Hibernation of the Conduction System and Atrioventricular Block Reversibility Following Revascularization in Patients without Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Although myocardial infarction (MI) is a reversible cause of atrioventricular (AV) block, the association of ischemia other than MI with AV block is unclear. The purpose of this study is to investigate this relationship. Among patients nominated for pacemaker implantation due to AV block in two centers from 2017-2020, 120 patients with significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in angiography were included in the study. Patients were divided into two equal groups based on their CAD treatment approach: drug therapy and revascularization. Coronary lesions were divided into three types based on location: left anterior descending artery (type 1), dominant coronary with AV node branch (type 2), and a combination of both (type 3). After coronary disease treatment, all patients were followed up with for 14 months, and AV block reversibility was assessed. There were 7 cases of block reversibility in the revascularization group (11.7%) and 1 case in the medical group (1.7%), which differed significantly (P = .02). A history of acute coronary syndrome, smoking, opium use, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, age, sex, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were not significantly associated with reversible block. Also, the type of coronary obstruction had no significant relationship with block reversibility (P = .3, .5, and .8 for type 1, type 2, and type 3, respectively). Hibernation due to ischemia can be a reversible cause of an AV blockage. Therefore, it is recommended that significant coronary artery lesions be revascularized before pacemaker implantation.

The importance of sustained junctional tachycardia following cessation of radiofrequency current delivery in slow pathway ablation.

BACKGROUND: Apart from junctional rhythms during slow pathway ablation, there is limited knowledge about the junctional tachycardia persisting following ablation cessation. This study is conducted to determine the characteristics and significance of this rare arrhythmia. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study was done on 487 patients with AVNRT undergoing the radiofrequency ablation. The RF delivery-induced Supraventricular Tachycardia, persisting for a few minutes following the termination of ablation (post-ablation SVT) was investigated in this research. Atrial Overdrive Pacing (AOP) was applied to the post-ablation SVT to distinguish AVNRT from Junctional Tachycardia(JT). A total of 2337 RF-current deliveries were applied, and post-ablation SVT was observed in 81 of them. According to the electrophysiological studies, five of them (in five separate cases) were definitely diagnosed as JT. The overall incidence of post-ablation JT was about 1% of all patients. In these cases, RF energy was applied to the posteroseptal region and roof of the proximal coronary sinus. The mean Cycle Length (CL) of JTs was equal to 446 ±67ms. Following post- ablation JT termination, four cases met endpoints of successful ablation, demonstrating a positive predictive value of 80%. Atrioventricular (AV) block did not occur in any of the cases and reappearance of JT was not observed during procedure or mean follow-up period of 19.8 ± 8.4 months. CONCLUSIONS: Post-ablation JT is probably a transient Ischemia-induced arrhythmia that does not require further ablation. Thus, it is recommended to differentiate between the AVNRT and JT in post-ablation arrhythmias to avoid unnecessary RF application.