Gender-specific outcomes of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease - results from a single movement disorder center.

INTRODUCTION AND GOAL: The investigation of gender differences in treatment response is crucial for effective personalized therapies. With only 30%, women are underrepresented in trials for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson's disease (PD). It is therefore important to evaluate gender-specific outcomes of DBS in PD in order to improve therapeutic counseling. METHODS: We analyzed clinical outcome parameters of 203 patients with PD that underwent DBS surgery targeting the subthalamic nucleus (STN) at our movement disorder center. A total of 27.6% of patients were female and 72.4% male. Motor and non-motor scores were compared before and 1 year after DBS surgery (1y FU) using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and gender specific outcomes were analyzed with chi-square tests. RESULTS: At 1y FU, we found significant improvement in UPDRS II, UPDRS III (35.78 ± 36.14% MedOFF vs. StimON-MedOFF), UPDRS IV, depression (BDI-II), and health-related disability as (ADL) that showed no gender-specific differences. No significant change was revealed for UPDRS I, QUIP, and DemTect for the entire cohort. However, when analyzing both groups separately, only women improved in general cognition (plus 1.26 ± 3.03 DemTect points, p = 0.014*), whereas only men ameliorated in depression (minus 1.97 ± 6.92 BDI-II points, p = 0.002**) and impulsivity (minus 2.80 ± 7.27 QUIP points, p = 0.004**). Chi-square tests, however, revealed no significant differences between genders. CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK: STN-DBS is a highly effective treatment for motor and non-motor symptoms of PD for both women and men but our study hints towards gender-specific outcomes in non-motor-domains like cognition, depressive symptoms, and impulsivity. To explore this in more detail, larger cohorts need to be investigated in multicenter trials.

Motor and non-motor improvements following short-term multidisciplinary day-clinic care in Parkinson´s disease.

BACKGROUND: Inpatient as well as outpatient care does often not meet PD-patients' individual needs. INTRODUCTION: Day-clinic concepts encompassing a multidisciplinary team as well as therapy adjustments accompanying everyday demands aim at filling this gap. METHODS: This is a retrospective study on short-term effects of a 3 week multidisciplinary rehabilitation program in patients with Parkinson´s disease (PD) embedded in a specialized movement disorder day-clinic. We analyzed short-term outcome of motor and non-motor symptoms (NMS) in 143 PD-patients (mean age 65.3 ± 11.9 years; Hoehn-and-Yahr-score 2.6 ± 0.7) after 3 weeks with 7.4 ± 1.8 active days of interdisciplinary day-care treatment. Participants attended the day-clinic in groups of five patients at a time. Improvements were evaluated by comparison of standardized physical therapy assessments, disease specific scores for motor symptoms (MDS-UPDRS III), mood (BDI), quality of life (PDQ39, SF36), sleep (PDSS, ESS), impulsiveness (QUIP), apathy (SAS), cognition (MMST), as well as change in medication before and directly after the intervention. RESULTS: MDS-UPDRS motor score improved significantly by 22.9 ± 21.5% (p < 0.001) and was accompanied by a significant reduction of imbalance, immobility, and weakness ranging between 6% and 17% in standardized physical therapy tests. In addition, all disease-specific non-motor scales improved significantly. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary day-clinic approach can support benefit on motor, non-motor symptoms and QoL in PD-patients. Given the increase in PD incidence and prevalence as well as the significant treatment effects shown here, more day-clinic treatment opportunities ought to be implemented to improve PD treatment adapted to everyday challenges while still reducing costs to the health care system.