Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 15 de 15
Filtrar
1.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn ; 13(4): 340-345, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33715794

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The "first-generation effect" refers to familial educational attainment's role in first-generation student academic success. It often implies low academic achievements at associate and bachelor degree levels. Would this be true at the doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) level? This study assessed perceptions and first-professional (P1) year student academic performance of first-generation vs. non-first-generation PharmD cohorts at the Feik School of Pharmacy. METHODS: Perceptions (academic and personal support) were assessed via a 49-question survey at the start of the second- and third-professional years. Academic performance was assessed via measures of academic success (course grades, grade point average, supplemental instruction enrollments, and academic infractions) in P1 year. Statistical t-tests and F-tests were used to analyze differences in perceptions and academic performance for the two cohorts. RESULTS: From 132 eligible students, 128 completed the survey (97% response rate) and 58 (45%) were first-generation students. First-generation students had a lower perception of their academic success, and they perceived finances as one of their greatest barriers (86% vs. 64%). Fifteen P1 courses were reviewed for academic performance, and first generations had lower final course grades in only two courses (Anatomy and Physiology 1; Medical Microbiology and Immunology). For measures of academic success, no significant differences were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study suggested that first-generation status may not be a hindrance to academic performance at the PharmD level, but that financial perceptions and a lower self-perception of academic success seem to be major barriers for first-generation PharmD students.


Asunto(s)
Rendimiento Académico , Educación en Farmacia , Estudiantes de Farmacia , Efecto de Cohortes , Evaluación Educacional , Humanos , Percepción
2.
Ann Pharmacother ; 54(4): 322-330, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31701773

RESUMEN

Background: Data regarding safety of nonselective ß-blockers (NSBBs) in patients with end-stage cirrhosis are conflicting, making it difficult for practitioners to justify if benefits outweigh the risks. Objective: Evaluate the effect of NSBB use on mortality in patients with end-stage cirrhosis. Methods: We performed a dual-center retrospective study of patients who received octreotide for a variceal bleed. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on whether or not a NSBB was prescribed at hospital discharge. The primary outcome was 24-month mortality. Multivariable logistic regression, with 24-month mortality as the dependent variable, was performed to identify independent risk factors for the primary outcome. Results: 255 patients met inclusion criteria; 24-month mortality was 32.8%. The NSBB and no-NSBB groups had similar mortality rates at 24 months (32.0% vs 38.5%, P = 0.51). Mortality at 3 months (11.6% vs 23.3%, P = 0.08) and 12 months (22.2% vs 30.0%, P = 0.36) were similar, and there were no differences in rate of variceal bleeding (22.7% vs 13.3%, P = 0.34) or cirrhosis-related cause of death (20.4% vs 23.3%, P = 0.81). In the multivariable model, age, model for end-stage liver disease with sodium and hepatocellular carcinoma were independent risk factors for 24-month mortality. NSBB therapy had no effect on 24-month mortality (adjusted odds ratio = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.32 to 3.40). Conclusion and Relevance: In patients with end-stage cirrhosis, use of NSBBs did not affect 24-month mortality. More research is needed to determine when, and if, NSBBs should be discontinued in end-stage cirrhosis.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/mortalidad , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/mortalidad , Cirrosis Hepática/mortalidad , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/efectos adversos , Adulto , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/etiología , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/prevención & control , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevención & control , Humanos , Hipertensión Portal/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión Portal/etiología , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Ann Hepatol ; 18(6): 841-848, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31611065

