Ultrasensitive molecular tests for Plasmodium detection: applicability in control and elimination programs and reference laboratories.

Objective: To evaluate molecular tools to detect low-level parasitemia and the five species of Plasmodium that infect humans for use in control and elimination programs, and in reference laboratories. Methods: We evaluated 145 blood samples from patients who tested positive by nested polymerase chain reaction (nPCR), from asymptomatic individuals and from the WHO Global Malaria Programme/United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Service. Samples were assayed using the genus-specific RealStar® Malaria PCR Kit 1.0 (alt-Gen; altona Diagnostics) and the RealStar® Malaria Screen & Type PCR Kit (alt-S&T; altona Diagnostics). The results from the molecular tests were compared with those from quantitative PCR (qPCR), nPCR and thick blood smear. Results: The levels of parasitemia ranged from 1 to 518 000 parasites/µL, depending on the species. Compared with nPCR, alt-S&T had a sensitivity of 100%, except for identifying P. falciparum, for which the sensitivity was 93.94%. All samples positive by alt-Gen were also positive by nPCR. When comparing alt-Gen to qPCR, the sensitivity was 100% for P. vivax, P. malariae and P. falciparum. For all Plasmodium species, the correlation between cycle threshold values of alt-S&T and alt-Gen compared with qPCR was significant (P < 0.0001, Spearman's test), with r = 0.8621 for alt-S&T and r = 0.9371 for alt-Gen. When all Plasmodium species were considered, there was a negative correlation between the level of parasitemia and real-time PCR cycle threshold values (P < 0.0001). In this study, only 2 of 28 samples from asymptomatic individuals were positive by thick blood smear; however, all 28 of these samples were positive by alt-S&T. Conclusions: The alt-Gen and alt-S&T assays are suitable for detecting submicroscopic infections for distinct epidemiological purposes, such as for use in surveys and reference laboratories, and screening in blood banks, which will contribute to global efforts to eliminate malaria.

An algorithm based on molecular protocols to improve the detection of Plasmodium in autochthonous malarial areas in the Atlantic Forest biome.

Malaria is the most important vector-borne disease in the world and a challenge for control programs. In Brazil, 99% of cases occur in the Amazon region. In the extra-Amazonian region, a non-endemic area, epidemiological surveillance focuses on imported malaria and on autochthonous outbreaks, including cases with mild symptoms and low parasitemia acquired in the Atlantic Forest biome. In this scenario, cases are likely to be underreported, since submicroscopic parasitemias are not detected by thick blood smear, considered the reference test. Molecular tests are more sensitive, detecting asymptomatic individuals and mixed infections. The aim of this study was to propose a more efficient alternative to detect asymptomatic individuals living in areas of low malaria endemicity, as they are reservoirs of Plasmodium that maintain transmission locally. In total, 955 blood samples from residents of 16 municipalities with autochthonous malaria outbreaks in the Sao Paulo State were analyzed; 371 samples were collected in EDTA tubes and 584 in filter paper. All samples were initially screened by a genus-specific qPCR targeting ssrRNA genes (limit of detection of 1 parasite/µL). Then, positive samples were subjected to a nested PCR targeting ssrRNA and dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase genes (limit of detection of 10 parasites/µL) to determine Plasmodium species. The results showed a statistically significant difference (K = 0.049; p < 0.0001) between microscopy positivity (6.9%) and qPCR (22.9%) for EDTA-blood samples. Conversely, for samples collected in filter paper, no statistical difference was observed, with 2.6% positivity by thick blood smear and 3.1% for qPCR (K = 0.036; p = 0.7). Samples positive by qPCR were assayed by a species-specific nested PCR that was in turn positive in 26% of samples (16 P. vivax and 4 P. malariae ). The results showed that molecular protocols applied to blood samples from residents in areas with autochthonous transmission of malaria were useful to detect asymptomatic patients who act as a source of transmission. The results showed that the genus-specific qPCR was useful for screening positives, with the subsequent identification of species by nested PCR. Additional improvements, such as standardization of blood plotting on filter paper and a more sensitive protocol for species determination, are essential. The qPCR-based algorithm for screening positives followed by nested PCR will contribute to more efficient control of malaria transmission, offering faster and more sensitive tools to detect asymptomatic Plasmodium reservoirs.

