Effectiveness and safety of a cement-on-cement removal system for hip and knee arthroplasty revision surgery.

Cement removal during hip or knee arthroplasty revision is challenging and not exempt of complications. Cement-on-cement procedure is among techniques developed to safe removal of cement from bone, and it could be a realistic solution. This cement-on-cement devices can provide advantages in removing bone cement during hip and knee arthroplasty septic and non-septic revision surgeries, and can be regarded as an effective and safe alternative. We present our experience using the cement-on-cement technique in 34 cases between 2010 and 2021, including revision surgeries for 20 knee and 14 hip arthroplasties. In 3 out of 34 cases the technique failed, with a success of 91%. Mean surgical time was 2.77 (SD 0.93) hours and blood transfusion was required in 23 cases. Success was achieved in every aseptic case. Of all patients, 60% were septic cases. Infection was considered to be eradicated in 70% (14/20) of patients with a septic revision. Cement-on-cement is a safe and effective alternative for cement removal during hip and knee arthroplasty revision. Level of evidence: III, retrospective case series.

Staphylococcus lugdunensis, a Not So Infrequent Pathogen in Orthopedic Surgery.

Abstract Background: Staphylococcus lugdunensis is a coagulase-negative staphylococci that is considered normal skin microbiota. It has been described as a cause of soft tissue infections but is not a common micro-organism as the cause of orthopedic surgery-related infections. This study describes the characteristics, treatment, and results of musculoskeletal infection by Staphylococcus lugdunensis treated in our institution. Methods: We performed a descriptive, retrospective observational study. Clinical records of all musculoskeletal infections treated in our department between 2012 and 2020 were reviewed. We selected those patients with a positive monomicrobial culture for Staphylococcus lugdunensis. Risk factors for infection, patient's medical records, previous surgery performed, time from surgery to infection, culture antibiogram, antibiotic and surgical treatment for the infection, and recovery rate were registered for the analysis. Results: Of the 1,482 patients with musculoskeletal infections diagnosed in our institution, 22 had a monomicrobial positive culture of Staphylococcus lugdunensis after an orthopedic surgery representing 1.5% of all orthopedic infections. Ten patients underwent arthroplasty, six underwent fractures synthesis, three had foot surgeries, two had anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions, and one had spine surgery. All patients needed surgery and antibiotic treatment with a mean of two surgeries. The most used antibiotic scheme was levofloxacin-rifampicin. The mean follow-up was 36 months. Ninety-six percent of the patients achieved a complete clinical and analytical recovery. Conclusions: Although musculoskeletal infections caused by Staphylococcus lugdunensis are not common, we have observed a statistically significant incidence increase of Staphylococcus lugdunensis in recent years. If managed with appropriately aggressive surgical treatment and correct antibiotic therapy, good results can be obtained.

Does a New Antibiotic Scheme Improve the Outcome of Staphylococcus aureus-Caused Acute Prosthetic Joint Infections (PJI) Treated with Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR)?

One of the most commonly used treatments for acute prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is DAIR (debridement, antibiotics and implant retention), which comprises the debridement and the retention of the implant, followed by antibiotic treatment. The efficacy of DAIR remains unclear, as the literature has demonstrated variable success rates, ranging from 26% to 92%. The Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most closely related causative microorganisms, especially with acute and late-acute PJI; it has been identified as one of the most significant predictors of DAIR failure. The current guidelines consider the use of vancomycin as the therapy of choice, but it requires the close control of possible side effects. The aim of this study is to determine if a new combination of antibiotics (a highly bactericidal initial combination followed by an antibiofilm scheme) decreases the failure of DAIR-treated acute prosthetic joint infection (PJI) caused by Staphylococcus aureus. A retrospective analysis of cases of orthopedic infections during a nine-year period (2011-2019) was performed. A total of 45 acute PJI cases caused by S. aureus were diagnosed. The results of two antibiotic schemes were compared: a novel scheme comprising 5 days of daptomycin (10 mg/kg/24 h) + cloxacillin (2 g/6 h) followed by levofloxacin (500 mg/24 h) + rifampicin (600 mg/24 h), versus a traditional, less bactericidal scheme of vancomycin (1000 mg/12 h) plus rifampicin (600 mg/24 h) or levofloxacin (500 mg/24 h) plus rifampicin (600 mg/24 h). Twenty-two out of the twenty-four patients treated with the new scheme (91.6%) were free of infection after 24.8 months of mean follow-up, whereas fourteen out of twenty-one patients (66.6%) were free of infection after 46.6 months of follow-up. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.036). Demographic comparisons demonstrated homogeneous features, except the Charlson score, which was higher in the novel scheme group (p = 0.047). The combination of high-dose daptomycin and cloxacillin, followed by levofloxacin plus rifampicin, together with surgical treatment, shows better results when compared with other antibiotic schemes for treating acute PJI caused by S. aureus in which DAIR was performed.

