RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acral actinic keratosis (AK) lesions are considered difficult to treat, and published data for photodynamic therapy (PDT) on these lesions is limited. Thus, we evaluated sustained efficacy, safety, and satisfaction after PDT for AK on the hands. METHODS: We analysed subgroup data for treatment on the hands from a randomised, double-blind, intra-individual phase III study. All participants previously underwent up to two field-directed red light PDTs with 10 % 5-aminolevulinic acid nanoemulsion gel (BF-200 ALA). Assessments included pain during PDT, clearance and recurrence rates, and satisfaction. RESULTS: 24 participants treated on the hands were included; 21 participants were analysed. Complete clearance rates with BF-200 ALA were 90.9 % (lesion-based) and 76.2 % (per participant's side), both markedly higher than with vehicle. The lesion recurrence rate with BF-200 ALA was 29.0 %. Adverse events reflected the mode of action. Mean pain intensities were 4.8 ± 3.8 (BF-200 ALA) and 0.8 ± 2.1 (vehicle) on an 11-point numeric rating scale. Most participants (81.0 %) rated their satisfaction with BF-200 ALA as very good or good. CONCLUSION: This subgroup analysis indicates that PDT with BF-200 ALA provides a suitable treatment for AK lesions on the hands.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Treatment options for children younger than 6 years with severe atopic dermatitis (AD) are limited, as systemic immunosuppressants may present safety concerns in this young age group. Dupilumab is the first systemic treatment option approved for infants and young children with severe AD in the European Union. This study reports the efficacy and safety of dupilumab with concomitant low-potency corticosteroids in children aged 6 months to 5 years with severe AD. METHODS: This was a pre-specified subgroup analysis of data for patients aged 6 months to 5 years with severe AD at baseline (Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] = 4) from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of dupilumab. Patients were randomised to either subcutaneously administered dupilumab (200/300 mg) or matched placebo every 4 weeks, plus low-potency topical corticosteroids for 16 weeks. Co-primary endpoints at week 16 were the proportion of patients with IGA ≤ 1 (clear or almost clear skin) and the proportion of patients with ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75). Secondary endpoints at week 16 included mean changes in EASI, pruritus, skin pain, sleep loss and quality of life. RESULTS: The analysis included 125 patients (63 receiving dupilumab vs. 62 placebo). At week 16, significantly more patients receiving dupilumab vs. placebo had achieved IGA ≤ 1 (14.3% vs. 1.6%; P = 0.0085) and EASI-75 (46.0% vs. 6.6%; P < 0.0001). Significant improvements with dupilumab were observed in all secondary endpoints, including a least squares mean 48.9% reduction in pruritus. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar between the dupilumab and placebo groups (66.7% vs. 73.8%). No dupilumab-related AEs were serious or led to treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Dupilumab significantly improved AD signs, symptoms and quality of life in children aged 6 months to 5 years with severe AD with acceptable safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov with ID number NCT03346434, part B.
