Disposition and metabolism of safinamide, a novel drug for Parkinson's disease, in healthy male volunteers.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Absorption, biotransformation and elimination of safinamide, an enantiomeric α-aminoamide derivative developed as an add-on therapy for Parkinson's disease patients, were studied in healthy volunteers administered a single oral dose of 400 mg (14)C safinamide methanesulphonate, labelled in metabolically stable positions. METHODS: Pharmacokinetics of the parent compound were investigated up to 96 h, of (14)C radioactivity up to 192/200 h post-dose. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: Maximum concentration was achieved at 1 h (plasma, median Tmax) for parent drug and at 7 and 1.5 h for plasma and whole blood (14)C radioactivity, respectively. Terminal half-lives were about 22 h for unchanged safinamide and 80 h for radioactivity. Safinamide deaminated acid and the N-dealkylated acid were identified as major metabolites in urine and plasma. In urine, the ß-glucuronide of the N-dealkylated acid and the monohydroxy safinamide were also characterized. In addition, the glycine conjugate of the N-dealkylated acid and 2-[4-hydroxybenzylamino]propanamide were tentatively identified as minor urinary metabolites.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-ascending-dose study on the pharmacodynamics of ABIO-08/01, a new CNS drug with potential anxiolytic activity. 1. EEG mapping, psychometric and tolerability findings.

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-ascending-dose study, the encephalotropic and psychotropic properties of ABIO-08/01, a new potentially anxiolytic and nootropic isoxazoline, were studied in 16 young healthy males. In a randomized nonbalanced phase 1 study, they received 3 oral drug doses (10, 20, 40 mg) and placebo for 7 days (washout period 8 days). EEG mapping and psychometry were carried out at hours 0, 1, 6 of day 1 (acute effect) and day 5 (subacute and superimposed effects). MANOVA/ Hotelling T(2) test demonstrated significant central effects of ABIO-08/01 versus placebo after acute, subacute and superimposed administration of all doses in the resting, vigilance-controlled and eyes-open EEG. Univariate analysis revealed activating patterns in the resting EEG (40 mg > 20 mg > 10 mg), and sedative patterns in the eyes-open EEG (10 mg > 20 mg > 40 mg). In the vigilance-controlled EEG, 40 mg of ABIO-08/01 induced activating patterns, whereas 10 mg induced sedative patterns. Concerning psychometry, ABIO-08/01 improved concentration (40 mg > 20 mg > 10 mg; activating effect) and deteriorated well-being (10 mg > 20 mg > 40 mg; sedative effect). Ten milligrams also improved reaction time performance and psychomotor activity. ABIO-08/01 is well-tolerated and is of interest in anxiety disorders.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-ascending-dose study on the pharmacodynamics of ABIO-08/01, a new CNS drug with potential anxiolytic activity. 2. EEG-tomography findings based on LORETA (low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography).

Effects of ABIO-08/01, a new potentially anxiolytic isoxazoline, on regional electrical brain generators were investigated by 3-dimensional EEG tomography. In a double- blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-ascending-dose study, 16 healthy males (30.2 +/- 5.7 years) received 3 oral drug doses (10, 20, 40 mg) and placebo for 7 days (8-day wash-out) in a randomized non-balanced design for phase-1 studies. A 3-min vigilance-controlled (V) EEG, a 4-min resting (R) EEG with eyes closed, a 1-min eyes-open (EO) EEG and psychometric tests were performed 0, 1 and 6 h after taking the drug on days 1 and 5. Low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) was computed from the spectrally analyzed EEG data, and differences between drug and placebo were displayed as statistical parametric maps. Data were registered to the Talairach-Tournoux Human Brain Atlas available as a digitized MRI. An overall omnibus significance test followed by a voxel-by-voxel t test demonstrated significant regional EEG changes after ABIO-08/01 versus placebo, dependent on recording condition, dose and time. While in the EO-EEG specifically the lowest dose of ABIO-08/01 induced pronounced sedative effects (delta/theta and beta increase) 1 h after acute and slightly less so after superimposed administration, in the 6th hour a decrease in alpha and beta activity signaled less sedative and more relaxant action. In the V-EEG these changes were less pronounced, in the R-EEG partly opposite. Hemisphere-specific changes were observed, suggesting increases in LORETA power over the left temporal, parietal, superior frontal regions and decreases over the right prefrontal, temporal pole and occipital regions. These LORETA changes are discussed in the light of neuroimaging findings on anxiety and anxiolytics.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-ascending-dose study on the effects of ABIO-08/01, a novel anxiolytic drug, on perception and cognition, utilizing event-related potential mapping and low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography.