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Limited data describe current SBP epidemiology and specific secondary SBP prophylactic regimens, leading to variable prescribing practices. This work aims to compare 90-day and one-year SBP recurrence and mortality based on secondary SBP antibiotic prophylaxis regimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort of patients >18 years with an SBP diagnosis from 2010 to 2015 at two academic institutions. Eligible patients had ascitic PMN counts ≥250cells/mm3 or a positive ascitic culture. Patients were compared based on secondary SBP prophylaxis regimens (i.e., daily, intermittent, or no prophylaxis). RESULTS: Of 791 patients with ascitic fluid samples, 86 patients were included. Antibiotic prophylaxis included daily (n=34), intermittent (n=36), or no prophylaxis (n=16). Nearly half of SBP episodes had a positive ascitic fluid culture; 50% were gram-negative pathogens, and 50% were gram-positive pathogens. Daily and intermittent regimens had similar rates of recurrence at 90-days (19.4% vs. 14.7%, p=0.60) and one-year (33.3% vs. 26.5%, p=0.53). Similarly, mortality did not differ among daily and intermittent regimens at 90-days (32.4% vs. 30.6%, p=0.87) or one-year (67.6% vs. 63.9%, p=0.74). When comparing any prophylaxis vs. no prophylaxis, there were no differences in 90-day or one-year recurrence or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a history of SBP, our data indicate similar outcomes with daily, intermittent, or no secondary antibiotic prophylaxis. With available data, including ours, demonstrating a changing epidemiology for SBP pathogens, further data is required to determine if traditional approaches to secondary SBP prophylaxis remain appropriate.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Peritonitis/prevención & control , Anciano , Ascitis/etiología , Líquido Ascítico , Infecciones Bacterianas/etiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/mortalidad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Ceftizoxima/administración & dosificación , Ceftizoxima/análogos & derivados , Quimioprevención/métodos , Ciprofloxacina/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Moxifloxacino/administración & dosificación , Análisis Multivariante , Peritonitis/etiología , Peritonitis/mortalidad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Combinación Trimetoprim y Sulfametoxazol/administración & dosificación , Cefpodoxima
4.
J Crit Care ; 36: 265-271, 2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27595461

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Recent data have not demonstrated improved outcomes when guideline-concordant (GC) antibiotics are given to patients with health care-associated pneumonia (HCAP). This study was designed to evaluate the relationship between health outcomes and GC therapy in patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) with HCAP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a population-based cohort study of patients admitted to greater than 150 hospitals in the US Veterans Health Administration system to compare baseline characteristics, bacterial pathogens, and health outcomes in ICU patients with HCAP receiving GC-HCAP therapy, GC community-acquired pneumonia (GC-CAP) therapy, or non-GC therapy. The primary outcome was 30-day patient mortality. Risk factors for the primary outcome were assessed in a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 3593 patients met inclusion criteria and received GC-HCAP therapy (26%), GC-CAP therapy (23%), or non-GC therapy (51%). Patients receiving GC-HCAP had higher 30-day patient mortality compared to GC-CAP patients (34% vs 22%; P< .0001). After controlling for confounders, risk factors for 30-day patient mortality were vasopressor use (odds ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-2.13), recent hospital admission (1.53; 1.15-2.02), and receipt of GC-HCAP therapy (1.51; 1.20-1.90). CONCLUSIONS: Our data do not demonstrate improved outcomes among ICU patients with HCAP who received GC-HCAP therapy.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Adhesión a Directriz , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/mortalidad , Cuidados Críticos , Infección Hospitalaria/mortalidad , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Veteranos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Neumonía Bacteriana/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéutico
5.
J Nurs Educ ; 55(1): 45-8, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26812383

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Study abroad (SA) experiences for health professions students may be used to heighten cultural sensitivity to future patients and incorporate interprofessional education (IPE). METHOD: Two groups of nursing and pharmacy students participated in an SA elective over a 2-year period, traveling to China and India. RESULTS: Both groups improved significantly in knowledge, awareness, and skills following the travel experiences. Student reflections indicate that the SA experience was transformative, changing their views of travel, other cultures, personal environment, collaboration with other health professionals, and themselves. CONCLUSION: Use of SA programs is a novel method to encourage IPE, with a focus on enhancing the acquisition of cultural competency skills.


Asunto(s)
Conducta Cooperativa , Competencia Cultural , Educación en Enfermería/métodos , Cooperación Internacional , Relaciones Interprofesionales , China , India
6.
BMC Res Notes ; 8: 450, 2015 Sep 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26382940

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Linezolid has been directly compared to vancomycin in pneumonia; however, most clinical trials have not compared outcomes specifically in the healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) population. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of vancomycin and linezolid in a national cohort of hospitalized veterans with HCAP. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of Veterans Health Administration patients admitted to >150 hospitals across the United States between 2002 and 2007. Patients were included if they were at least 65 years old, had an ICD-9-CM code for pneumonia, had one or more HCAP risk factors, and received guideline-concordant antibiotic therapy with linezolid or vancomycin within 48 h of admission. Critically ill patients were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression models and propensity scores were used to examine the association between linezolid or vancomycin therapy and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1211 patients met study criteria; 946 received vancomycin and 265 received linezolid. Thirty-day mortality was higher in patients treated with vancomycin (n = 243; 25.7 %) as compared to linezolid (n = 33; 12.5 %) (adjusted OR 2.56; 95 % CI 1.67-4.04). Vancomycin use (n = 945) was also predictive of 30-day mortality compared to linezolid use (n = 264) in the propensity score analysis (adjusted OR 2.55; 95 % CI 1.66-4.02). CONCLUSION: Linezolid was associated with decreased patient mortality compared to vancomycin in a national cohort of non-critically ill, hospitalized veterans with HCAP.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Linezolid/uso terapéutico , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Linezolid/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Vancomicina/administración & dosificación
7.
BMC Infect Dis ; 15: 380, 2015 Sep 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26385225

