RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to report the clinical outcome of B cell depletion therapy in 18 patients with refractory lupus nephritis (LN). METHODS: Eighteen patients received rituximab on an open-label basis with prospective evaluations. All patients had renal disease refractory to conventional immunosuppressive therapy, including intravenous cyclophosphamide (CyC). All patients fulfilled the revised ACR classification criteria for SLE. Rituximab was given as 2 × 1 g infusions with 500 mg iv CyC and 500 mg iv methylprednisolone, two weeks apart. Complete remission (CR) of nephritis at six months was defined as normal serum creatinine and serum albumin levels, inactive urine sediment, and proteinuria < 0.5 g/day; partial remission (PR) was defined as a ≥50% improvement in all renal parameters that were abnormal at baseline. Clinical response was assessed by the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) score pre- and post-rituximab treatment, and efficacy was recorded by extent and duration of B lymphocyte depletion (normal range 0.100-0.500 × 10(9)/l). Follow-up data were collected at six months, one year post-treatment and at the most recent clinic visit. RESULTS: At six months, 11/18 patients reached renal CR and two of 18 PR. The mean global BILAG scores for responders decreased from 15 (SD 10) to 5 (SD 3), and a total of ten A scores disappeared. Five patients failed to show complete or partial renal response despite peripheral B lymphocyte count depletion, and progressed to end-stage renal failure (ESRF) and dialysis. Four of these patients had severe proliferative, crescentic nephritis, of whom three had Class IV-G, one Class III and one late membranous glomerulonephritis. One patient died six years after rituximab therapy from overwhelming sepsis while on long-term haemodialysis. CONCLUSION: Rituximab therapy achieved a response in 13/18 patients with refractory LN. However, in patients with rapidly progressive crescentic LN, when there is already evidence of significant renal impairment, rituximab therapy may not prevent progression to ESRF and dialysis. Our data also suggest that severe Class IV-G LN may be associated with a poor response to therapy.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino/uso terapéutico , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Nefritis Lúpica/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Nefritis Lúpica/fisiopatología , Masculino , Metilprednisolona/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Inducción de Remisión/métodos , Rituximab , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is typically associated with hypergammaglobulinaemia but has been described in the setting of hypogammaglobulinaemia as well. The purpose of this article is to describe various cases of SLE and hypogammaglobulinaemia, review the literature and present management strategies for hypogammaglobulinaemia in SLE. METHODS: We describe five patients with SLE and antibody deficiency, and review the literature exploring the relationship between the two. RESULTS: Various types of antibody deficiency syndromes, including common variable immunodeficiency (CVID), IgA deficiency, IgM deficiency, drug-induced hypogammaglobulinaemia and hypogammaglobulinaemia secondary to nephrotic syndrome can occur in SLE. Antibody deficiency states can be treated with antibiotics and replacement immunoglobulin therapy (particularly CVID) but sometimes close monitoring is all that is required. CONCLUSION: Measurement of immunoglobulin levels is useful in SLE to identify coexisting antibody deficiency and the later development of hypogammaglobulinaemia. This allows monitoring and appropriate treatment to be instituted.