Early pharmacological studies in animals demonstrated that ABIO-08/01, a new isoxazoline, exerted anxiolytic and anticonvulsant, but also cognition-enhancing properties. Thus, the aim of the present double-blind, placebo-controlled multiple-ascending-dose study was to investigate the effect of the new compound on event-related potentials (ERPs). In a randomized ascending-dose design for phase-1 studies, 16 young healthy male subjects aged 30.2 +/- 5.7 years received three ascending drug doses (10, 20, and 40 mg) and placebo for 7 days, with a washout period of 8 days in between. Auditory ERPs were recorded pre-dose and 2 h post-dose on days 1 (acute effect) and 5 (subacute and absolute superimposed effect). Descriptive statistics with one confirmatory statement on P300 latency demonstrated a significant shortening after acute, subacute, and superimposed administration of 40 mg ABIO-08/01. While ERP amplitudes showed only minor effects, low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) demonstrated that ABIO-08/01 promotes more efficient information processing by reallocating perceptual and cognitive ERP resources. Thus, our ERP studies confirm early pharmacological findings in animals of a cognition-enhancing effect of ABIO-08/01, which is interesting in the context of the anxiolytic mode of action of the compound as its CNS effects are quite different from those of anxiolytic sedatives, such as benzodiazepines.

Clinical study of the therapeutic efficacy and safety of emedastine difumarate versus terfenadine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

OBJECTIVE: Emedastine is a new H1-receptor antagonist endowed with potent and selective antihistamine activity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of emedastine difumarate (CAS 87233-62-3) in Caucasian patients in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis as compared to terfenadine (CAS 50679-08-8). METHODS: A total of 130 patients suffering from grass pollen allergic rhinitis were randomly assigned to 14 days treatment with either emedastine difumarate (2 mg b.i.d.) or terfenadine (60 mg b.i.d.) in a double-blind, randomised, crossover design. Primary efficacy parameter was a Total Severity Symptom Score, including among symptoms nasal congestion, sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal/throat/palate itching, eye itching and lacrimation. Safety was assessed on routine laboratory tests and recording vital signs and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Emedastine 2 mg b.i.d. was significantly more effective than terfenadine 60 mg b.i.d. in reducing Total Symptom Severity Score (p = 0.0258). This statistical significant difference was also obtained in controlling sneezing and rhinorrhea (p = 0.003). Moreover, both the physician and patients indicated emedastine as the preferred therapy (p < 0.01). Forty-seven drug related AEs were reported for emedastine (= 51.07 %) and 53 for terfenadine (64.15 %), most of them involving the CNS. CONCLUSION: The results of study show that emedastine difumarate is more effective than terfenadine in the symptomatic management of seasonal allergic rhinitis and is particularly active in controlling the main nasal symptoms, such as sneezing and rhinorrhea; it is safe and well tolerated in this therapeutic indication, while related AEs are less if compared to those displayed by terfenadine.

Clinical study of the therapeutic efficacy and safety of emedastine difumarate versus cetirizine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