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Community-onset (CO) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia is an evolving problem, and there is a great need for a reliable method to assess MRSA risk at hospital admission. A new MRSA prediction score classifies CO-pneumonia patients into low, medium, and high-risk groups based on objective criteria available at baseline. Our objective was to assess the effect of initial MRSA therapy on mortality in these three risk groups. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Patients were included if they were hospitalized with pneumonia and received antibiotics within the first 48 h of admission. They were stratified into MRSA therapy and no MRSA therapy treatment arms based on antibiotics received in the first 48 h. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 80,330 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 36% received MRSA therapy and 64% did not receive MRSA therapy. The majority of patients were classified as either low (51%) or medium (47%) risk, with only 2% classified as high-risk. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that initial MRSA therapy was associated with a lower 30-day mortality in the high-risk group (adjusted odds ratio 0.57; 95% confidence interval 0.42-0.77). Initial MRSA therapy was not beneficial in the low or medium-risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated improved survival with initial MRSA therapy in high-risk CO-pneumonia patients. The MRSA risk score might help spare MRSA therapy for only those patients who are likely to benefit.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Neumonía/microbiología , Neumonía/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
8.
BMC Med ; 12: 96, 2014 Jun 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24916809

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of antibiotics is the single most important driver in antibiotic resistance. Nevertheless, antibiotic overuse remains common. Decline in antibiotic prescribing in the United States coincided with the launch of national educational campaigns in the 1990s and other interventions, including the introduction of routine infant immunizations with the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV-7); however, it is unknown if these trends have been sustained through recent measurements. METHODS: We performed an analysis of nationally representative data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys from 2000 to 2010. Trends in population-based prescribing were examined for overall antibiotics, broad-spectrum antibiotics, antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) and antibiotics prescribed during ARTI visits. Rates were reported for three age groups: children and adolescents (<18 years), adults (18 to 64 years), and older adults (≥65 years). RESULTS: An estimated 1.4 billion antibiotics were dispensed over the study period. Overall antibiotic prescribing decreased 18% (risk ratio (RR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.72 to 0.94) among children and adolescents, remained unchanged for adults, and increased 30% (1.30, 1.14 to 1.49) among older adults. Rates of broad-spectrum antibiotic prescriptions doubled from 2000 to 2010 (2.11, 1.81 to 2.47). Proportions of broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing increased across all age groups: 79% (1.79, 1.52 to 2.11) for children and adolescents, 143% (2.43, 2.07 to 2.86) for adults and 68% (1.68, 1.45 to 1.94) for older adults. ARTI antibiotic prescribing decreased 57% (0.43, 0.35 to 0.52) among children and adolescents and 38% (0.62, 0.48 to 0.80) among adults; however, it remained unchanged among older adults. While the number of ARTI visits declined by 19%, patients with ARTI visits were more likely to receive an antibiotic (73% versus 64%; P <0.001) in 2010 than in 2000. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic use has decreased among children and adolescents, but has increased for older adults. Broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing continues to be on the rise. Public policy initiatives to promote the judicious use of antibiotics should continue and programs targeting older adults should be developed.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Pacientes Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/prevención & control , Estados Unidos , Vacunación , Vacunas Conjugadas/administración & dosificación , Adulto Joven
9.
Ann Pharmacother ; 48(2): 258-67, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24259640

