RESUMEN
Aim: To compare endoscopic versus microscopic method for tympanoplasty in terms of Graft uptake and hearing outcome. Material and methods: A randomized prospective observational study was done. 60 patients who came to ENT outpatient of tertiary care teaching hospital requiring operative intervention for inactive mucosal chronic otitis media. Randomization was done and patients divided into two groups with Group A undergoing endoscopic tympanoplasty and Group B undergoing microscopic tympanoplasty. Post operative graft uptake and hearing improvement were compared between both groups. Intraoperatively visualization of middle ear structures, surgeon's comfort, duration of surgery, post operative pain, giddiness was compared. in both the groups. Results: Total 60 patients got randomly divided in the two groups. There was no difference in terms post op graft success rate and post operative hearing improvement in both the groups Intra operative visualization of middle ear structures better in the endoscopic group and also the surgical time was significantly less in endoscopic group. Conclusion: On comparing endoscopic versus microscopic tympanoplasty in patients of mucosal chronic otitis media, success rate in terms of graft acceptance and hearing improvement was equal between both groups. However, visualisation of middle ear structures was better in endoscopic method. Operating time was shorter in endoscopic tympanoplasty. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-024-04585-z.
RESUMEN
Tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19 requires significant decision making and procedural planning. Use of tracheostomy can facilitate weaning from ventilation and potentially increase the availability of much needed intensive care unit (ICU) beds, however this being a high aerosol generating procedure it does put the health care worker to risk of transmission. Here we present our experience and protocols for performing tracheostomy in COVID-19 positive patients. Eleven tracheostomies were performed in COIVD-19 patients over a period of 2 months (May-June 2020) at this tertiary care hospital dedicated to manage COVID patients. All patients underwent open surgical tracheostomy, the specific indication, preoperative protocols, surgical steps and precautions taken have been discussed. Tracheostomy was done not before 10 days after initiation of mechanical ventilation. Patient's cardiovascular vitals should show recovery with some spontaneous effort. There should be reduction in need for FiO2 and ventilator requirements. Of total 11 tracheostomies performed only one patient had post procedure bleeding which was controlled conservatively. We have summarized our experience in performing tracheostomies in 11 such patients. Our guidelines and recommendations on tracheostomy during the COVID-19 pandemic are presented in this study. We suggest tracheostomies to be done after 10 days of intubation with precautions and given indications with the idea of early weaning off of patient from ventilator and more availability of ICU beds which is already overwhelmed by patient load.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To find a better screening test by correlating between history and video-laryngoscopy in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease. To compare the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and the Reflux Finding Score (RFS). METHOD: Patients with the signs and symptoms of LPRD were scored based on RSI. Those with RSI above 13 were included in study and evaluated further by videolaryngoscopy examination and rated according to RFS. The correlation between RSI and RFS was analysed. RESULT: Out of the 107 patients included in study 55% were females. Among these patients positive RFS score (i.e. > 7) was seen in 58.3%. The average RSI was 18.22, and average RFS was 7.45. According to RSI the most common symptom was heartburn/indigestion (44.5%) and from RFS the most common finding was posterior commissure hypertrophy (95%). Correlation between RSI and total RFS was found to be 0.184 with a p value of 0.159 which was not significant. CONCLUSION: LPRD is more common in females and in the middle age group. A correlation of RSI and RFS was not found to be significant suggesting that both should be used for diagnosis of LPRD instead of relying on only one. RFS and RSI are easy, quick and out patient based screening tools and when used together can be more reliable for LPRD diagnosis.