment Using the Heli-FX EndoAnchor System Global Registry (ANCHOR) who had an infrarenal neck length <10 mm down to 4 mm based on core laboratory measurements. Primary outcomes included technical success of the index procedure, rate of type IA endoleak at 1 month and 12 months, and rate of secondary procedures at 12 months. RESULTS: In this short-neck cohort (n = 70), the average neck length and diameter were 6.9 ± 1.6 mm and 25.7 ± 4.0 mm, respectively. Investigators reported an overall procedural success rate of 97.1% and a technical success rate of 88.6%. The duration of the implant procedure, EndoAnchor implantation, and total fluoroscopy time was 148.0 ± 80.0 minutes, 17.1 ± 11.5 minutes, and 35.3 ± 22.0 minutes, respectively, and an average of 5.5 ± 2.1 EndoAnchors were implanted per patient. Through the 30-day follow-up, type IA endoleaks were reported in four patients, of which three resolved spontaneously by the 12-month follow-up. There was an additional type IA endoleak through the 12-month follow-up that has not resulted in AAA enlargement or required a secondary procedure. The Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from secondary endovascular procedures and all-cause mortality is 95.4% and 92.7% through 365 days, respectively. No patient in the short-neck cohort experienced main body stent migration, increase in maximum aneurysm diameter, or aneurysm rupture or required conversion to open surgical repair through 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of the short-neck cohort from ANCHOR, the Endurant II/IIs endograft in conjunction with Heli-FX EndoAnchor implants (ESAR) appears to be a safe and effective treatment option with a high technical success rate and low incidence of type IA endoleaks and secondary interventions. Despite the complex and hostile anatomies, the ESAR method required short procedure and fluoroscopy times. These short-term outcomes suggest that ESAR could be complementary to therapies currently available for treatment of hostile AAA anatomy and a viable off-the-shelf endovascular treatment option for patients with short-neck AAAs, although long-term follow-up is critically important.

Cocaine use is associated with worse outcomes in patients treated with thoracic endovascular repair for type B aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare the clinical and anatomical characteristics and outcomes of patients with and without known cocaine use who underwent thoracic endovascular repair for type B aortic dissections. METHODS: Between January 2012 and January 2017, 186 patients underwent thoracic endovascular repair for type B aortic dissection at our institution. Clinical data and anatomical characteristics were collected under an institutional review board-approved protocol. Survival, reintervention, complications, and characteristics of dissection were compared between patients with cocaine use (C+; n = 14) and those with no known cocaine use (C-; n = 172). RESULTS: Cocaine users were more likely to be young African American males who smoked. They tended to present with more extensive dissections as evidenced by larger false lumen diameters. They also had higher rates of endoleaks and more reinterventions. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that special care should be taken to provide close follow-up for these patients.

Multicenter experience with endovascular treatment of aortic coarctation in adults.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes of endovascular treatment of aortic coarctation in adults. METHODS: Clinical data and imaging studies of 93 consecutive patients treated at nine institutions from 1999 to 2015 were reviewed. We included newly diagnosed aortic coarctation (NCO), recurrent coarctation, and aneurysmal/pseudoaneurysmal degeneration (ANE) after prior open surgical repair (OSR) of coarctation. Primary end points were morbidity and mortality. Secondary end points were stent patency and freedom from reintervention. RESULTS: There were 54 (58%) male and 39 (42%) female patients with a mean age of 44 ± 17 years. Thirty-two patients had NCO (mean age, 48 ± 16 years) and 61 had endovascular reinterventions after prior OSR during childhood (mean, 30 ± 17 years after initial repair), including 50 patients (54%) with recurrent coarctation and 11 (12%) with ANE. Clinical presentation included asymptomatic in 31 patients (33%), difficult to control hypertension in 42 (45%), and lower extremity claudication in 20 (22%). Endovascular treatment was performed using balloon-expandable covered stents in 47 (51%) patients, stent grafts in 36 (39%) patients, balloon-expandable uncovered stents in 9 (10%) patients, and primary angioplasty in 1 (1%) patient. Mean lesion length and diameter were 64.5 ± 50.6 mm and 19.5 ± 6.7 mm, respectively. Mean systolic pressure gradient decreased from 24.0 ± 17.5 mm Hg to 4.4 ± 7.4 mm Hg after treatment (P < .001). Complications occurred in nine (10%) patients, including aortic dissections in three (3%) patients and intraoperative ruptures in two patients; type IA endoleak, renal embolus, spinal headache, and access site hemorrhage occurred in one patient each. The aortic dissections and ruptures were treated successfully by deploying an additional covered stent proximal to the site of dissection or rupture. Two patients died within 30 days of the index procedure. After a mean follow-up of 3.2 ± 3.1 years, nearly all patients (98%) were clinically improved and all stents were patent. Reintervention was needed in 10 (11%) patients. Freedom from reintervention at 5 years was 85%. Two additional patients died during follow-up of coarctation-related causes, including rupture of an infected graft and visceral ischemia. Patient survival at 5 years was 89%. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair is effective with an acceptable safety profile in the treatment of NCO and postsurgical complications of coarctation after initial OSR. Aortic rupture is an infrequent (2%) but devastating complication with high mortality. Balloon-expandable covered stents are preferred for NCO, whereas stent grafts are used for ANE. The rate of reinterventions is acceptable, with high procedural and long-term clinical success.