Comparative In Vitro Study of Biofilm Formation and Antimicrobial Susceptibility in Gram-Negative Bacilli Isolated from Prosthetic Joint Infections.

Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are typically caused by microorganisms that grow in biofilms. Traditional antimicrobial susceptibility tests are based on the study of planktonic bacteria that might lead to missing the biofilm behavior and to a treatment failure. This study was designed to analyze the antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) isolates from PJIs in planktonic and sessile states and the possible relationship between antimicrobial resistance and biofilm formation. A total of 46 clinical isolates from patients with PJIs (mainly hip and knee prostheses) plus three GNB ATCC isolates were studied. The Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC), minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC), minimal biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC), and minimal biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) were assessed using a previously published methodology. Almost all of the GNB clinical isolates tested were biofilm forming. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the largest biofilm-forming species. A comparison of MBIC90 versus MIC90 shows an increase higher than 1- to -2-fold dilutions in most antimicrobials studied, and MBEC90 was significantly higher than MIC90, becoming resistant to all the antimicrobial drugs tested. Higher biofilm production values were obtained in antibiotic-susceptible Escherichia coli in comparison to their resistant counterparts. However, regarding the relationships between antimicrobial resistance and biofilm formation, our analysis showed that each strain differed. A high antimicrobial resistance rate was found among the GNB studied. Moreover, almost all bacterial isolates were in vitro biofilm formers. Although there was no significant association between biofilm and antibiotic resistance, multidrug-resistant isolates were found to be greater biofilm formers than non-multidrug-resistant isolates. IMPORTANCE This study is the first one to analyze a high number of isolates of Gram-negative bacilli that are the cause of prosthetic joint infection. The analysis includes biofilm development and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of both planktonic and sessile bacteria. The obtained results support the clinical knowledge about the treatment of these bacteria when biofilms are involved.

Usefulness of a Multiplex PCR Assay for the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infections in the Routine Setting.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay as a complementary tool in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections in the routine setting of a clinical microbiology laboratory, with a special focus on patients at high risk of culture-negative infections and high suspicion of infection. METHODS: The results obtained in the routine care setting with the use of the commercial multiplex PCR (Unyvero i60©, Curetis AG, Holzgerlingen, Germany) were retrospectively reviewed. The test was performed in samples of patients with suspected prosthetic joint infection, which were also processed for conventional diagnostic methods, including sonication of the implant when possible. Patients selected for the test were those with negative cultures after a 24-h incubation period. RESULTS: Ninety-nine PCRs were performed, 57 of which were diagnostic of infection according to 2018 MSIS criteria. Nine patients received antibiotics within the 15 days prior to the diagnostic procedure. Tested samples included synovial fluid (33), sonication fluid (56) and tissue biopsies (10). The PCR test detected microorganisms in 26 samples: including two cases of polymicrobial infection. Eleven patients were diagnosed by using PCR only. The most frequently detected microorganism in PCR was Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus in 11 samples, followed by Staphylococcus aureus in five. One sample was positive for the bacteria universal primer, included in the 2.0 version of the kit. Only one discrepancy was detected between a negative PCR and a positive culture. One sample was also positive for a resistance marker (detection of mecA gene in a case of methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection). CONCLUSION: The incorporation of the Unyvero ITI multiple PCR technique in patients selected by clinical experts is a useful tool for the diagnosis of bone and joint infections in a routine care setting. A close clinical-microbiological collaboration improves the usefulness of this kit for the management of patients with these infections.