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic skin disease that is relatively common in infants and young children worldwide. Severe AD causes skin rashes and intense itch that strongly interfere with sleep quality and normal daily activities, thereby affecting the quality of life of patients and their families. When therapies for AD that are applied to the skin do not work, limited options are available to treat severe AD in children younger than 6 years. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in children aged 6 months to 5 years with severe AD, recruited from various sites in Europe and North America. Patients received 200 or 300 mg of dupilumab (based on the child's weight) or placebo, together with mild steroids applied to the skin, every 4 weeks for 16 weeks. At the end of treatment, AD severity was greatly improved in patients receiving dupilumab, with 14% of patients achieving almost clear skin. Patients receiving dupilumab also experienced significant improvements in itch intensity, sleep quality, skin pain, and quality of life. Furthermore, dupilumab did not increase the risk of infections. This study demonstrates that dupilumab can be effective at treating severe AD in infants and young children, with important benefits for the quality of life of patients and their families.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Dermatitis Atópica , Fármacos Dermatológicos , Preescolar , Humanos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Eccema , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Inmunoglobulina A , Prurito/prevención & control , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , LactanteAsunto(s)
COVID-19 , Eritema Pernio , Humanos , Eritema Pernio/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Dedos del Pie/patologíaRESUMEN
Context: The treatment of allergic reactions to red tattoo dye is challenging in most cases, as local therapy often does not offer long-term improvement and laser therapy is considered relatively contraindicated by many authors owing to the risk of generalized side effects. Therefore, surgical removal of these tattoos is favored; shave excision is the method of choice, particularly for the removal of the entire dye. Aims: The aim of this article was to retrospectively analyze the best post-operative outcome after surgical removal of allergic tattoo reactions using different excision techniques. Materials and Methods: We compared the different surgical procedures performed on seven patients with single and multiple allergic tattoo reactions treated between 2013 and 2018. Results: The best aesthetic results were achieved by superficial ablation of the inflammatory reaction, partially leaving tattoo remains in the skin. Conclusion: Based on our experience with this small number of patients, a superficial removal of the tattoo without complete removal of the dye is, in most cases, sufficient to achieve healing. The remaining dye residues seem to be better tolerated by the immune system afterwards. Furthermore, the tattoo is often preserved in large parts.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Examination of subungual pigmented lesions is sometimes a diagnostic challenge for clinicians. OBJECTIVES: The study was aimed to investigate characteristic patterns in optical coherence tomography (OCT) of subungual hematomas and determine distinctive features that can differentiate them from subungual melanocytic lesions. METHODS: VivoSight® (Michelson Diagnostics, Maidstone, UK) was used to examine 71 subungual hematomas and 11 subungual melanocytic lesions in 69 patients (18 female and 51 male patients). RESULTS: On OCT, bleeding was related to sharply defined black sickle-shaped (p < 0.001) or globular regions (not significant [ns]) with a hyperreflective margin (0.002), a grey center (0.013), hyperreflective lines in the area (ns) or periphery (p = 0.031), peripheral fading (p = 0.029), and red dots in the area (p = 0.001). In the 1 case of melanoma in situ examined, we found curved vessels with irregular sizes and distribution on the dermis of the nailbed, while subungual hematomas and subungual benign nevi presented as clustered red dots and/or regularly distributed curved vessels. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the use of OCT in addition to dermoscopy provides high-resolution optical imaging information for the diagnosis of subungual hematoma and facilitates the differential diagnosis of subungual hematomas and subungual melanocytic lesions.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Uña , Nevo Pigmentado , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Dermoscopía/métodos , Nevo Pigmentado/diagnóstico , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Enfermedades de la Uña/diagnóstico por imagen , Hematoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Hematoma/patologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Proactive therapy with topical corticosteroids (TCSs) is the standard treatment for chronic inflammatory diseases such as atopic dermatitis; however, skin atrophy as TCS side effect remains a concern. METHODS: This 16-week, evaluator-blinded, within-patient placebo-controlled, randomized study enrolled volunteers with healthy skin conditions. For 12 weeks, their volar forearm and the back of their hand were applied with hydrocortisone acetate 1% cream (HC), methylprednisolone aceponate 0.1% cream (MPA), betamethasone valerate 0.1% cream (BMV), or an active agent-free base cream (Dermatop® Basiscreme) once daily twice weekly, and pimecrolimus 1% cream (PIM) twice daily twice weekly. Epidermal and dermal thickness was measured by optical coherence tomography and high-frequency ultrasound, respectively. Furthermore, skin atrophy and telangiectasia were determined by contact dermatoscopic photography (Dermaphot®). RESULTS: After 8 and 12 weeks, only BMV led to significant epidermal thinning on both sites. Four weeks after the end of treatment, epidermal thickness returned to baseline. No dermal thinning, atrophy, or telangiectasia was observed. CONCLUSIONS: MPA, HC, and PIM may be more suitable for repeated and prolonged treatment, especially in chronic diseases.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Fármacos Dermatológicos , Administración Tópica , Inhibidores de la Calcineurina/uso terapéutico , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Glucocorticoides , Humanos , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
A 5-year-old Syrian boy , presented with a complex cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) of the right ankle caused by Leishmania (L.) tropica. The patient received photodynamic therapy (PDT; 6 cycles with application of 5aminolevulinic acid and foil occlusion for 3â¯h). Due to pain during exposure to red light, exposure was continued with simulated daylight (sDL-PDT). The lesion healed with an atrophic scar. Due to fewer side effects and less pain, sDL-PDT seems to be a good therapeutic strategy for CL caused by L. tropica.
