New insights in acute heart failure.

Acute heart failure (AHF) is a clinical complex disease and a worldwide issue due to its inconsistent diagnosis and poor prognosis. The cornerstone of pathophysiology of AHF is systemic venous congestion, which is led by the underlying structural and functional cardiac condition. Systemic venous congestion is a major target for AHF management because it causes symptoms and organs dysfunction, and is associated with poor prognosis. The mainstay of decongestive therapy is diuresis with intravenous loop diuretics combined with other diuretics including thiazides when necessary, and non-invasive ventilation. The presence of unresolved congestion at discharge can lead heart failure related rehospitalization, and careful follow-up is required especially during "vulnerable phase", several months after discharge. The updated recommendation for management of AHF has been provided by latest guidelines from European Society of Cardiology and American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Failure Society of America. Several large studies have currently demonstrated the benefits of guideline-directed oral medical therapies, and trials are ongoing on medication such as selective sodium-glucose transport proteins 2 inhibitors and protocols for congestive therapy. This review aimed to summarize the latest insights in AHF, based primarily on the most recent guidelines and large randomized controlled trials.

Acute heart failure: current pharmacological treatment and perspectives.

Acute heart failure (AHF) represents the most frequent cause of unplanned hospital admission in patients older than 65 years. Symptoms and clinical signs of AHF (e.g. dyspnoea, orthopnoea, oedema, jugular vein distension, and variation of body weight) are mostly related to systemic venous congestion secondary to various mechanisms including extracellular fluids, increased ventricular filling pressures, and/or auto-transfusion of blood from the splanchnic into the pulmonary circulation. Thus, the initial management of AHF patients should be mostly based on decongestive therapies on admission followed, before discharge, by rapid implementation of guideline-directed oral medical therapies for heart failure. The therapeutic management of AHF requires the identification and rapid diagnosis of the disease, the diagnosis of the cause (or triggering factor), the evaluation of severity, the presence of comorbidities, and, finally, the initiation of a rapid treatment. The most recent guidelines from ESC and ACC/AHA/HFSA have provided updated recommendations on AHF management. Recommended pharmacological treatment for AHF includes diuretic therapy aiming to relieve congestion and achieve optimal fluid status, early and rapid initiation of oral therapies before discharge combined with a close follow-up. Non-pharmacological AHF management requires risk stratification in the emergency department and non-invasive ventilation in case of respiratory failure. Vasodilators should be considered as initial therapy in AHF precipitated by hypertension. On the background of recent large randomized clinical trials and international guidelines, this state-of-the-art review describes current pharmacological treatments and potential directions for future research in AHF.

Subclinical and clinical acute kidney injury share similar urinary peptide signatures and prognosis.

PURPOSE: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent and severe condition in intensive care units (ICUs). In 2020, the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) group proposed a new stage of AKI, referred to as stage 1S, which represents subclinical disease (sAKI) defined as a positive biomarker but no increase in serum creatinine (sCr). This study aimed to determine and compare the urinary peptide signature of sAKI as defined by biomarkers. METHODS: This is an ancillary analysis of the prospective, observational, multinational FROG-ICU cohort study. AKI was defined according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome definition (AKIKDIGO). sAKI was defined based on the levels of the following biomarkers, which exceeded the median value: neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (pNGAL, uNGAL), cystatin C (pCysC, uCysC), proenkephalin A 119-159 (pPENKID) and liver fatty acid binding protein (uLFABP). Urinary peptidomics analysis was performed using capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry. Samples were collected at the time of study inclusion. RESULTS: One thousand eight hundred eighty-five patients had all biomarkers measured at inclusion, which included 1154 patients without AKI (non-AKIKDIGO subgroup). The non-AKIKDIGO subgroup consisted of individuals at a median age of 60 years [48, 71], among whom 321 (27.8%) died. The urinary peptide signatures of sAKI, regardless of the biomarkers used for its definition, were similar to the urinary peptide signatures of AKIKDIGO (inflammation, haemolysis, and endothelial dysfunction). These signatures were also associated with 1-year mortality. CONCLUSION: Biomarker-defined sAKI is a common and severe condition observed in patients within intensive care units with a urinary peptide signature that is similar to that of AKI, along with a comparable prognosis.

Safety, tolerability and efficacy of up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies for acute heart failure in elderly patients: A sub-analysis of the STRONG-HF randomized clinical trial.