Prognosis of unexpected positive intraoperative cultures in arthroplasty revision: A large multicenter cohort.

BACKGROUND: The positive-intraoperative-cultures-type prosthetic joint infection (PIOC-PJI) is considered when surgical cultures yield microorganisms in presumed aseptic arthroplasty revisions. Herein we assess the risk factors for failure in the largest cohort of PIOC-PJI patients reported to date. METHODS: A retrospective, observational, multicenter study was performed during 2007-2017. Surgeries leading to diagnose PIOC-PJI included only one-stage procedures with either complete or partial prosthesis revision. Failure was defined as recurrence caused by the same microorganism. RESULTS: 203 cases were included (age 72 years, 52% females). Coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 125, 62%) was the main etiology, but some episodes were caused by virulent bacteria (n = 51, 25%). Prosthesis complete and partial revision was performed in 93 (46%) and 110 (54%) cases, respectively. After a median of 3.4 years, failure occurred in 17 episodes (8.4%, 95%CI 5.3-13.1). Partial revision was an independent predictor of failure (HR 3.63; 95%CI 1.03-12.8), adjusted for gram-negative bacilli (GNB) infection (HR 2.68; 95%CI 0.91-7.89) and chronic renal impairment (HR 2.40; 95%CI 0.90-6.44). Treatment with biofilm-active antibiotics (rifampin/fluoroquinolones) had a favorable impact on infections caused by staphylococci and GNB. CONCLUSION: Overall prognosis of PIOC-PJI is good, but close follow-up is required in cases of partial revision and in infections caused by GNB.

Surgical Technique of a Cement-On-Cement Removal System for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Revision Surgery.

Cement removal during hip or knee arthroplasty revision surgery is technically demanding and prone to severe complications such as periprosthetic fractures, incomplete cement removal, or perforations. Several alternative techniques have been developed to enable complete, accurate, and safe removal of cement from bone, including osteotomies and cortical windows, endoscopic instruments, ultrasound devices, lithotripsy, and laser-assisted removal. We describe a cement-on-cement technique with a sterile, single-use tool for cement removal. The cement is removed piece by piece using a specifically designed device, without osteotomies or cortical windows.

Cutibacterium spp. isolated from orthopaedic implant-associated infection: A not-so-slowly growing organism.

INTRODUCTION: It has been reported that microbiological diagnosis of Cutibacterium spp. infection requires a prolonged incubation time (up to 14 days). We present our experience with regard to incubation time for detection of Cutibacterium spp. in orthopaedic samples over a 10-year period. METHODS: One hundred and nineteen samples were included in this retrospective study. Fifty-three were implants (having previously undergone sonication), 64 were periprosthetic tissue biopsies and two were synovial fluids. Atkins's criteria were used for interpreting the isolates. Quantification and number of days until a culture became positive for Cutibacterium spp. were evaluated. RESULTS: The median number of days to detection of a clinically significant isolate and a contaminant was 4 days. No clinically significant isolates grew after day eight. CONCLUSION: Most clinically significant isolates of Cutibacterium spp. are detected in the first 7 days of incubation, although a recommendation of prolonged incubation (up to 14 days) appears to be necessary for detecting other organisms.

Cutibacterium spp. isolated from orthopaedic implant-associated infection: A not-so-slowly growing organism / Cutibacterium spp. aislados de infecciones ortopédicas asociadas a implantes: Un microorganismo de crecimiento no tan lento

Introduction: It has been reported that microbiological diagnosis of Cutibacterium spp. infection requires a prolonged incubation time (up to 14 days). We present our experience with regard to incubation time for detection of Cutibacterium spp. in orthopaedic samples over a 10-year period. Methods: One hundred and nineteen samples were included in this retrospective study. Fifty-three were implants (having previously undergone sonication), 64 were periprosthetic tissue biopsies and two were synovial fluids. Atkins's criteria were used for interpreting the isolates. Quantification and number of days until a culture became positive for Cutibacterium spp. were evaluated. Results: The median number of days to detection of a clinically significant isolate and a contaminant was 4 days. No clinically significant isolates grew after day eight. Conclusion: Most clinically significant isolates of Cutibacterium spp. are detected in the first 7 days of incubation, although a recommendation of prolonged incubation (up to 14 days) appears to be necessary for detecting other organisms.(AU)

