Real-life evidence about the use of intravenous brivaracetam in urgent seizures: The BRIV-IV study.

PURPOSE: Urgent seizures are a medical emergency for which new therapies are still needed. This study evaluated the use of intravenous brivaracetam (IV-BRV) in an emergency setting in clinical practice. METHODS: BRIV-IV was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study. It included patients ≥18 years old who were diagnosed with urgent seizures (including status epilepticus (SE), acute repetitive seizures, and high-risk seizures) and who were treated with IV-BRV according to clinical practice in 14 hospital centers. Information was extracted from clinical charts and included in an electronic database. Primary effectiveness endpoints included the rate of IV-BRV responder patients, the rate of patients with a sustained response without seizure relapse in 12 h, and the time between IV-BRV administration and clinical response. Primary safety endpoints were comprised the percentage of patients with adverse events and those with adverse events leading to discontinuation. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 57.7 ± 21.5 years old with a prior diagnosis of epilepsy for 57.1% of patients. The most frequent etiologies were brain tumor-related (18.1%) and vascular (11.2%) epilepsy. SE was diagnosed in 55.3% of patients. The median time from urgent seizure onset to IV treatment administration was 60.0 min (range: 15.0-360.0), and the median time from IV treatment to IV-BRV was 90.0 min (range: 30.0-2400.0). Regarding dosage, the mean bolus infusion was 163.0 ± 73.0 mg and the mean daily dosage was 195.0 ± 87.0 mg. A total of 77.6% of patients responded to IV-BRV (66.3% with SE vs. 91% other urgent seizures) with a median response time of 30.0 min (range: 10.0-60.0). A sustained response was achieved in 62.8% of patients. However, adverse events were reported in 14.7%, which were predominantly somnolence and fatigue, with 4.5% leading to discontinuation. Eighty-six percent of patients were discharged with oral brivaracetam. CONCLUSION: IV-BRV in emergency settings was effective, and tolerability was good for most patients. However, a larger series is needed to confirm the outcomes.

Use of intravenous brivaracetam in status epilepticus: A multicenter registry.

OBJECTIVE: The pharmacokinetics of brivaracetam (BRV), added to its effectiveness observed in animal models of status epilepticus (SE), makes this drug attractive for use in emergency situations. Our objective was to evaluate the use of intravenous BRV in a multicenter study. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter registry of SE cases treated with BRV was created. These patients were evaluated between January and December 2018 at seven hospitals in Spain. Demographic variables, SE characteristics, concomitant drugs, loading doses, and response to treatment were collected. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were registered. The mean age was 56 ± 23.1 years, 51.2% were male, 29 had previous epilepsy, 24 (55.8%) had prominent motor symptoms, and 19 had nonconvulsive symptoms. Regarding the etiology, 19 (44.2%) were considered acute symptomatic, 16 (17.2%) remote symptomatic, four (9.3%) progressive symptomatic, and four (9.3%) cryptogenic. Regarding concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), 17 had previously received levetiracetam (LEV). In 14 patients, BRV was used early (first or second AED). The median loading dose was 100 mg (range = 50-400), and the weight-adjusted dose was 1.8 mg/kg (range = 0.4-7.3). BRV was effective in 54% (n = 23), and a response was observed in <6 hours in 13 patients. We observed a tendency for it to be more effective when administered earlier (P = 0.09), but there were no differences regarding SE type and the concomitant use of LEV. In those with the fastest responses, we observed that both the total administered dose (300 mg vs 100 mg, P = 0.008) and the weight-adjusted dose (3.85 mg vs 1.43 mg, P = 0.006) were significantly higher. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the best cutoff point for a faster response was 1.82 mg/kg. SIGNIFICANCE: BRV is useful for the treatment of SE, even when patients are already being treated with LEV. The response rate seems higher when it is administered earlier and at higher doses (>1.82 mg/kg).

Efecto de la lacosamida sobre la calidad de vida del paciente con epilepsia / Effect of lacosamide on the quality of life of patients with epilepsy

Introducción. La epilepsia provoca trastornos psiquiátricos en un 20-40% de los pacientes y repercute de forma negativa en su calidad de vida. La lacosamida es un nuevo antiepiléptico que se utiliza como terapia añadida en crisis parciales con o sin generalización. Objetivo. Hemos realizado un estudio para valorar el impacto de la lacosamida en cuanto a la calidad de vida del paciente con epilepsia. Se han utilizado la escala hospitalaria de ansiedad y depresión (HADS) y la escala de calidad de vida en la epilepsia (QOLIE-10). Se ha valorado la eficacia y la tolerabilidad. Pacientes y métodos. Se recogen prospectivamente pacientes con epilepsia mal controlada y a los que se añade lacosamida. Se realiza una visita basal, a los tres y a los seis meses. Se cumplimentan los cuestionarios y se recaban los datos sobre la epilepsia. Resultados. Se incluyen 31 pacientes, con una edad media de 45,5 ± 17,2 años, un 64,5% varones. El número de crisis mensuales previas es de 1,6 ± 1,8. La HADS para ansiedad muestra una mejoría significativa a los tres y seis meses. La HADS para depresión refleja una mejoría significativa en los parámetros cualitativos. La QOLIE-10 muestra mejoría significativa para el grupo con baja calidad de vida previa a los tres y seis meses. Tras seis meses, el 61,3% de los pacientes presenta una reducción de las crisis igual o superior al 50%, y el 54,8% está libre de crisis. El mareo es el efecto secundario más frecuente (22,8%). El 74,2% continúa con el tratamiento. Conclusiones. La lacosamida podría mejorar la ansiedad, depresión y calidad de vida del paciente epiléptico con independencia del control de las crisis. La respuesta al tratamiento, la adhesión y los efectos secundarios son similares a estudios previos (AU)

