Laparoscopy-Assisted Restorative Proctocolectomy with Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Middle Colic Artery Ligation Immediately before Specimen Removal.

Introduction: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the surgical procedure for ulcerative colitis (UC). Intestinal ischemia may occur if the main blood vessels are ligated at an early stage of this surgery. Considering that the blood flow in the large intestine can be maintained by preserving the middle colic artery, we have used a new IPAA method: ligating the middle colic artery immediately before removal of the specimens ("M-method"). Here, we evaluated the M-method's clinical outcomes. Methods: Between April 2009 and December 2021, 13 patients underwent a laparoscopy-assisted IPAA procedure at our institution. The conventional method was used for 6 patients, and the M-method was used for the other 7 patients. We retrospectively analyzed the cases' clinical notes. Results: The M-method's rate of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification grade II or more) was significantly lower than that of the conventional method (14.2% vs. 83.3%). The M-method group's postoperative stay period was also significantly shorter (average 16.4 days vs. 55.5). There were significant differences in the albumin value and the ratio of the modified GPS score 1 or 2 on the 7th postoperative day between the M- and conventional methods (average 3.15 vs. 2.5, average 4/7 vs. 6/6). However, it is necessary to consider the small number of cases and the uncontrolled historical comparison. Conclusion: Late ligation of the middle colic artery may be beneficial for patients' post-surgery recovery and can be recommended for IPAAs in UC patients.

The first case of laparoscopic surgery for cecal cancer occurring in a blind loop.

Cancer occurrence in a blind loop is extremely rare. An 86-year-old Japanese woman underwent colonoscopy for tarry stools and weight loss; it revealed a bypass of the transverse colon and small intestine, cecal cancer, and a polyp. She had suffered from acute appendicitis and had undergone two surgeries at age 25: an appendectomy and then a bypass surgery between the transverse colon and the small intestine. We performed a laparoscopy-assisted ileocecal resection for the cancer and polyp in the blind loop with an end-to-side instrumental anastomosis. The pathological examination demonstrated that the cancer was medullary carcinoma (T2, N0, M0, Stage I) and the polyp was tubular adenoma. Two months have passed since the patient's discharge, and she is free of abdominal complaints. Our literature search identified 10 cases of cancer in a blind loop. Laparoscopy-assisted surgery may be possible in patients who have undergone blind-loop surgery.

Prognostic Value of KRAS Exon-specific Mutations in Patients With Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The clinical significance of many RAS-family mutations in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship of RAS mutations on an exon basis (i.e., mutations in KRAS exons 2, 3, and 4 and in NRAS) with clinicopathological features and prognosis in CRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of the medical records and frozen tissue samples of 268 consecutive patients with stage I-III CRC who underwent curative resection at a single institution between 2014 and 2018. RESULTS: The RAS mutation rate was significantly associated with age and histology. Patients with KRAS exon 2 mutations exhibited shorter recurrence-free survival compared to those with KRAS wild-type, KRAS exon 3 mutations, KRAS exon 4 mutations, and NRAS mutations (73.0% vs. 85.5%, 86.7%, 85.7%; p=0.031). Age and histology were independent risk factors for RAS mutations. RAS mutations were independent prognostic factors with respect to recurrence-free survival in patients with stage I-III CRC. CONCLUSION: In stage I-III CRC patients, KRAS exon 2 mutations had the worst prognosis, whereas KRAS wild type, exon 3 mutations, exon 4 mutations, and NRAS mutations had better prognoses.

Impact of Colon Cancer Location on the Prognostic Significance of Nutritional Indexes and Inflammatory Markers.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The prognosis of colorectal cancer is reported to differ depending on the tumor site, and clinical differences depending on the site of occurrence have gained attention. The aim was to compare nutrition index and inflammatory markers according to the site of colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 272 cases of stage I-III colon cancer (55% males, 45% females). The clinical characteristics, nutrition index and inflammatory markers were compared between patients with right colon cancer (RCC, n=119) and those with left colon cancer (LCC, n=153), and the relapse-free survival was then compared. RESULTS: RCC was associated with older age (p=0.03), female gender (p=0.003), higher T stage (p=0.01), elevated platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (p=0.009), and elevated CONUT score (p=0.028). The prognostic values differed between RCC and LCC (RCC: CONUT score, p=0.04, LCC: PLR, p=0.02). CONCLUSION: RCC was associated with an elevated CONUT score and PLR. In RCC, the CONUT score was an independent recurrence factor, and in LCC, the PLR was an independent recurrence factor.

Ulcerative colitis that developed during radiotherapy for prostate cancer, deteriorated rapidly and required emergency surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although there are reports linking ulcerative colitis (UC) to prostate cancer (PC), those reports are of PC patients who were previously diagnosed with UC. There are no reports of the development of UC during radiotherapy. Here we describe the first case of a patient who developed UC during radiotherapy for PC. The UC progressed rapidly and required emergency surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: A 61-year-old Japanese man underwent a prostate biopsy at another hospital due to a high prostate-specific antigen level and was diagnosed with PC. Goserelin and bicalutamide treatment was initiated in 2019, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (total of 60 Gy/20 Fr) was administered in 2020. Diarrhea began during the radiotherapy and bleeding began post-radiotherapy. He was admitted to another hospital 14 days after the end of the radiotherapy, and colonoscopy revealed a deep ulcer in the colon, which led to the suspicion of UC. He was transferred to our hospital, and colonoscopy showed a widespread map-like ulcer, pseudopolyposis, and very easy bleeding in the colon. We diagnosed severe UC, and it worsened rapidly with uncontrollable bleeding, which we considered an indication for surgery. Emergency surgery (a total colectomy and ileostomy creation) was performed. The specimens confirmed an extensively spreading ulcer throughout the colon. The pathological report was UC in the active phase. The postoperative course was good. CONCLUSIONS: When a patient exhibits diarrhea while undergoing radiotherapy for PC, clinicians should be aware of the possibility of UC in addition to radiation colitis, and colonoscopy should be considered.