Asunto(s)
Leishmania tropica , Leishmaniasis Cutánea , Fotoquimioterapia , Ácido Aminolevulínico/uso terapéutico , Preescolar , Humanos , Leishmaniasis Cutánea/diagnóstico , Leishmaniasis Cutánea/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , DolorRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Documenting patient data in psoriasis clinical practice can improve care, but standardized and transparent documentation is rare. The current project aimed to develop a data set for the documentation of psoriasis in daily practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In four online Delphi rounds and one in-person meeting, 27 psoriasis experts allocated variables to a standard, an optimal and an optional data set. Most of the questions were standardized. Open questions were included to allow for the provision of reasons and to enlarge the data sets. Furthermore, in the in-person meeting we considered a) patients' attitudes and b) dermatologists' information on the current usage and acceptability in Germany. RESULTS: The consensus approach resulted in a data set with 69 variables. The standard data set includes 20, the optimal data set 31 and the optional data set 18 variables. In summary, the data set can mainly be grouped into master data, general status and medical history data, medical history of psoriasis, status of psoriasis, diagnostics and comorbidity, therapies and patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The consensus recommendation of a standard, an optimal and an optional data set for routine care of psoriasis intends to be a decision-making aid and an orientation for both daily practice and further development of documentation systems.
Asunto(s)
Psoriasis , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Documentación , Alemania , Humanos , Psoriasis/diagnóstico , Psoriasis/epidemiología , Psoriasis/terapiaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: There are clear treatment options for mild psoriasis where topical therapies are the mainstay, and for severe psoriasis where systemic therapy (biologic or non-biologic) is necessary. However, there is less clarity in the 'grey zone' of patients in the moderate or so-called 'beyond-mild' segment. There are frequent delays to the initiation, discontinuation, switching and dose change in treatment, and many patients fail to continue treatment because of concerns about safety or lack of efficacy. Treatment with topical therapies, such as calcipotriol and betamethasone dipropionate (Cal/BD) combinations, may be suitable for these patients. METHOD: These consensus recommendations on the use of topical therapies including Cal/BD foam for beyond-mild psoriasis originated from a modified Delphi process of European clinical experts. In the process, the experts iteratively refined a series of draft statements, which had to receive ≥ 80% approval to be incorporated into the consensus. RESULTS: The experts identified three main themes: Cal/BD foam as monotherapy, as an add-on to non-biologic systemic therapies and as an add-on to systemic biologics. The consensus emphasises disease factors and patient preference in treatment choice, summarises the evidence base for Cal/BD foam monotherapy for flare treatment as well as long-term management, and identifies the potential for improved treatment outcomes, such as reduced time to onset of action and reduced systemic dose to minimise side effects for add-on Cal/BD therapy to non-biologic systemics. The recommendations regarding add-on Cal/BD foam to biologics are similar to those for non-biologic systemic therapies, but also include suggestions for patients on biologics who are late responders. As clinical choices of Cal/BD combination vary, we have here often used 'Cal/BD' without reference to any particular formulation. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations aim to give practical guidance to those treating patients with beyond-mild psoriasis, to support patients' use of topical preparations and to optimise treatment outcomes.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Actinic keratoses (AK) may occur in all sun-exposed skin areas. Those occurring outside the head area are generally more resistant to treatment than those on the face. OBJECTIVE: To determine efficacy and safety of BF-200 ALA versus vehicle in the treatment of mild-to-severe AK located on extremities, trunk, and neck with red light photodynamic therapy (PDT). METHODS: This phase III study had an intra-individual design with 50 patients in 6 centers in Germany. Each patient received a maximum of 2 field-directed PDTs. Clinical end points and 1-year follow-up results were recorded. RESULTS: BF-200 ALA was superior to the vehicle with respect to total lesion clearance rates (86.0% vs 32.9%; P < .0001) and patient complete clearance per patient's side (67.3% vs 12.2%, P < .0001). One-year overall lesion recurrence rate was 14.1% versus 27.4% (BF-200 ALA vs vehicle; P = .0068). Patients were more satisfied by the cosmetic outcome of BF-200 ALA/PDT than the vehicle/PDT. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of BF-200 ALA/PDT. LIMITATIONS: Small number of severe lesions; limited sample size; unbalanced but representative distribution of AK. CONCLUSION: BF-200 ALA showed significantly higher AK clearance rates on extremities, trunk, and neck than the vehicle and was well tolerated.