Introduction. Epilepsy causes psychiatric disorders in 20-40% of patients impacting negatively on their quality of life. Lacosamide is a new antiepileptic as adjunctive therapy in partial seizures with or without generalization. Aim. We conducted a study to assess the impact of lacosamide as to the quality of life of epileptic patients. We used the HAD scale for anxiety and depression and QOLIE-10 scale for quality of life. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability. Patients and methods. We collected prospectively poorly controlled epileptic patients are and added lacosamide treatment. Baseline visit, at 3 and 6 months were performed. The questionnaires are completed and the epilepsy information has been collected. Results. 31 patients, age 45.5 ± 17.2 years, 64.5% males are included. Number of previous monthly crisis 1.6 ± 1.8.HAD anxiety scale shows a significant improvement at 3 and 6 months. HAD scale for depression reflects a significant improvement in quality parameters. QOLIE-10 shows significant improvement for the group with low quality of life after 3 and 6 months. After 6 months 61.3% of patients have a seizure reduction equal or more than 50% and 54.8% are seizure free. Dizziness is the most common side effect (22.8%). 74.2% continued treatment. Conclusions. Lacosamide may improve anxiety, depression and quality of life of epileptic patients regardless of seizure control. Response to treatment, adherence and side effects are similar to previous studies (AU)

[Effect of lacosamide on the quality of life of patients with epilepsy]. / Efecto de la lacosamida sobre la calidad de vida del paciente con epilepsia.

INTRODUCTION: Epilepsy causes psychiatric disorders in 20-40% of patients impacting negatively on their quality of life. Lacosamide is a new antiepileptic as adjunctive therapy in partial seizures with or without generalization. AIM: We conducted a study to assess the impact of lacosamide as to the quality of life of epileptic patients. We used the HAD scale for anxiety and depression and QOLIE-10 scale for quality of life. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected prospectively poorly controlled epileptic patients are and added lacosamide treatment. Baseline visit, at 3 and 6 months were performed. The questionnaires are completed and the epilepsy information has been collected. RESULTS: 31 patients, age 45.5 ± 17.2 years, 64.5% males are included. Number of previous monthly crisis 1.6 ± 1.8. HAD anxiety scale shows a significant improvement at 3 and 6 months. HAD scale for depression reflects a significant improvement in quality parameters. QOLIE-10 shows significant improvement for the group with low quality of life after 3 and 6 months. After 6 months 61.3% of patients have a seizure reduction equal or more than 50% and 54.8% are seizure free. Dizziness is the most common side effect (22.8%). 74.2% continued treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Lacosamide may improve anxiety, depression and quality of life of epileptic patients regardless of seizure control. Response to treatment, adherence and side effects are similar to previous studies.

TITLE: Efecto de la lacosamida sobre la calidad de vida del paciente con epilepsia.Introduccion. La epilepsia provoca trastornos psiquiatricos en un 20-40% de los pacientes y repercute de forma negativa en su calidad de vida. La lacosamida es un nuevo antiepileptico que se utiliza como terapia añadida en crisis parciales con o sin generalizacion. Objetivo. Hemos realizado un estudio para valorar el impacto de la lacosamida en cuanto a la calidad de vida del paciente con epilepsia. Se han utilizado la escala hospitalaria de ansiedad y depresion (HADS) y la escala de calidad de vida en la epilepsia (QOLIE-10). Se ha valorado la eficacia y la tolerabilidad. Pacientes y metodos. Se recogen prospectivamente pacientes con epilepsia mal controlada y a los que se añade lacosamida. Se realiza una visita basal, a los tres y a los seis meses. Se cumplimentan los cuestionarios y se recaban los datos sobre la epilepsia. Resultados. Se incluyen 31 pacientes, con una edad media de 45,5 ± 17,2 años, un 64,5% varones. El numero de crisis mensuales previas es de 1,6 ± 1,8. La HADS para ansiedad muestra una mejoria significativa a los tres y seis meses. La HADS para depresion refleja una mejoria significativa en los parametros cualitativos. La QOLIE-10 muestra mejoria significativa para el grupo con baja calidad de vida previa a los tres y seis meses. Tras seis meses, el 61,3% de los pacientes presenta una reduccion de las crisis igual o superior al 50%, y el 54,8% esta libre de crisis. El mareo es el efecto secundario mas frecuente (22,8%). El 74,2% continua con el tratamiento. Conclusiones. La lacosamida podria mejorar la ansiedad, depresion y calidad de vida del paciente epileptico con independencia del control de las crisis. La respuesta al tratamiento, la adhesion y los efectos secundarios son similares a estudios previos.

Control of seizures in different stages of partial epilepsy: LACO-EXP, a Spanish retrospective study of lacosamide.

Lacosamide is approved as adjunctive therapy for focal epilepsies. The number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) tried is associated with prognosis. This multicenter, retrospective, observational study (LACO-EXP) in Spain in 500 adult patients with focal epilepsies examined the efficacy and tolerability of add-on lacosamide. Factors associated with better efficacy/tolerability were analyzed. After 12months, the responder rate (≥50% reduction in seizure frequency) was 57.1%, and the seizure-free rate was 14.9%. Efficacy was better when lacosamide was the first or second add-on AED, although there was a small chance to be seizure-free even for patients who had received ≤10 prior AEDs. The mechanism of action of concomitant AEDs is important in all the stages, but differences are smaller in the early stages. Lacosamide was generally well tolerated. A slower dosage-titration schedule was associated with a lower adverse event rate. Further investigation of the timing of initiation of lacosamide add-on therapy and ideal combinations of AEDs is required.