Clinical and histological features of head and neck melanoma: a population-based study in France.

BACKGROUND: Head and neck melanomas (HNMs) account for an increasing proportion of melanomas and have a poor prognosis. OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical and histological characteristics of HNMs with those of melanomas at other sites (MOS), and to identify pertinent clinicopathological subgroups of HNM. METHODS: A retrospective population-based study of incident in situ and invasive melanomas in the period 2004-2011 was performed. RESULTS: HNMs represented 26·7% of 1548 melanomas, corresponding to a density ratio of 3·7 between HNMs and MOS. HNMs occurred later than MOS (71·2 vs. 58·4 years; P < 0·01), included a higher proportion of in situ cases (49·6% vs. 13·5%; P < 0·01) and were mainly lentigo malignant melanomas (73·0% vs. 2·6%; P < 0·01). Invasive HNMs included a higher proportion of thick (> 2 mm) tumours [33·7% vs. 24·1% (P = 0·01); mean Breslow thickness: 2·18 vs. 1·77 mm (P = 0·03)] and nodular melanomas (20·1% vs. 12%; P < 0·01). HNMs in the peripheral area of the head and neck differed from those of central location by a younger age of onset (65·2 vs. 72·4 years; P < 0·01), male predominance (64·4% vs. 33·8%; P < 0·01), and higher proportions of invasive (67·2% vs. 42%; P < 0·01) and nodular (15·1% vs. 7·5%; P = 0·01) melanomas. CONCLUSIONS: HNMs highly differ from MOS, and are clinically and histologically heterogeneous, possibly as a consequence of different patterns of sun exposure. These data could help to improve primary and secondary prevention messages for patients and doctors.

Comparison of anatomical locations of cutaneous melanoma in men and women: a population-based study in France.

BACKGROUND: Identification of differences in melanoma location between the sexes could lead to sex-specific preventive measures. OBJECTIVES: To compare precise melanoma location and side in men and women. METHODS: The location of 1542 incident melanomas diagnosed during the period 2004-2011 in the French Champagne-Ardenne region (1·3 million inhabitants) was recorded using a regional registry and questionnaires sent to physicians. Men and women were compared for frequency of tumours on the head and neck; trunk; upper limb; lower limb; hand and foot. For each location, more precise sublocations were recorded. The laterality (right vs. left) was studied for head/neck and limb tumours. RESULTS: Melanomas predominated on the lower limb in women (32·2% vs. 9·3% in men; P < 0·01) and on the trunk in men (41·8% vs. 14·9%; P < 0·01), while the proportion of upper limb and head/neck tumours was similar in both sexes. Hand and foot melanomas predominated in women (10·3% vs. 6·3%; P < 0·01), with a sex-related distribution between sublocations. Within the head and neck location, 75·1% of tumours in women were located in the central area vs. 53·7% in the peripheral area in men (P < 0·01). Head and neck melanomas were more frequently right-sided in women and left-sided in men (P = 0·04), with the left/right ratio reaching 1·58 in men vs. 0·61 in women for peripheral tumours (P < 0·01). No difference in laterality was observed for other locations. CONCLUSIONS: Sex differences in occupational and leisure time ultraviolet exposure, clothing (including shoes), hairstyle, and side and photo exposure in cars could explain these results. General preventive messages could be completed by sex-specific advice for melanoma prevention.

Diagnosis and management of melanoma with regional lymph node metastases: a population-based study in France.

BACKGROUND: Stage III melanoma represents a borderline situation regarding the potential curability of this potentially aggressive cancer and consequently, regional lymph node metastases (RLNM) are a major challenge for melanoma management. OBJECTIVE: To describe the management of melanoma with RLNM as practised in France in 2008 and compare results with previous data from 2004, considering that new French recommendations were published in 2005. METHODS: Retrospective population-based study in five regions of France totalling 8.3 million inhabitants, targeting all incident cases of RLNM diagnosed in 2008. Questionnaires were mailed to physicians to identify cases and collect data, with verification by cancer registries for cases diagnosed concomitantly with the primary tumour using sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNB). RESULTS: Data were collected for 101 patients in 2008, and compared to 89 cases treated in 2004. Palpation by a dermatologist was the most common circumstance of diagnosis of RLNM in 2008 (36%), followed by SLNB (29%), self-palpation by the patient (16%) and lymph node ultrasonography (6%), without significant modification from 2004. After lymphadenectomy an adjuvant therapy was proposed in 62% of cases, mainly consisting in high-dose interferon (HD-IFN) (80%). Overall, HD-IFN was proposed in 49% of cases, but effectively started in only 40% of cases after being proposed, and prematurely withdrawn in 28%, showing major changes as compared with 2004 (33%, 77% and 67%, respectively, P < 0.05). Adjuvant chemotherapy was not proposed to any patients in 2008, compared to 29% in 2004. Surveillance procedures included medical imaging less often in 2008 (76%) than in 2004 (92%) (P = 0.004), but more often included FDG-PET (23% vs. 12%, P = 0.09). CONCLUSION: Overall, actual practice was in accordance with French recommendations. The main developments from 2004 to 2008 were the disappearance of adjuvant chemotherapies and a more accurate selection of patients for adjuvant interferon.

The role of general practitioners in diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma: a population-based study in France.

BACKGROUND: Little data are available concerning the role of general practitioners (GPs) in the diagnosis of melanoma. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the actual role of GPs in a population-based study covering five regions of France and 8·2 million inhabitants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey of cancer registries and pathology laboratories, and questionnaires to practitioners were used to identify incident melanomas in 2008, and evaluate characteristics of patients (age, sex, area of residence, social isolation), tumours (Breslow, ulceration, location, histological type), and GPs (training, conditions of practice), and their influence on patterns of diagnosis and Breslow thickness. RESULTS: Among 898 melanomas, 376 (42%) were first diagnosed in a general practice setting (GP group). Breslow thickness was much higher in the GP group than in other melanomas (median: 0·95 vs. 0·61 mm, P < 0·0001). Multivariate analysis identified an older age, lower limb location, nodular subtype and Breslow thickness as factors associated with the GP group. Within this group, 52·5% of melanomas were detected by patients (median Breslow thickness: 1·30 mm) and 47·5% by GPs (median Breslow thickness: 0·80 mm, P = 0·0009), including 8% during a systematic full-body skin examination. Previous GP training on melanoma was associated with active detection by GPs. Male sex and social isolation of patients were associated with thicker melanomas, whereas active detection by GPs was associated with thinner CMs. CONCLUSIONS: GPs play a key role in melanoma diagnosis in France, but still frequently detect thick tumours. Increasing awareness and training of GPs and focusing attention on male and/or socially isolated patients should help to improve early detection of melanoma.