Retrograde type A dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical, anatomic, and procedural characteristics of patients who developed retrograde type A dissection (RTAD) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection (TBAD). METHODS: Between January 2012 and January 2017, there were 186 patients who underwent TEVAR for TBAD at a multidisciplinary aortic center. Patients who developed RTAD after TEVAR (n = 15) were compared with those who did not (no-RTAD group, n = 171). Primary outcomes were survival and need for reintervention. RESULTS: The incidence of RTAD in our sample was 8% (n = 15). Kaplan-Meier estimates found that no-RTAD patients had better survival (P = .04). Survival rates at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years were 93%, 60%, and 60% for RTAD patients and 94%, 87%, and 80% for no-RTAD patients. One RTAD was diagnosed intraoperatively, 5 were diagnosed within 30 days of the index procedure, 6 were diagnosed within 1 year, and 3 were diagnosed after 1 year. Reintervention for RTAD was undertaken in 10 of 15 patients, with a 50% survival rate after reintervention. Partial or complete false lumen thrombosis was more frequently present in RTAD patients (P = .03). RTAD patients more frequently presented with renal ischemia (P = .04). Most RTAD patients (93%, RTAD patients; 64%, no-RTAD patients; P = .02) had a proximal landing zone in zone 0, 1, or 2. Aortic diameter was more frequently ≥40 mm in the RTAD group (47%, RTAD patients; 21%, no-RTAD patients; P = .05). Patients with RTAD had stent grafts placed in the renovisceral arteries for complicated dissections, and this approached significance (P = .05). Three RTAD patients had a type II arch (20%) compared with 53 no-RTAD patients (31%; P = .6), but a comparison of type II arch with type I or type III found no statistical significance (P = .6). No correlations were found between ratio of descending to ascending diameters, average aortic sizing, graft size, or bare-metal struts at proximal attachment zone and development of RTAD. We found no statistically significant differences in demographics, genetic disease, comorbidities, or previous repairs. CONCLUSIONS: The development of RTAD after TEVAR for TBAD does not appear to be correlated with any easily identifiable demographic feature but appears to be correlated with proximal landing zones in zone 1 and 2 and an ascending diameter >4 cm. Furthermore, the presence of partial or complete false lumen thrombosis as well as more complicated presentation with renal ischemia was significantly more frequent in patients with RTAD. TBAD patients should be observed long term, as type A dissections in our patients occurred even after 1 year.

Right Atrial Anomalous Muscle Bundle Presenting with Acute Superior Vena Cava Syndrome and Pulmonary Embolism: Surgical Management.

BACKGROUND: An anomalous muscle bundle (AMB) crossing the right atrial cavity represents a pathologic finding with unproved clinical significance. This congenital anomaly may be difficult to recognize via echocardiography and could be confused with other intracavitary lesions. METHODS: We report the case of a 53-year-old woman presented to the cardiovascular service with acute superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome and submassive pulmonary embolism. RESULTS: The patient underwent venography, confirming SVC stenosis. A ventilation/perfusion lung scan showed 2 sizable perfusion defects because of pulmonary embolism. Magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography imaging demonstrated a right atrium (RA) mass. Surgery was then carried out using standard cardiopulmonary bypass; the right atrial muscle bundle was excised, and SVC reconstruction was performed. The patient was discharged uneventfully and remains symptom-free at 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In cases of nonmalignant pathology of SVC syndrome, appropriate studies should be conducted to exclude potential congenital abnormalities such as this AMB in the RA. Open-heart surgery is a viable treatment option in select cases.