Ultrasensitive molecular tests for Plasmodium detection: applicability in control and elimination programs and reference laboratories

[ABSTRACT]. Objective. To evaluate molecular tools to detect low-level parasitemia and the five species of Plasmodium that infect humans for use in control and elimination programs, and in reference laboratories. Methods. We evaluated 145 blood samples from patients who tested positive by nested polymerase chain reaction (nPCR), from asymptomatic individuals and from the WHO Global Malaria Programme/United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Service. Samples were assayed using the genus-specific RealStar® Malaria PCR Kit 1.0 (alt-Gen; altona Diagnostics) and the RealStar® Malaria Screen & Type PCR Kit (alt-S&T; altona Diagnostics). The results from the molecular tests were compared with those from quantitative PCR (qPCR), nPCR and thick blood smear. Results. The levels of parasitemia ranged from 1 to 518 000 parasites/μL, depending on the species. Compared with nPCR, alt-S&T had a sensitivity of 100%, except for identifying P. falciparum, for which the sensitivity was 93.94%. All samples positive by alt-Gen were also positive by nPCR. When comparing alt-Gen to qPCR, the sensitivity was 100% for P. vivax, P. malariae and P. falciparum. For all Plasmodium species, the correlation between cycle threshold values of alt-S&T and alt-Gen compared with qPCR was significant (P < 0.0001, Spearman’s test), with r = 0.8621 for alt-S&T and r = 0.9371 for alt-Gen. When all Plasmodium species were considered, there was a negative correlation between the level of parasitemia and real-time PCR cycle threshold values (P < 0.0001). In this study, only 2 of 28 samples from asymptomatic individuals were positive by thick blood smear; however, all 28 of these samples were positive by alt-S&T. Conclusions. The alt-Gen and alt-S&T assays are suitable for detecting submicroscopic infections for distinct epidemiological purposes, such as for use in surveys and reference laboratories, and screening in blood banks, which will contribute to global efforts to eliminate malaria.

[RESUMEN]. Objetivo. Evaluar herramientas moleculares para detectar bajos niveles de parasitemia y las cinco especies de Plasmodium que infectan a los seres humanos, a fin de emplearlas en los programas de control y eliminación y en los laboratorios de referencia. Métodos. Se evaluaron 145 muestras de sangre de pacientes positivos por reacción en cadena de la polimerasa anidada (nPCR), de individuos asintomáticos y de muestras del Programa Mundial de Malaria de la Organización Mundial de la Salud/Servicio Nacional de Evaluación Externa de Calidad del Reino Unido. Las muestras se analizaron con el kit de PCR RealStar® Malaria 1.0 (alt-Gen; altona Diagnostics), específico para cada género, y con el kit de PCR RealStar® Malaria Screen & Type (alt-S&T; altona Diagnostics). Se compararon los resultados de las pruebas moleculares con los de la PCR cuantitativa (qPCR), la nPCR y el frotis de gota gruesa. Resultados. Los niveles de parasitemia oscilaron entre 1 y 518 000 parásitos/μl, según la especie. En comparación con la nPCR, la prueba alt-S&T tuvo una sensibilidad del 100%, excepto para la identificación de P. falciparum, para el cual la sensibilidad fue del 93,94%. Todas las muestras positivas por alt-Gen lo fueron también por nPCR. Al comparar alt-Gen con la qPCR, la sensibilidad fue del 100% para P. vivax, P. malariae y P. falciparum. Para todas las especies de Plasmodium, la correlación entre los valores del umbral de ciclo de alt-S&T y alt-Gen en comparación con la qPCR fue significativa (P < 0,0001, prueba de Spearman), con r = 0,8621 para alt-S&T y r = 0,9371 para alt-Gen. Cuando se consideraron todas las especies de Plasmodium hubo una correlación negativa entre el nivel de parasitemia y los valores de umbral de ciclo de PCR en tiempo real (P < 0,0001). En este estudio, solo 2 de las 28 muestras de individuos asintomáticos fueron positivas por frotis de gota gruesa; sin embargo, las 28 muestras fueron positivas por alt-S&T. Conclusiones. Los ensayos alt-Gen y alt-S&T son adecuados para detectar infecciones submicroscópicas con distintos fines epidemiológicos, como su uso en investigaciones y laboratorios de referencia y el cribado en bancos de sangre, lo que contribuirá a los esfuerzos mundiales para eliminar la malaria.

