Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc ; 71(6): 737-753, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33507848

RESUMEN

In recent years, recycling of municipal solid waste (MSW) has been recognized as one of the most efficient methods of waste management in terms of environmental benefits. This study investigates the energy savings and other environmental benefits of recycling of dry MSW collected in Shiraz, Iran (2018). The impact of different recycling rates (current = 15%, desirable = 50%, ideal = 80%) on environmental benefits and energy savings were assessed. The annual quantity of recycled components were defined as glass (735 tons), plastic carrier bags (555 tons), cardboard (3,874 tons), paper (3,806 tons), disposable plastic containers (287 tons), other types of metals (785 tons), disposable metallic containers (aluminum) (171 tons), other types of plastics (812 tons) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) (887 tons). The results confirmed that recycling of paper and glass in three different scenarios resulted in a reduction of 1.01, 2.14, and 3.43 million tons of air pollutant emissions, respectively. By improving the recycling rates from 15 to 80%, overall energy savings can improve by between a factor of 3.5 to 5.5. Also, a reduction of approximately 2-3.5% in air pollutant emissions can be achieved by upgrading the current recycling program (15% recycling rate) to favorable and ideal conditions.Implications: In recent years, recycling of municipal solid waste (MSW) has been recognized as one of the most efficient methods of waste management in terms of environmental benefits. This study investigates the energy savings and other environmental benefits of recycling of dry MSW collected in Shiraz, Iran (2018). According to available data, there has been little effort for recycling in developing countries, and waste landfilling is recognized as the most favorable option in MSW management. The aim of this study was to characterize MSW components in Shiraz, Iran, and to quantify the environmental benefits and energy savings as result of paper, glass, and aluminum recycling. This work is novel in that there are no reports to our knowledge of the environmental benefits and energy savings resulting from different recycling scenarios including current (15%), desirable (50%), and ideal (80%) recycling for aluminum, paper, and glass. The results of this work have broad implications both for other regions owing to the pervasiveness of recycling facilities and also for developing countries that can strive towards the infrastructure needed to reach improved recycling scenarios.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire , Eliminación de Residuos , Administración de Residuos , Reciclaje , Residuos Sólidos
2.
Environ Pollut ; 256: 113379, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31753630

RESUMEN

This study reports a characterization of indoor polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) associated with dust (dust-PAHs) in household evaporative coolers and their associated health effects. Extensive analysis showed that the indoor dust-PAHs stemmed mostly from pyrogenic sources (vehicular emissions) with mean total concentrations limited between 131 and 429 ng g-1. The distribution pattern of PAHs based on number of rings exhibited the following order of decreasing relative abundance: 4 > 3 > 5 > 6 > 2 rings. Results indicate that the mutagenicity of dust-PAHs exceeded their carcinogenicity, but that the potential carcinogenic effects are still significant. The mean lifetime cancer risk for different age groups for three pathways based on Model 2 (dermal (1.39 × 10-1 to 1.91 × 10-2), ingestion (2.13 × 10-3 to 8.08 × 10-3) and inhalation (1.62 × 10-7 to 4.06 × 10-7)) was 7.4-146 times higher than values predicted by Model 1 (dermal (5.13 × 10-5 to 3.03 × 10-3), ingestion (9.34 × 10-5 to 1.31 × 10-3) and inhalation (7.13 × 10-20 to 1.68 × 10-20)). Hence, exposure to dust-PAHs in household evaporative coolers lead to high risk, especially for children (less than 11 years) (HQ = 2.71 × 10-20 to 54.8 and LTCRs = 7.13 × 10-20 to 1.39 × 10-1). Strategies should be considered to eliminate such pollutants to protect people, especially children, from the non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic effects by changing household evaporative coolers with other cooling systems.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Contaminación del Aire Interior/análisis , Carcinógenos/análisis , Polvo/análisis , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Hidrocarburos Policíclicos Aromáticos/análisis , Contaminación del Aire Interior/prevención & control , Niño , Ingestión de Alimentos , Humanos , Proyectos de Investigación , Medición de Riesgo , Emisiones de Vehículos/análisis , Emisiones de Vehículos/prevención & control
3.
Environ Pollut ; 247: 607-617, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30711816