Short-term and midterm survival of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in the contemporary endovascular era.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been shown to reduce mortality in the emergent repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). However, long-term survival data for this group of patients are lacking with contemporary endovascular endografts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate both 30-day mortality rates and 1-year survival in patients undergoing emergent EVAR in a 43-facility hospital system with a quaternary referral center with an established ruptured aneurysm protocol. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients captured prospectively in an Institutional Review Board-approved registry for patients treated emergently for AAA were reviewed between 2012 and 2017 was conducted. Primary outcome measures were 30-day mortality and 1-year survival for the entire group as well as for symptomatic and ruptured aneurysms. Data were analyzed using logistic regression survival curves, and a log-rank test was performed to compare survival between open and endovascular repair. Patients were evaluated on an intent-to-treat basis, and outcomes were evaluated in a multivariate model. RESULTS: A total of 249 patients were referred as part of the protocol. Of these, 102 (41%) were treated emergently. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 30-day and 1-year survival were 64% and 53% for all patients, 58% and 46% for ruptured patients, and 86% and 81% for symptomatic patients. EVAR resulted in improved 30-day survival (64% vs 31%; odds ratio, 4.0; P = .03) and 1-year survival (40% vs 23%; odds ratio, 2.3; P = .4) over open repair. Significant predictors for 30-day mortality included hypotension (P = .0003), blood transfusion (P < .0001), length of stay (P = .0005), extravasation (P = .01), preoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation (P = .04), open repair (P = .007), aortouni-iliac reconstruction (P = .008), and abdominal compartment syndrome (P = .007). Significant predictors for 1-year mortality included advanced age (P = .04), hypotension (P = .01), blood transfusion (P = .006), extravasation (P = .03), reintubation (P = .03), and abdominal compartment syndrome (P = .03). There were no differences in outcomes based on race, gender, or outside transfer. Peripheral arterial disease (P = .04), hypertension (P = .04), coronary artery disease (P = .03), and familial history of aneurysms (P = .05) were related to increased 30-day mortality. Peripheral arterial disease (P = .06) and coronary artery disease (P = .07) were nearly significant, with increased 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: EVAR is associated with improved survival compared with open repair in patients requiring emergent AAA repair. However, in the first year, there is a significant risk of death based on initial presentation as well as underlying comorbidities. To improve long-term survival, aggressive medical management and medical surveillance are warranted.

Ethnic disparities in outcomes of patients with complicated type B aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the difference in outcomes after endovascular intervention in patients with complicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD) based on ethnicity and blood pressure control. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2016, there were 126 patients who underwent endovascular procedures for complicated TBAD at a single-institution quaternary referral center. Patients self-identified as African American (n = 53), white (n = 70), and Asian (n = 3). African American and white patients were compared on a number of variables, including age, ethnicity, insurance type, blood pressure, comorbidities, number of previous interventions, and number of antihypertension medications they were taking before intervention. Primary outcomes were survival and need for reintervention. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier estimates for survival for African Americans vs whites were 94% vs 89%, 91% vs 83%, 89% vs 79%, and 89% vs 76% at 30 days, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years, respectively (P = .05). African Americans were younger overall (52.5 ± 11 years) vs whites (63.7 ± 14.7 years; P < .0001). African Americans required a significantly greater number of reinterventions (P = .007). They also had higher rates of chronic kidney disease (P = .01), smoking (P = .03), and cocaine use (P = .02) and were more likely to be on Medicaid (P = .02). Hypertension was poorly controlled in both groups, with the percentage of patients with uncontrolled hypertension (systolic >140 mm Hg) preoperatively, postoperatively, and 30 days after intervention at 32%, 32%, and 39%. There was no significant difference between the cohorts in uncontrolled hypertension preoperatively (P = .39) or postoperatively (P = .63). However, more African Americans had uncontrolled hypertension at 30 days (African Americans, 49%; whites, 31%; odds ratio, 2.1; P = .09). African Americans were taking a greater number of antihypertension medications at presentation than whites (P = .01) and specifically had higher use rates of beta blockers (P = .02), diuretics (P = .02), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: African Americans with TBAD present at a younger age than their white counterparts do and have a survival advantage up to at least 5 years. However, African Americans have a higher rate of reintervention that is probably associated with poor blood pressure control despite taking more antihypertension medications both before and after the repair. It appears that optimal medical therapy is difficult to achieve in all groups. More aggressive medical management is needed, particularly more so in African Americans, which may in turn decrease the number of interventions and potentially improve long-term survival.