Introducción: Se ha reportado que el diagnóstico microbiológico de las infecciones por Cutibacterium spp. requiere un tiempo de incubación prolongado (hasta 14 días). Presentamos nuestra experiencia al respecto en muestras ortopédicas durante un período de 10 años. Métodos: Se incluyeron en este estudio retrospectivo 119 muestras de las que 53 fueron implantes (previa sonicación), 64 biopsias de tejido periprotésico y dos líquidos sinoviales. Para la interpretación se siguieron los criterios de Atkins. Se evaluó la cuantificación y el número de días hasta que el cultivo fue positivo para Cutibacterium spp. Resultados: La mediana del número de días para detectar un aislado clínicamente significativo y un contaminante fue de cuatro días. Ningún aislado clínicamente relevante creció después del día ocho. Conclusión: La mayoría de aislados clínicamente significativos de Cutibacterium spp. se detectan durante los siete primeros días de incubación, sin embargo, parece necesaria una incubación de hasta 14 días para la detección de otros microorganismos.(AU)

Prosthetic Shoulder Joint Infection by Cutibacterium acnes: Does Rifampin Improve Prognosis? A Retrospective, Multicenter, Observational Study.

This retrospective, multicenter observational study aimed to describe the outcomes of surgical and medical treatment of C. acnes-related prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and the potential benefit of rifampin-based therapies. Patients with C. acnes-related PJI who were diagnosed and treated between January 2003 and December 2016 were included. We analyzed 44 patients with C. acnes-related PJI (median age, 67.5 years (IQR, 57.3-75.8)); 75% were men. The majority (61.4%) had late chronic infection according to the Tsukayama classification. All patients received surgical treatment, and most antibiotic regimens (43.2%) included ß-lactam. Thirty-four patients (87.17%) were cured; five showed relapse. The final outcome (cure vs. relapse) showed a nonsignificant trend toward higher failure frequency among patients with previous prosthesis (OR: 6.89; 95% CI: 0.80-58.90) or prior surgery and infection (OR: 10.67; 95% IC: 1.08-105.28) in the same joint. Patients treated with clindamycin alone had a higher recurrence rate (40.0% vs. 8.8%). Rifampin treatment did not decrease recurrence in patients treated with ß-lactams. Prior prosthesis, surgery, or infection in the same joint might be related to recurrence, and rifampin-based combinations do not seem to improve prognosis. Debridement and implant retention appear a safe option for surgical treatment of early PJI.

The Impact of Surgical Strategy and Rifampin on Treatment Outcome in Cutibacterium Periprosthetic Joint Infections.

BACKGROUND: Cutibacterium species are common pathogens in periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). These infections are often treated with ß-lactams or clindamycin as monotherapy, or in combination with rifampin. Clinical evidence supporting the value of adding rifampin for treatment of Cutibacterium PJI is lacking. METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective study, we evaluated patients with Cutibacterium PJI and a minimal follow-up of 12 months. The primary endpoint was clinical success, defined by the absence of infection relapse or new infection. We used Fisher's exact tests and Cox proportional hazards models to analyze the effect of rifampin and other factors on clinical success after PJI. RESULTS: We included 187 patients (72.2% male, median age 67 years) with a median follow-up of 36 months. The surgical intervention was a 2-stage exchange in 95 (50.8%), 1-stage exchange in 51 (27.3%), debridement and implant retention (DAIR) in 34 (18.2%), and explantation without reimplantation in 7 (3.7%) patients. Rifampin was included in the antibiotic regimen in 81 (43.3%) cases. Infection relapse occurred in 28 (15.0%), and new infection in 13 (7.0%) cases. In the time-to-event analysis, DAIR (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 2.15, P = .03) and antibiotic treatment over 6 weeks (adjusted HR = 0.29, P = .0002) significantly influenced treatment failure. We observed a tentative evidence for a beneficial effect of adding rifampin to the antibiotic treatment-though not statistically significant for treatment failure (adjusted HR = 0.5, P = .07) and not for relapses (adjusted HR = 0.5, P = .10). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a rifampin combination is not markedly superior in Cutibacterium PJI, but a dedicated prospective multicenter study is needed.