AIMS: STRONG-HF examined a high-intensity care (HIC) strategy of rapid up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and close follow-up after acute heart failure (AHF) admission. We assess the role of age on efficacy and safety of HIC. METHODS AND RESULTS: Hospitalized AHF patients, not treated with optimal GDMT were randomized to HIC or usual care. The primary endpoint of 180-day death or HF readmission occurred equally in older (>65 years, n = 493, 74 ± 5 years) and younger patients (53 ± 11 years, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-1.43, p = 0.89). Older patients received slightly lower GDMT to day 21, but same doses at day 90 and 180. The effect of HIC on the primary endpoint was numerically higher in younger (aHR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.82) than older patients (aHR 0.73, 95% CI 0.46-1.15, adjusted interaction p = 0.30), partially related to COVID-19 deaths. After exclusion of COVID-19 deaths, the effect of HIC was similar in younger (aHR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.82) and older patients (aHR 0.63, 95% CI 0.32-1.02, adjusted interaction p = 0.56), with no treatment-by-age interaction (interaction p = 0.57). HIC induced larger improvements in quality of life to day 90 in younger (EQ-VAS adjusted-mean difference 5.51, 95% CI 3.20-7.82) than in older patients (1.77, 95% CI -0.75 to 4.29, interaction p = 0.032). HIC was associated with similar rates of adverse events in older and younger patients. CONCLUSION: High-intensity care after AHF was safe and resulted in a significant reduction of all-cause death or HF readmission at 180 days across the study age spectrum. Older patients have smaller benefits in terms of quality of life.

Management of Acute Right Ventricular Failure.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Acute right ventricular failure (RVF) is a frequent condition associated with high morbidity and mortality. This review aims to provide a current overview of the pathophysiology, presentation, and comprehensive management of acute RVF. RECENT FINDINGS: Acute RVF is a common disease with a pathophysiology that is not completely understood. There is renewed interest in the right ventricle (RV). Some advances have been principally made in chronic right ventricular failure (e.g., pulmonary hypertension). Due to a lack of precise definition and diagnostic tools, acute RVF is poorly studied. Few advances have been made in this field. Acute RVF is a complex, frequent, and life-threatening condition with several etiologies. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the key diagnostic tool in search of the etiology. Management includes transfer to an expert center and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) in most severe cases, etiological treatment, and general measures for RVF.

Diagnostic significance of fat globules in blood in fulminant-type fat embolism syndrome.

Fat globule detection in the blood in fat embolism syndrome (FES) diagnosis remains controversial. This case illustrates two life-threatening, possibly FES-related, episodes with dramatic increases in blood fat globule level. Future studies should aim at evaluating the significance of the quantitative changes in blood fat levels in diagnosing FES.

Elevated Plasma Bioactive Adrenomedullin and Mortality in Cardiogenic Shock: Results from the OptimaCC Trial.

AIMS: Bioactive adrenomedullin (bio-ADM) was recently shown to be a prognostic marker in patients with acute circulatory failure. We investigate the association of bio-ADM with organ injury, functional impairment, and survival in cardiogenic shock (CS). METHODS: OptimaCC was a multicenter and randomized trial in 57 patients with CS. In this post-hoc analysis, the primary endpoint was to assess the association between bio-ADM and 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included adverse events and parameters of organ injury or functional impairment. RESULTS: Bio-ADM values were higher in 30-day non-survivors than 30-day survivors at inclusion (median (interquartile range) 67.0 (54.6-142.9) pg/mL vs. 38.7 (23.8-63.6) pg/mL, p = 0.010), at 24 h (p = 0.012), and up to 48 h (p = 0.027). Using a bio-ADM cutoff of 53.8 pg/mL, patients with increased bio-ADM had a HR of 3.90 (95% confidence interval 1.43-10.68, p = 0.008) for 30-day all-cause mortality, and similar results were observed even after adjustment for severity scores. Patients with the occurrence of refractory CS had higher bio-ADM value at inclusion (90.7 (59.9-147.7) pg/mL vs. 40.7 (23.0-64.7) pg/mL p = 0.005). Bio-ADM values at inclusion were correlated with pulmonary vascular resistance index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (r = 0.49, r = -0.47, and r = 0.64, respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In CS patients, the values of bio-ADM are associated with some parameters of organ injury and functional impairment and are prognostic for the occurrence of refractory CS and 30-day mortality.

Adrecizumab: an investigational agent for the biomarker-guided treatment of sepsis.

Introduction: Sepsis is a major health problem with a high incidence and mortality. ADM, a free-circulating peptide mainly expressed and secreted by vascular endothelial cells, shows vasodilatory properties and causes hypotension when present in higher concentrations during sepsis. Areas covered: Adrecizumab (ADZ) (HAM 8101) is a humanized targeted therapy directed against the N-terminus of adrenomedullin (ADM). ADZ inhibits excessive circulating sepsis-induced ADM and stimulates protective effects on the endothelial barrier, and decreases interstitial vasodilatory effects. ADZ demonstrated a promising safety profile in healthy subjects in phase I studies. According to these results, a phase II proof of concept study enrolling 300 septic patients is currently in course (NCT03085758). Expert opinion: ADZ is the first humanized antibody directed against ADM. The main interest of ADZ is its potential use as a 'biomarker-guided therapy' in septic patients with high circulating ADM. ADZ is increasingly seen as a potential adjunct therapy to restore endothelial function in septic shock. A positive pivotal phase III trial is indeed needed to convince the intensive care community to prescribe ADZ in septic shock patients. Further, it would be of interest to see whether ADZ might also benefit other critical diseases such as cardiogenic shock where endothelial dysfunction has also been described.