Risk assessment in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic pre-excitation.

AIMS: Controversy remains as to whether the exercise stress test (EST) is sufficient for risk evaluation in patients with pre-excitation. This study aims to clarify the usefulness of EST in risk stratification in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients presenting with pre-excitation. METHODS AND RESULTS: This prospective study includes consecutive asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with pre-excitation referred for risk assessment. All participants performed an incremental EST (bicycle) prior to an electrophysiology study (EPS). Primary data from the EST included loss of pre-excitation during exercise, and primary data from the EPS included the measurement of accessory pathway effective refractory period (APERP), shortest pre-excited RR interval (SPERRI), and inducible arrhythmia with the use of a beta-adrenergic receptor agonist if deemed necessary. One hundred and sixty-four patients (59 asymptomatic, 105 symptomatic) completed an EST and EPS. Forty-five patients (27%) demonstrated low-risk findings on EST, of which 19 were asymptomatic and 26 were symptomatic. Six patients with low-risk EST findings had SPERRI/APERP ≤ 250 ms at EPS, and two of them were asymptomatic. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of low-risk EST for excluding patients with SPERRI/APERP ≤ 250 ms were 40, 91, 87, 51, and 60%, respectively. The number of patients with inducible arrhythmia at EPS was similar in the asymptomatic (36, 69%) and symptomatic (73, 61%) groups. CONCLUSION: Sudden loss of pre-excitation during EST has a low NPV in excluding high-risk APs. The EPS with the use of isoproterenol should be considered to accurately assess the risk of patients with pre-excitation regardless of symptoms (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03301935).

Association between catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and mortality or stroke.

OBJECTIVE: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation effectively reduces symptomatic burden. However, its long-term effect on mortality and stroke is unclear. We investigated if patients with atrial fibrillation who undergo catheter ablation have lower risk for all-cause mortality or stroke than patients who are managed medically. METHODS: We retrospectively included 5628 consecutive patients who underwent first-time catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation between 2008 and 2018 at three major Swedish electrophysiology units. Control individuals with an atrial fibrillation diagnosis but without previous stroke were selected from the Swedish National Patient Register, resulting in a control group of 48 676 patients. Propensity score matching was performed to produce two cohorts of equal size (n=3955) with similar baseline characteristics. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or stroke. RESULTS: Patients who underwent catheter ablation were healthier (mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 1.4±1.4 vs 1.6±1.5, p<0.001), had a higher median income (288 vs 212 1000 Swedish krona [KSEK]/year, p<0.001) and had more frequently received university education (45.1% vs 28.9%, p<0.001). Mean follow-up was 4.5±2.8 years. After propensity score matching, catheter ablation was associated with lower risk for the combined primary endpoint (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.69). The result was mainly driven by a decrease in all-cause mortality (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.63), with stroke reduction showing a trend in favour of catheter ablation (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.07). CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation was associated with a reduction in the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality or stroke. This result was driven by a marked reduction in all-cause mortality.

Acute myocardial infarction in a patient with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries and complex coronary anatomy-a case report.

Background: Congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA) is a rare congenital heart anomaly with atrioventricular and ventriculoarterial discordance that is often associated with other cardiac and coronary artery anomalies. Here, we report a case of a patient with ccTGA and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) with challenging coronary anatomy that was treated with stress-perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (spCMR) guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Case summary: A 46-year-old male smoker with ccTGA, dyslipidaemia, diabetes Type 2 managed with dietary restrictions and a family history of premature myocardial infarction, presented with typical chest pain, elevated cardiac troponin levels and ECG-changes indicative of ischaemia. The patient was diagnosed with NSTEMI and underwent initial urgent coronary angiography (CA) without apparent significant stenosis, although the right coronary artery (RCA) could not be selectively investigated. The patient had coronary anatomy 1R-2LCX according to the Leiden convention, which is the usual anatomy in patients with ccTGA. Despite this, CA was challenging due to the different anatomy compared with individuals with normally positioned great vessels. The patient remained highly symptomatic with chest pain at moderate exertion. To improve identification of the anatomic location and extent of ischaemia, we performed spCMR with adenosine. This revealed a limited septal infarction (likely embolic) in the right ventricle and reversible ischaemia in two inferior right ventricular segments. A second angiography, selectively investigating RCA demonstrated a significant stenosis in the distal RCA that was successfully treated with a drug-eluting stent. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements of the left coronary arteries demonstrated hemodynamically non-significant stenosis. The patient's symptoms resolved, and he remained asymptomatic at one month follow-up. Discussion: This ccTGA patient had multiple risk factors for coronary artery disease and presented with NSTEMI. Diagnosis and treatment were challenging due to complex cardiac anatomy and associated different origins of the coronary arteries. We highlight the importance of careful evaluation of the coronary anatomy and functional testing using for example spCMR and FFR to target the culprit coronary vessel(s) in ccTGA complicated by NSTEMI.