OBJECTIVE: The therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of emedastine difumarate (CAS 87233-62-3) in male and female Caucasian patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis as compared to cetirizine (CAS 83881-51-0) was evaluated. METHODS: The study was designed as a double-blind, randomised, parallel groups comparison of two antihistamines administered by oral route (emedastine 4 mg o.d. versus cetirizine 10 mg o.d.) in a population of 120 patients suffering from grass pollen allergic rhinitis. The duration of the treatment period was 14 days. Primary efficacy variable was a total symptoms score (including among symptoms nasal congestion, sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal/throat/palate itching, eye itching and lacrimation) evaluated after 14 days of treatment vs. baseline value. Safety was assessed on routine laboratory assays and recording vital signs and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: The between-group difference in primary efficacy variable averaged over the 2-week treatment period was not statistically significant. Results clearly showed that no significant difference exists between the two treatments as far as total symptoms score evaluated after 14 days of treatment vs. baseline values are concerned. Therefore, the efficacy profiles of the study medications are overlapping. The pattern and incidence of AEs was similar in both treatment groups. The most frequent AEs with both compounds were related to the CNS, headache being the most reported one. In particular, this study seems to disclose a slighter tendency to drowsiness with emedastine than with cetirizine. CONCLUSIONS: Both drugs under investigation in this trial appear to be effective for relieving the symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis in Caucasian adult patients. The results demonstrate that emedastine 4 mg o.d. is comparable in efficacy to cetirizine 10 mg once daily in the symptomatic management of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Moreover, based on the results of this study, emedastine can be considered a safe and well-tolerated drug and its safety profile seems to resemble that of cetirizine.

Electrophysiological neuroimaging of the central effects of S-adenosyl-L-methionine by mapping of electroencephalograms and event-related potentials and low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography.

BACKGROUND: S-Adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe, or ademetionine) is a naturally occurring molecule used as both a nutraceutical and a pharmaceutical to treat depression. OBJECTIVE: The central mode of action of SAMe was investigated in 20 healthy volunteers by mapping of electroencephalograms (EEGs) and event-related potentials (ERPs) and low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA). DESIGN: In an acute and subacute, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, subjects received in random order infusions of 800 mg SAMe and placebo for 7 d, with a washout period of 3 wk between the 2 treatment periods. EEG recordings were made 0, 1, 3, and 6 h after and ERP recordings were made 0 and 1 h after the drug infusions on days 1 and 7. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses of variance and Hotelling T2 tests showed significant acute and subacute encephalotropic effects of SAMe compared with placebo. Acute pharmaco-EEG changes were typical of classic antidepressants of the thymoleptic type; subacute alterations were typical of cognition enhancers. Regarding ERPs, standard N1 and P2 latencies were shortened, and target P300 latencies were lengthened. N1 amplitudes increased after subacute treatment, and temporooccipital P300 amplitudes increased after the acute dose. Similar changes were described for antidepressants. LORETA showed that the N2 source strength increased in both the left and the right temporal lobes, whereas the P300 source strength increased in the dorsolateral prefrontal regions and decreased in the ventral limbic regions. CONCLUSION: EEG-ERP mapping identified SAMe as an antidepressant. LORETA targeted brain regions crucial in the therapeutic efficacy of antidepressants.

Visualizing central effects of S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe), a natural molecule with antidepressant properties, by pharmaco-EEG mapping.

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study, the central effects of the natural molecule S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe), or ademetionine (ADE), used in low doses as a nutraceutical and in higher doses as a pharmaceutical, were investigated by means of EEG mapping and psychometry. Ten young, normal healthy volunteers of both sexes, with a mean age of 25.2+3.9 yr received, in random order, infusions of 800 mg ADE in 250 ml of isotonic solution, and placebo consisting of 250 ml of isotonic solution administered over 30 min for 7 d, with a wash-out period of 3 wk in between. EEG recordings and psychometric tests were carried out 0, 1, 3 and 6 h after drug administration on days 1 and 7. While there were no significant changes in psychometric findings, multivariate analyses of the EEG results based on MANOVA/Hotelling T 2 tests demonstrated significant encephalotropic effects of ADE compared to placebo. ADE-induced changes were characterized by a decrease in total power, an increase in absolute delta power and a decrease in absolute alpha and beta power, further by an increase in relative delta and beta power and a decrease in relative alpha power, a slowing of the delta/theta centroid, an acceleration of the alpha centroid as well as a slowing of the centroid of the total power spectrum. These changes are typical of classical antidepressants of the thymoleptic type such as imipramine and amitriptyline. Time-efficacy calculations demonstrated a significant central effect of ADE in the first hour after the first infusion, declining slowly until the third hour and thereafter steeply until the sixth hour; a further significant effect was after 1 wk of daily infusions and in the third hour after one superimposed infusion on day 7 of subacute treatment. Our pharmaco-EEG findings suggest both inhibitory and excitatory drug effects at the neurophysiological level, underlying the antidepressant properties well-documented in clinical trials.