COVID-19: The association between knowledge, practice, and attitude of tuberculosis infection in the university population.

Objective: The study focused on the association between knowledge, practice and attitude towards tuberculosis in the university population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Used Jean Watson's theory of caring in mindfulness practice and surveyed 187 nursing surveyed 187 nursing interns from three universities. The instruments (knowledge, practice and attitude questionnaires) were validated and showed high reliability (Cronbach's α reliability Cronbach's α = 0.814). Results: A strong correlation was found between knowledge and practice of tuberculosis (r = 0.996, p < 0.05), indicating a significant association. However, the association between knowledge and attitude was weaker (r = 0.160, p < 0.05). The majority had knowledge (61.2 %), a neutral practice (52.2 %) and an acceptable attitude towards TB (85.4 %). Conclusion: These findings suggest the need to strengthen anti-TB strategies, especially in times of pandemic. The inclusion of Watson's humanistic approach can improve the well-being of inmates and the care of patients.

Public Management for Local Development: Perception from the Administrative Area of a Municipality in Peru.

Objective: To analyze the perception of the administrative department of a municipality regarding public management. Method: Qualitative approach through interviews. The sample consisted of 30 employees from the administrative department of a municipality in Peru. Results: It was found that the employees seem to have a clear understanding of the applied public management model and the organization of the administrative area. Responses regarding the management of financial, human, and material resources vary in accuracy and detail, suggesting a possible lack of knowledge in some areas. It is important to enhance communication clarity on these topics and provide precise information to ensure effective and transparent management within the municipality. Conclusion: Municipality employees demonstrate an understanding of their roles and face challenges in teamwork and bureaucracy. There is some confusion regarding the "New Public Management" and a lack of knowledge in resource management. Improving training, streamlining procedures, and fostering team participation in planning are crucial aspects. Furthermore, implementing periodic assessments is recommended to enhance administrative efficiency.

Prevalence and factors associated with cervical cancer preventive screening in a Peruvian region. / Prevalencia y factores asociados al tamizaje preventivo del cáncer cervical en una región de Perú.

Introduction: Preventive screening for cervical cancer is the best available strategy to reduce the incidence and mortality from this neoplasm. However, the low proportion of women who undergo routine screening is a pending concern for healthcare systems worldwide. Objective: To estimate the prevalence and factors associated with preventive cervical cancer screening in a Peruvian region. Methods: Cross-sectional, multicenter study. It enrolled 1146 women users of healthcare centers in a Peruvian sanitary region. The dependent variable was the performance of cervical cancer preventive screening with Papanicolaou or visual inspection with acetic acid in the last two years. The independent variables were sociodemographic and socio-sanitary factors, knowledge about cervical cancer and human papillomavirus, attitudes and information towards screening tests. To evaluate the association between the variables, crude and adjusted prevalence ratios were calculated with generalized linear models of Poisson. Results: The overall prevalence of preventive screening was 50.5%. This was associated with being tested, having a higher education level and urban area of residence, using contraceptive methods, having health insurance, being recommended by healthcare personnel to be screened, and being concerned about developing cervical cancer. It was also associated with responding that this cancer is preventable, being aware of cervical cancer or human papillomavirus, and believing it can cause cervical cancer. In contrast, considering preventive screening risky was associated with not having the test. Conclusions: The proportion of women with preventive cervical cancer screening is low. In addition, certain associated modifiable factors were identified, which could improve preventive screening behaviors and rates.

Introducción: El tamizaje preventivo del cáncer cervical es la mejor estrategia disponible para mermar la incidencia y mortalidad por esta neoplasia. No obstante, la baja proporción de mujeres que se someten al tamizaje de rutina, constituye un problema pendiente para los sistemas de salud del mundo. Objetivo: Estimar la prevalencia y los factores asociados a realizarse el tamizaje preventivo del cáncer cervical en una región de Perú. Métodos: Estudio transversal y multicéntrico. En él participaron 1146 mujeres usuarias de centros de salud de una región sanitaria de Perú. La variable dependiente fue la realización de un tamizaje preventivo de cáncer cervical con Papanicolaou o inspección visual con ácido acético, en los últimos dos años. Las variables independientes fueron factores sociodemográficos, sociosanitarios, conocimientos sobre cáncer de cuello uterino y virus del papiloma humano, actitudes e información ante las pruebas de tamizaje. Para evaluar la asociación entre las variables se calcularon razones de prevalencia crudas y ajustadas, con modelos lineales generalizados de la familia Poisson. Resultados: La prevalencia general del tamizaje preventivo fue de 50,5%. Esta se asoció a realizarse la prueba, el grado de instrucción superior y área de residencia urbana, usar métodos anticonceptivos, tener seguro de salud, recibir recomendación del personal de salud para realizarse el tamizaje y sentirse preocupada por adquirir cáncer de cuello uterino. También se vinculó a quienes respondieron que el cáncer es prevenible, que habían oído hablar de cáncer cervicouterino o virus del papiloma humano y si cree que este virus puede causar cáncer de cuello uterino, Además, se asoció el admitir que existe posibilidad de curar el cáncer con su detección temprana. En cambio, el considerar riesgoso el tamizaje preventivo se relacionó con no realizarse la prueba. Conclusiones: La proporción de mujeres con tamizaje preventivo de cáncer cervical es baja. Asimismo, se identificaron ciertos factores asociados modificables, los que podrían mejorar las conductas y tasas del tamizaje preventivo.