Afferent limb syndrome after total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis.

BACKGROUND: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a common postoperative complication of ulcerative colitis (UC). There have been a few recent reports of afferent limb syndrome (ALS) as a rare occurrence in cases of SBO. We present a case of ALS with recurrent SBO that was successfully managed surgically. CASE PRESENTATION: When this male patient was 55 years old, he underwent laparoscopy-assisted anus-preserving total proctocolectomy, the creation of a J-type ileal pouch, ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis (IPAA), and creation of ileostomy for intractable UC. Three months later, ileostomy closure was performed. The first onset of SBO was observed 5 months after ileostomy closure. SBO occurred repeatedly, and the patient was hospitalized nine times in approximately 2 years. Each SBO was improved by non-surgical treatment. A computed tomography (CT) scan revealed that the afferent limb was narrowing and twisted, and gastrografin enema confirmed narrowing at the proximal portion of the pouch inlet. Endoscopy showed a sharp angulation at the pouch inlet. We suspected ALS and decided on a surgical policy and performed pouchopexy and ileopexy to the retroperitoneum by suturing with excision of the remaining blind end of the ileum. Endoscopy 3 days after surgery showed neither twist nor stricture in the fixed ileal pouch or the afferent limb. At the time of writing, the patient remains free of SBO symptoms. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should consider ALS when examining a patient with recurrent intermittent SBO after IPAA surgery. When ALS is suspected, the patient is indicated for surgery such as surgical pexy.

A young woman who developed ascending colon cancer 2 years after the onset of ulcerative colitis.

Guidelines recommend surveillance colonoscopy for patients with an ulcerative colitis (UC) duration of 8-10 years. We experienced a patient who had not undergone UC surveillance. A 35-year-old Japanese woman developed diarrhea and abdominal pain in January 2018 and was diagnosed with UC. She underwent medical therapy, and 18 months after onset of UC colonoscopy indicated that her UC activity was remission and showed no cancer lesions. Twenty-four months after onset, colonoscopy revealed a tumor in the ascending colon, and the biopsy revealed tubular adenocarcinoma. She had no family history of colorectal cancer. There were no findings of distant metastases or primary sclerosing cholangitis. Laparoscopy-assisted anus-preserving total proctocolectomy, the creation of a J-type ileal pouch, ileal pouch anal anastomosis, and the creation of an ileostomy were performed. The pathological report was type 3, 30 × 27-mm, adenocarcinoma (por2 > tub2), pT4a, Ly1a, V1a, budding grade 3, pN0, M0, Stage IIb. Some colitic cancers such as our patient's may not conform to the existing guidelines. When a colonoscopy is being performed for a UC patient, even if its timing is less < 8 years since the UC onset, suspicious lesions should be biopsied considering the possibility of cancer.

Successful surgical management of mesenteric inflammatory veno-occlusive disease.

BACKGROUND: The term "mesenteric inflammatory veno-occlusive disease (MIVOD)" is used to describe an ischemic injury resulting from phlebitis or venulitis that affects the bowel or mesentery in the absence of arteritis. MIVOD is difficult to diagnose because of its rarity and frequent confusion with other diseases. The incidence and etiology of MIVOD remain unclear; only a few cases have been reported. We describe a case of the successful surgical management of a patient with MIVOD with characteristic images. CASE PRESENTATION: A 65-year-old Japanese man visited a hospital with the chief complaint of abdominal pain in January 2018. CT showed edema and thickening of the intestinal wall from the descending colon to the rectum. The patient was admitted to the hospital. Suspected diagnoses were enteritis, ulcerative colitis, amyloidosis, vasculitis, malignant lymphoma, and venous thrombus, but no definitive diagnosis was obtained. The patient was transferred to our hospital for the treatment of stenosis (located from the descending colon to the rectum) and bowel obstruction. An emergency transverse colostomy was performed. The sigmoid colon and mesentery were too rigid and edematous to resect. Colonic hemorrhage occurred 2 weeks after the surgery. With radiology intervention, coiling for the arteriovenous fistula in the descending colon was performed, and hemostasis was obtained. A colonoscopy at 6 months post-surgery showed neither ulceration nor stenosis in the rectum, indicating that the rectum could be preserved in the next surgery. However, severe stenosis in the descending and sigmoid colon remained unchanged. Ten months after the transverse colostomy, we performed a subtotal colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis, and an ileostomy was created. The sigmoid colon and mesentery were not so rigid compared to the first surgery's findings, and we were able to resect intestine and mesentery. Histopathology revealed phlebitis and venulitis, fibrinoid necrosis, and normal arteries, meeting the diagnostic criteria for MIVOD. Postoperatively, the patient showed no recurrence for 8 months. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should consider MIVOD when examining a patient with intestinal ischemia. When MIVOD is suspected, the patient is indicated for surgery based on an accurate diagnosis and good prognosis.