¿Puede el diseño del catéter ureteral reducir la sintomatología de los pacientes? Estudio controlado, aleatorizado y simple ciego, que compara el catéter ureteral de superficie lisa con el catéter ureteral de diseño acanalad / Can ureteral stents with a different format reduce patients’ symptomatology? A single-blinded, randomized, controlled study comparing smooth-walled and grooved ureteral stents

Introducción: Los verdaderos beneficios de la colocación perioperatoria de un catéter doble J (CDJ) están siendo ampliamente estudiados debido a sus conocidos efectos secundarios. Sin embargo, todavía no se ha llegado a un consenso en la literatura sobre el diseño óptimo del catéter. Por este motivo, este estudio prospectivo, aleatorizado y simple ciego, tuvo como objetivo comparar la sintomatología asociada a 2 diseños de catéter: el de superficie lisa y el de diseño acanalado.Materiales y métodosEl estudio recogió prospectivamente los datos de 42 pacientes que se sometieron a la colocación de un CDJ entre julio de 2019 y agosto de 2020. Los pacientes se dividieron aleatoriamente en 2 grupos según el diseño del catéter utilizado: en el primer grupo se utilizó el catéter de superficie lisa (control) y en el segundo, el catéter de diseño acanalado (intervención). Después de la cirugía, todos los pacientes completaron el Cuestionario de Síntomas del Catéter Ureteral validado en portugués en 3 momentos del postoperatorio (días 7 y 30 después del procedimiento quirúrgico, y día 30 después de la retirada del catéter).Resultados: No se encontraron diferencias significativas en cuanto al sexo, la edad, la mediana de índice de masa corporal, la lateralidad, el tipo de procedimiento quirúrgico (ureteroscopia flexible, semirrígida o mixta). Los CDJ de superficie lisa se asociaron a una mayor incidencia de dolor en el flanco (52,38 vs. 10%; p=0,006) y de dolor suprapúbico (57,14 vs. 30%; p=0,04) el día 7 después del procedimiento. La regresión lineal mixta mostró, de forma significativa, menos dolor en el flanco (p<0,001) y suprapúbico (p<0,01), y un rendimiento sexual significativamente mejor en el grupo de intervención (p=0,03).ConclusionesLos CDJ con diseño acanalado se asocian a una menor incidencia de dolor en el flanco y suprapúbico, y tienen un impacto menor en el rendimiento sexual de los pacientes. (AU)

Introduction: The true benefits of perioperative JJ stent placement are being widely studied due to its known side effects. However, no consensus has been reached in the literature regarding the best type of stent. This prospective, randomized, single-blinded study therefore aimed to compare the symptomatology associated with two JJ stent designs: smooth-walled and grooved.Materials and methodsThe study prospectively recruited 42 patients who underwent JJ stent placement between July 2019 and August 2020. The patients were randomly divided into two groups according to the JJ stent design used: the smooth-walled stent (control) and grooved stent (intervention) groups. After surgery, all patients completed the Portuguese-validated Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire at three timepoints (days 7 and 30 post-surgical procedure, and day 30 post-stent removal).Results: No significant differences in gender, age, median body mass index, laterality, type of surgical procedure (flexible, semi-rigid or mixed ureteroscopy) were found. Smooth-walled JJ stents were associated with a higher incidence of flank pain (52.38% vs. 10%, P=.006) and suprapubic pain (57.14% vs. 30%, P=.04) on the 7th. post-procedure day. Linear mixed regression showed significantly lower flank (P<.001) and suprapubic pain (P<.01), and significantly better sexual performance in the intervention group (P=.03).ConclusionsUreteral stent with a grooved format are associated with a lower incidence of flank and suprapubic pain and had less impact on the sexual performance of patients. (AU)

Can ureteral stents with a different format reduce patients' symptomatology? A single-blinded, randomized, controlled study comparing smooth-walled and grooved ureteral stents.

INTRODUCTION: The true benefits of perioperative JJ stent placement are being widely studied due to its known side effects. However, no consensus has been reached in the literature regarding the best type of stent. This prospective, randomized, single-blinded study therefore aimed to compare the symptomatology associated with two JJ stent designs: smooth-walled and grooved. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study prospectively recruited 42 patients who underwent JJ stent placement between July 2019 and August 2020. The patients were randomly divided into two groups according to the JJ stent design used: the smooth-walled stent (control) and grooved stent (intervention) groups. After surgery, all patients completed the Portuguese-validated Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire at three timepoints (days 7 and 30 post-surgical procedure, and day 30 post-stent removal). RESULTS: No significant differences in gender, age, median body mass index, laterality, type of surgical procedure (flexible, semi-rigid or mixed ureteroscopy) were found. Smooth-walled JJ stents were associated with a higher incidence of flank pain (52.38% vs. 10%, P = .006) and suprapubic pain (57.14% vs. 30%, P = .04) on the 7th post-procedure day. Linear mixed regression showed significantly lower flank (P < .001) and suprapubic pain (P < .01), and significantly better sexual performance in the intervention group (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Ureteral stent with a grooved format are associated with a lower incidence of flank and suprapubic pain and had less impact on the sexual performance of patients.