CYSTOID MACULAR EDEMA AFTER FOUR-POINT SCLERAL FIXATION OF INTRAOCULAR LENS.

PURPOSE: To assess the incidence of cystoid macular edema (CME) associated with 4-point Gore-Tex suture intraocular lens (IOL) scleral fixation, before and after institution of routine intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide prophylaxis and long-term topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug usage. METHODS: Consecutive patients were included after IOL implantation with concurrent pars plana vitrectomy for spontaneous IOL dislocation due to pseudoexfoliation syndrome. We compared short-term prophylactic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs only (Group A) to prophylactic intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide and long-term nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (Group B). RESULTS: Twenty-six eyes of 26 patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome and spontaneous IOL dislocation were studied. Mean logMAR visual acuity improved from 1.27 ± 0.80 (20/375 Snellen equivalent) preoperatively to 0.46 ± 0.39 (Snellen 20/43) postoperatively (P < 0.001). Visual outcomes were similar for Groups A and B. In Group A, 10/16 eyes had CME, 4/16 had chronic CME longer than 6 months, and 1 longer than 12 months. In Group B, 1/10 had CME (which was both chronic and refractory). CONCLUSION: In eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome and spontaneous IOL dislocation, 4-point Gore-Tex suture IOL ab externo fixation yielded good visual outcomes, although CME was observed more than reported elsewhere. Prophylactic intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide and long-term nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs seem to reduce the risk of postoperative CME.

Wright hang-back recession with fibrin glue compared with standard fixed suture recession for the treatment of horizontal strabismus.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of the novel Wright hang-back recession with fibrin glue for the treatment of horizontal strabismus. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, case-controlled clinical study comparing surgical outcomes of the Wright hang-back rectus recession with fibrin glue (WHBG) versus standard fixed suture rectus recession (SFR). METHODS: Medical records of all patients who underwent strabismus surgery by one strabismus surgeon between 2016 and 2018 for horizontal deviations only, including cases of WHBG (group 1) or SFR (group 2), were reviewed. Good surgical outcome was defined as a postoperative deviation ≤10 prism diopters (PD) at a minimum 2 months of follow-up. RESULTS: 32 eyes of 17 patients underwent WHBG and 32 eyes of 17 patients underwent SFR; in each group, 35% had esotropia and 65% had exotropia. Mean preoperative deviations between groups were similar: esotropia 25.5 PD and exotropia 26.6 PD in WHBG; esotropia 28.3 PD and exotropia 23.8 PD in SFR. The mean postoperative deviation was <7 PD for both groups. Good surgical outcomes were similar between groups, 16/17 (94%) in WHBG and 15/17 (88%) in SFR, with no complications. CONCLUSIONS: WHBG was safe and effective with postoperative results similar to SFR. WHBG has an important advantage, eliminating the complication of retinal perforation that can occur with SFR while avoiding under- or overcorrection that can occur with traditional hang-back recession. This technique increases patient safety without sacrificing surgical outcomes and is especially useful in patients with thin sclera such as patients with high myopia or with difficult posterior exposure.

[TREATMENT DILEMMAS IN FULMINANT INTRACRANIAL HYPERTENSION].

INTRODUCTION: Fulminant intracranial hypertension is a rare, acute presentation of idiopathic intracranial hypertension with rapid and devastating visual loss that can lead to blindness. As vision deteriorates quickly and often irreversibly, prevention of further visual loss requires emergent treatment to decrease intracranial pressure. The case presented is that of an 18 years old male with new symptoms of headaches and visual obscurations that had rapid progressive visual loss with findings of severe bilateral swollen discs. Brain MRI and MRV ruled out intracranial mass and cerebral venous thrombosis. A lumbar puncture confirmed highly increased ICP. Due to the fulminant clinical presentation, he underwent an urgent fenestration of both optic nerves with improvement of vision in both eyes. The patient's clinical scenario accentuates the importance of prompt recognition of this rare disorder and the need for immediate surgical intervention to prevent further visual loss and blindness.

The prognostic value of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in non-cardiac patients with sepsis, ultra-long follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: Sepsis is a multifactorial syndrome with increasing incidence of morbidity and mortality. Identification of outcome predictors is therefore essential. Recently, elevated brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels have been observed in patients with septic shock. Little information is available concerning BNP levels in patients with critical illness, especially with sepsis. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the role of BNP as a biomarker for long-term mortality in patients with sepsis. METHODS: We studied 259 patients with sepsis and absence of heart failure. BNP levels were obtained for all patients. A long-term survival follow-up was done, and survival was evaluated 90days after admission, and during the subsequent 60months of follow-up. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients died during the 90-day follow-up (31.7%), 53 died in the index hospitalization (20.5%). On multivariate analysis models, elevated values of BNP were a strong predictor of in-hospital mortality, 90-day and 60-month mortality in patients with sepsis. BNP was a better prognostic predictor than the Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score for 90-day mortality, and a better predictor for 60-month mortality in low risk groups. CONCLUSION: In the population of hospitalized patients with sepsis, BNP is a strong independent predictor of short- and long-term mortality.