Prevalencia y factores asociados al tamizaje preventivo del cáncer cervical en una región de Perú / Prevalence and factors associated with cervical cancer preventive screening in a Peruvian region

INTRODUCCIÓN: El tamizaje preventivo del cáncer cervical es la mejor estrategia disponible para mermar la incidencia y mortalidad por esta neoplasia. No obstante, la baja proporción de mujeres que se someten al tamizaje de rutina, constituye un problema endiente para los sistemas de salud del mundo. OBJETIVO: Estimar la prevalencia y los factores asociados a realizarse el tamizaje preventivo del cáncer cervical en una región de Perú. MÉTODOS: Estudio transversal y multicéntrico. En él participaron 1146 mujeres usuarias de centros de salud de una región sanitaria de Perú. La variable dependiente fue la realización de un tamizaje preventivo de cáncer cervical con Papanicolaou o inspección visual con ácido acético, en los últimos dos años. Las variables independientes fueron factores sociodemográficos, sociosanitarios, conocimientos sobre cáncer de cuello uterino y virus del papiloma humano, actitudes e información ante las pruebas de tamizaje. Para evaluar la asociación entre las variables se calcularon razones de prevalencia crudas y ajustadas, con modelos lineales generalizados de la familia Poisson. RESULTADOS: La prevalencia general del tamizaje preventivo fue de 50,5%. Esta se asoció a realizarse la prueba, el grado de instrucción superior y área de residencia urbana, usar métodos anticonceptivos, tener seguro de salud, recibir recomendación del personal de salud para realizarse el tamizaje y sentirse preocupada por adquirir cáncer de cuello uterino. También se vinculó a quienes respondieron que el cáncer es prevenible, que habían oído hablar de cáncer cervicouterino o virus del papiloma humano y si cree que este virus puede causar cáncer de cuello uterino, Además, se asoció el admitir que existe posibilidad de curar el cáncer con su detección temprana. En cambio, el considerar riesgoso el tamizaje preventivo se relacionó con no realizarse la prueba. CONCLUSIONES: La proporción de mujeres con tamizaje preventivo de cáncer cervical es baja. Asimismo, se identificaron ciertos factores asociados modificables, los que podrían mejorar las conductas y tasas del tamizaje preventivo.

INTRODUCTION: Preventive screening for cervical cancer is the best available strategy to reduce the incidence and mortality from this neoplasm. However, the low proportion of women who undergo routine screening is a pending concern for healthcare systems worldwide. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence and factors associated with preventive cervical cancer screening in a Peruvian region. METHODS: Cross-sectional, multicenter study. It enrolled 1146 women users of healthcare centers in a Peruvian sanitary region. The dependent variable was the performance of cervical cancer preventive screening with Papanicolaou or visual inspection with acetic acid in the last two years. The independent variables were sociodemographic and socio-sanitary factors, knowledge about cervical cancer and human papillomavirus, attitudes and information towards screening tests. To evaluate the association between the variables, crude and adjusted prevalence ratios were calculated with generalized linear models of Poisson. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of preventive screening was 50.5%. This was associated with being tested, having a higher education level and urban area of residence, using contraceptive methods, having health insurance, being recommended by healthcare personnel to be screened, and being concerned about developing cervical cancer. It was also associated with responding that this cancer is preventable, being aware of cervical cancer or human papillomavirus, and believing it can cause cervical cancer. In contrast, considering preventive screening risky was associated with not having the test. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of women with preventive cervical cancer screening is low. In addition, certain associated modifiable factors were identified, which could improve preventive screening behaviors and rates.