Asunto(s)
Queratosis Actínica , Fotoquimioterapia , Ácido Aminolevulínico/efectos adversos , Ácido Aminolevulínico/análogos & derivados , Extremidades , Humanos , Queratosis Actínica/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Fotosensibilizantes/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Acne vulgaris is the most common dermatological disorder worldwide, causing significant physical and psychological morbidity. Topical combination therapy has shown superior efficacy compared to monotherapy, especially when combined with retinoids. Few studies have directly compared combined formulations. This evaluator-blinded pilot study compared the efficacy and tolerability of two marketed topical combination acne gels, clindamycin 1%-tretinoin 0.025% (CT) and benzoyl peroxide 2.5%-adapalene 0.1% (BA) in 20 patients with mild to moderate acne vulgaris. Gels were applied daily on opposite sides of the face for 21 days. The primary outcome was difference in transepidermal water loss (TEWL) at the end of treatment. Secondary endpoints were skin moisture content measurement, Investigators' Global Assessment, subject self-assessments (SSA) of burning/stinging, itching, erythema, and dryness/scaling, and Comparative Participant Satisfaction Questionnaire (CPSQ). Efficacy was assessed by inflammatory and non- inflammatory acne efflorescences counts. TEWL increased significantly for both CT and BA (+57.74%, P=0.002; +58.77%, P<0.001); skin moisture content significantly decreased only for BA (-16.47%, P=0.02). Only BA showed a significant increase in erythema and dryness/scaling (P=0.027 and P=0.014) and in SSA burning/stinging (P=0.04). Patient satisfaction evaluation also reflected the strong BA irritation. Although CT and BA both reduced acne lesions (P<0.001) and more patients preferred to continue with CT, subject perception of acne improvement was higher for BA. These findings suggest that CT and BA have similar efficacy in the treatment of mild to moderate papulopustular acne. However, CT was better tolerated than BA by both medical and subject evaluation. CT is an effective and tolerated treatment option.J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(3):295-301. doi:10.36849/JDD.2021.5641.
Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar/tratamiento farmacológico , Combinación Adapaleno y Peróxido de Benzoílo/administración & dosificación , Clindamicina/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administración & dosificación , Tretinoina/administración & dosificación , Acné Vulgar/diagnóstico , Combinación Adapaleno y Peróxido de Benzoílo/efectos adversos , Administración Cutánea , Adolescente , Adulto , Clindamicina/efectos adversos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efectos adversos , Combinación de Medicamentos , Eritema/inducido químicamente , Eritema/epidemiología , Femenino , Geles , Humanos , Masculino , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos Piloto , Prurito/inducido químicamente , Prurito/epidemiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tretinoina/efectos adversos , Pérdida Insensible de Agua/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Determining optimal treatment for moderate plaque psoriasis can be challenging. Recent studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of calcipotriol and betamethasone dipropionate (Cal/BD) foam in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: This research explored the use of Cal/BD foam in patients with beyond-mild psoriasis (defined as patients eligible for topical treatment, systemic treatment, or combined topical/systemic treatments) using an online questionnaire, retrospective medical-record review, and by capturing the attitudes and treatment approaches of dermatology specialists. RESULTS: Data from 409 patients with beyond-mild psoriasis treated with Cal/BD foam were provided by 120 dermatology specialists from Germany, Spain, and the UK. Cal/BD foam was prescribed as monotherapy for most (58%) patients and was considered to be effective. Cal/BD foam was infrequently used in combination with biologics (7%) in this segment; 26% of patients received Cal/BD foam in combination with a non-biologic systemic treatment. Cal/BD foam prescribers generally use topical agents to bridge the waiting time to non-biologic/biologic systemic treatment, and as an add-on to systemic treatment for residual lesions. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with beyond-mild psoriasis, the most commonly prescribed topical medication was Cal/BD foam, which was regarded as an effective treatment. Further research is needed to determine optimal use of Cal/BD foam in these patients.