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Health care professionals, trainees, and patients use the Internet extensively. Editable Web sites may contain inaccurate, incomplete, and/or outdated information that may mislead the public's perception of the topic. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the editable, online descriptions of clinical pharmacy and pharmacist and attempt to improve their accuracy. METHODS: The authors identified key areas within clinical pharmacy to evaluate for accuracy and appropriateness on the Internet. Current descriptions that were reviewed on public domain Web sites included: (1) clinical pharmacy and the clinical pharmacist, (2) pharmacy education, (3) clinical pharmacy and development and provision for reimbursement, (4) clinical pharmacists and advanced specialty certifications/training opportunities, (5) pharmacists and advocacy, and (6) clinical pharmacists and interdisciplinary/interprofessional content. The authors assessed each content area to determine accuracy and prioritized the need for updating, when applicable, to achieve consistency in descriptions and relevancy. The authors found that Wikipedia, a public domain that allows users to update, was consistently the most common Web site produced in search results. RESULTS: The authors' evaluation resulted in the creation or revision of 14 Wikipedia Web pages. However, rejection of 3 proposed newly created Web pages affected the authors' ability to address identified content areas with deficiencies and/or inaccuracies. CONCLUSIONS: Through assessing and updating editable Web sites, the authors strengthened the online representation of clinical pharmacy in a clear, cohesive, and accurate manner. However, ongoing assessments of the Internet are continually needed to ensure accuracy and appropriateness.


Asunto(s)
Internet , Farmacia , Edición , Educación en Farmacia , Comunicación en Salud , Humanos , Farmacias , Farmacéuticos
10.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 26(5): 508-17, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24004702

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To measure the incidence of treatment failure and associated costs in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study in 13 primary care clinics. Primary care providers collected clinical data, wound swabs, and 90-day follow-up information. Patients were considered to have "moderate or complicated" SSTIs if they had a lesion ≥5 cm in diameter or diabetes mellitus. Treatment failure was evaluated within 90 days of the initial visit. Cost estimates were obtained from federal sources. RESULTS: Overall, treatment failure occurred in 21% of patients (21 of 98) at a mean additional cost of $1,933.71 per patient. In a subgroup analysis of patients who received incision and drainage, those with moderate or complicated SSTIs had higher rates of treatment failure than those with mild or uncomplicated SSTIs (36% vs. 10%; P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: One in 5 patients presenting to a primary care clinic for a methicillin-resistant S. aureus SSTI will likely require additional interventions at an associated cost of almost $2,000 per patient. Baseline risk stratification and new treatment approaches are needed to reduce treatment failures and costs in the primary care setting.


Asunto(s)
Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/economía , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/terapia , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/economía , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/terapia , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Adulto , Antibacterianos/economía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Índice de Masa Corporal , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/economía , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Drenaje , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/microbiología , Texas
11.
Am J Med ; 124(8): 689-97, 2011 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21663884

RESUMEN

Health care-associated pneumonia is a relatively new classification of pneumonia that includes community-dwelling pneumonia patients having contact with the health care system. Current data indicate that health care-associated pneumonia patients present with more severe disease, are more likely to be infected with drug-resistant pathogens, and suffer increased mortality compared with community-acquired pneumonia patients. Guidelines recommend that these patients receive empiric antibiotics similar to those recommended for nosocomial pneumonia; however, it is not currently known if outcomes are improved when health care-associated pneumonia patients are treated with these therapies. In addition, the individual health care-associated pneumonia risk factors are based on limited data and are a poor predictor of patients likely to be infected with drug-resistant pathogens. Many questions remain on how to most appropriately care for this growing group of pneumonia patients. This review is an evidence-based discussion of current health care-associated pneumonia data, the individual health care-associated pneumonia risk factors, and limitations and additional considerations for the health care-associated pneumonia classification system.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Atención a la Salud , Neumonía/epidemiología , Neumonía/etiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Hogares para Ancianos , Hospitalización , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/efectos adversos , Casas de Salud , Admisión del Paciente , Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía/microbiología , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo
12.
Drugs ; 71(6): 757-70, 2011 Apr 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21504252

