Pain as a disease in the new International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11): Latin American expert consensus.

Aims: Pain diagnoses in the 10th version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) did not adequately support the current management of pain. Therefore, we aimed to review the new 11th revision (ICD-11) in order to analyze its usefulness for the management, coding, research and education of chronic pain from a Latin American perspective. Methods: The Latin American Federation of Associations for the Study of Pain convened a meeting of pain experts in Lima, Peru. Pain specialists from 14 Latin American countries attended the consensus meeting. Results: In ICD-11, chronic pain is defined as pain that persists or recurs longer than 3 months and is subdivided into seven categories: chronic primary pain and six types of chronic secondary pain. Chronic primary pain is now considered a disease in itself, and not a mere symptom of an underlying disease. Conclusion: The novel definition and classification of chronic pain in ICD-11 is helpful for better medical care, research and health statistics. ICD-11 will improve chronic pain management in Latin American countries, for both the pain specialist and the primary care physician.

Chronic pain is one of the most frequent reasons for medical consultation in Latin America. In the tenth revision of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10), chronic pain was not adequately defined and individual pain diagnoses were poorly defined. For the first time in Latin America, a meeting of pain experts analyzed and reviewed the 11th version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), when the Latin America Federation of Associations for the Study of Pain organized a meeting of experts from 14 Latin American countries. In ICD-11, chronic pain is recognized as a biopsychosocial phenomenon and defined as pain that continues or returns for more than 3 months. It is split into seven types: chronic primary pain and six types of chronic secondary pain. In ICD-11, chronic primary pain is now considered a disease in itself, not a mere manifestation of other disease. Our article is the first to address the problems, challenges and benefits of using ICD-11 from a Latin American perspective. It will help to facilitate and disseminate the use of this new classification of chronic pain. This will improve chronic pain treatment, statistics, research and development of better health strategies for pain management in Latin America.

Latin American and Caribbean consensus on noninvasive central nervous system neuromodulation for chronic pain management (LAC2-NIN-CP).

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pain (CP) is highly prevalent and generally undertreated health condition. Noninvasive brain stimulation may contribute to decrease pain intensity and influence other aspects related to CP. OBJECTIVE: To provide consensus-based recommendations for the use of noninvasive brain stimulation in clinical practice. METHODS: Systematic review of the literature searching for randomized clinical trials followed by consensus panel. Recommendations also involved a cost-estimation study. RESULTS: The systematic review wielded 24 transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and 22 repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) studies. The following recommendations were provided: (1) Level A for anodal tDCS over the primary motor cortex (M1) in fibromyalgia, and level B for peripheral neuropathic pain, abdominal pain, and migraine; bifrontal (F3/F4) tDCS and M1 high-definition (HD)-tDCS for fibromyalgia; Oz/Cz tDCS for migraine and for secondary benefits such as improvement in quality of life, decrease in anxiety, and increase in pressure pain threshold; (2) level A recommendation for high-frequency (HF) rTMS over M1 for fibromyalgia and neuropathic pain, and level B for myofascial or musculoskeletal pain, complex regional pain syndrome, and migraine; (3) level A recommendation against the use of anodal M1 tDCS for low back pain; and (4) level B recommendation against the use of HF rTMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the control of pain. CONCLUSION: Transcranial DCS and rTMS are recommended techniques to be used in the control of CP conditions, with low to moderate analgesic effects, and no severe adverse events. These recommendations are based on a systematic review of the literature and a consensus made by experts in the field. Readers should use it as part of the resources available to decision-making.