RESUMEN
Contemporarily to the new SARS-CoV-2 mediated COVID-19 pandemic, a rise in patients with acral chilblain lesions has been described. They manifest late after mild disease or asymptomatic exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Their pathogenic evolution is currently unknown. In biopsies from three patients with acral partially ulcerating chilblain lesions that occurred associated to the COVID-19 pandemic, we analysed the expression of type I interferon induced proteins and signal transduction kinases. Histology demonstrated perivascular and periadnexal lymphohistiocytic infiltrates and endothelial dominated MxA-staining, as well as pJAK1 activation. Our findings demonstrate induction of the type I IFN pathway in lesional sections of COVID-19-associated chilblain-like lesions. This may indicate a local antiviral immune activation status associated with preceding exposure to SARS-CoV-2.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Abrocitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, was effective and well tolerated in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in a phase 2b trial. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib monotherapy in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. METHODS: In this multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial (JADE MONO-1), patients (aged ≥12 years) with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (Investigator Global Assessment score ≥3, Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI] score ≥16, percentage of body surface area affected ≥10%, and Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale score ≥4) with a bodyweight of 40 kg or more, were enrolled at 69 sites in Australia, Canada, Europe, and the USA. Patients were randomly assigned (2:2:1) to oral abrocitinib 100 mg, abrocitinib 200 mg, or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Randomisation was done using an interactive response technology system, stratified by baseline disease severity and age. Patients, investigators, and the funder of the study were masked to study treatment. The coprimary endpoints were the proportion of patients who had achieved an Investigator Global Assessment response (score of 0 [clear] or 1 [almost clear] with a ≥2-grade improvement from baseline), and the proportion of patients who achieved at least a 75% improvement in EASI score from baseline (EASI-75) score, both assessed at week 12. Efficacy was assessed in the full analysis set, which included all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study medication. Safety was assessed in all randomised patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03349060. FINDINGS: Between Dec 7, 2017, and March 26, 2019, 387 patients were enrolled: 156 were assigned to abrocitinib 100 mg, 154 to abrocitinib 200 mg, and 77 to placebo. All enrolled patients received at least one dose of study treatment and thus were evaluable for 12-week efficacy. Of the patients with available data for the coprimary endpoints at week 12, the proportion of patients who had achieved an Investigator Global Assessment response was significantly higher in the abrocitinib 100 mg group than in the placebo group (37 [24%] of 156 patients vs six [8%] of 76 patients; p=0·0037) and in the abrocitinib 200 mg group compared with the placebo group (67 [44%] of 153 patients vs six [8%] of 76 patients; p<0·0001). Of the patients with available data for the coprimary endpoints at week 12, compared with the placebo group, the proportion of patients who had achieved an EASI-75 response was significantly higher in the abrocitinib 100 mg group (62 [40%] of 156 patients vs nine [12%] of 76 patients; p<0·0001) and abrocitinib 200 mg group (96 [63%] of 153 patients vs nine [12%] of 76 patients; p<0·0001). Adverse events were reported in 108 (69%) of 156 patients in the abrocitinib 100 mg group, 120 (78%) of 154 patients in the abrocitinib 200 mg group, and 44 (57%) of 77 patients in the placebo group. Serious adverse events were reported in five (3%) of 156 patients in the abrocitinib 100 mg group, five (3%) of 154 patients in the abrocitinib 200 mg group, and three (4%) of 77 patients in the placebo group. No treatment-related deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION: Monotherapy with oral abrocitinib once daily was effective and well tolerated in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. FUNDING: Pfizer.