RESUMEN

This study characterized spatio-temporal variations in the concentration of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) compounds in the vicinity of gas and compressed natural gas (CNG) stations in Tehran, Iran. Health risk assessment (HRA) was computed using Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) for evaluating inhalation lifetime cancer risk (LTCR), the hazard quotient (HQ), and sensitivity analysis (SA) for BTEX exposure in different age groups (birth to <81) and as a function of distance (0-250 m) from the center of the stations. For all monitoring stations, the average values of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene in winter were 466.09 ±â€¯132.25, 873.13 ±â€¯233.51, 493.05 ±â€¯141.22, and 910.57 ±â€¯145.40 µg m-3, respectively. The mean wintertime ratios of T/B for the 12 stations ranged from 1.69 to 2.04. Furthermore, there was no significant relationship between the concentration of BTEX with either the specific month or distance from the center of stations (p > 0.05). Factors promoting BTEX formation in the study region were fuel evaporation and gas/CNG station emissions. The LTCRs for the target compounds in the winter for different age groups and distances from the center of stations was limited to 2.11 × 10-4 to 1.82 × 10-3 and 2.30 × 10-4 to 2.01 × 10-3, respectively, which exceeded proposed values by U.S. EPA. Moreover, the HQs for BTEX for three age groups and distances were limited to between 2.89 × 10-5 and 9.33 × 10-2, which were lower than the acceptable limit (HQs < 1). The results of this work are applicable to similar areas that are heavily populated with vehicular traffic. This study motivates a closer look at mitigation strategies to limit the health effects of carcinogenic emissions such as benzene and ethylbenzene from gas/CNG stations.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/estadística & datos numéricos , Contaminación Ambiental/estadística & datos numéricos , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/toxicidad , Benceno/análisis , Derivados del Benceno/análisis , Carcinógenos/análisis , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/análisis , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Contaminación Ambiental/análisis , Humanos , Irán , Medición de Riesgo , Estaciones del Año , Tolueno/análisis , Xilenos/análisis
4.
Environ Pollut ; 242(Pt A): 938-951, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30373039

RESUMEN

This study reports a spatiotemporal characterization of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde in the summer and winter of 2017 in the urban area of Shiraz, Iran. Sampling was fulfilled according to EPA Method TO-11 A. The inverse distance weighting (IDW) procedure was used for spatial mapping. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to evaluate carcinogenic and non-cancer risk owing to formaldehyde and acetaldehyde exposure in 11 age groups. The average concentrations of formaldehyde/acetaldehyde in the summer and winter were 15.07/8.40 µg m-3 and 8.57/3.52 µg m-3, respectively. The formaldehyde to acetaldehyde ratios in the summer and winter were 1.80 and 2.43, respectively. The main sources of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde were photochemical generation, vehicular traffic, and biogenic emissions (e.g., coniferous and deciduous trees). The mean inhalation lifetime cancer risk (LTCR) values according to the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) for formaldehyde and acetaldehyde in summer and winter ranged between 7.55 × 10-6 and 9.25 × 10-5, which exceed the recommended value by US EPA. The average LTCR according to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) for formaldehyde and acetaldehyde in summer and winter were between 4.82 × 10-6 and 2.58 × 10-4, which exceeds recommended values for five different age groups (Birth to <1, 1 to <2, 2 to <3, 3 to <6, and 6 to <11 years). Hazard quotients (HQs) of formaldehyde ranged between 0.04 and 4.18 for both seasons, while the HQs for acetaldehyde were limited between 0.42 and 0.97.


Asunto(s)
Acetaldehído/toxicidad , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/toxicidad , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/estadística & datos numéricos , Formaldehído/toxicidad , Acetaldehído/análisis , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Carcinógenos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/análisis , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Formaldehído/análisis , Humanos , Irán , Estaciones del Año
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...