RESUMEN

Fluoroquinolone use has dramatically increased since the introduction of the first respiratory fluoroquinolone in the late 1990s. Over a relatively brief period of time, the respiratory fluoroquinolones have supplanted other first-line options as the predominant community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) therapy in hospitals. This article discusses the rise of the fluoroquinolone era, debates the comparative effectiveness of fluoroquinolones for CAP therapy, examines fluoroquinolone resistance and adverse drug reactions, and discusses new trends in pneumonia epidemiology and outcomes assessment. Overall, published data suggest that fluoroquinolone monotherapy is associated with improved patient survival compared with ß-lactam monotherapy and similar survival to ß-lactam plus macrolide combination therapy. Fluoroquinolone monotherapy may be associated with shorter hospital length of stay compared with ß-lactam plus macrolide combination therapy, particularly in severe pneumonia or with high-dose therapy. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that any individual fluoroquinolone therapy is better than another with regards to patient mortality. Fluoroquinolones are generally well tolerated and Streptococcus pneumoniae resistance remains low; however, rare but serious adverse effects have been reported. Some members of the fluoroquinolone class have been removed from the market amidst safety concerns. Pneumonia classifications have changed and antipseudomonal fluoroquinolones may have a role in healthcare-associated pneumonia when administered in combination with other antipseudomonal and anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus therapies.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapéutico , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos de los Medicamentos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Utilización de Medicamentos/tendencias , Fluoroquinolonas/administración & dosificación , Fluoroquinolonas/efectos adversos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Neumonía Bacteriana/epidemiología , Neumonía Bacteriana/microbiología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 10: 143, 2010 May 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20507628

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: African-Americans admitted to U.S. hospitals with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are more likely than Caucasians to experience prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS), possibly due to either differential treatment decisions or patient characteristics. METHODS: We assessed associations between race and outcomes (Intensive Care Unit [ICU] variables, LOS, 30-day mortality) for African-American or Caucasian patients over 65 years hospitalized in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) with CAP (2002-2007). Patients admitted to the ICU were analyzed separately from those not admitted to the ICU. VHA patients who died within 30 days of discharge were excluded from all LOS analyses. We used chi-square and Fisher's exact statistics to compare dichotomous variables, the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test to compare age by race, and Cox Proportional Hazards Regression to analyze hospital LOS. We used separate generalized linear mixed-effect models, with admitting hospital as a random effect, to examine associations between patient race and the receipt of guideline-concordant antibiotics, ICU admission, use of mechanical ventilation, use of vasopressors, LOS, and 30-day mortality. We defined statistical significance as a two-tailed p

Asunto(s)
Población Negra/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía/etnología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/etnología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/terapia , Femenino , Hospitales de Veteranos , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Neumonía/mortalidad , Neumonía/terapia , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéutico
14.
Clin Ther ; 32(2): 293-9, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20206787

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the survival benefit of US community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) practice guidelines in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with CAP who were admitted to 5 community hospital ICUs between November 1, 1999, and April 30, 2000. The guidelines for antibiotic prescriptions were the 2007 Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society guidelines. Guideline-concordant antimicrobial therapy was defined as a beta-lactam plus fluoroquinolone or macrolide, antipseudomonal beta-lactam plus fluoroquinolone, or antipseudomonal beta-lactam plus aminoglycoside plus fluoroquinolone or macrolide. Patients with a documented beta-lactam allergy were considered to have received guideline-concordant therapy if they received a fluoroquinolone with or without clindamycin, or aztreonam plus fluoroquinolone with or without aminoglycoside. All other antibiotic regimens were considered to be guideline discordant. Time to clinical stability, time to oral antibiotics, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality were evaluated with regression models that included the outcome as the dependent variable, guideline-concordant antibiotic therapy as the independent variable, and the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) score and facility as covariates. RESULTS: The median age of the 129 patients included in the study was 71 years (interquartile range, 60-79 years). Sixty-two of 129 patients (48%) were male. Comorbidities included liver dysfunction (7 patients [5%]), heart failure (62 [48%]), renal dysfunction (39 [30%]), cerebrovascular disease (21 [16%]), and cancer (14 [11%]). The median (25th-75th percentile) PSI score was 119 (98-142), and overall mortality was 19% (25 patients). Patient demographics were similar between groups. Fifty-three patients (41%) received guideline-endorsed therapies. Guideline-discordant therapy was associated with an increase in inpatient mortality (25% vs 11%; odds ratio = 2.99 [95% CI, 1.08-9.54]). Receipt of guideline-concordant antibiotics was not associated with reductions in time to clinical stability, time to oral antibiotics, or length of hospital stay when patients who died were excluded from the analysis. CONCLUSION: Guideline-concordant empiric antibiotic therapy was associated with improved survival among these patients with CAP who were admitted to 5 ICUs.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Admisión del Paciente , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Anciano , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/mortalidad , Comorbilidad , Quimioterapia Combinada , Utilización de Medicamentos , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Bacteriana/microbiología , Neumonía Bacteriana/mortalidad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Texas/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...