RESUMEN
Brazil's response to the HIV/AIDS epidemic was characterised by an innovative alliance of governmental and non-governmental actors inspired by a strong progressive tradition in public health. Brazil eventually moved to decentralise HIV/AIDS programmes to its states and cities, a policy endorsed and supported financially by the World Bank as consistent with the mix of public and private elements central to the country's HIV/AIDS strategy. However, decentralisation has not provided the results anticipated. Through interviews with key informants, government officials and patient advocates as well as observation of treatment sites, we outline how the shift of administration and resources to state and municipal bodies operated in practice. The Bank promoted decentralisation as an uncontroversial technical matter, and its programmatic guidelines implied that the nonprofit sector would be strengthened by it. However, instead of bringing HIV/AIDS policy closer to the grassroots, decentralisation has undermined the country's early work and opened the door to a rejuvenated epidemic by empowering unsympathetic local elites, marginalising the human rights focus, and removing federal oversight. Its experience holds crucial lessons for developing countries facing similar conditions.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Infecciones por VIH , Política de Salud , Política , Brasil/epidemiología , Eficiencia Organizacional , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Derechos Humanos , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Salud Pública , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
This study aimed to identify incentives and barriers to HIV testing in men who have sex with men (MSM). This was a cross-sectional study of MSM who had lived at least three months in greater metropolitan Fortaleza, Ceará State, Brazil, 2010. The study recruited 391 men ≥ 18 years of age who reported sexual relations with men in the previous six months, using Respondent Driven Sampling. Personal network and socio-demographic data were collected and HIV testing was offered, analyzed with RDSAT 6.0 and Stata 11.0. The majority were young (40.3%), had 5 to 11 years of schooling (57.3%), were single (85.1%), had low income (37.6%), and 58.1% had tested for HIV some time in life. Incentive to test: certainty of not being infected (34.1%) and the exposure to national campaign Fique Sabendo [Know your Status] (34%). Barriers: trust in partner(s) (21%) and fear of discrimination if tested positive (20.3%). Policies should be developed to ensure test confidentiality and communication campaigns focusing on information gaps and encouragement for testing.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Homosexualidad Masculina , Adolescente , Adulto , Brasil/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Asunción de Riesgos , Parejas Sexuales , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Factores Socioeconómicos , Población Urbana , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Abstract: This study aimed to identify incentives and barriers to HIV testing in men who have sex with men (MSM). This was a cross-sectional study of MSM who had lived at least three months in greater metropolitan Fortaleza, Ceará State, Brazil, 2010. The study recruited 391 men ≥ 18 years of age who reported sexual relations with men in the previous six months, using Respondent Driven Sampling. Personal network and socio-demographic data were collected and HIV testing was offered, analyzed with RDSAT 6.0 and Stata 11.0. The majority were young (40.3%), had 5 to 11 years of schooling (57.3%), were single (85.1%), had low income (37.6%), and 58.1% had tested for HIV some time in life. Incentive to test: certainty of not being infected (34.1%) and the exposure to national campaign Fique Sabendo [Know your Status] (34%). Barriers: trust in partner(s) (21%) and fear of discrimination if tested positive (20.3%). Policies should be developed to ensure test confidentiality and communication campaigns focusing on information gaps and encouragement for testing.
Resumo: Identificar os incentivos e as barreiras aos testes de HIV entre homens que fazem sexo com homens (HSH). Estudo transversal entre HSH que residiram pelo menos três meses na região metropolitana de Fortaleza, Ceará, Brasil, em 2010. Foram recrutados 391 homens, ≥ 18 anos, que relataram sexo com homens nos últimos seis meses, utilizando Respondent Driven Sampling. Coletados os dados: rede social, sociodemográficos e oferecido o teste de HIV e analisados pelo RDSAT 6.0 e Stata 11.0. A maioria era jovem (40,3%), de 5 a 11 anos de escolaridade (57,3%), solteira (85,1%), baixa renda (37,6%), 58,1% testaram para o HIV alguma vez na vida. Incentivos ao teste: certeza de não estar infectado (34,1%) e campanha nacional Fique Sabendo (34%). Barreiras: confiar no(s) parceiro(s) (21%) e medo de discriminação se o resultado for positivo (20,3%). Políticas que assegurem a confidencialidade dos testes e campanhas de comunicação voltadas às lacunas de informação e incentivo ao teste devem ser desenvolvidas.
Resumen: Identificar los incentivos y las barreras a los test de VIH entre hombres que practican sexo con hombres (HSH). Estudio transversal entre HSH que residieron por lo menos tres meses en la región metropolitana de Fortaleza, Ceará, Brasil, en 2010. Fueron reclutados 391 hombres, ≥ 18 años, que relataron sexo con hombres en los últimos seis meses, utilizando Respondent Driven Sampling. Datos recogidos: red social, sociodemográficos y ofrecido el test de VIH y analizados por el RDSAT 6.0 y Stata 11.0. La mayoría era joven (40,3%), de 5 a 11 años de escolaridad (57,3%), soltero (85,1%), baja renta (37,6%), 58,1% se hicieron pruebas del VIH alguna vez en la vida. Incentivos al test: certeza de no estar infectado (34,1%) y campaña nacional Fique Sabendo (34%). Barreras: confiar en el compañero (s) (21%) y miedo a la discriminación si el resultado fuera positivo (20,3%). Se deben desarrollar políticas que aseguren la confidencialidad de los test, así como campañas de comunicación, dirigidas a las lagunas de información sobre este asunto, además de incentivos a la realización del test.