Perceptions of racism in a children's psychiatric inpatient unit: A qualitative study of entrenching and uprooting factors.

WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: The impacts of racism on health are well documented and are greater for mental than for general health. Mental health professionals are well positioned to help dismantle racism and structural barriers compromising optimal patient care. WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE: We describe a systematic and orderly way to identify factors that contribute to entrenching racism as the status quo or that help to uproot it. By incorporating a racial equity lens, we can better understand daily racism and inform the optimal antiracist actions most relevant to an inpatient psychiatric setting. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Our two-domain/six-theme model may serve as a rubric for individuals to engage in structured self-reflection, for organizations in auditing or programmatic evaluation, or as scaffolding for difficult but frequently elided conversations. The unique strengths of a mental health environment can be harnessed toward the elimination of racism and racist practices in clinical care and in the workplace ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: It is well documented that racism plays a role in health care access and outcomes. However, discussions about racism in the inpatient psychiatric workplace are generally avoided. To address this gap, we incorporated a racial equity perspective into a qualitative study to better understand daily racism, its impact on patients and staff, and to inform optimal antiracist actions most relevant to inpatient psychiatric settings. AIM/QUESTION: We sought to identify factors that may contribute to or deter from racism to inform interventions to sustain a psychologically supportive environment for patients and staff. METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews using a purposive sample of 22 individuals in an acute child psychiatric inpatient service. We analysed transcripts using thematic analysis guided by a constructivist grounded theory conceptual framework. RESULTS: We identified two countervailing processes: (1) Entrenching-factors that sustain or increase racism: Predisposing, Precipitating, and Perpetuating and (2) Uprooting-factors that rectify or reduce racism: Preventing, Punctuating, and Prohibiting. We organized each of the elements into a '6P' model along a temporal sequence around sentinel racist events. For each of the six components we describe: Contributing Factors, Emotional Reactions, and Behavioural Responses as reported by participants. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Identifying factors that entrench or uproot racism can inform specific steps to improve the care of all children and families on an inpatient child psychiatry unit. The two-domain/six-theme model we developed can serve as a rubric for individuals or milieu-based inpatient settings serving patients of any age to engage in structured self-reflection, auditing, program evaluation, or as scaffolding for difficult but frequently elided conversations.

A Socio-Ecological Approach to Addressing Digital Redlining in the United States: A Call to Action for Health Equity.

Physical distancing requirements due to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has increased the need for broadband internet access. The World Health Organization defines social determinants of health as non-medical factors that impact health outcomes by affecting the conditions in which people are born, grow, work, live, and age. By this definition broadband internet access is a social determinant of health. Digital redlining-the systematic process by which specific groups are deprived of equal access to digital tools such as the internet-creates inequities in access to educational and employment opportunities, as well as healthcare and health information. Although it is known that internet service providers systematically exclude low-income communities from broadband service, little has been done to stop this discriminatory practice. In this paper, we seek to amplify the call to action against the practice of digital redlining in the United States, describe how it contributes to health disparities broadly and within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, and use a socio-ecological framework to propose short- and long-term actions to address this inequity.

Mobile device use among inpatients on a psychiatric unit: A preliminary study.

Few studies have investigated barriers to mobile phone use for health purposes among patients with serious mental illness. In an inpatient psychiatric adult sample, we examined: (a) patterns and perceptions of mobile phone use and (b) the role of psychiatric diagnoses on mobile phone use for mental health purposes. Participants completed questionnaires after using a psychometrically validated scale to determine capacity for consent. Descriptive analyses revealed that most participants owned a smartphone (94%), data plan (94%), and frequently accessed the internet (75%). Only 27% used their mobile phones daily for health purposes and 47% had used their mobile phone to access their electronic medical record (EMR). Participants with psychotic disorders were significantly less likely to have mobile access to their EMR and expressed difficulty in using a mobile app for mental health purposes; whereas participants with depressive disorders expressed low interest in using their mobile devices to monitor their mental health. Adult psychiatric inpatients may have access to and be willing to use mobile phones for purposes related to mental health. However, key barriers may include frequency of mobile phone use for health purposes and lack of mobile access to the EMR, particularly among those with psychotic disorders.

Caregiver Involvement in Sexual Risk Reduction with Substance Using Juvenile Delinquents: Overview and Preliminary Outcomes of a Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Substance using juvenile offenders have some of the highest rates for engaging in risky sexual behaviors compared to other adolescent subgroups. METHODS: An overview of the literature on sexual risk behaviors among these youth is provided, including the empirical support for including caregivers/parents as critical partners in sexual risk reduction efforts with this population. In particular, there is (a) evidence that family factors contribute to adolescent sexual risk, (b) emerging support for caregiver focused interventions that target adolescent sexual risk, and (c) established support for caregiver focused interventions that target other complex adolescent behavior problems. In addition, this paper presents preliminary results from a randomized controlled trial evaluating a family-based intervention for substance using juvenile delinquents that combines contingency management (CM) for adolescent substance use with a novel sexual risk reduction (SRR) protocol. Results through six months post-baseline (corresponding with the end of treatment) are presented for intervention fidelity and outcomes including number of intercourse acts (Sex Acts), use of condoms or abstinence (Safe Sex), and obtaining HIV testing (Testing). CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to youth focused group substance abuse treatment, the CM-SRR intervention was associated with significantly greater therapist use of SRR techniques and greater caregiver involvement in treatment sessions (supporting treatment fidelity) and significantly lower increases in Sex Acts (supporting treatment efficacy). There were also higher odds for Safe Sex and for Testing, although these results failed to reach statistical significance. Findings add to the growing literature supporting the feasibility and efficacy of caregiver focused interventions targeting sexual risk behaviors among high-risk adolescent populations.