Staphylococcus aureus Prosthetic Joint Infection Is Prevented by a Fluorine- and Phosphorus-Doped Nanostructured Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Loaded With Gentamicin and Vancomycin.

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most devastating complications in orthopedic surgery. One approach used to prevent PJI is local antibiotic therapy. This study evaluates the antibiotic release, in vitro cytocompatibility and in vivo effectiveness in preventing PJI caused by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) of the fluorine- and phosphorus-doped, bottle-shaped, nanostructured (bNT) Ti-6Al-4V alloy loaded with a mixture of gentamicin and vancomycin (GV). We evaluated bNT Ti-6Al-4V loading with a mixture of GV, measuring the release of these antibiotics using high-performance liquid chromatography. Further, we describe bNT Ti-6Al-4V GV cytocompatibility and its efficacy against S. aureus using an in vivo rabbit model. GV was released from bNT Ti-6Al-4V following a Boltzmann non-linear model and maximum release values were obtained at 240 min for both antibiotics. The cell proliferation of MCT3T3-E1 osteoblastic cells significantly increased at 48 (28%) and 168 h (68%), as did the matrix mineralization (52%) of these cells and the gene expression of three of the most important markers related to bone differentiation (more than threefold for VEGF and BGLAP, and 65% for RunX) on bNT Ti-6Al-4V GV compared with control. In vivo study results show that bNT Ti-6Al-4V GV can prevent S. aureus PJI according to histopathological and microbiological results. According to our results, bNT Ti-6Al-4V loaded with a mixture of GV using the soaking method is a promising biomaterial with favorable cytocompatibility and osteointegration, demonstrating local bactericidal properties against S. aureus. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 38:588-597, 2020.

Urine Aluminum Concentration as a Possible Implant Biomarker of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection Using a Fluorine- and Phosphorus-Doped Ti-6Al-4V Alloy with Osseointegration Capacity.

Joint prosthesis failure is mainly related to aseptic loosening and prosthetic joint infections, both associated with high morbidity and a substantial cost burden for patients and health systems. The development of a biomaterial capable of stimulating bone growth while minimizing bacterial adhesion would reduce the incidence of prosthetic failure. Using an in vivo rabbit model, this study evaluates the osseointegration effect of the fluorine (F)- and phosphorus (P)-doped bottle-shaped nanostructured (bNT) Ti-6Al-4V alloy and effectiveness of monitoring urine aluminum concentration to determine the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in Ti-6Al-4V implants. Unlike chemically polished (CP) Ti-6Al-4V alloy implants, bNT Ti-6Al-4V alloy implants promoted osseointegration and showed effectiveness as a biomaterial marker. The bNT Ti-6Al-4V alloy implants were associated with a twofold increase in bone thickness and up to 15% greater bone density compared to the CP alloy. Additionally, bNT Ti-6Al-4V alloy implants allowed for discrimination between P. aeruginosa-infected and noninfected animals for 15 days postoperatively, as indicated by the decrease of aluminum concentration in urine, while this difference was only appreciable over the first 7 days when CP Ti-6Al-4V alloy implants were used. Therefore, bNT Ti-6Al-4V alloys could have clinical applications by detecting the infection and by avoiding aseptic loosening.

Pharmacotherapy options and drug development in managing periprosthetic joint infections in the elderly.

