'Wind-up' in Parkinson's disease: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder mainly marked by selective degeneration of dopaminergic neurons that leads to disabling motor and cognitive impairment. This condition is less widely appreciated as a disease associated with a substantial variety of pain syndromes, although the prevalence of pain is relatively high. Repeated painful stimulation of peripheral nerves can cause pain 'wind-up' if the frequency of the stimulation is adequate and specifically stimulates the afferent C-fibres. We presumed that in case of PD, pain or pain severeness might be frequently caused by the aggravation of the 'wind-up' phenomenon due to any central or peripheral lesions or functional alterations. METHODS: To test for this hypothesis, we compared three groups (patients with left- and right-dominant PD and control subjects) using functional magnetic resonance imaging and thermally induced pain. RESULTS: Patient showed higher average 'wind-up' scores, compared to the healthy subjects, with lower values on the more affected sides compared to the less affected ones. In group level comparisons, patients had higher activation during 'wind-up' compared to control subjects in two main areas; these were the posterior division of cingulate gyrus and the precuneus cortex. In case of patients, further analyses showed that applied heat pain on the less affected side elicited higher activation in the supramarginal and postcentral gyri. CONCLUSIONS: These differences may arise from the deficiency in the efferent information, as well as the alterations in the central processing. It is highly likely that both processes contribute to this phenomenon simultaneously.

Sensitivity and specificity of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination, Mattis Dementia Rating Scale, Frontal Assessment Battery and Mini Mental State Examination for diagnosing dementia in Parkinson's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Among the non-motor features of Parkinson's disease (PD), cognitive impairment is one of the most troublesome problems. Highly sensitive and specific screening instruments for detecting dementia in PD (PDD) are required in the clinical practice. METHODS: In our study we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of different neuropsychological tests (Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination, ACE; Frontal Assessment Battery, FAB and Mattis Dementia Rating Scale, MDRS) in 73 Parkinson's disease patients without depression. By receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, these screening instruments were tested against the recently established clinical diagnostic criteria of PDD. RESULTS: Best cut-off score for ACE to identify PDD was 80 points (sensitivity = 74.0%, specificity = 78.1%). For FAB the most optimal cut-off value was 12 points (sensitivity = 66.3%, specificity = 72.2%); whereas for MDRS it was 125 points (sensitivity = 89.8%, specificity = 98.3%). Among the examined test batteries, MDRS had the best clinicometric profile for detecting PDD. CONCLUSION: Although the types of applied screening instruments might differ from movement disorder clinic to clinic within a country, determination of the most specific and sensitive test for the given population remains to be an important task. Our results demonstrated that the specificity and sensitivity of MDRS was better than those of ACE, FAB and MMSE in Hungary. However, further studies with larger sample size and more uniform criteria for participation are required to determine the most suitable screening instrument for cognitive impairment.