[RESUMO]. Objectivo. Avaliar ferramentas moleculares para detectar parasitemia de baixo nível e as cinco espécies de Plasmodium que infectam humanos, para utilização em programas de controlo e eliminação e em laboratórios de referência. Métodos. Avaliámos 145 amostras de sangue de doentes que testaram positivo por reacção em cadeia da polimerase aninhada (nPCR), de indivíduos assintomáticos, e do Programa Global de Paludismo da Organização Mundial de Saúde/Serviço Nacional de Avaliação da Qualidade Externa do Reino Unido. As amostras foram ensaiadas utilizando o RealStar® Malaria PCR Kit 1.0 (alt-Gen; altona Diagnostics) e o RealStar® Malaria Screen & Type PCR Kit (alt-S&T; altona Diagnostics). Os resultados dos testes moleculares foram comparados com os resultados da PCR quantitativa (qPCR), nPCR e exame da gota espessa. Resultados. Os níveis de parasitemia variaram de 1 a 518 000 parasitas/μL, dependendo da espécie. Em comparação com a nPCR, alt-S&T tinha uma sensibilidade de 100%, excepto na identificação de P. falciparum, para a qual a sensibilidade era de 93,94%. Todas as amostras positivas por alt-Gen foram também positivas por nPCR. Ao comparar alt-Gen com qPCR, a sensibilidade foi de 100% para P. vivax, P. malariae e P. falciparum. Para todas as espécies Plasmodium, a correlação entre os valores limiares de ciclo de alt-S&T e alt-Gen comparados com qPCR foi significativa (P < 0,0001, teste de Spearman), com r = 0,8621 para alt- S&T e r = 0,9371 para alt-Gen. Quando todas as espécies de Plasmodium foram consideradas, houve uma correlação negativa entre o nível de parasitemia e os valores limiares do ciclo de PCR em tempo real (P < 0,0001). Neste estudo, apenas 2 de 28 amostras de indivíduos assintomáticos foram positivas por exame da gota espessa; no entanto, todas estas 28 amostras foram positivas por alt-S&T. Conclusões. Os ensaios alt-Gen e alt-S&T são adequados para a detecção de infecções submicroscópicas para fins epidemiológicos distintos, tais como para utilização em inquéritos e laboratórios de referência e o rastreio em bancos de sangue, o que contribuirá para os esforços globais de eliminação da malária.

Ultrasensitive molecular tests for Plasmodium detection: applicability in control and elimination programs and reference laboratories / Pruebas moleculares ultrasensibles para la detección de Plasmodium: aplicabilidad en los programas de control y eliminación y en los laboratorios de referencia / Testes moleculares ultra-sensíveis para detecção de Plasmodium: aplicabilidade em programas de controlo e eliminação e laboratórios de referencia