INTRODUCTION: Prosthetic joint infections are an increasingly important problem among patients undergoing arthroplasty procedures, and are associated with significant morbidity, reduced quality of life, substantial healthcare costs, and even mortality. Arthroplasties are performed with increasing frequency in elderly patients, who present specific problems. AREAS COVERED: Surgical therapy is clearly influenced by the clinical status of the patient, which in some case can contraindicate surgery. Antibiotic selection is also affected by comorbidities and underlying diseases, which in some cases reduce therapeutic options. The authors review this together with the changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in the elderly population and the prospects for future research on prevention and treatment. EXPERT OPINION: The management of PJI in the elderly makes multidisciplinary teams even more mandatory than in other patients, because the complexity of these patients. A frequent scenario is that in which surgery is contraindicated with long-term suppressive treatment as the only available option. Treating physicians must consider the presence of multiple comorbidities, interactions with other treatments and secondary effects when choosing antibiotic treatment. An in-depth knowledge of the alterations in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in elderly patients is key for a proper treatment selection.

Orthopedic Implant-Associated Infection by Multidrug Resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

INTRODUCTION: Orthopedic implant-associated infections caused by multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae are a growing challenge for healthcare providers due to their increasing incidence and the difficulties of medical and surgical treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study of all cases of multidrug resistant Enterobacteriaceae orthopedic implant-associated infection diagnosed in a tertiary European hospital from December 2011 to November 2017 was carried out. Clinical records were reviewed using a previously designed protocol. Data analysis was performed with IBM® SPSS®, version 22. RESULTS: 25 patients met inclusion criteria. The infected implants included 10 prosthetic joints, seven osteosyntheses, six combinations of prosthetic joint and osteosynthesis material, and two spacers. Of the multidrug resistant Enterobacteriaceae obtained on culture, 12 were extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli, three OXA-48-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, nine extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, and one extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Proteus mirabilis. Combination antimicrobial therapy was employed in all cases but two. Overall, 16 (64%) patients underwent implant removal. The rate of infection control in the overall implant removal group was 100% compared to 33% in the implant retention group. A strong relationship between implant removal and infection control was observed (p = 0.001). DISCUSSION: Implant removal is strongly associated with infection control. However, in some cases, patient age and comorbidity contraindicate hardware extraction. Potential objectives for future studies should be geared towards targeting the population in which debridement, antibiotic therapy, and implant retention can be used as a first-line therapeutic strategy with a reasonable probability of achieving infection control.

Evaluation of the use of sonication of retrieved implants for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection in a routine setting.

In order to evaluate the usefulness of sonication of retrieved implants for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in a large group of patients in a routine setting, we designed a 3-year retrospective study. Patients were classified into two groups: those meeting the clinical criteria of PJI and those that did not (control group). Two hundred patients and 276 samples were included. The types of infection were early (n = 44), delayed (n = 53), positive intraoperative cultures (n = 13) and late-acute (n = 8). The culture sensitivities of sonicate fluid, periprosthetic tissue, synovial fluid and combination of periprosthetic tissue and/or synovial fluid were 69.5, 52.8, 54.8 and 60.2%, respectively. The specificities were 97.6, 90.3, 93.0 and 89.9%, respectively. Sonicate fluid culture of implants was more sensitive than peri-implant tissue, synovial fluid and combination of periprosthetic tissue and/or synovial fluid for all infection types, though it was especially useful in delayed infection: 91.3% vs. 60.0% (p = 0.0015), 63.2% (p = 0.0005) and 66.7% (p = 0.0001), respectively. When sonicate fluid culture of implants was performed in addition to conventional cultures, the sensitivity increased significantly in total (from 60.2 to 77.1%) and delayed PJI (from 45.1 to 71.7%). On the other hand, for early PJI, sonicate fluid culture of prosthesis was not superior to conventional diagnostic methods.

Evaluation of a commercial multiplex PCR (Unyvero i60(R)) designed for the diagnosis of bone and joint infections using prosthetic-joint sonication / Evaluación de una PCR múltiple comercial (Unyvero i60(C)) diseñada para el diagnóstico de infecciones osteoarticulares utilizando prótesis articulares sonicadas