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Eccema/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Australia/epidemiología , Canadá/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Dermatitis Atópica/patología , Método Doble Ciego , Eccema/patología , Etnicidad , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Janus Quinasa 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Placebos/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Seguridad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lyme borreliosis develops in 1-5% of individuals bitten by ticks, but with a diagnostic gap affecting up to 30% of patients, a broadly applicable pharmacological prevention strategy is needed. Topical azithromycin effectively eradicated Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato from the skin in preclinical studies. We assessed its efficacy in human beings. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial done in 28 study sites in Germany and Austria, adults were equally assigned to receive topical 10% azithromycin or placebo twice daily for 3 consecutive days, within 72 h of a tick bite being confirmed. Randomisation numbers, which were stratified by study site, were accessed in study centres via an interactive voice-response system, by pharmacists not involved in the study. The primary outcome was the number of treatment failures, defined as erythema migrans, seroconversion, or both, in participants who were seronegative at baseline, had no further tick bites during the study, and had serology results available at 8 weeks (intention-to-treat [ITT] population). This study is registered with EudraCT, number 2011-000117-39. FINDINGS: Between July 7, 2011, and Dec 3, 2012, 1371 participants were randomly assigned to treatment, of whom 995 were included in the ITT population. The trial was stopped early because an improvement in the primary endpoint in the group receiving azithromycin was not reached. At 8 weeks, 11 (2%) of 505 in the azithromycin group and 11 (2%) of 490 in the placebo group had treatment failure (odds ratio 0·97, 95% CI 0·42-2·26, p=0·47). Topical azithromycin was well tolerated. Similar numbers of patients had adverse events in the two groups (175 [26%] of 505 vs 177 [26%] of 490, p=0·87), and most adverse events were mild. INTERPRETATION: Topical azithromycin was well tolerated and had a good safety profile. Inclusion of asymptomatic seroconversion into the primary efficacy analysis led to no prevention effect with topical azithromycin. Adequately powered studies assessing only erythema migrans should be considered. A subgroup analysis in this study suggested that topical azithromycin reduces erythema migrans after bites of infected ticks. FUNDING: Ixodes AG.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Lyme/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Lyme/prevención & control , Adulto , Animales , Azitromicina/efectos adversos , Borrelia burgdorferi/inmunología , Borrelia burgdorferi/aislamiento & purificación , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Garrapatas , Insuficiencia del TratamientoRESUMEN
Lyme borreliosis (LB) patients who recover, as well as previously infected asymptomatic individuals, remain vulnerable to reinfection with Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato. There is limited information available about the use of OspA vaccines in this population. In this study, a randomized double-blind phase I/II trial was performed to investigate the safety and immunogenicity of a novel multivalent OspA vaccine in healthy adults who were either seronegative or seropositive for previous B. burgdorferi sensu lato infection. The participants received three monthly priming immunizations with either 30 µg or 60 µg alum-adjuvanted OspA antigen and a booster vaccination either 6 months or 9 to 12 months after the first immunization. The antibody responses to the six OspA serotypes included in the vaccine were evaluated. Adverse events were predominantly mild and transient and were similar in the seronegative and seropositive populations. Substantial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and surface-binding antibody responses against all six OspA antigens were induced after the primary immunization schedule in both populations, and they were substantially increased with both booster schedules. The antibody responses induced by the two doses were similar in the seronegative population, but there was a significant dose response in the seropositive population. These data indicate that the novel multivalent OspA vaccine is well tolerated and immunogenic in individuals previously infected with B. burgdorferi sensu lato. (This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01504347.).