ABSTRACT Objective. To evaluate molecular tools to detect low-level parasitemia and the five species of Plasmodium that infect humans for use in control and elimination programs, and in reference laboratories. Methods. We evaluated 145 blood samples from patients who tested positive by nested polymerase chain reaction (nPCR), from asymptomatic individuals and from the WHO Global Malaria Programme/United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Service. Samples were assayed using the genus-specific RealStar® Malaria PCR Kit 1.0 (alt-Gen; altona Diagnostics) and the RealStar® Malaria Screen & Type PCR Kit (alt-S&T; altona Diagnostics). The results from the molecular tests were compared with those from quantitative PCR (qPCR), nPCR and thick blood smear. Results. The levels of parasitemia ranged from 1 to 518 000 parasites/µL, depending on the species. Compared with nPCR, alt-S&T had a sensitivity of 100%, except for identifying P. falciparum, for which the sensitivity was 93.94%. All samples positive by alt-Gen were also positive by nPCR. When comparing alt-Gen to qPCR, the sensitivity was 100% for P. vivax, P. malariae and P. falciparum. For all Plasmodium species, the correlation between cycle threshold values of alt-S&T and alt-Gen compared with qPCR was significant (P < 0.0001, Spearman's test), with r = 0.8621 for alt-S&T and r = 0.9371 for alt-Gen. When all Plasmodium species were considered, there was a negative correlation between the level of parasitemia and real-time PCR cycle threshold values (P < 0.0001). In this study, only 2 of 28 samples from asymptomatic individuals were positive by thick blood smear; however, all 28 of these samples were positive by alt-S&T. Conclusions. The alt-Gen and alt-S&T assays are suitable for detecting submicroscopic infections for distinct epidemiological purposes, such as for use in surveys and reference laboratories, and screening in blood banks, which will contribute to global efforts to eliminate malaria.

RESUMEN Objetivo. Evaluar herramientas moleculares para detectar bajos niveles de parasitemia y las cinco especies de Plasmodium que infectan a los seres humanos, a fin de emplearlas en los programas de control y eliminación y en los laboratorios de referencia. Métodos. Se evaluaron 145 muestras de sangre de pacientes positivos por reacción en cadena de la polimerasa anidada (nPCR), de individuos asintomáticos y de muestras del Programa Mundial de Malaria de la Organización Mundial de la Salud/Servicio Nacional de Evaluación Externa de Calidad del Reino Unido. Las muestras se analizaron con el kit de PCR RealStar® Malaria 1.0 (alt-Gen; altona Diagnostics), específico para cada género, y con el kit de PCR RealStar® Malaria Screen & Type (alt-S&T; altona Diagnostics). Se compararon los resultados de las pruebas moleculares con los de la PCR cuantitativa (qPCR), la nPCR y el frotis de gota gruesa. Resultados. Los niveles de parasitemia oscilaron entre 1 y 518 000 parásitos/µl, según la especie. En comparación con la nPCR, la prueba alt-S&T tuvo una sensibilidad del 100%, excepto para la identificación de P. falciparum, para el cual la sensibilidad fue del 93,94%. Todas las muestras positivas por alt-Gen lo fueron también por nPCR. Al comparar alt-Gen con la qPCR, la sensibilidad fue del 100% para P. vivax, P. malariae y P. falciparum. Para todas las especies de Plasmodium, la correlación entre los valores del umbral de ciclo de alt-S&T y alt-Gen en comparación con la qPCR fue significativa (P < 0,0001, prueba de Spearman), con r = 0,8621 para alt-S&T y r = 0,9371 para alt-Gen. Cuando se consideraron todas las especies de Plasmodium hubo una correlación negativa entre el nivel de parasitemia y los valores de umbral de ciclo de PCR en tiempo real (P < 0,0001). En este estudio, solo 2 de las 28 muestras de individuos asintomáticos fueron positivas por frotis de gota gruesa; sin embargo, las 28 muestras fueron positivas por alt-S&T. Conclusiones. Los ensayos alt-Gen y alt-S&T son adecuados para detectar infecciones submicroscópicas con distintos fines epidemiológicos, como su uso en investigaciones y laboratorios de referencia y el cribado en bancos de sangre, lo que contribuirá a los esfuerzos mundiales para eliminar la malaria.