BACKGROUND: The development of sonication protocols over the last few years has improved the sensitivity of conventional cultures for the diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection (PJI). However, the development of a new, specifically designed kit for the molecular diagnosis of PJI could provide a major improvement in this field. METHODS: Prostheses retrieved from patients who underwent implant removal from May 2014 to May 2015 were sent for culture, and processed according to a previously defined protocol that included sonication. Furthermore, 180 microlitres of sonication fluid were used to carry out the multiplex PCR test (Unyvero i60 system®). A comparison of the sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive value, was performed. The study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee. RESULTS: The analysis included 88 prostheses from 68 patients (1.29 prostheses/patient). The type of prostheses studied were knee (n=55), total hip (n=26), partial hip (n=5), and shoulder (n=2). Twenty-nine patients were diagnosed with a PJI (15 delayed, 12 acute, and 2 haematogenous infections). In 24 cases, the result of the PCR was positive, all but 1 corresponding to patients with clinical criteria of PJI. Nine resistance mechanisms were detected from 5 samples. The Unyvero i60 system® showed slightly better results than traditional culture in terms of specificity and PPV. CONCLUSIONS: The Unyvero i60 system® may play a role in rapid diagnosis of PJI, due to its high specificity and PPV. However, despite these results, cultures have to be performed to detect organisms not detected by the system

INTRODUCCIÓN: El desarrollo de la sonicación durante los pasados años ha incrementado la sensibilidad de los cultivos convencionales para el diagnóstico de Infecciones de Prótesis Articulares (IPA). Sin embargo, el desarrollo de un nuevo kit, diseñado específicamente para el diagnóstico de las IPA podría suponer un avance significativo en este campo. MÉTODOS: Todas las prótesis retiradas de pacientes entre mayo 2014 y mayo 2015 fueron enviadas para cultivo mediante un protocolo de procesamiento que incluye la sonicación del implante. Además, se emplearon 180 microlitros del líquido de sonicado en la realización de una PCR múltiple (Unyvero i60®). Se realizó una comparación de la sensibilidad, especificidad, valor predictivo positivo (VPP) y negativo (VPN). El estudio fue aprobado por el Comité de Ética en Investigación Clínica. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 88 prótesis de 68 pacientes (1,29 prótesis/paciente). Las prótesis estudiadas fueron rodillas (n=55), total de cadera (n=26), parcial de cadera (n=5), y hombro (n=2). Veintinueve pacientes fueron diagnosticados de IPA (15 crónicas, 12 agudas y 2 hematógenas). En 24 casos, el resultado de la PCR fue positivo, siendo todas menos 1 de estas de pacientes con criterios de IPA. Se detectaron además 9 mecanismos de resistencia en 5 muestras. El sistema Unyvero i60® mostró resultados ligeramente superiores al cultivo tanto en especificidad como en VPP. CONCLUSIONES: El sistema Unyvero i60® puede tener un papel en el diagnóstico rápido de IPA debido a su elevada especificidad y VPP. Sin embargo, a pesar de estos resultados, debe realizarse cultivo para detectar organismos no detectados por el sistema

Evaluation of a commercial multiplex PCR (Unyvero i60®) designed for the diagnosis of bone and joint infections using prosthetic-joint sonication.

BACKGROUND: The development of sonication protocols over the last few years has improved the sensitivity of conventional cultures for the diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection (PJI). However, the development of a new, specifically designed kit for the molecular diagnosis of PJI could provide a major improvement in this field. METHODS: Prostheses retrieved from patients who underwent implant removal from May 2014 to May 2015 were sent for culture, and processed according to a previously defined protocol that included sonication. Furthermore, 180 microlitres of sonication fluid were used to carry out the multiplex PCR test (Unyvero i60 system®). A comparison of the sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive value, was performed. The study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee. RESULTS: The analysis included 88 prostheses from 68 patients (1.29 prostheses/patient). The type of prostheses studied were knee (n=55), total hip (n=26), partial hip (n=5), and shoulder (n=2). Twenty-nine patients were diagnosed with a PJI (15 delayed, 12 acute, and 2 haematogenous infections). In 24 cases, the result of the PCR was positive, all but 1 corresponding to patients with clinical criteria of PJI. Nine resistance mechanisms were detected from 5 samples. The Unyvero i60 system® showed slightly better results than traditional culture in terms of specificity and PPV. CONCLUSIONS: The Unyvero i60 system® may play a role in rapid diagnosis of PJI, due to its high specificity and PPV. However, despite these results, cultures have to be performed to detect organisms not detected by the system.