RESUMO Objectivo. Avaliar ferramentas moleculares para detectar parasitemia de baixo nível e as cinco espécies de Plasmodium que infectam humanos, para utilização em programas de controlo e eliminação e em laboratórios de referência. Métodos. Avaliámos 145 amostras de sangue de doentes que testaram positivo por reacção em cadeia da polimerase aninhada (nPCR), de indivíduos assintomáticos, e do Programa Global de Paludismo da Organização Mundial de Saúde/Serviço Nacional de Avaliação da Qualidade Externa do Reino Unido. As amostras foram ensaiadas utilizando o RealStar® Malaria PCR Kit 1.0 (alt-Gen; altona Diagnostics) e o RealStar® Malaria Screen & Type PCR Kit (alt-S&T; altona Diagnostics). Os resultados dos testes moleculares foram comparados com os resultados da PCR quantitativa (qPCR), nPCR e exame da gota espessa. Resultados. Os níveis de parasitemia variaram de 1 a 518 000 parasitas/µL, dependendo da espécie. Em comparação com a nPCR, alt-S&T tinha uma sensibilidade de 100%, excepto na identificação de P. falciparum, para a qual a sensibilidade era de 93,94%. Todas as amostras positivas por alt-Gen foram também positivas por nPCR. Ao comparar alt-Gen com qPCR, a sensibilidade foi de 100% para P. vivax, P. malariae e P. falciparum. Para todas as espécies Plasmodium, a correlação entre os valores limiares de ciclo de alt-S&T e alt-Gen comparados com qPCR foi significativa (P < 0,0001, teste de Spearman), com r = 0,8621 para alt-S&T e r = 0,9371 para alt-Gen. Quando todas as espécies de Plasmodium foram consideradas, houve uma correlação negativa entre o nível de parasitemia e os valores limiares do ciclo de PCR em tempo real (P < 0,0001). Neste estudo, apenas 2 de 28 amostras de indivíduos assintomáticos foram positivas por exame da gota espessa; no entanto, todas estas 28 amostras foram positivas por alt-S&T. Conclusões. Os ensaios alt-Gen e alt-S&T são adequados para a detecção de infecções submicroscópicas para fins epidemiológicos distintos, tais como para utilização em inquéritos e laboratórios de referência e o rastreio em bancos de sangue, o que contribuirá para os esforços globais de eliminação da malária.

An algorithm based on molecular protocols to improve the detection of Plasmodium in autochthonous malarial areas in the Atlantic Forest biome

ABSTRACT Malaria is the most important vector-borne disease in the world and a challenge for control programs. In Brazil, 99% of cases occur in the Amazon region. In the extra-Amazonian region, a non-endemic area, epidemiological surveillance focuses on imported malaria and on autochthonous outbreaks, including cases with mild symptoms and low parasitemia acquired in the Atlantic Forest biome. In this scenario, cases are likely to be underreported, since submicroscopic parasitemias are not detected by thick blood smear, considered the reference test. Molecular tests are more sensitive, detecting asymptomatic individuals and mixed infections. The aim of this study was to propose a more efficient alternative to detect asymptomatic individuals living in areas of low malaria endemicity, as they are reservoirs of Plasmodium that maintain transmission locally. In total, 955 blood samples from residents of 16 municipalities with autochthonous malaria outbreaks in the Sao Paulo State were analyzed; 371 samples were collected in EDTA tubes and 584 in filter paper. All samples were initially screened by a genus-specific qPCR targeting ssrRNA genes (limit of detection of 1 parasite/µL). Then, positive samples were subjected to a nested PCR targeting ssrRNA and dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase genes (limit of detection of 10 parasites/µL) to determine Plasmodium species. The results showed a statistically significant difference (K = 0.049; p < 0.0001) between microscopy positivity (6.9%) and qPCR (22.9%) for EDTA-blood samples. Conversely, for samples collected in filter paper, no statistical difference was observed, with 2.6% positivity by thick blood smear and 3.1% for qPCR (K = 0.036; p = 0.7). Samples positive by qPCR were assayed by a species-specific nested PCR that was in turn positive in 26% of samples (16 P. vivax and 4 P. malariae ). The results showed that molecular protocols applied to blood samples from residents in areas with autochthonous transmission of malaria were useful to detect asymptomatic patients who act as a source of transmission. The results showed that the genus-specific qPCR was useful for screening positives, with the subsequent identification of species by nested PCR. Additional improvements, such as standardization of blood plotting on filter paper and a more sensitive protocol for species determination, are essential. The qPCR-based algorithm for screening positives followed by nested PCR will contribute to more efficient control of malaria transmission, offering faster and more sensitive tools to detect asymptomatic Plasmodium reservoirs.

The hidden Plasmodium malariae in blood donors: a risk coming from areas of low transmission of malaria.

Malaria is an infectious vector-borne disease with other important routes of transmission, such as blood transfusion and organ/tissue transplantation, due to asymptomatic reservoirs of Plasmodium presenting with low parasitemia. Reports of transfusion-transmitted malaria have shown that in immunosuppressed recipients, infections can be fatal if they are not diagnosed and timely treated. All Plasmodium species can survive on blood components at temperatures from 2 to 6 °C for some days or even weeks. This report describes two candidates for blood donation harboring Plasmodium, infected in an area considered non-endemic. Blood samples were collected from donors who attended a blood bank in Sao Paulo and tested by microscopy, qPCR for Plasmodium genus-specific amplification, targeting the parasite 18S ribosomal subunit gene and a multiplex qPCR based on mtDNA of the five species. Under microscopy, only structures resembling Plasmodium were observed. The qPCR whose standard curve tested parasites varying from 2 to 0.1 parasites/ µL, showed the presence of Plasmodium DNA in the two blood donors, as did the multiplex qPCR that revealed the presence of P. malariae. The prevalence of positive donors varies according to the level of transmission, ranging from 0.7 to 55% in endemic areas. In non-endemic regions, prevalences are lower, however, transfusion malaria can evolve to severe cases, due to the lack of suspicion of this transmission route. Asymptomatic donors from low transmission regions pose a risk to blood banks, with particular emphasis on those located in areas with malaria elimination goals.

Value of the oral swab for the molecular diagnosis of dogs in different stages of infection with Leishmania infantum.

This study was based on the need to employ a sensitive and specific method with samples that could be easily collected for diagnosing dogs infected with Leishmania infantum. To this end, we used real time-PCR (qPCR) to assess the value of the oral swab (OS) in detecting infected sick dogs (SD; n=62), including, for the first time, the analysis of apparently healthy infected dogs (AD; n=30), both from endemic areas for visceral leishmaniasis (VL). For comparison, we also evaluated the performance of the conjunctival swab (CS), blood (BL), lymph node (LN) and serology. We detected the presence of Leishmania DNA in the oral cavity in 62 out of the 92 dogs studied. The OS positivity (67.4%) was equivalent to the CS (68.5%) (p>0.05), higher than BL (52.2%) (p≤0.05), and lower than LN (84.8%) (p≤0.05). OS and CS performed well in SD dogs (82.3% and 83.9%, respectively) but not in AD dogs (36.7% for both samples). BL showed the lowest positivity (52.2%) and provided equivalent results between AD (60.0%) and SD (48.4%) dogs (p>0.05). LN yielded the highest positivity (84.8%), and it was also higher in the SD population (93.5%) compared to the AD population (66.7%) (p≤0.05). Parasite load was high in LN, moderate in OS and CS, and low in BL, showing the relationship between the levels of parasitism and the positivity rates found in these samples. Serology was positive in 82.2% of the SD group and in 70% of the AD dogs (p>0.05). Among the 20 seronegative dogs, seven (35%) were positive in either OS or CS, and 12 (60%) were positive when both noninvasive samples were jointly considered. The OS/CS combination resulted in a significant increase of positivity (p≤0.05) for the AD dogs (from 36.7% to 63.4%), as well as OS/serology (80%) and OS/CS/serology (83.4%). For the SD population, positivity reached up to 95.2% with the same combinations, showing that combination of samples and/or tests is required for the identification of dogs infected with L. infantum and that the OS and CS combination based on qPCR notably improves the detection of both AD and SD dogs. In conclusion, OS proved to be a suitable sample for the molecular diagnosis of infected dogs with clinical signs of VL, but not for dogs with inapparent infection. For these, we recommend the combination of OS results with CS and/or serology in order to reach relevant positivity for L. infantum. Finally, another advantage of using OS or both noninvasive samples is the increased likelihood of diagnosing seronegative dogs.